Updated - A Report on the County of Arlington s Existing and Possible Urban Tree Canopy

Similar documents
Open-Air Markets. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Public Meeting

Conservancy Mission. Leveraging GIS Technologies in Chesapeake Conservation and Restoration 10/17/2018

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 17, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Map Update. Presentation to the County Board July 15, 2017

Infrastructure challenges & geospatial solutions

R E S O L U T I O N. a. Remove Table B from the plan.

The GIS Behind Dakota County s FARMLAND AND NATURAL AREAS PROGRAM

By: Barney I. S. Laseko Programme Coordinator Prime Minister s Office TANZANIA

Request to Advertise: Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Map Update. June 20, 2017

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Elk Grove Residential Assessment Narrative April 16th, 2019

A Geocoded Cadastral Fabric as a Precondition for a Sustainable Land Management System

Chesapeake Bay Program s Current Zoning and Conservation Plus Scenarios

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 5, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings

New Models for Property Data Verification and Valuation

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

AFFORDABLE WORKFORCE HOUSING REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP Recommendations for our Region Approved February 22, 2006

Open Space Model Ordinance

9 November 12, 2014 Public Hearing

ALREADY SUBMITTED FOR HIGHLANDS COUNCIL PRE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017

Urban Fringe Development Area Project Update And Staff Recommendation

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREA EXCEPTION APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Land Use. Land Use Categories. Chart 5.1. Nepeuskun Existing Land Use Inventory. Overview

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Protected Lands Updated September 2016 (Data current through 2015_16)

Current Situation and Issues

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Evanston Residential Assessment Narrative Updated: April 8 th, 2019

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 13, 2013

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

The Added Value of Geospatial Information in Disaster and Risk Management: A Case Study on the 2009 Flooding in Namibia

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Good Land Governance for the 2030 Agenda

RENITA HURDSMAN BEAR RIVER STATE PARK LAND EXCHANGE PROPOSAL

TOWN OF PELHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

Learning from land suitability analysis and Dutch spatial policy for sustainable land use in Japan

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE. Presentation on REAL TIME CADASTRAL SURVEYING SOLUTION WITH A SPECIAL IMPHESIS TO MODERN GPS TECHNOLOGY.

Land Tenure and Geospatial Data and Technology

Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.

4. facilitate the construction of streets, utilities and public services in a more economical and efficient manner;

State of Washington Project Luke Rogers, University of Washington March 2010

Preliminary Analysis

Validation Checklist. Date submitted: How to use this check-list. Ecosystem Credit Accounting System. Version 1.1&2. Project Information

Map Modernization Modernization Program

CATALOGING, MONITORING AND MANAGING INVASIVE SPECIES ON POST LANDS. PSU Geog596A Capstone Proposal Dale Jantzen Dec 17, 2015

Mission Planning for a GPS Control Survey Using ESRI ArcMap. August 8, 2004 Mickie Warwick, PLS

REZONING REQUESTS. Rezoning to: Site Area 25,000 sq. ft. or less Site Area More than 25,000 sq. ft.

REZONING REQUESTS. Rezoning to: Site Area 25,000 sq. ft or less Site Area More than 25,000 sq ft

SOLAR MASSACHUSETTS RENEWABLE TARGET PROGRAM (225 CMR 20.00) GUIDELINE

Applicant s Agent Lisa Murphy, Esq. Staff Planner PJ Scully. Lot Recordation 12/01/1972 Map Book 94, Page 33 GPIN

Restoring Waterfowl Habitat and Potential Flood Storage Services on Wetland Reserve Program Lands in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley

3 April 9, 2014 Public Hearing

CHAPTER 2 VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE LAND INVENTORY

Land Use Survey Summer 2014

Hi-tech Survey Operation using Modern Technologies: Concept & Process Flow

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Lee. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 14, 2014

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018

Village of Perry Zoning Ordinance Update Draft Diagnostic Report

Role of Republic Geodetic Authority in the Serbian geo-sector

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 17, 2018

VILLAGE CENTER ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA ADVISORY WORKING GROUP/ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ORR PARTNERS 01/

Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (Pan- European and Local) in the Netherlands

Application of tsunami modelling for escape and refuge planning in Aceh (Indonesia)

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

PART 3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. Designation of Residential Zoning Districts and Purpose Statements.

Memorandum. Mr. Dennis W. Langley Weese Langley Weese Architects Stephen B. Corcoran, P.E., PTOE Director of Traffic Engineering. DATE: May 31, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Planning & Development. Background. Subject Properties

The agenda for a Group of Experts on Land Administration and Management within the United Nations

Crediting Conservation: Frequently Asked Questions

BULGARIAN CADASTRE A GUARANTEE FOR THE OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES

Yakima County Public Services Department Planning Division

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

MONTGOMERY COUNTY APRIL 2018

June 1, 2017 BOARD MATTER H - 1 FINAL CONSIDERATION OF STATE TRUST LAND EXCHANGE

Techniques for Stewardship of Preserved Farms: Three Programs Saving America s Farms and Farmland Conference

MULTIFAMILY PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE RESEARCH. City of Phoenix Water Services Department

Residential Customers shall be charged a SAF based on the SAF meter size as listed below: SAF Fee Schedule Table. System Availability Fee

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center

CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center

Inclusionary Housing. The what, where, when, and how of affordable housing choices

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Gonzalez. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

City of Palm Bay Stormwater Assessment Program. March 30, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Buildable Lands and Land-Use Trends in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area

Transcription:

Updated - A Report on the County of Arlington s Existing and Possible Urban Tree Canopy Key Terms UTC: Urban tree canopy (UTC) is the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that cover the ground when viewed from above. Land Cover: Physical features on the earth mapped from satellite or aerial imagery such as trees, or water. Existing UTC: The amount of UTC present within parcel boundaries. Possible UTC: The amount of land that is theoretically available for the establishment of tree canopy within parcel boundaries. Possible UTC excludes areas covered by tree canopy, roads, buildings, and water. It is the combination of Possible UTC - Vegetation and Possible UTC - Impervious. Possible UTC - Vegetation: The amount of land that is theoretically available for the establishment of tree canopy in nontree vegetation areas within parcel boundaries. This excludes areas covered by tree canopy, impervious surfaces, and water. Possible UTC - Impervious: The amount of land that is theoretically available for the establishment of tree canopy in impervious areas within parcel boundaries. This includes impervious areas (roads, parking lots, and sidewalks) except for buildings. UTC Classes Project Background The analysis of Arlington s urban tree canopy (UTC) was carried out at the request of the Virginia Department of Forestry in collaboration with the County of Arlington and the Chesapeake Bay Program. The analysis was performed by the Virginia Geospatial Extension Program (VGEP) at Virginia Tech s Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation in consultation with the Spatial Analysis Laboratory (SAL) of the University of Vermont. The goal of the project was to apply the USDA Forest Service s UTC assessment protocols to the County of Arlington. This analysis was conducted based on year 2008 data. In this update all federal lands have been removed from the analysis, so that all of the land area included may possibly be affected by Arlington County. Existing UTC Acres % Total Land * Tree Canopy 6353.1 43.3% 43.5% Non-Tree Vegetation 2504.2 17.1% 17.2% Non-Building Impervious 4100.9 28.0% 28.1% Buildings Impervious 1632.1 11.1% 11.2% Water 72.6 0.5% 0.0% Total 16701 100.0% 100.0% Table 1: Existing UTC area and percentages for the County. *% Total Land includes area covered by water. Figure 1: Land cover for the County of Arlington. Why is Tree Canopy Important? Urban tree canopy (UTC) is the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that cover the ground when viewed from above. Urban tree canopy provides many benefits to communities including improving water quality, conserving energy, lowering county temperatures, reducing air pollution, enhancing property values, providing wildlife habitat, facilitating social and educational opportunities, and providing aesthetic benefits. How Much Tree Canopy Does Arlington Have? Figure 1 shows the UTC analysis for Arlington, which is derived from high resolution aerial imagery. 6,353 acres of Arlington is covered by tree canopy (termed Existing UTC). This corresponds to 43% of the total land area within the County (Table 1). An additional 4010 acres of the county could theoretically be improved to support urban tree canopy (termed Possible UTC), Table 2. 12/21/2009 1

Using high-resolution (1 meter) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery acquired in the summer of 2008 (Figure 2a) in combination with remote sensing techniques, land cover data for the County was generated (Figure 2b). A 94% accuracy rate was found after conducting an accuracy assessment. Single trees with canopies larger than 16 square meters were detected. Parcels Mapping Arlington s Trees Who Owns Arlington s Trees? The detailed land cover mapping conducted as part of this assessment allowed the percentage of Existing and Possible UTC to be calculated for each parcel of land (Figure 3). Using this data, ownership patterns for Existing UTC and Possible UTC (Figure 4) can be examined. Existing UTC 2008 NAIP Imagery (1m) Possible UTC Land Cover Derived from 2008 NAIP Imagery (1m) Figure 2a, 2b: Comparison of 2008 NAIP imagery to the resulting highresolution land cover. 12/21/2009 Figure 3: UTC metrics summarized at the property parcel level 2

Figure 4: Existing UTC mapped using Non-Federal property parcels provided by the County of Arlington. 12/21/2009 3

Urban Tree Canopy Summarized by Non- Federally Owned Property Parcels Using the parcel data provided by the County of Arlington, Existing and Possible UTC were summarized by property parcels with federally owned parcels removed. This summary excludes any area outside of non-federally owned property parcel boundaries and areas covered by water. Figure 4 shows Existing UTC through out the County of Arlington summarized by non-federal property parcels. Arlington has 48% (5,174 acres) Existing UTC and 37% (4,009 acres) Possible UTC, table 2. Possible UTC has two components, Possible UTC - Vegetation and Possible UTC - Impervious. 18% (1,899 acres) of parcel land area is associated with Possible UTC - Vegetation. 20% (2,110 acres) of parcel land area is associated with Possible UTC - Impervious (Figure 5). 20% 18% 15% Existing UTC Possible UTC - Impervious 48% Possible UTC - Vegetation Not Suitable for UTC Figure 5: Pie chart showing Arlington UTC distribution within nonfederally owned parcels. Urban Tree Canopy Summarized by Zoning Categories Using the zoning data provided by the County of Arlington, Existing and Possible UTC were summarized by zoning category (pages 4-8). This summary excludes any area outside the analysis boundary and areas covered by water. The zoning category One-Family Dwelling District: R-6 has the largest amount of land area with 4,319 acres and the largest amount of Existing UTC, 33.9% (Table 3a). Special District: S3-A and One-Family Dwelling District: R-10 are 2nd (22.2%) and 3rd (17.5%) in Existing UTC respectively. Figure 6a and 6b compare zoning categories by the amount of land area within the categories. Figure 6a compares zoning categories that have more than 400 acres, which comprises 83% of the land area. Figure 6b compares zones with less than 400 acres of land area (17% of the land area). Figure 7 shows Possible UTC by zoning category for the County. Table 2: Acres and percent land area from UTC metrics summarized by non-federally owned property parcels. *Not Suitable for UTC includes all Building Impervious areas within the parcel boundaries. UTC Parcel Metrics Acres % Parcel Land Parcel Land 10810.0 100.0% Existing UTC 5173.9 47.9% Possible UTC 4009.1 37.1% Possible UTC - Vegetation 1898.7 17.6% Possible UTC - Impervious 2110.4 19.5% Not Suitable for UTC* 1626.9 15.1% Apartment Dwelling District: RA6-15 Possible UTC Possible -Vegetation Apartment Dwelling District: RA8-18 Possible -Impervious Existing UTC Apartment Dwelling District: RA14-26 Land One-Family Dwelling District: R-6 One-Family Dwelling District: R-8 One-Family Dwelling District: R-10 One-Family, Restricted Two Family Dwelling District: R-5 Special District: S-3A 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Acres Figure 6a: UTC metrics summarized by zoning categories with more than 400 acres of land area (not including water area) which comprises 83% (11,987 acres) of the land area in zoning. 12/21/2009 4

Urban Tree Canopy Summarized by Arlington s Zoning Categories Apartment Dwelling and Commercial District: RC Apartment Dwelling District: RA4.8 Apartment Dwelling District: RA7-16 Columbia Pike - Form Based Code District: CP-FBC Commercial Off. Bldg, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-A Possible UTC Possible -Vegetation Possible -Impervious Existing UTC Land Commercial Off. Bldg, Hotel and Multiple-Family Dwelling: C-O Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-1.0 Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-1.5 Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-2.5 Commercial Redevelopment District: C-R Commercial Town House District: C-TH C-O-ROSSLYN: C-O-ROSS General Commercial District: C-3 Hotel District: RA-H Light Industrial District: M-1 Limited Commercial - Professional Office Building District: C-1-O Limited Industrial District: CM Local Commercial District: C-1 Mixed Use-Virginia Square: MU-VS Multiple-Family Dwelling and Hotel District: RA-H-3.2 One Family Residential-Town-House Dwelling District: R-10T One-Family Dwelling District: R-20 Public Service District: P-S Residential Town House Dwelling District: R15-30T Restricted Local Commercial District: C-1-R Service Commercial - Community Business Districts: C-2 Service Industrial District: M-2 Special Development District: S-D Two-Family and Town House Dwelling District: R2-7 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Acres Figure 6b: UTC metrics summarized by zoning with less than 400 acres of land area (not including water area) which comprises 17% (2,436 acres) of the land area. 12/21/2009 5

Urban Tree Canopy Summarized by Zoning Categories Zoning Land (Acres) Existing UTC Possible UTC Vegetation Possible UTC Impervious Apartment Dwelling and Commercial District: RC 41 0.03% 10.31% 0.07% 0.02% 5.89% 0.10% 0.11% 38.06% 0.34% Apartment Dwelling District: RA4.8 62 0.08% 18.81% 0.19% 0.03% 7.39% 0.19% 0.19% 43.91% 0.60% Apartment Dwelling District: RA6-15 407 0.76% 27.07% 1.76% 0.39% 13.67% 2.25% 1.30% 46.05% 4.10% Apartment Dwelling District: RA7-16 109 0.26% 33.85% 0.59% 0.12% 16.12% 0.71% 0.30% 39.05% 0.93% Apartment Dwelling District: RA8-18 523 1.07% 29.58% 2.47% 0.56% 15.55% 3.28% 1.54% 42.59% 4.87% Apartment Dwelling District: RA14-26 759 2.19% 41.59% 5.04% 0.83% 15.74% 4.83% 1.89% 35.97% 5.97% Columbia Pike - Form Based Code District: CP-FBC 2 0.01% 37.07% 0.01% 0.00% 25.57% 0.02% 0.01% 43.82% 0.02% Commercial Off. Bldg, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-A 42 0.02% 5.22% 0.03% 0.00% 1.02% 0.02% 0.11% 37.85% 0.35% Commercial Off. Bldg, Hotel and Multiple-Family Dwelling: C-O 212 0.09% 6.42% 0.22% 0.09% 6.31% 0.54% 0.62% 42.48% 1.97% Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-1.0 22 0.03% 23.06% 0.08% 0.01% 8.78% 0.08% 0.06% 41.54% 0.20% Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-1.5 192 0.21% 15.44% 0.47% 0.24% 17.76% 1.38% 0.68% 51.10% 2.15% Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Apartment District: C-O-2.5 225 0.16% 10.48% 0.38% 0.14% 9.20% 0.84% 0.70% 44.67% 2.19% Commercial Redevelopment District: C-R 14 0.00% 3.47% 0.01% 0.00% 3.53% 0.02% 0.03% 29.25% 0.09% Commercial Town House District: C-TH 6 0.00% 8.00% 0.01% 0.00% 10.23% 0.03% 0.02% 34.52% 0.05% C-O-ROSSLYN: C-O-ROSS 13 0.00% 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.82% 0.00% 0.03% 29.55% 0.09% General Commercial District: C-3 64 0.03% 7.02% 0.07% 0.03% 5.83% 0.15% 0.18% 39.93% 0.56% Hotel District: RA-H 30 0.02% 8.95% 0.04% 0.01% 6.18% 0.08% 0.13% 59.74% 0.39% Light Industrial District: M-1 87 0.05% 9.03% 0.13% 0.04% 6.95% 0.24% 0.34% 56.46% 1.07% Limited Commercial - Professional Office Building District: C-1-O 3 0.00% 26.62% 0.01% 0.00% 11.05% 0.01% 0.01% 40.59% 0.02% Limited Industrial District: CM 38 0.03% 9.78% 0.06% 0.04% 15.79% 0.24% 0.15% 55.06% 0.46% Local Commercial District: C-1 90 0.05% 8.00% 0.12% 0.04% 6.39% 0.23% 0.29% 46.40% 0.91% Mixed Use-Virginia Square: MU-VS 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 24.73% 0.01% Multiple-Family Dwelling and Hotel District: RA-H-3.2 70 0.05% 11.00% 0.12% 0.04% 7.83% 0.22% 0.18% 36.57% 0.56% One-Family Dwelling District: R-6 4319 14.75% 49.26% 33.95% 5.54% 18.49% 32.26% 8.70% 29.07% 27.46% of UTC type for specified land use = % = of all land of UTC type for specified land use of all land for specified land use of UTC type for specified land use = of all UTC type The % value of 14.75% indicates that 14.75% of Arlington s land area is tree canopy in areas where the land use is One-Family Dwelling District: R- 6. The Use value of 49.26% indicates that 49.26% of One-Family Dwelling District: R-6 land is covered by tree canopy. The value of 33.95% indicates that 33.95% of all Existing UTC lies in areas of One-Family Dwelling District: R-6 land use. Table 3a: UTC metrics by type, summarized by zoning categories. For each zone, category UTC metrics were computed as a percent of all zoned land in the County ( ), as a percent of land area by zoning categories ( ) and as a percent of the area for the UTC type ( ). 12/21/2009 6

Urban Tree Canopy Summarized by Zoning Categories Continued Zoning Land (Acres) Existing UTC Possible UTC Vegetation Possible UTC Impervious One-Family Dwelling District: R-8 563 2.14% 54.95% 4.94% 0.62% 0.62% 0.62% 0.96% 24.67% 3.04% One-Family Dwelling District: R-10 2025 7.64% 54.40% 17.58% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52% 3.68% 26.22% 11.61% One-Family Dwelling District: R-20 250 1.21% 69.79% 2.79% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.32% 18.30% 1.00% One Family Residential-Town-House Dwelling District: R-10T 83 0.24% 41.22% 0.54% 0.07% 0.07% 0.07% 0.17% 29.91% 0.54% One-Family, Restricted Two Family Dwelling District: R-5 497 1.49% 43.10% 3.42% 0.61% 0.61% 0.61% 1.05% 30.36% 3.30% Public Service District: P-S 108 0.10% 13.93% 0.24% 0.15% 0.05% 0.00% 0.49% 66.16% 1.56% Residential Town House Dwelling District: R15-30T 61 0.10% 24.51% 0.24% 0.05% 0.00% 0.12% 0.16% 37.61% 0.50% Restricted Local Commercial District: C-1-R 3 0.00% 6.85% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.03% 0.01% 47.30% 0.03% Service Commercial - Community Business Districts: C-2 260 0.16% 8.76% 0.36% 0.12% 0.03% 0.04% 0.80% 44.67% 2.54% Service Industrial District: M-2 15 0.01% 11.55% 0.03% 0.03% 0.04% 4.24% 0.07% 64.96% 0.22% Special Development District: S-D 51 0.10% 28.25% 0.23% 0.04% 4.24% 0.33% 0.14% 38.98% 0.44% Special District: S-3A 2894 9.65% 48.08% 22.21% 4.24% 0.33% 0.00% 5.63% 28.08% 17.77% Two-Family and Town House Dwelling District: R2-7 282 0.69% 35.48% 1.60% 0.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.67% 34.06% 2.10% Table 3b : UTC metrics by type, summarized by zoning categories. For each zone, category UTC metrics were computed as a percent of all zoned land in the County ( ), as a percent of land area by zoning categories ( ) and as a percent of the area for the UTC type ( ). 12/21/2009 7

Figure 7: Possible percentage increase of UTC mapped using zoning categories provided by the County of Arlington. 12/21/2009 8

Where to Plant Trees? Decision makers can use GIS to find out specific UTC metrics for a parcel or zoning category. This information can be used to estimate the amount of tree loss in a planned development or set UTC improvement goals for an area. GIS Database Figure 8: Parcel-based UTC metrics can be used to support targeted UTC. Conclusions Arlington s urban tree canopy is a vital community asset, reducing stormwater runoff, improving air quality, reducing the County s carbon footprint, enhancing quality of life, contributing to savings on energy bills, and serving as habitat for wildlife. With 43.5% canopy coverage of all land area within the county, Arlington has similar coverage as Charlottesville, Fairfax County, and Lexington. Figure 9 shows how Arlington compares to other Virginia localities participating in Urban Tree Canopy Assessments. When summarized by property parcels, Arlington has 48% Existing UTC with only 28% of all parcels with less than 30% canopy coverage. 74% (4,621 acres) of the Existing UTC is located within the following zoning categories: One-Family Dwelling District: R-6, Special District: S-3A, and One-Family Dwelling District: R-10. 58% 60% Existing UTC 50% 44% 47% 44% 41% 40% 30% 27% 27% 27% 26% 20% 20% 10% 0% Figure 9: Comparison of Existing UTC of % land area (excludes water area) with other Virginia localities that have completed UTC assessments. Prepared by: Additional Information Jennifer McKee Geospatial Project Developer Virginia Geospatial Extension Program Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation Virginia Tech 540-231-9115, jmckee@vt.edu http://www.gep.frec.vt.edu The study was conducted with funding from the Virginia Department of Forestry. More information on the UTC assessment project can be found at the following web site. http://nrs.fs.fed.us/urban/ utc/ http://www.gep.frec.vt.edu/va_utc.html 12/21/2009 9