RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

Similar documents
RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 December 14. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 02. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 January 26. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 16. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 13. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT RICHMOND (WARD 8) RICHMOND ROAD SW AND 24 STREET SW BYLAWS 10P2018 AND 52D2018

LAND USE AMENDMENT SPRINGBANK HILL (WARD 6) ELMONT DRIVE SW AND 69 STREET SW BYLAW 114D2017

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 May 04. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 17

LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD

Date to Committee: October 13, 2015 Date to Council: November 2, 2015

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Secondary suites. A guide to developing a secondary suite. Home Improvements. calgary.ca call Helpful, Equitable, Accurate, Responsive.

Highland Green Estates Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment. 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT Committee of Adjustment Decision Regarding an Application for Consent

It is recommended that this application be considered and that it be referred a public meeting.

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 December 01

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

Zoning Amendment. Public Meeting: February 7, 2018

Frequently Asked Questions

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER :00 P.M.

Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee

Planning and Building Department

INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani

Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

Belmead Neighbourhood Structure Plan

April 3 rd, Monitoring the Infill Zoning Regulations. Review of Infill 1 and 2 and Proposed Changes

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

Development Permit Application

NCP Amendment Rezoning Development Variance Permit

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

MINUTES of a Regular Meeting of the MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION held on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. with the following in attendance:

Staff Report. Recommendations: Background:

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT JULY COMITÉ DE L URBANISME RAPPORT 34 LE 11 JUILLET ZONING 1008 SHEFFORD ROAD

Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District ESC 44 OZ & ESC 44 SB

The City of Red Deer

BYLAW NUMBER 256D2017

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

Zoning Options. Key Questions:

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Planning Justification Report

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

SPECIAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES Wednesday February 17, :00 p.m. Town Council Chambers Page 1

PLANNING PRIMER. Elective: Understanding Residential Intensification and Infill. Planning and Growth Management Department.

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

1555 Midland Avenue - Zoning Amendment & Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

Public Notice. June 7, Application: New Zoning Schedule: RD3 (Residential Infill)

Director, Community Planning, South District

Property Location: 2970 Bank Road

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAND USE AND PLANNING COMMITTEE

Planning Division Department of Community & Economic Development. Applicant: Peter and Sandra Clark

What We Heard Report Summary: Indigenous Housing Capital Program

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

RT-8 District Schedule

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

May 23, CANKOVIC, MLADEN AVE SW CALGARY, AB T2V 0E9, CANADA Dear Sir/Madam:

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

preservation guide Types of preservation protection Frequently-asked questions Helpful contact information

5.0 Specific Use Regulations

Address: 2025 Agassiz Road Applicant: Cristian Anca. RM5 Medium Density Multiple Housing

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department

5. Housing. Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws. Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

AS YOUR COMMUNITY EVOLVES, SO DOES OUR SUPPORT.

INCREASING HOUSING SUPPLY IN ONTARIO

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

DATE: April 26, 2017 REPORT NO. CD Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment

City of Kingston Report to Planning Committee Report Number PC

Islington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Village of Queen Charlotte OCP and Bylaw Review Open House April 29, 2017 Highlights, Policy Directions, and Choices

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

RT-7 District Schedule

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

An Introduction to the City of Winnipeg s New Zoning By-Law

Galloway Road and 4097 Lawrence Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

PHASE 2B DROP-IN INFORMATION SESSION PROJECT BACKGROUND:

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT

Proposed London Plan Amendment 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643, and 1649 Richmond Street London, ON

Transcription:

Page 1 of 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from R-C1 to R-C1s to allow for a secondary suite. The site contains an existing secondary suite. This application was submitted as a result of a complaint. PREVIOUS COUNCIL DIRECTION On 2013 September 16, Council directed Administration to remove fees associated with land use amendment and development permit applications for secondary suites to encourage the development of legal and safe secondary suites throughout the city. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06 That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION That Council hold a Public Hearing on Bylaw 1D2015; and 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 0.04 hectares ± (0.10 acres ±) located at 35 Riverbirch Crescent SE (Plan 8210447, Block 5, Lot 22) from Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 1D2015. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: The proposed R-C1s district which allows for two forms of secondary suite uses (Secondary Suite and Backyard Suite) are believed to be compatible and complementary residential uses with the established character of the community. This proposal is in conformance with relevant policies in the Municipal Development Plan and would allow for development that has the ability to meet the intent and requirements of Land Use Bylaw 1P2007. ATTACHMENT 1. Proposed Bylaw 1D2015 2. Public Submission

CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 of 11 LOCATION MAPS

Page 3 of 11 ADMINISTRATIONS RECOMMENDATION TO CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 0.04 hectares ± (0.10 acres ±) located at 35 Riverbirch Crescent SE (Plan 8210447, Block 5, Lot 22) from Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District. Moved by: G.-C. Carra Carried: 8 1 Opposed: R. Honsberger Reasons for Opposition from Mr. Honsberger: Site doesn t meet minimum width requirements 5 letters of objection. Tenant will not be permitted to park in garage, so counting the double car garage as two independent spaces is overstating the supply.

Page 4 of 11 Applicant: Lois Humm Landowner: Lois G Humm Alan Brent Humm Planning Evaluation Content *Issue Page Density Is a density increase being proposed. No 5 Land Use Districts Are the changes being proposed housekeeping or simple bylaw amendment. No 5 Legislation and Policy Does the application comply with policy direction and legislation. Yes 6 Transportation Networks Do different or specific mobility considerations impact this site No 6 Utilities & Servicing Is the site in an area under current servicing review and/or has major infrastructure (water, sewer, storm and emergency response) concerns. Environmental Issues Other considerations eg. sour gas or contaminated sites No 6 No 6 Growth Management Is there growth management direction for this site. Does the recommendation create capital budget impacts or concerns. Public Engagement Were major comments received from the circulation No 6 Yes 7 *Issue - Yes, No or Resolved

Page 5 of 11 PLANNING EVALUATION SITE CONTEXT Situated in a low density residential R-C1 setting in the community of Riverbend, the parcel is approximately 13.4 metres by 30.5 metres in size and is developed with a single detached dwelling on a laned parcel. The lot pattern on this block is aligned north-south with houses flanking the street on one side. Riverbend Shopping Centre (Commercial-Community 2 District) is located to the east across 18 Street SE. Information on the Community of Riverbend can be found here: http://www.calgary.ca/csps/cns/documents/community_social_statistics/riverbend.pdf LAND USE DISTRICTS The proposed R-C1s district has the ability to accommodate secondary suites on parcels that already contain a single detached dwelling. The R-C1s district allows for one additional permitted use (Secondary Suite) and an additional discretionary use (of Backyard Suite). Approval of this land use application does not constitute approval of a specific secondary suite type, but rather allows for an additional dwelling unit (in the form of a secondary suite) to be considered via the development permit process. Site Specific Considerations The subject site has an approximate width of 13.4 metres and therefore, does not meet the minimum R-C1s parcel width requirement of 15 metres. As a result, relaxation(s) of the Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 requirement will be required at the development permit stage. Nonetheless, the parcel area meets the minimum parcel size requirement and has the capacity to accommodate: a single detached dwelling with a secondary suite; the two required on-site motor vehicle parking stalls (one stall for the single detached dwelling unit and one stall for the secondary suite) and two additional parking spaces; and any required building setback(s) as determined necessary at the development permit stage. In addition, it should be noted that a number of low density residential districts in Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 allow for secondary suites on parcels with a minimum parcel width of 9 metres, 11 metres or 13 metres respectively. For additional information regarding minimum parcel width, please see Table 1 in APPENDIX III of this report.

Page 6 of 11 LEGISLATION & POLICY Municipal Development Plan (Statutory - 2009) The site is located within a Developed Residential Inner City Area as identified on Map 1: Urban Structure of the Municipal Development Plan (MDP). Although the MDP does not make specific reference to this site, the proposal is in keeping with a number of MDP policy areas including: Residential Developed, Neighbourhood Infill & Redevelopment and Housing Diversity & Choice policies. Riverbend Area Structure Plan (statutory- 1979) The site is identified in the Riverbend Area Structure Plan (ASP) as Residential and associated uses. The ASP encourages varying housing types. TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS Pedestrian and vehicular access is available from Riverbirch Crescent SE as well as from the existing rear lane. The area is served by Calgary Transit with a number of bus routes and stops within 150-200 metre walking distance of the parcel on Riverbend Drive SE, Riverbend Gate SE, and 18 Street SE. UTILITIES & SERVICING Water, sanitary and sewer services are available and can accommodate the potential addition of a secondary suite without the need for off-site improvements at this time. Adjustments to on-site servicing may also be required depending on the type of secondary suite proposed with this aspect being determined at the development permit stage. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES An Environmental Site Assessment was not required. GROWTH MANAGEMENT This land use proposal does not require additional capital infrastructure investment and therefore, no growth management concerns have been identified at this time. In addition, the proposal is in alignment with the MDP references associated with growth management matters.

Page 7 of 11 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Community Association Comments A letter from the Community Association was received and is attached to this report. Citizen Comments Five letters of objection were received by Administration. All five letters expressed concerns associated with on-street parking. Two letters expressed concerns over impacts on property values, and maintenance issues with rental properties. One letter expressed concerns about the equity in allowing for a change in land use to allow for secondary suites and the change in atmosphere in the neighbourhood created by renters. Public Meetings No public meetings were held by the applicant or Administration.

Page 8 of 11 APPENDIX I APPLICANT S SUBMISSION We haved owned the house at 35 Riverbirch Cres. S.E. Calgary, Alberta for over 24 years. This house was built with a fully equipped 1 bedroom suite in the basement to which we have always used for our children. At this time we have moved out of this property and wish to rent out the main floor and the basement suite. With the shortage of homes to rent in Calgary this would be a great unit to house someone in need of a place to live. This house is half a block to the bus stop which takes you to the train station at Chinook. Also an express bus to downtown. Within one block of house there is a grocery store, gas station, restaurants, banks, etc. The public elementary school is 3 blocks away and the Catholic Elementary is within walking distance. The new Quarry park business district is in the next subdivision for those needing a place to live close to work.

Page 9 of 11 APPENDIX II LETTER FROM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION From: RCA_Treasurer [mailto:treasurer@riverbendcommunity.ca] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:51 PM To: St. Arnaud, Nicole Cc: info@riverbendcommunity.ca; RCAB_President; RCAB_VPOperations; Commn. & Community Liaison - Ward 9 Subject: RE: Application for Secondary Suite Request for Comments Hi Nicole, Thank you for your follow-up. Let me start that at the end of the day, the role of a COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION is to collectively represent the views of the community. The problem here is that what if the community does not have enough experience on which to take a view? As you well know, the topic of secondary suites is very much up in the air not only for most communities, but City Council. I am aware of the information that is out on the INTERNET with respect to this topic. Examples include: http://www.calgary.ca/pda/pd/pages/home-building-and-renovations/secondarysuites/secondary-suites.aspx http://calgarysecondarysuites.ca/ http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/planning+committee+rejects+secondary+suites+pro posal/10192723/story.html http://secondarysuitescalgary.com/ Looking at the above noted items, our conclusion is that there is no consensus, or majority on whether they are the way to go to not. Having said that, given this environment, it is hard for us to put forward a position that would allow us to state with any degree of uncertainty that they are good or bad for the community. Not only that, but, because there is lack of background on the part of most residents as far as this new concept is concerned, it would also be difficult for us to take a stand on behalf of the community. One of the things that we know is that there is a housing shortage in the city of Calgary, and the idea of a secondary suite would be one solution to deal with this problem. Does that mean it is the solution in every case? Hard to say.

Page 10 of 11 Is Riverbend for secondary suites. Conceptually - yes. But what we do not know is what that means in practical terms. Some of the questions that we do not know the answers to are How will the neighbors respond? Is it for use by family members or outside people? Will neighbors view it as causing a depreciation in the property values - whether that perception is real or not? How does the NIMBY principle come into play (i.e. NOT IN MY BACK YARD)? Part of our issue is it is hard to know whether we should go ahead with it, given that there is really no framework with which to determine that any particular application should move forward or not. Until such a framework exists - the only thing we can do is look at each application on a case by case basis. In this case, my guess is that as we saw nothing that necessarily warranted us opposing it at this time, most of our Board in conjunction with our community chose to effectively "abstain". That means that we are not for it, but, we are also not against it. As time goes on, and the City as well as our community has better information and data on which to provide informed feedback, we will be happy to provide more informed feedback. I hope that this helps. I know you likely were looking for a definitive opinion on one side of the issue or not, but, given the complexity of the issue and that as I said, City Council cannot even agree, it would be difficult for us to do any different. Douglas Ratke, BComm Treasurer and Chairperson, Riverbend Development Review and Planning Committee Riverbend Community Association 19 Rivervalley Drive S.E. Calgary, Alberta T2C 3S1

Page 11 of 11 Land Use District APPENDIX III TABLE 1 PARCEL WIDTH REQUIREMENTS Secondary Suite (basement) Secondary Suite Detached Garage Secondary Suite Detached Garden R-C1s 15 m 15 m 15 m R-1s 11 m 11 m 13 m R-C1N 9 m 13 m 13 m R-1N 9 m 13 m 13 m R-C2 9 m 13 m 13 m R-C1Ls 24 m 24 m 24 m R-2M 9 m 13 m 13 m R-2 9 m 13 m 13 m