Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP) David Kwong Director of Community Development

Similar documents
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION WORK SHEET FY Revised 07/01/2017 Available on the City s web site at

NORTH POINTE SPECIFIC PLAN RIPON, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN

PROPOSED CDD NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING

CITY OF PETALUMA HOUSING PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FY

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ANNUAL REPORT FOR: Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018

Water Investigation Zone No. 2 Fee Analysis Report Fiscal Year

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DOWNTOWN HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE FOR POST STREET TOWER AT 171 POST STREET

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

Steven J. Pinkerton, Housing and Redevelopment Director

City of Belmont Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, Thomas Fil, Finance Director,

RESOLUTION NO ( R)

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION SPECIAL TELEPHONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 25, 2013 ACTION ITEM

City and County of San Francisco

City of Stockton. Legislation Text AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 AND 509 WEST WEBER AVENUE

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS AND MANUAL

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report

San Joaquin County Grand Jury. Getting Rid of Stuff - Improving Disposal of City and County Surplus Public Assets Case No.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO

The Added Value of Geospatial Information in Disaster and Risk Management: A Case Study on the 2009 Flooding in Namibia

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2017, 9:00 AM

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY RESOLUTION NUMBER

Return on Investment Model

Industrial Market Review

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

MEMORANDUM. Current Development Fees

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

... AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

Town of Clinton, Connecticut Action Plan for the Historic Unilever Property and Area. Steering Committee Meeting #5 Implementation Strategies

6. Other Matters of Business: Information/Discussion a SJMSCP Development Fees b. SJ County Agricultural Building Permit Process

Annual Report

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

CITY OF OAKLAND COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Joaquin ordains as follows:

Item 7.1, June 29, 2004 ACQUISITION OF THE GLOBAL PHOTON PROPERTY FOR THE GUADALUPE RIVER PARK

SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CENTRAL PARK VILLAGE BREA ENTITLEMENT DOCUMENTS FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE PROJECT AT W.

Title 6 - Local Government Provisions Applicable to Special Purpose Districts and Other Political Subdivisions

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 17, 2017

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE RATE ADJUSTMENT

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

FINDINGS OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FEASIBILITY

RESOLUTION NO

INFORMATION SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DOWNTOWN HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE FOR THE GRADUATE AT 88 E. SAN CARLOS STREET

CITY OF SAN MATEO. Administrative Report

Administrative Procedures for the collection of Development Impact Fees

SANjOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

After taking public testimony, staff recommends the City Council take the following course of action:

Veramendi. December 18, 2012

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT To provide responsive service to our growing community that exceeds expectations at a fair value

TRANSPORTATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPACT FEES

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications

Regular Agenda Public Hearing D

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 4-D

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

County of Kern HOME Program Housing Developer Pre-Application

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

RD17 Area: Interim Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. September 15, 2010 (Agenda)

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA *************************************************************************

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

Incentives for Private-Sector Affordable Housing Development

Development Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit

South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Study

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of July 11, 2018.

SUMMARY REPORT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS FOR AN AGREEMENT TO CONVEY BY SALE

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN Responses to Questionnaire for HUD s Initiative on Removal of Regulatory Barriers: May 11, 2007 Status

8Land Use. The Land Use Plan consists of the following elements:

Industrial Market Review

1. The UAIZ shall not be established in areas that are outside the City of San Jose's USA/UGB.

Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee Study

STAFF REPORT. Grandview Beach and Paradise Point Water System Funding and Connection Costs

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE

PLANNING & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. FROM: Julie Caporgno DEPARTMENT: Planning Advance Planning Manager


CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Master Case No ; Tentative Parcel Map No

CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 16, 2016 NEW BUSINESS

Agenda Report DATE: APRIL 30,2007 TO: CITY COUNCIL CYNTHIA J. KURTZ, CITY MANAGER FROM:

Chapter SWAINSON S HAWK IMPACT MITIGATION FEES

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE ADOPTING AND LEVYING REVISED ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

Policy Issues Regarding a Potential Non-Residential Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Program for Broward County

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Councilmember Heilman, Mayor Pro Tempore Meister, and Mayor Horvath. Councilmember Duran. Councilmember D'Amico. None.

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #BroadwayValdez

Transcription:

Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP) David Kwong Director of Community Development November 3, 2015

Introduction On October 13, 2015, the City Council conducted a Study Session on the Economic Stimulus Plan. At the Study Session, City staff made a presentation on the impacts of the SESP and provided an update on the General Plan. City Council directed the SESP to be placed on the November 3, 2015 agenda for consideration and directed staff to provide recommendations to encourage development in Downtown and South. On October 20, 2015, Councilmember Zapien requested that an alternate proposal be placed on the next Council agenda for consideration, and Council concurred. The meeting tonight was noticed as a public hearing to allow City Council more flexibility to act given the different proposals.

Why are PFF s established? New development projects cause the need for construction, expansion or improvement of Public Facilities within the City of. California law Cities typically use a combination of specific project conditions and a PFF program to mitigate development impacts. Cities balance project conditions and PFF amounts differently.

What is the background of PFF s? PFF s are known as Development Impact Fees. Cities construct PFF programs based on local preferences. General Plan was adopted in 1990. City established PFF program in 1991 based on service standards identified in the 1990 General Plan for new development.

Community Development Department November 2015 Single Family Home in, CA 2,070 square foot area & $322,000 Valuation in Lodi Unified School District Permit Fee % by Category 3% 7% PFFs Permit, Plan Check, Processing Fees Special Fees 90%

What are the three categories of permit fees in the City? Processing Fees: charges to issue and approve permits, such as Plan Check services and inspection services. Special Fees: charges dedicated to a specific function or program within the Community Development Department such as Flood Plain Management, Technology, and General Plan Maintenance and Implementation. PFFs: charges to offset increased City capital project costs caused by new development.

Community Development Department November 2015 Single Family Home in, CA 2,070 square foot area & $322,000 Valuation in Lodi Unified School District PFF's by % 33.5% 28% Public Buildings, Street Improvements, Parks Utilities.5% Mitigation 39% Other Agency/Pass Through

What is a PFF in? They include: Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks Utilities Delta Water Supply, Water Surface Fee, Water Connection Fee, Wastewater, & Administration Fees Mitigation Air Quality & Agricultural Land Pass Through/Other Agency County Facility Fee, School District Fees, Habitat Mitigation Fees, & Regional Transportation Impact Fee

How have PFF s changed since 1991? 2003 Inflationary Adjustments 2005 Amended Nexus 2007 General Plan 2035 Adopted 2008 Infrastructure Studies for General Plan 2035 (not adopted) 2010 PFF Reduction Program Established

The Current PFF Reduction Program Resolution # 10 0308 authorized the current PFF reduction program in residential and nonresidential projects in September 2010. Resolution # 10 0377 authorized the current PFF reduction program in multi family projects in November 2010. Resolution # 2014 11 18 1501 extended the PFF reduction program through December 31, 2015.

Figure 1 Residential v. Industrial/Commercial Last 5 Years Permit Valuation 140,000,000 120,000,000 100,000,000 Permit Valuation 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 FY 2010 11 FY 2011 12 FY 2012 13 FY 2013 14 FY 2014 15 Residential Industrial/Commercial NOTE: Total building permit valuation increased from FY 2010-11 to FY 2014-15 by 103% (from $105.9 million to $214.9 million).

The UOP Study A study of the economic impact of the construction of 1,000 homes in a year. The projected economic output of 1,000 homes generates a potential benefit of $492 million to San Joaquin County. The study does not estimate the impact to City revenues. The study does not estimate the increased cost to mitigate the impact of development. The study does not estimate the increased cost of ongoing services associated with increased housing and population. The study does not estimate baseline conditions for the housing market or projected changes in the market absent a stimulus package.

DISTRICT # OF VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOTS (filtered by greater than 5,000 square foot lots) District 1 667 District 2 59 District 3 17 District 4 374 District 5 482 District 6 566 TOTAL 2,165

Figure 2 University of Pacific March 2015 Study % of Permit Fee for Single Family Home Square Footage = 2,070 & Valuation = $322,000 Note: Blue fields = PFF components Special Fees 4% Pass Through/Other Agency 25% Permit/Plan Check/Processing Fees 7% Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks 23% Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks Utilities Mitigation Pass Through/Other Agency Special Fees Mitigation 4% Utilities 37% Permit/Plan Check/Processing Fees

Figure 3 University of Pacific Study March 2015 Single Family Home in, CA 2,070 square foot area & $322,000 Valuation Fee Type Fee Amount Without Reduction Program Fee Amount With Reduction Program (Used in Study) Economic Stimulus Proposal (SESP) Total Reduction Per Unit Public Buildings, Street $20,173 $20,173 $20,173 $0 Improvements, & Parks Utilities $20,874 $20,874 $20,874 $0 Mitigation $2,246 $2,246 $2,246 $0 Pass Through/Other Agency $14,058 $14,058 $14,058 $0 Current PFF Reduction Program (Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks Only) $0 $7,650 $7,650 $7,650 SUB TOTAL $57,351 $49,701 $49,701 $0 SESP PFF Reduction $0 $0 $17,000 $17,000 GRAND TOTAL $57,351 $49,701 $32,701 $24,650 * Information compiled by Dr. Michael using BIA estimates, City on line fee estimator, SJCOG, and Lodi USD website.

Community Development Department November 2015 Single Family Home in, CA 2,070 square foot area & $322,000 Valuation in Lodi Unified School District klk Permit Fee Category Permit Fee Amount with Current Reduction 2,070 square foot area & $322,000 Valuation Permit, Plan Check, & Processing Fees 3,704 Special Fees 1,291 Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks 19,997 Current PFF Reduction Program 7,538 Economic Stimulus Proposal (SESP) Remaining Public Buildings, Street 12,459 $17,000 Improvements, & Parks Utilities 17,237 Mitigation 187 Pass Through/Other Agency 14,644 GRAND TOTAL $49,522 $37,076

Geographic Based Permit Fee Scenarios Permit Fee Scenario Characteristics: 2,070 square foot home $322,000 valuation all permit fee categories included such as PFFs, school fees, habitat, processing fees, etc. 4 Permit Fee Scenarios Developed: 2 Scenarios in North Identical permits with the exception of different school fees between Lodi Unified School District and Unified School District. 1 Scenario in Downtown 1 Scenario in South

Scenario Summary Table Single Family Home in, CA Scenario 1: Single Family Residence 2,070 square foot $322,000 Valuation North North 2 Central South Lodi USD fees USD fees USD fees USD fees Permit, Plan Check, Processing Fees 3,704 3,704 3,704 3,704 Special Fees 1,291 1,291 1,291 1,291 Public Buildings, Street Improvements, Parks 12,459 12,459 0 12,459 Utilities 17,237 17,237 7,337 7,337 Mitigation 187 187 187 187 Other Agency/Pass Through 14,644 19,198 16,528 16,528 TOTAL 49,522 54,076 29,047 41,506

Scenario Summary Table Single Family Home in, CA Scenario 1: Single Family Residence 2,070 square foot $322,000 Valuation North North 2 Central South Lodi USD fees USD fees USD fees USD fees Permit, Plan Check, Processing Fees 3,704 3,704 3,704 3,704 Special Fees 1,291 1,291 1,291 1,291 Public Buildings, Street Improvements, Parks 12,459 12,459 0 12,459 Utilities 17,237 17,237 7,337 7,337 Mitigation 187 187 187 187 Other Agency/Pass Through 14,644 19,198 16,528 16,528 TOTAL 49,522 54,076 29,047 41,506

What are the financial impacts of PFF reductions? Existing PFF Reduction Program reduced revenues by $4.8 million to date The SESP would reduce revenues another $22.10 million The cumulative revenue reduction would be $27 million

Conclusion City Council expressed interest in encouraging development in by waiving the collection of Public Facilities Fees and asking staff to propose specific additional fee reductions for South and Downtown. The existing PFF Reduction program has not overcome prevailing economic factors or resulted in a significant increase in development. The options presented would have potential financial impacts depending on the City Council action taken. Establishing a fee waiver program based on existing infrastructure in anticipation of PFF program revisions after completion of the General Plan process and associated nexus study would be reasonable. City staff recommend that the Council only consider reductions to the PFFs identified as Public Buildings, Street Improvements, and Parks to maximum amount of $12,459.

Single Family Home in, CA Lodi Unified School District with 2,070 square foot area & $322,000 Valuation Permit Fee Category LODI FEES Per unit fees* STOCKTON FEES with Current Reduction Economic Stimulus Proposal (SESP) STOCKTON FEES with Current Reduction (minus DWSP/Surface Water) Permit, Plan Check, & Processing Fees 5,856 3,704 3,704 Special Fees n/a 1,291 1,291 Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks 5,903 20,173 20,173 Current PFF Reduction Program 3,282 7,650 7,650 Remaining Public Buildings, Street Improvements, & Parks 2,621 12,523 $17,000 12,523 Utilities 8,687 17,237 17,237 Utility Reductions 5,368 0 $9,333 Remaining Utility Fees 3,319 17,237 7,904 Mitigation n/a 187 187 Pass Through/Other Agency 14,049 14,644 14,644 GRAND TOTAL $25,845 $49,586 $32,586 $40,253 *Source: City of Lodi, Development Impact Fee Summary Sheet. Pass Through = RTIF/Strong Motion/LUSD/SJCo Facility Fees/Habitat