CITY OF WHITEHORSE BYLAW

Similar documents
TOWN OF SIDNEY BYLAW NO A BYLAW OF THE MUNICIPALITY TO IMPOSE DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES.

Subdivision By-law No. 5208

CITY OF PITT MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGE IMPOSITION

BYLAW C

Chapter 22 LAND USE* Article III. Subdivisions

SG-C THAT Schedule A to this by-law be hereby adopted as the Schedule of Rates and Fees for the Glen Walter Water and Sewer area.

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND BYLAW #2503

BYLAW a) To impose and provide for the payment of Off-site development levies;

Appendix A. Definitions

CITY OF EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY (Dated: November 8, 2016)

TOWN OF REDCLIFF BYLAW NO. 1829/2016

TOWN OF SIDNEY BYLAW 1390

(CONSOLIDATED TO BYLAW NO ) A BYLAW TO REGULATE MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS WITHIN THE CITY OF TERRACE

Temporary Sign By-law

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INGERSOLL BY-LAW NO

DECLARATION OF RESTRICITONS AFFECTING EWING PLACE SUBDIVISION SECTION 2

DECLARATION OF RESTRICITONS AFFECTING EWING PLACE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3

Planning & Building Services Department

ADP Rescind 3 rd Reading

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BYLAW. Date: Monday, April 27, Annacis Room. 4:30-4:45 pm

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to dispose of portions of a public highway in exchange for adjoining lands necessary for a public highway...

SECTION 10.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES

BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY RESPECTING CONNECTIONS TO CITY UTILITY SYSTEMS

Town of Whitby By-law #

Chapter 3 FINANCE, TAXATION, AND PUBLIC RECORDS

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA ROAD OCCUPANCY, LOT GRADING, MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROTECTION DEPOSIT BY-LAW

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA ROAD OCCUPANCY, LOT GRADING, MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROTECTION DEPOSIT BY-LAW

Municipality of Colchester. Subdivision Bylaw. March 31, Colchester

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing.

S U B D I V I S I O N AGREEMENT

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM BYLAW NO. 3182

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A Bylaw to establish a revitalization tax exemption program...

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

CHAPTER 22 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MUSKOKA LAKES BY-LAW NUMBER

Title: ENCROACHMENT POLICY Number: 0132 Reference: Administrative Committee January 21, Adopted by City Council: February 2, 2009

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PERTH EAST BY-LAW NO

Chapter Plat Design (LMC)

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO BYLAW NO. 500 PART 4 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

THE LAND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS PERRYVILLE, MISSOURI

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF PICTOU SUBDIVISION BY-LAW. Act means the Municipal Government Act, Stats. N.S., 1998, c. 18 and amendments thereto;

CHAPTER 620. [History: Repealed and Recreated by Ord ]

BY-LAW NO OF THE COUNTY OF GRANDE PRAIRIE NO. 1

Memorandum: October 13, 2008 REVISED To: Trowbridge Township Planning Commission From: P. Hudson, AICP Re: Suggested New Ordinance

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING CHAPTER SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Ordinance No. An Amendment to the City Code of Ordinances

WARREN COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 46 CHAPTER 46 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. WHEREAS the City of Guelph will experience growth through development and redevelopment;

Subdivision - Minor Plat Submittal

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise multiple family housing.

SECTION 6: DOWNTOWN ZONES

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA ROAD OCCUPANCY, LOT GRADING, MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROTECTION BY-LAW

BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND MANAGE THE LOON LAKE COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM

SUBDIVISION BY-LAW MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF INVERNESS

PART XXIII - RT-1 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A. INTENT

KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007)

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

CHAPTER 154: SIGNS. Section

Committee of Adjustment Information for Applications for Consent (Severance)

BYLAW 5781 ****************

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO

CHAPTER 154 RIGHTS OF WAY

SENATE BILL 274 CHAPTER. Tax Increment Financing and Special Taxing Districts Transit Oriented Development

ORDINANCE NO. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Abilene, Texas:

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MACUNGIE LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO [To be considered for Adoption June 1, 2017]

ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA ROAD OCCUPANCY, LOT GRADING AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROTECTION DEPOSIT BY-LAW

SUBDIVISION DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS

APPROVAL REQUIRED... A5 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN... A6 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLAN... A7

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WELLINGTON NORTH

APPENDIX 2 PROCEDURES AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2017-

Municipal Housing Facilities By-law

CITY OF HOBBS ORDINANCE NO..

ARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Bylaw No Private Sewer and Water Service Connection Bylaw, Codified to Bylaw No (December 18, 2017)

ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS

Local Improvement Process. Presented By: Virgilio Mendoza

JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT Minor Subdivision - Plat Raymond F. Kravis Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. Initial Submittal: September 11, 2018

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF THAMES CENTRE BY-LAW NO

Execution of Certain Documents By-law

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

FINAL PLAT APPLICATION

PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION PLAT APPLICATION

ARTICLE SINGLE FAMILY SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

LAND USE PROCEDURES (LUP) BYLAW NO. 1235, 2007

ATTACHMENTS: 1. By-law No with proposed amendments 2. Supplementary Report Public Hearing CLEARANCES: DATE: October 5, 2017 APPROVALS:

THE DISTRICT OF NORTH VANCOUVER

Planning Grant Contract No. SC P-8 (G) South Carolina State Development Board Division of Community Planning of the Development and Research Center

BY-LAW NO BUILDING BY-LAW

APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT CERRO GORDO COUNTY, IOWA

Record of Amendments to Water Regulation and Fee Bylaw No. 967 Amending Bylaw No. 984 Section 12, Schedule A September 19, Section 4.

Chapter Sidewalk Construction and Improvement Standards

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIPSHIP OF McNAB/BRAESIDE BY-LAW NO

BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99. (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No.

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

Transcription:

CITY OF WHITEHORSE BYLAW 2011-21 A bylaw to establish rules of general application for assessing local improvement charges. WHEREAS section 246 of the Municipal Act, (R.S.Y. 2002) provides that, subject to this Act, the Assessment and Taxation Act, and the Municipal Finance and Community Grants Act, council shall adopt bylaws providing for the raising of revenue by the imposition and collection of taxes and service charges imposed in respect of local improvements within the jurisdiction and boundaries of the municipality; and WHEREAS section 268 of the Municipal Act provides that council may by bylaw prescribe how to determine the total cost of a local improvement, the total cost or a proportion of that cost that is to be levied against parcels of land that will benefit from a local improvement, and determine the levy to be charged against each parcel of land that will benefit over the probable life of the local improvement; NOW THEREFORE, the council of the municipality of the City of Whitehorse, in open meeting assembled, hereby ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: SHORT TITLE 1. This bylaw may be cited as the "L.I.C. Rules Bylaw". DEFINITIONS 2. In this bylaw, "City" means the City of Whitehorse. "corner lot" means a lot or piece of land abutting on two or more intersecting streets. "cost" means: (1) in relation to a local improvement, may include the cost, not merely of the actual work and labour of making the local improvement, but also of all plant, tools, machinery, appliances and materials of every kind and description purchased or acquired for the purpose of the local improvement; (2) also all expenses of taxation, engineering, surveying, advertising and the issuing of debentures; and Page 1

(3) all other expenses growing out of, incidental to, or connected with the carrying out and execution of the work, and also all expenses of raising the money to pay the cost thereof, including discounts and interest. council means the duly elected council of the City of Whitehorse. "flankage" is the length of the side of a lot which abuts two or more streets, and is the shorter linear distance between the corners of the lot. frontage of the lot is the linear distance between the corners of the lot abutting onto the street in which the local improvement is to be made, the assessable length of which is determined in accordance with Section 3 or 4 of this Bylaw. interior lot means a lot or piece of land which is not a corner lot. local improvement means: (1) opening, widening, straightening, extending, grading, levelling, diverting, landscaping or paving a street; (2) constructing a sidewalk, foot-crossing, curbing, bridge, culvert or embankment forming part of a street, or constructing a system of storm drainage; (3) making, deepening, enlarging, or lengthening a common sewer or water main; (4) making sewer or water service connections to the street line on land abutting a main; (5) constructing a conduit for wires or pipes along or under a street; (6) providing other services normally found in organized communities; and (7) reconstructing or replacing any of the works mentioned. "lot" shall include a lot or a part thereof which is in a registered plan of subdivision and also a parcel or piece of unsubdivided land. rear of the lot" is the linear distance between the corner pins opposite the front of the lot. DETERMINATION OF FRONTAGES 3. Where an assessment for local improvement installations is to be on a frontage basis, such frontages shall be determined in accordance with the following: Page 2

(1) Where the lot is a rectangle or square and is an interior lot, the frontage shall be taken to be the length of the boundary of such lot abutting on the street on or in which the local improvement is made. (2) Where the lot is a triangle and is an interior lot, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the boundary of said lot abutting on the street. Page 3

(3) Where the lot is an interior quadrilateral and not a rectangle, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the boundary of said lot abutting on the street. Page 4

(4) (a) Where the lot is an interior quadrilateral and not a rectangle abutting on two streets, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the boundary of said lot where the local improvement is to be made. Page 5

(b) If the local improvement is to be made on both streets abutting on the lot, then the frontage shall be calculated by determining the frontage on both streets, as described in 3(4)(a), taking 100% of the longer frontage and 50% of the shorter frontage and adding them together. (5) (a) Where the lot is other than a triangle, quadrilateral or a rectangle and is an interior lot, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the linear distance bisecting the two front corner pins adjacent to the right-ofway in which the local improvement is to be made. Page 6

(b) Where the lot is other than a triangle, quadrilateral or a rectangle, is an interior lot which has a straight tangent section to circular arch section fronting on a street, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the straight tangent section adjacent to the wrong-of-way in which the local improvement is to be made. Page 7

(c) Where the lot is other than a triangle, quadrilateral or a rectangle and is an interior lot which has a frontage on two streets, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the boundary of said lot on the frontage where the local improvement is to take place. Page 8

(d) If the local improvement is to be made on both streets abutting the lot, then the frontage shall be calculated by determining the frontage on both streets, as described previously, taking 100% of the longer frontage and 50% of the shorter frontage and adding them together. (6) (a) Where a lot is bound by streets at the front, rear and side of the lot, the frontage shall be measured at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the boundary of said lot on the frontage where the local improvement is to take place. (b) If the local improvement is to be made on two or more streets abutting the lot, then frontage calculation shall be as follows: (i) If the local improvement is to be made on streets A and B (as noted on the page following), then the frontage shall be calculated by taking 100% of the longer frontage and 50% of the shorter frontage. (ii) If the local improvement is to be made on streets A and C, then the longer of the two distances shall be defined as the frontage, and shall be considered as assessable frontage. (iii) If the local improvement is to be made on streets A, B and C, then C shall be deemed to be the flankage or side position of the lot, and no local improvement charges will be assessed. The frontage shall be calculated by taking 100% of the longer frontage and 50% of the shorter frontage. All frontages shall be calculated as described in 3(6)(a). (c) If a local improvement is made on one street abutting on the lot and a second local improvement is made within a period of five years on a separate street abutting on the lot, then the calculation of the chargeable frontage for the second local improvement shall be assessed as if the first and second local improvements were done simultaneously and the concept of frontage and flankage applied. If the second local improvement is made after the five year period, then the second local improvement charges shall be calculated as described above. Page 9

(7) Where a lot is a corner lot and a local improvement is to be made on one or both of the two sides abutting onto a street frontage, calculation is as follows: (a) (b) (c) (d) Calculate the frontage distance on both sides of the lot at a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel to the boundary. The shorter of the two distances shall be defined as the frontage and shall be measured as the assessable frontage. The longer of the two distances shall be defined as the flankage and shall be considered as assessable frontage for only nonresidential properties. If local improvement is made on one street abutting on the lot and a second local improvement is made on a separate street abutting on the lot within a period of five years, then the second improvement will not be calculated for payment. If the second improvement is made after the five year period then the improvement will be calculated for payment as described above. Page 10

Page 11

(8) Where a lot is a corner lot and where one side of the lot abuts onto a street with only one legal point, the frontage for that side of the lot shall be calculated by extending a straight line from the previous two points through the lot and measuring a distance of 15.000 metres perpendicular offset and parallel from that line. Determining the frontage distance for the lot would be the same as in Section 3(7). (9) Where dealing with lots under the foregoing provisions, if the situation, value and superficial area thereof as compared to the adjoining lots are such that because of location, squared area or small frontages, such lots are not capable of being normally developed or conflict with zoning regulations, the council may make variations in the frontage of such lots which, under the circumstances, the council may deem just and equitable. Page 12

(10) In the case of lots which are so irregularly shaped as not to be herein described, the bylaw making a levy for local improvements may establish a frontage therefore as may, in the opinion of council, be equitable and just. 4. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 3(1) through 3(10) inclusive, where in the opinion of council special circumstances warrant, a levy for local improvements may be established based on the assessable frontage or based on the size of each property will, in the opinion of council, be equitable and just. BYLAW REPEAL 5. Bylaw 90-76, including all amendments thereto, is hereby repealed. COMING INTO FORCE 6. This bylaw shall come into full force and effect upon the final passing thereof. FIRST and SECOND READING: April 26, 2011 THIRD READING and ADOPTION: May 9, 2011 ORIGINAL BYLAW SIGNED BY: "Bev Buckway" Bev Buckway, Mayor "Robert I. Fendrick" Robert I. Fendrick, CGA, City Clerk Page 13