DAW PLAZA ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

Similar documents
VOLUME 25 NUMBER 20 OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1995 OFFICE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT TYPE

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Sycamore Plaza. Cincinnati, Ohio. Project Type: Commercial/Industrial. Case No: C Year: 1997

VOLUME 24 NUMBER 18 OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 OFFICE 225 HIGH RIDGE ROAD STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT PROJECT TYPE

Staff Report. Street Vacation. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. Ashley Scarff, (801) or Date: April 10 th, 2019

VOLUME 24 NUMBER 2 JANUARY-MARCH 1994 RESIDENTIAL WILDWOOD GABLES ATLANTA, GEORGIA PROJECT TYPE

Shopping Center Occupancy Study of the Greater Hagerstown Area

Clayton Lane. Denver, Colorado. Project Type: Mixed-Use/Multi-Use. Case No: C Year: 2006

Do You See What I See? Most Likely Not! Visibility Covenants in Commercial Leases

LEASE AND OPERATION OF THE HISTORIC EAGLE TAVERN

TOWER SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

Meruelo Maddux Properties

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

Oriental Warehouse. San Francisco, California. Project Type: Residential. Case No: C Year: 2000

TRIUMPH GULF COAST, INC. PRE-APPLICATION FORM

COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

Department of Planning & Zoning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following are the key recommendations of the neighborhood revitalization strategy:

Smart Growth in Mercer Island s Town Center

The Miramar Santa Monica

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

U r b a n D e s i g n a n d t h e P u b l i c R e a l m

Proposed Development Code Amendments to Parking Requirements for Certain Uses

Orange Avenue Corridor Study

VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village)

3.1 Existing Built Form

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

Wichita Core Report 2016 Q1 RETAIL. Delano Downtown Old Town Douglas Design District

WRT. October 16, Arthur Collins President Collins Enterprises, LLC 2001 West Main Street, Suite 175 Stamford, CT 06902

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ]

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

PART ONE - GENERAL INFORMATION

PRIME WEST-END RETAIL 1 AUGUSTA STREET

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

VILLAGE OF MUNDELEIN NORTH LAKE STREET FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES

Urban Design Brief. Italian Seniors Project 1090, 1092, 1096 Hamilton Road City of London

Crawford Square. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Project Type: Residential. Case No: C Year: 1999

PRIME WEST-END RETAIL 1 AUGUSTA STREET

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

Rezoning from IL-1 to IB-2

Advisory Group Meeting 19 October 2010

Planning Justification Report

The CoStar Retail Report

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300

ON REGENT RETAIL SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY

STUDENT HOUSING BUSINESS INNOVATOR AWARDS BEST RENOVATION OF EXISTING PROJECT ENTRY

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 1, 2019

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Comprehensive Site-Planning Overview. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Role of Government

PROPERTY management. Case Studies

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

UP TO 72,250 SF OF CREATIVE OFFICE SPACE

1833 S Florida Ave, Lakeland, FL 33803

TOWNHOMES ON CAPITOL HILL WASHINGTON, D.C. 1998

Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.

Nuisance Abatement Cadre

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

2) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

THE NEVER-ENDING STORY OF STREET MANAGEMENT

City of Walker Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 16, 2011

SE corner of Locust Street and Loop 288, Denton, Texas

Plan Area and Current Facilities

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

The Cannery Marketplace Narrative. Purpose: Site Design Approach: Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017

Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

VOLUME 27 NUMBER 2 JANUARY-MARCH 1997 RESIDENTIAL NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK PROJECT TYPE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SPACE COMMITTEE OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Application of PN Hoffman, Inc. May 18, 2016 CONCEPT REVIEW 1800 COLUMBIA ROAD NW

Chapter 5: Testing the Vision. Where is residential growth most likely to occur in the District? Chapter 5: Testing the Vision

BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA

A Quiet Campus... In a High-Powered Community

Regeneration and Property Committee. 16 March 2017

FOR LEASE. 5 Earl Court Woodridge, IL. Great Loading. High image suite - move in ready. Ideal access to I-55 & I-355. End cap unit.

The CoStar Retail Report

Buckhead Village Lofts

PARKING ELEVATING. The Bedrock Real Estate Services team is on a mission THE OF

Chapter 7 Riverfront District

Major Retail Shopping Centre Performance - A Presentation by John Highman

SOUTH CHURCH TUCSON S PREMIER OFFICE TOWER

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

JOHN ARENA. To: All Developers, Property Owners, and Architects Seeking Zoning Relief or an Amendment to the Zoning Code

Chapter MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Technical Report 7.1 MODEL REPORT AND PARKING SCENARIOS. May 2016 PARKING MATTERS. Savannah GA Parking Concepts PARKING MATTERS

UNDERSTANDING THE TAX BASE CONSEQUENCES OF LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

CLINTON 42ND STREET PORT AUTHORITY ELEVENTH AVENUE TENTH AVENUE NINTH AVENUE MIDTOWN WEST 34TH STREET MANHATTAN WEST EMPIRE STATION COMPLEX CHELSEA

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Nine Story, LEED Certified Class A Office Building. One Summerlin Festival Plaza Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

property introduction

Transcription:

VOLUME 24 NUMBER 14 JULY-SEPTEMBER 1994 RETAIL SHOPPERS PENN DAW PLAZA ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA PROJECT TYPE A fully renovated 132,203-square-foot neighborhood shopping center located along Route 1 in Alexandria, Virginia. The project's two anchor stores were constructed over and around an operational bowling center. Twelve smaller specialty, service, and food retail users round out the mix. The Plaza's innovative design is as attractive as it is functional. SPECIAL FEATURES Dual primary entrances for major grocery anchor All-brick column, signband, tower, and arch elements Signature clock tower featuring two backlighted clocks Extensive site landscaping and directional signage Two interparcel pedestrian trails to neighboring apartment complex DEVELOPER Combined Properties Incorporated 1899 L Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20036 202-293-4500 ARCHITECT Rounds VanDuzer Associates, Ltd. Falls Church, Virginia 703-533-3577 GENERAL CONTRACTOR L.F. Jennings, Inc. Falls Church, Virginia 703-241-1200

GENERAL DESCRIPTION Shoppers Penn Daw Plaza epitomizes the transformation of a well-positioned but obsolete strip shopping center into a vibrant, dynamic community marketplace. Combined Properties Incorporated, the owner and developer of the project, encountered a zoning obstacle early on that could have jeopardized the potential of the Plaza. The project team responded with an innovative design that resulted in an architecturally and functionally elegant use of space. Today, the 132,203-square-foot Plaza is the most prominent retail center on Route 1 in Alexandria, Virginia. The success of Shoppers Penn Daw Plaza is perhaps best demonstrated by tenant sales, which have skyrocketed from an average of $50 per square foot to $360 per square foot. THE SITE AND BACKGROUND Combined Properties takes a long-term approach to business. It has developed nearly 40 neighborhood and power shopping centers in the Washington, D.C., area, all of which it has retained for its own portfolio. In 1990, the existing Penn Daw shopping center had all the characteristics of a center ripe for change. It was in a good location eight miles south of Washington, D.C., along the well-traveled, heavily populated Route 1 corridor of Alexandria, Virginia but was performing far below its potential. The architecture was mundane and outdated, and the buildings were aged and in need of repair. The major tenant and most prominent structure was a 30-year-old domed bowling center that was still a popular community attraction but did little to promote the other tenants. Fantle's Drugs had been the other anchor store until 1989, when the drug store chain went bankrupt and the space became vacant. After Fantle's departure, consumer traffic in the center declined, and the existing merchants were suffering from extremely low sales volumes. The center was struggling to remain viable with an alarmingly high 40 percent vacancy rate. A careful evaluation of the trade area surrounding the existing shopping center indicated a strong demand for value-oriented food and drug retail. Combined Properties proceeded to execute leases with two new anchor stores, Shoppers Food Warehouse and CVS/Pharmacy, rounded out by a complementary mix of service, specialty, and restaurant tenants. A number of the smaller tenants today, such as Super Trak, Crown Books, Erol's Video Club, and Murry's Steaks, were also tenants before the renovation. The new Plaza was completely preleased before construction, virtually eliminating speculative risk. PLANNING AND DESIGN Zoning for the site dictated that there was very little additional building space available. Approximately 40 percent of the 10.5-acre site lies in a residential zone, and construction for the renovation was limited to the commercially zoned area. After obtaining a special exception for redesigned parking in the residential zone, the project team faced the challenge of designing and constructing two retail anchors totaling more than 65,000 square feet around and partially over the existing 38,000 square-foot bowling center. The postexpansion gross leasable area of 132,203 square feet is a net addition of about 25,000 square feet. Combined Properties chose to retain the Alexandria Bowling Center even though it posed a significant design challenge and is a somewhat unconventional neighborhood shopping center tenant. It had been a source of family entertainment for two generations of local residents and was still a popular destination. The project team sought to integrate the bowling center into the Plaza so that it was not the predominant visual focus and would not interfere with the accessibility of the other establishments. They hoped to keep the same families coming to the Plaza to bowl and encourage them to shop there as well. The final design produced a dual entrance concept for Shoppers Food Warehouse, with customer parcel pickup on both sides of the store. This feature eliminates the usual peak-hour tangle of customers loading groceries at the storefront as others try to enter and exit the parking lot. In essence, the design created two front entrances to the Plaza with no rear at all.

Two abundant parking fields provide access to the entrances and together accommodate over 600 cars. Before renovation, the entrance to the bowling center was below grade in front of the shopping center and at grade in the back. No structural changes were made to the bowling center itself, but much of what was formerly its back facade was filled in, making this entrance one level below the entrance to the supermarket. The dome of the bowling center remains intact but is hidden by the new facades. The Plaza's graceful architecture and all-brick construction exemplify Combined Properties' long-term retail perspective. Prominent tower elements, one of which includes two backlighted clocks; standing seam metal roofs; handsome parapet railings; and enhanced undercanopy and parking lot lighting highlight the project's facades and invite customers into the Plaza. The Plaza enjoys the best of both worlds in that it is a landmark on busy Route 1 and is also well incorporated into the surrounding Penn Daw neighborhoods. Before the first shovel entered the ground, Combined Properties embraced the local community and civic associations by explaining the scope of the Plaza renovation and reacting to their concerns. Merchants, new and existing, participated in and contributed to the design and planning of the project. Two interparcel pedestrian trails link the Plaza to a neighboring apartment complex. The widening of Poag Street along the Plaza's eastern boundary has benefited homeowners by providing safer and more convenient access to their homes. CONSTRUCTION Combined Properties believes that project success can be virtually guaranteed with thorough plan review, partnering with tenants and contractors, and attention to detail during construction. This strategy worked well for the $7 million, eight-month renovation of Shoppers Penn Daw Plaza. An aggressive construction schedule and strict budget control helped the project surpass all financial expectations. Combined Properties planned carefully to minimize the inherent difficulties of carrying out the construction while keeping the existing center operational. The nature of the design presented some unusual challenges. The new grocery anchor, for example, was built partially over the operational bowling center and partially on a slab on grade over an unused portion of the existing parking lot. Directly over the bowling center's main entrance, the entrance to Shoppers Food Warehouse is supported on an elevated slab with a floating architectural sidewalk. During the rainy construction period, innovative methods were devised to keep water out of the bowling center while maintaining the fast-track construction schedule. The project team sought to keep both merchants and customers focused on the future benefits of the renovation. Trash removal and delivery requirements were coordinated with merchants before the start of the project, eliminating potential operational conflicts. A phasing plan for paving was implemented to facilitate customer parking convenience. The widening of Poag Street provided yet another operational challenge for the team. By designing and implementing temporary parking and traffic patterns, using temporary signage, the developer minimized disruption resulting from the road construction. EXPERIENCE GAINED An effective project team made up of the owner, architect, contractors, and existing merchants fostered efficiencies and creativity throughout the entire renovation process. Open communication, meticulous planning, and painstaking attention to detail are essential characteristics of such a team. Establishing a proactive relationship with the surrounding neighborhoods should be one of the highest priorities in the development or redevelopment of a retail project. After all, the success of a neighborhood shopping center depends entirely upon how effectively it appeals to its community.

Preleasing a shopping center reduces speculative risks and helps identify construction costs. Designing the tenants' space in advance eliminates duplication and construction unknowns.

PROJECT DATA LAND USE INFORMATION Site Area: 10.45 acres Gross Leasable Area (GLA): Before renovation: 106,682 square feet After renovation: 132,203 square feet Floor/Area Ratio (FAR): 0.29 Number of Levels: Partial 2-level Total Parking (All Surface Spaces): Before renovation: 650 After renovation: 660 LAND USE PLAN Before (Acres) After (Acres) Percent of Site Buildings 1.81 2.16 21% Paved areas (surface parking/roads) 6.44 5.98 57 Landscaped areas 2.20 2.31 22 Total 10.45 10.45 100% RETAIL INFORMATION Classification Number of Stores Percent of Total Total GLA (Square Feet) Percent of GLA Food 3 22% 59,362 45% Restaurant 2 14 2,265 2 Automotive 1 7 6,241 5 Hobby/special interest 3 14 7,655 5 Drugs 1 7 11,400 9 Personal services 3 22 6,417 5 Recreation/community 1 7 38,132 28 Financial 1 7 731 1 Total 15 100% 132,203 100% Total Number of Stores before Renovation: 10 Average Length of Lease: 5 to 10 years Typical Lease Provisions: Triple net pass-through (CAM, insurance, taxes) Annual Rents: Before renovation: $9 to $20 per square foot After renovation: $12 to $23 per square foot

Average Annual Sales: Before renovation: $50 per square foot After renovation: $359 per square foot REDEVELOPMENT COST INFORMATION Site Improvement Costs On-site $1,173,421 Off-site 282,630 Total $1,456,051 Construction Costs Building shell $2,742,712 Building interior 1,715,307 Relocation/tenant allowances 49,827 Total $4,507,846 Soft Costs Architecture/engineering $547,141 Marketing 2,645 Legal/accounting 47,487 Permits and fees 90,832 Construction interest and fees 710,480 Total $1,398,585 Total Redevelopment Cost $7,362,482 Total Redevelopment Cost per GLA Square Foot: $56 ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (1993) Taxes $100,000 Insurance 9,000 Maintenance 136,000 Utilities 31,000 Legal 21,000 Management 86,000 Miscellaneous 5,000 Total $388,000 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Site Purchased: Summer 1982 Planning Started: Winter 1990 Approvals Obtained: Spring 1992

Construction Started: Spring 1992 Releasing Started: Winter 1990 Project Completed: January 1993 DIRECTIONS From Washington National Airport: Take the George Washington Parkway south toward Alexandria. Make a right onto Slaters Lane, which eventually merges with U.S. Route 1. After crossing over the Capital Beltway (495), continue approximately 1.5 miles to Shoppers Penn Daw Plaza on the right. The plaza is located at the intersection of North and South Kings Highway and U.S. Route 1. Driving Time: Approximately 20 minutes in non-peak traffic. The Project Reference File is intended as a resource tool for use by the subscribers in improving the quality of future projects. Data contained herein were made available by the Development team and constitute a report on, not an endorsement of, the project by ULI - The Urban Land Institute. Copyright 1994, 1997, by ULI - the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N. W. Ste. 500w, Washington, D. C. 20007-5201

DOCUMENT IMAGES