Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

Similar documents
Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT

CHARLOTTESVILLE. Corridors. Corridors ENTRANCE CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES. Amendments adopted by City Council March 7, 2011

MEADOWBROOK FLATS SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

The following uses may be allowed in the CL zone with administrative approval, subject to section of this ordinance:

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

90+/-Acres D-19 Southwest corner of I-96 & D-19 Marion Township, Michigan

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION

Chapter 8 The Residential District Requirements

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 801 BURLINGTON AVENUE. June 2, :00 p.m. AGENDA

CURRIE-HALL INVESTMENT CO. BROKERS 77 Milford Road, Suite 274, Hudson, Ohio Akron Cleveland Fax

City of Fraser Residential Zoning District

ARTICLE III. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY

ARTICLE B ZONING DISTRICTS

Chapter CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

ZONING

Project Team. Community Workshop Draft Specific Plan Review West Anaheim Youth Center September 4, /6/2018.

ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION

Independence Township Planning Commission. Richard K. Carlisle, AICP. DATE: November 30, Millstone Golden, LLC Special Land Use

DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS

CHAPTER 2 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWS.

CITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

PICKENS COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ORDINANCE. Organization of the Ordinance

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES

PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Edward B. Wright LOT FOR SALE ACROSS FROM WAL-MART. Industrial Rd Warrenton, VA

NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 15, 2015

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report. 956 W. Chatham Street. Town Council Meeting January 9, 2014

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.

CHAPTER 10 Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14) Part I. C-1 Restricted Commercial District

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Sec HC - Highway commercial district.

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

PLANNING COMMISSION. Study Session: Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Workshop

R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT

Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: April 5, 2016

Staff Contact: Jake Parcell Phone No.: PC Agenda: April 25, 2018

PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER G.P. LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING DISTRICT FLOOD HAZARD ZONE SITE ACREAGE AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE?

Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT REQUEST. DSA : Zone Change from R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) to B-4 (Community Services).

Chapter 1107: Zoning Districts

Business Park District Zoning Text Amendment (PLNPCM ) ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Public Hearing Item

Residential-1 District

FOR SALE OR LEASE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITH DEVELOPMENT SITES 999 WILLOW GROVE ST HACKETTSTOWN, NEW JERSEY

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

LONG-TERM GROUND LEASE OPPORTUNITY ±4.53 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL LAND Eden Prairie, MN 55347

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

1.0 Introduction. November 9, 2017

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

City of Spokane Infill Development. June 30, 2016

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Regulations (LDR) which would further the codification of TOD regulations that

ARTICLE XI SIGNS Shelbyville Zoning Regulations 1994

REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS

front on Route 6; bounded on the East by the western property lines which front

Industrial Warehouse Space

GC General Commercial District

CHAPTER XX ZONING PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS PART 2 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE Proposed Zoning Amendments to Create an Hempstead Turnpike Elmont Zoning District

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 10, 2017 MINUTES

MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING MINNEHAHA COUNTY & SIOUX FALLS PLANNING COMMISSIONS June 22, 2015

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. Date Filed Fees Paid. Name of applicant: Address of applicant: Phone number of applicant:

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

2017 ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENTS

1 Application Form 4

Figure 5-1, Land Use Plan, establishes the boundaries of each land use districts in the Boronda Community

For the purpose of this Zoning Ordinance, the Village is hereby divided into five classes of zoning districts known as:

Part 9. Chatham Overlay District (CV)

FOR SALE > MULTIFAMILY/COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

CHAPTER 3. For the purpose and administration of this Ordinance, the City of Thorp, Wisconsin, is hereby organized into the following districts:

Delcrest Commerce Park

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Lacey UGA Residential density

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS 304 R 9 DISTRICT

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING. January 10, 2017 MINUTES

MAJOR & ARROLL, LLC C O M M E R C I A L R E A L E S T A T E

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

ARTICLE V - DIVISION 10 RM-10 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Transcription:

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE A World Class City Department of Neighborhood Development Services City Hall Post Office Box 911 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Telephone 434-970-3182 Fax 434-970-3359 www.charlottesville.org July 18, 2016 TO: Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media Please Take Notice A Work Session of the Charlottesville Planning Commission will be held on Tuesday July 26, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. in the NDS Conference Room in City Hall (610 East Market Street). AGENDA 1. Water Street Corridor Code Discussion 2. Small Area Tour Emmet Street cc: City Council Maurice Jones Mike Murphy Alexander Ikefuna Planners Kathy McHugh, Tierra Howard Craig Brown, Lisa Robertson

City of Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Development Services Memorandum To: City of Charlottesville Planning Commission From: Brian Haluska, AICP Date of Memo: July 14, 2016 RE: Proposed Changes to the Water Street Corridor Summary At their meeting on March 21, 2016, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to review proposed changes to the Water Street Corridor zoning district that were raised by the placement of the Midway Manor property within the Water Street Corridor. The Commission forwarded recommended changes to the Council for consideration, but also requested that staff evaluate several other regulations that might be appropriate in light of the inclusion of 100 Ridge Street in the Water Street Corridor. Those items are: Setback regulations along Ridge Street Stepback regulations adjacent to the South Street Mixed-Use District Ridge Street Setback Currently, the Ridge Street frontage of the property is governed by the primary street frontage setback, which requires at least 75 feet of the streetwall of a building be built on the property line, and the remaining streetwall be a maximum 5 feet from the property line. The code permits a reduction in the amount of the streetwall required to be on the property line to 50% and an increase in the maximum setback to 20 feet to accommodate street trees, or pursuant to a special use permit. The Tree Commission expressed a desire to see the setback along Ridge Street set at 25 feet minimum to permit adequate space for street trees on private property. The Commission additionally asked that staff investigate this as a means of maintaining green space within the intersection. Staff finds no justification for the 25 foot setback, because no other setback regulations in the vicinity of the property are subject to such a regulation. Staff instead recommends using the existing setback regulations that apply to the 200 block of Ridge Street south of the railroad, as

well as the buildings across Ridge Street from the site a required 10 foot minimum setback with a 20 foot maximum. South Street Stepback In the Water Street Corridor, stepbacks are only required along street walls. The Commission expressed concern that even with a 10 foot setback adjacent to the South Street District, a building of 70 feet in height would not be in scale with the 45 foot maximum height in the South Street District, and that further regulations were needed to ensure a transition from the smaller scale South Street buildings to a potential development on the site at 100 Ridge Street. Staff recommends a 15 foot setback after 45 feet in building height. The maximum building height in the South Street District is 45 feet tall, and the 15 foot stepback coupled with the 10 foot setback would equal the 25 foot stepback currently required on streetwalls in the Water Street District.

Sec. 34-743. - Streetwall regulations. (a) Stepbacks. (1) For properties with frontage on the north side of South Street between Ridge Street and 2nd Street SW, the maximum height of the streetwall of any building or structure shall be forty-five (45) feet. After forty-five (45) feet, there shall be a minimum stepback of twenty-five (25) feet along the length of such street wall along South Street and a minimum stepback of ten (10) feet along the length of Ridge Street. (2) After forty-five (45) feet, there shall be a minimum stepback of fifteen (15) feet along the length of any building wall adjacent to the South Street Mixed Use Corridor District. (b) Setbacks. (1) Primary and linking street frontage. At least seventy-five (75) percent of the streetwall of a building must be built to the property line adjacent to a primary street. For the remaining portion of streetwall (i.e., twenty-five (25) percent), the maximum permitted setback is five (5) feet; however, (i) if streetscape trees are provided to the standards set forth in section 34-870, or (ii) pursuant to a special use permit granted by city council up to fifty (50) percent of the streetwall of a building may be set back twenty (20) feet. (2) Setback, Water Street: A minimum setback of five (5) feet shall be required for all buildings located on Water Street. (3) Setback, South Street: a building located on South Street shall be setback a minimum of ten (10) feet from any parcel within the South Street Mixed Use Corridor District. An S-2 buffer shall be provided within this required setback. (4) Setback, Ridge Street: A minimum setback of ten (10) feet shall be required for all buildings located on Ridge Street. The maximum permitted setback for a streetwall on Ridge Street shall be twenty (20) feet. (5-19-08(3)) Sec. 34-746. - Mixed-use developments Additional regulations. (a) [Reserved.] (b) No ground floor residential uses may front on a primary street, unless a building fronts on more than one (1) primary street, in which case ground floor residential uses may front on one (1) primary street. Under no circumstances, however, shall any ground floor residential uses front on Main Street, Market Street, Ridge Street or Water Street. (c) All entrances shall be sheltered from the weather, and lighted. (d) Where any building or development occupies one (1) or more parcels constituting an entire city block, courtyards shall be provided (subject to the street wall requirements set forth, above, within this division). Such courtyards shall be accessible from adjacent streets. (5-19-08(3); 8-16-10(5)) Page 1

City of Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Development Services Memorandum To: City of Charlottesville Planning Commission From: Brian Haluska, AICP Date of Memo: June 17, 2016 RE: Small Area Plan Tours Summary At the Planning Commission s January 26 th Work Session, staff was directed by the Commission to set up tours of three areas in the City that have been designated for small area plans in the 2013 Comprehensive Plan. The three areas selected by the Commission were: The Woolen Mills Planning Area Emmett Street north of the 29/250 interchange The Cherry Avenue/Roosevelt Brown Boulevard commercial corridor In addition, staff was directed to craft a fact sheet for each of the three areas chosen by the Commission so that the Commission would have some common data sources to evaluate when touring the three areas. The fact sheets are attached to this memo and contain the current zoning map, the future land use map, a map showing the date of the last property transfer of a select group of parcels within the small area, and the bicycle/pedestrian master plan map. Also included on the sheet are some key zoning regulations to consider, and the intent of the primary zoning classification. Emmett Street/Hydraulic Road Walking Tour The final area the Commission will tour is the Emmett Street/Hydraulic Road area. Staff intends to provide transportation from City Hall to the K-Mart parking lot. Once the Commission observes the intersection of Hydraulic Road and Emmett Street, the group will choose between walking down Emmett Street to Holiday Drive, or down Hydraulic Road to Brandywine Drive before returning to the parking lot.

Roosevelt Brown Boulevard Current Zoning Cherry Avenue Corridor Regulations of Note: Minimum Height 35 feet Maximum Height 50 feet Minimum FAR of 0.5 Future Land Use A district designed to encourage conservation of land resources, minimize automobile travel, and promote employment and retail centers in proximity to residential uses. It permits increased development on busier streets without fostering a strip-commercial appearance. Last Sale

Woolen Mills Current Zoning Manufacturing-Industrial Regulations of Note: Maximum Height 85 feet Required Front Yard 20 feet Required Side Yard (adjacent to residential zone or use) - 1 foot/2 feet in building height, 10 feet minimum Required Rear Yard (adjacent to residential zone or use) - 20 feet The M-I district is established to allow areas for light industrial uses that have a minimum of environmental pollution in the form of traffic, noise, odors, smoke and fumes, fire and explosion hazard, glare and heat and vibration. Future Land Use

Emmet Street Current Zoning Highway Corridor Regulations of Note: Maximum Height 80 feet Primary frontage setback 5 feet minimum, 30 feet maximum The intent of the Highway Corridor district is to facilitate development of a commercial nature that is more auto oriented than the mixed use and neighborhood commercial corridors. Development in these areas has been traditionally auto driven and the regulations established by this ordinance continue that trend. This district provides for intense commercial development with very limited residential use. It is intended for the areas where the most intense commercial development in Charlottesville occurs. Future Land Use