CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Housing Authority D Successor Agency D Oversight Board D

Similar documents
BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II

Christopher J. Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/ City Engineer

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF VACAVILLE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ACCEPT A 6

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION ONE: Chapter shall be added to the Inyo County Code shall be added to read as follows: Chapter 18.73

County Of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

Effective Date: July 21, 2017 Page 1 of 8. Reference: DBC Admin 132.9, IEBC 407.1, Ordinance No , Series of 2017

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. BOARD ACTION AS FOLLOWS: NO

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Honorable Members of the Rent Stabilization Board. Budget and Personnel Committee and Jay Kelekian, Executive Director

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

ORDINANCE NO REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD)

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Resolution No : 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

Finance Tool for Townhome and Condo Association Improvements.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO RESOLUTION NO 16-38

Contra Costa County Agreement Addendum City of Richmond Revised 04/2018 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT ADDENDUM

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Honorable Chair and Agency Board Members Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager/Executive Director

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

ORDINANCE NO. STRTF Review

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1296 Page 2

EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO.

ASC 842 (Leases)

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 15, 2018 LEGISLATIVE

ORDINANCE NO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

GROVE CONDOMINIUMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Home Improvement Application

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 16 Mayfair Drive

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Table of Contents. Page 2 of 11 CRMLS Rules & Regulations Reference Guide Effective

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 624 Oak Lawn Avenue

Item 10C 1 of 69

Councilmember Heilman, Mayor Pro Tempore Meister, and Mayor Horvath. Councilmember Duran. Councilmember D'Amico. None.

Successor Agency to the Paradise Redevelopment Agency Meeting Agenda. 7:00 PM June 11, 2013

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

ORDINANCE NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AGENDA HAILEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Monday, March 23 rd, 2015 Hailey City Hall 5:30 p.m. (Special Meeting)

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

SHORT TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL CODE Purpose.

MINUTES OF THE ORLAND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING HELD APRIL 2, 2019

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Technical Services Division 1660 Mission Street San Francisco CA Office (415) FAX (415) Website:

ATTACHMENT 8 ORDINANCE NO. 5017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

I. Subject Property Information This does not include any adjoining property that is not subject to this matter S

Application for Short-Term Rental (STR) Permit

County of Santa Cruz

SUBJECT: Status Report on Executive Order : DATE: June 27, 2017 Improving Safety of Non-Permitted Spaces While Avoiding Displacement INFORMATION

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

The City Council makes the following findings:

PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER MAIN AGREEMENT

OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS ACTION AGENDA SUMMARY

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

PLANNING BOARD FEBURARY 11, 2019

SOUTH VILLAGE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (TIF) COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES & APPLICATION

Item 9 September 7, 2016

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE JOINT LAND USE BOARD December 4, 2018

July 31, Marin County Board of Supervisors 3501 Civic Center Drive San Rafael, CA 94903

ORDINANCE NO

TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

And adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on May 2, 2017 by the following vote:

RESOLUTION PC NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Duarte resolves as follows:

CONDOMINIUM LIVING IN FLORIDA. Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes

Home Seller Name(s) Here

*Required for Processing

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

PUD Ordinance - Cascade Lakes Plat #10 of 1995

Guidelines for the Preparation & Use of the Pennsylvania Association of Realtors Pre-Settlement Possession Addendum to Agreement of Sale (Form PRE)

City of Palos Verdes Estates Requirements for a Minor Lot-Line Adjustment

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

City of New York OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER. Scott M. Stringer COMPTROLLER AUDIT AND SPECIAL REPORTS

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

Counts of Santa Cruz 299

Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence. Tenant Issues Committee Licensing and Standards Committee

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SUBSTANDARD HOUSING-RELIEF REGULATIONS

OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

TOWN OF PARRY SOUND NOTICE POLICY

Recreation and Park Commission Capital Committee. Angelo J. Rossi Playground Restroom Replacement Conceptual Plan Approval

ORDINANCE NO

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title )

Applicant means a person or entity who has filed an application for change of use of a manufactured home park.

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 716 Oak Lawn Avenue

Transcription:

Joint D City Council 1Z! CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Housing Authority D Successor Agency D Oversight Board D February 10, 2015 AGENDA ITEM Report: Information on Code Compliance Policy for Unpermitted Window Installations 1. Motion approving staff's recommended policy for addressing unpermitted window installations. COUNCIL ACTION Public Hearing D Ordinance D Consent Calendar D Action Item IZ! Approved for&, I 0 1 7fJ IS- calendar Report Only D ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION Submitted by: Hassan Haghani, Director of Community Development Prepared by: Philippe Eskandar, Administrative Officer Approved by: Scott Ochoa, City Manager Reviewed by: Yasmin K. Beers, Assistant City Manager ( Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney Timothy Foy, Deputy Director of Planning & Neighborhood Services John Brownell, Principal Neighborhood Services Supervisor Jay Platt, Senior Urban Designer 8 A f

RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends the City Council adopt the criteria below as the code compliance policy for unpermitted window installations to ensure life safety standards of the California Building Code are met and architectural compatibility is maintained. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 201 O, Community Development staff presented the City Council with a report on unpermitted window installations throughout the city. At that time, the City Council directed staff to develop a reasonable policy to address unpermitted window installations. Council directed staff to enforce City regulations with current owners who were responsible for window cha nge-outs. However, there was not a well-defined directive concerning prioritizing enforcement for properties where it could be shown that previous owners were responsible. Subsequently, many properties were brought into compliance by obtaining the required permits for window installations. In a few cases, enforcement action was deferred due to new owners being unaware of the unpermitted windows and were unwilling to alter windows to obtain design review exemption, or Design Review Board approval. Since this update and subsequent public education efforts, staff has seen a decline in the number of unpermitted window installations. Staff has been asked to revisit the issue to explore any advances that may assist property owners in achieving compliance. A significant concern with unpermitted window installations is the life safety concerns for the occupants of the property. The 2013 California Building and Residential Codes( 1029, R310, and R612) require all window installations be permitted and inspected to insure that proper ingress and egress requirements are met for emergencies. To meet minimum life safety standards, it is crucial that some level of compliance be achieved by all properties with unpermitted windows installations. Staff has refined the following policy to achieve minimum life safety compliance while assisting new property owners: 1. Current Property Owners Responsible for Unpermitted Installations: Staff is not recommending any modifications to the current policy to address this category of violations. Upon identification and verification that a property owner is responsible for the unpermitted windows, the property owner will be required to obtain proper permits for all unpermitted window installations on the property. The process will be the same to that which would be required of any regular applicant for a window permit. If the installed windows can be permitted in their current condition (i.e. they meet the Residential Window Replacement Guidelines), staff will issue a design review exemption and Building and Safety staff will review plans for compliance with the applicable codes, hopefully followed by issuance of permits and a field inspection. If the installed windows do not meet the Guidelines as installed, the applicant will have to submit plans to modify or replace the windows to meet the Guidelines, or seek approval from the Design Review Board. 2. Current Property Owners Who Purchased the Property with Prior Unpermitted Installations: The proposed compliance policy for this category of violators resolves life safety concerns immediately while also providing a path for eventual addressing of aesthetic concerns. 2

Although property owners may not have been aware that the property they purchased was in violation with various codes, the owners of the property must make an attempt to legalize the unpermitted windows. If the installed windows cannot be permitted at the staff level, then enforcement would be deferred except for those windows that are located in sleeping rooms. This exclusion is due to the seriousness of this life safety issue. It is imperative that minimum acceptable safety standards be achieved with such properties. This would apply to all cases where windows were actually or presumptively installed by a previous owner, those that arise in the future as well as those which are already known. In an effort to not overburden new property owners, staff will require the minimum standards for ingress and egress as outlined by the California Building and Safety Code be met. This minimum standard dictates, in part, that at least one window in each sleeping room must meet the ingress and egress standards. As such, staff will require property owners to obtain permits to legalize at least one such window in each affected sleeping room. The City shall record a "Notice of Substandard Building" at the County Recorder's Office ensure that the next property owner is made aware of the remaining unpermitted windows and their responsibility to comply with the code. Although the Notice does not strictly require remediation upon point of sale, lenders will typically require that the Notice be lifted prior to funding a mortgage loan. The Notice will not disrupt an all-cash sale, but these transactions represent a minority of sales within the city. At any time prior to a sale, the property owner may legalize the remaining unpermitted windows and have the "Notice of Substandard Building" lifted. It is important to note, just as with any other form of construction which has taken place prior to proper permits being obtained, double fees will be assessed under all such circumstances. Because the window replacement occurred without permits, almost all cases will lack documentation as to when the window change-out occurred. Occasionally, another City permit for other types of work may reference existing windows or contain photos of them. Other tools available include Pictometry or Google Street View, which now lets users view street views recorded in the past, dating back to about 2008 in the best of cases. Owners or Realtors may also have photos from the time of purchase. It should be noted that in many cases, none of the above resources will be available or conclusive. In those cases, unless a physical inspection can determine the approximate age of the windows, staff will accept the property owner's word and file a Notice of Substandard Building. Finally, regarding historic properties, the enforcement policy for window change-outs by previous owners would not apply to homes which are listed on the Glendale Historic Register or located in districts with historic designation. Such properties would be required to go through the full permitting and legalization process for all windows (for Register properties) or for all windows visible from the public right-of-way (for historic district properties) as soon as the violation is identified. It is important to note that the Community Development Department's code compliance workload is largely complaint driven by the community; an approach which has been supported by the Council. This community driven method will continue to be used with this modified window compliance policy, if approved. It is important to note that there are many unpermitted 3

window installations throughout the city that remain unknown to staff or the community. On the other hand, when Code Compliance staff inspects a property for any reason, they are expected to include all obvious compliance issues, even if unrelated to the original complaint. This practice attempts to inform property owners of all issues at one time, and not add new Code violations with each inspection. Point of Sale Inspection Program One additional option provided to the Council during the 201 O report was the potential development of a "Point of Sale" inspection program. Although the Council did not support this option at the time, such a program would offer a possible compliance mechanism. A point of sale inspection program, as implemented in other cities, would require all single-family residential units (houses and condominiums) to be inspected at the time they are sold, usually during the escrow process. The purpose of the inspection is to identify municipal or building code violations that might threaten the health or safety of the new owners while aiding in the preservation of property values. The most common items inspected during a point of sale inspection include electrical, plumbing, and heating systems, structural hazards, health and safety items, and zoning concerns such as illegal building additions or conversions. Similar programs in other cities are in large part self-supported through the charging of fees for services. However, the establishment of such a program in Glendale would require additional staffing in the Code Compliance section. With the implementation of a point of sale inspection program, properties throughout the city will become generally more compliant with various codes, resulting in a decrease in the need for complaint driven enforcement. It is anticipated that the local Realtor community would like to have input in the development of such a program. FISCAL IMPACT There is no additional fiscal impact as part of this policy; the code compliance actions are a part of the department's normal work functions. Should the Council consider the point of sale inspection program as a viable option, a fiscal impact would result due to the need for additional staffing. The staffing requirements and other fiscal components are unknown at this time due to the lack of scope for such a program but could be explored during the fiscal year 2015-2016 budget preparation if desired. ALTERNATIVES Alternative 1: Approve the policy as given in the attached motion. Alternative 2: City Council may consider requiring all property owners, regardless of when the unpermitted windows were installed, to bring all windows into compliance rather than just those required for ingress and egress by the California Building and Safety Code. Alternative 3: City Council may consider directing staff to develop a point of sale inspection program as the sole method of addressing unpermitted window installations or in conjunction with the recommended compliance policy. Alternative 4: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE Not Applicable EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: "Replacing Your Windows?" Handout 4

MOTION Moved by Council Member------------' and seconded. by Council Member, that the City Council hereby approves the unpermitted window installation compliance policy set forth in the February 10, 2015, staff report from the Director of Community Development, and subject to any Council comments or recommendations thereon. Vote as follows: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: j:\files\docfiles\mtn\unpermitted window compliance policy recommendation mtn.docx

------------ glen~~!~~@~ E_ x_h_ib_it_1 Replacing Your Windows? You Need A Permit! J Residents and contractors: if you are replacing a window(s) in your house, you need a permit from the City of Glendale Building and Safety Department. This applies even when you are changing windows, but keeping the frame. Visit the Permits Section of the Building and Safety Department before starting construction and bring the following: A complete plot plan (minimum 8.5 x 11" size) of the property, showing location of where the windows are to be replaced (or have already been replaced). Photographs of the buildings on the property (whole building - front, side, rear, garage, etc.) - not polaroid pictures. What "new" windows will look like (either a brochure for proposed new windows, or photographs of already replaced windows). For more information, call the Permits Section of the Building and Safety DeP-artment at (818) 548-3200. NOTE: If you already replaced windows, but did not get a permit, you are still required to get permits. Glendale Community Development Department Planning Division 633 East Broadway, Room 103 Glendale, CA 91206 (818) 548-2140 City of Glendale. California Community Development Department... Planning & Neighborhood Services Division (818) 548-3700 --------' 633 East Broadway. Room 101. Glendale. CA 91206