PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Similar documents
LOWER EAST SIDE NEW YORK

The Philadelphia Code. In order to be eligible for any floor area bonuses pursuant to this section:

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

The Philadelphia Code. Table : Commercial and Commercial Mixed-Use Districts {For a printable PDF version, click HERE}

Revised Partial Action Plan No. 6 For Affordable Housing for Low, Moderate and Middle Income Residents

320 Maple Mixed Use PDR Narrative Fort Collins, CO Project # 1525

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OFFICE BUILDINGS / SPORTS PROJECT WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO.

Flatbush Rezoning and Text Amendments LR Item 3: Description of Proposal

141 Chrystie Street New York, NY

B. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE: PROPOSED CONVERSION OF PARKLAND

68 COOPER STREET. Inwood Residential Development Site

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Truax Park Apartments

Downtown 2025 Sector Development Plan

Inwood NYC Update. CB 12 Land Use Committee May 3, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

291 Grand Street. Location Highlights. Prime Retail and Commercial Space for Lease in Manhattan s Lower East Side

Planning Justification Report

International Village By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Jacobs Landing Rehabilitation Plan

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Section 4 Master Plan Framework

DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

ORDINANCE NO. ABINGTON TOWNSHIP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Proposed Development. The first phase of development will include the construction of an as-of-right tower, which will avail itself of the permitted d

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Direct Control District No. 1 (DCD1) for The South Downtown

SUBJECT: Application for Planned Unit Development and Rezoning 1725 Winnetka Road

Introduction. General Development Standards

REQUEST STAFF RECOMMENDATION. On April 26, 2012, Signature Books Inc., represented by Dave Richards, submitted petitions for the following amendments:

Director, Community Planning, North York District

Bowie Marketplace Residential Detailed Site Plan Statement of Justification January 13, 2017 Revised February 2, 1017

Boston East. Fort Point Associates, Inc. Urban Planning Environmental Consulting Project Permitting. May 31, 2013

Highland Green Estates Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

Downtown Phase II Plan

3804 Wilson Boulevard (Staples Site) Special General Land Use Plan Study

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

M A N H A T T A N 69 THE FURMAN CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE & URBAN POLICY. Financial District Greenwich Village/Soho

Air Rights Reference Guide

1. Allow a workable, interrelated mix of diverse land uses;

Broker: Brett A. Sherman, CCIM Senior Vice President , Ext. 22

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

August 24, 2011/Calendar No. 16

COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

SECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

DENTON Developer's Handbook

Economic Development Action Plan

Washington Boulevard + Kirkwood Road Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study "Plus"

From Policy to Reality

Borough Council January 28, 2010

STAFF REPORT. Director Planning, Zoning and Building Department. Longboat Key, Florida

THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

East River Fifties/Sutton Place Rezoning Manhattan Community District 6 February 22, 2017 Applicant s Project Description

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Paul VI Redevelopment

Overview. Central Street Master Plan. Appendix B: Zoning

Demographics Review Multi-family Housing Data & Characteristics. Triplexes, quadplexes, and apartments. Development Potential Future Considerations

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE PETERS TOWNSHIP PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE, E. McMURRAY ROAD McMURRAY, PA 1531 (724)

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

Article 50: Business Zones

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #BroadwayValdez

FACT SHEET DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO. 91 UNIVERSITY PLACE RESIDENCES DEVELOPMENT

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

D-Downtown District Analysis

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

GAVIN.hanks Architectural Studio, PLLC AIA 300 West Broadway, Suite 4 Missoula, MT Ph Fax

Evolution of the Vision for NE 181st Street Study Area

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District

City of Dade City, Florida Land Development Regulations ARTICLE 3: ZONE DISTRICTS

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES

CITY OF PORT ORCHARD

contact 300 First Ave, Suite 200 Needham, MA atlanticretail.com

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

REGULATING PLAN for the Plaza Saltillo TOD Station Area Plan (SAP)

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

Comprehensive Plan /24/01

Article Optional Method Requirements

74af ANTELOPE VALLEY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

Class Lecture #2: Zoning

;ARTICLE 27N. SOUTH BOSTON SEAPORT BUFFER ZONE INTERIM PLANNING OVERLAY DISTRICT (;Article inserted on December 6, 1997*, rescinded on July 22, 1999)

City of Dade City, Florida Land Development Regulations ARTICLE 3: ZONE DISTRICTS

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

City of Sunny Isles Beach Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Route 6 Corridor Study Bristol Planning Commission Meeting #1. May 25, 2016 FITZGERALD & HALLIDAY, INC. Innovative Planning, Better Communities

Transcription:

Chapter 2, Section A: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INRODUCION he project site is located in the Borough of Manhattan and includes the median malls on Allen Street between Delancey Street and East Broadway and on Pike Street between East Broadway and South Streets (sees Figure 2A-1). he Proposed Project would reconstruct the median mall sections to provide public green space, recreational space, and amenities, would improve the overall visual character of Allen and Pike Streets between Delancey and South Streets, and would serve as a gateway to the East River Esplanade from interior blocks. his section considers existing land use, zoning, and public land use policies for the project site and the surrounding 400-foot study area. Land use issues associated with the Proposed Project include potential changes in local land uses and neighborhood land use patterns. Zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed modifications to the median malls with existing zoning and public policies. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS As described below, this analysis concludes that the Proposed Project would be in keeping with and supportive of existing land uses in the study area, and that it would be consistent with zoning and public policy for the area. Overall, the Proposed Project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to land use, zoning or public policy. B. EXIING CONDIIONS LAND USE PROJEC SIE he project site includes the Allen and Pike Street malls and the adjacent travel lanes. he Allen Street malls are located between Delancey Street and East Broadway. he Pike Street malls are located between East Broadway and South Street. he Allen and Pike Street malls are owned by the City of New York and are under the jurisdiction of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR). Most sections of the malls are paved with some benches and trees. DPR constructed a Demonstration Mall on the section between Delancey and Broome Streets in 2008. he Demonstration Mall contains decorative pavements and fences, planted areas, and benches. South of Monroe Street, the mall sections end and the project site becomes a narrow, concrete median. As described in Chapter 1, Project Description, the project site is overlaid on the New York City Department of ransportation s Interim Plan. Constructed for temporary usage under the Interim Plan are bike lanes with painted buffers adjacent to each side of the median malls and plaza connectors at Broome, Hester, and Monroe Streets. he plaza connectors permit only pedestrian and emergency vehicle access across Allen and Pike Streets and are marked with color seal paint and temporary planters. 2A-1

2.10.10 RIV ING MO S ME DE LAN CE YS O N OO FO RS YH CH RYS IE S LUD LOW BR BR DS OR AR DS CH AN ME HE RS ELD RID GE E CLI NO NS NO RFO LK LS SU FFO LK NA EX BO WE EL IZ CA ESS RY AB E H ER EN GR ALL HE ALL EN OO H Y RS FO PIKE DIVISION PIKE PIKE MADISON ON HENRY RUGERS GE AL RID ICS NB AN A A CH NH ME MA MARKE CH OA PR AP MONROE JEFFERS AY E BROADW CHERRY RUGERS ERINE CAH SLIP PIKE SLIP P PIKE SLI ERINE IP MARKE SL CAH H SOU FDR BR AN A NH MA SLIP SLIP ERINE CAH RS WAE DR Project Site ransportation and Utility Study Area Boundary (400-Foot Perimeter) Public Facilities and Institutions Residential Open Space and Outdoor Recreation Residential with Commercial Below Parking Facilities Hotels Vacant Land Commercial and Office Buildings Vacant Building Industrial and Manufacturing Under Construction EA RIVER N 0 200 500 FEE SCALE Land Use Reconstruction of the Allen and Pike Street Median Malls Figure 2A-1

he Reconstruction of the Pike and Allen Street Median Malls UDY AREA he study area is a dense, mixed-use urban neighborhood of transportation, residential, commercial, institutional, and manufacturing uses (see Figure 2A-1). he approach to the Manhattan Bridge is a defining land use in the area and a bridge anchorage straddles Cherry Street, just to the west of Pike Slip. Another transportation use is the FDR Drive that runs through the southernmost portion of the study area. Residential uses include walk-up tenements, apartment buildings, and large-scale housing complexes like Rutgers Houses, a New York City Housing Authority complex of five 20-story buildings on the block bounded by Pike, Madison, Rutgers, and Cherry Streets. Schools located in the study include P.S. 2 (the Meyer London School) at Henry and Pike Streets, P.S. 42 (the Benjamin Altman School) on Hester Street between Orchard and Ludlow Streets, and M.S. 131 on Hester Street between Forsythe and Eldridge Streets, which also includes the Chinatown YMCA Hester Street Center. Commercial uses include a wide variety of stores and restaurants, many of which are located on the ground-floors of residential buildings, and a large PAHMARK supermarket on Pike Slip between Cherry and South Streets. Art galleries are found throughout the study area north of Henry Street. Notable cultural facilities include the Lower East Side enement Museum at 97 Orchard Street (located between Delancey and Broome Streets) and the Museum at Eldridge Street, which is located in the former Eldridge Street Synagogue at 12 Eldridge Street between Canal and Division Streets. Numerous synagogues, churches, and temples are located within the study area. In addition to the Allen Malls segments on the project site, the only publicly accessible open spaces in the study area include the Allen Mall segments between Delancey and Houston Streets and the Colemen Square Playground on the west side of the Manhattan Bridge between Monroe and Cherry Streets. he playground includes a baseball diamond, playground equipment, a dog run, and basketball and handball courts. he Murry Bergtraum High School Recreation and Athletic Field, which is located on South Street between the Manhattan Bridge/Pike Slip and Market Slip, is sometimes made available for non-school athletics. he study area also includes a Consolidated Edison facility on Cherry Street between Pike and Rutgers Streets, a repair facility for the New York City s water supply on Pike Street between Henry and Madison Streets, a gas station, auto repair shops and parking lots, and a salt storage shed underneath the Manhattan Bridge on South Street. ZONING PROJEC SIE he median malls on Allen Street between Delancey Street and East Broadway are developed as parkland under the jurisdiction of DPR, but they are located within the following zoning districts: C6-1G, C6-2, C6-2G, and C4-4A (see Figure 2A-2). he project site between East Broadway and Cherry Street is located in an R7-2 district and the project site between Cherry and South Streets is located in a C6-4 district. C6 districts are high-density central commercial districts. C6-1G and C6-2G are commercial loft districts outside the central business district with special regulations governing the conversion of non-residential space to residential use. C6-1G districts have a maximum commercial floor area ratio (FAR) of 6.0 and a maximum residential FAR range of 0.87 to 3.44 (R7 equivalent). C6-2G districts have a maximum commercial FAR of 6.0, a residential FAR of 6.02 (R8 equivalent), and a community facility FAR of 6.5. C6-2 is a high-density commercial district 2A-2

2.10.10 R7-2 EA RIVER N Project Site Study Area Boundary (400-Foot Perimeter) Zoning DIstrict Boundary C1-5 Overlay C2-5 Overlay 0 400 1000 FEE SCALE Special Purpose District Reconstruction of the Allen and Pike Street Median Malls Zoning Figure 2A-2

Chapter 2, Section A: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy that permits commercial use up to 6.0 FAR, residential use up to 6.02 FAR, and community facility use up to 6.5 FAR. C6-4 districts are medium-bulk office districts and have a maximum commercial and community facility FAR of 10 and high-density residential development is permitted up to 10 FAR (R10 equivalent). C4-4A is a contextual commercial district that allows department stores, theaters, and other commercial uses that serve a larger area and encourages shorter, higher coverage buildings. hey have a maximum commercial FAR of 3.4 and a maximum residential FAR of 10.0 (R7A equivalent) with a bonus for the provision of lower-income housing. R7 districts are medium-density residential districts. he maximum allowable FAR in R7-2 districts ranges from 0.87 to 3.44. Parking is required for 50 percent of the dwelling units. he parking requirement is waived if 15 or fewer spaces would be required or if the zoning lot is 10,000 square feet or less, and it is decreased to 30 percent on zoning lots between 10,001 and 15,000 square feet. UDY AREA he study area includes an M1-4 manufacturing district, an R7-2 residential district, and the following commercial districts: C2-8, C4-4A, C6-1G, C6-2, C6-2A, C6-2G, C6-4, and C8-4. M1 manufacturing districts are often buffers between M2 or M3 districts and adjacent residential or commercial districts, and they contain light industrial uses and permit retail and office uses. he maximum FAR in M1-4 districts is 2.0 and parking is not required. Residential uses are not permitted. C2-8 districts are local shopping and services districts that are intended to serve a wider neighborhood. In a C2-8 district, the maximum commercial FAR is 2.0 and the maximum residential FAR is 10.0 (R10 equivalent). here are no parking requirements. C6-2A is a contextual commercial district that is the equivalent of an R8 contextual district. It permits commercial use up to 6.0 FAR and residential use up to 6.02 FAR. C8 districts form a bridge between commercial and manufacturing districts and contain automotive service facilities and warehouses. Residential uses are not permitted. In a C8-4 district, the maximum commercial FAR is 5.0. C8-4 districts are usually exempt from parking requirements. R7-2, C4-4A, C6-1G, C6-2, C6-2G, and C6-4 districts are described above in the discussion of the project site. PUBLIC POLICY Public policy at multiple levels of government supports the expedited redevelopment of Lower Manhattan. Public policies that affect the project site and study area by encouraging development and revitalization are outlined below. LOWER MANHAAN DEVELOPMEN CORPORAION he Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC) was created in November 2001 as a subsidiary of the Empire State Development Corporation to help plan and coordinate the rebuilding of Lower Manhattan south of Houston Street. LMDC is charged with assisting New York City in recovering from the terrorist attacks on the World rade Center, and ensuring that Lower Manhattan emerges as a strong and vibrant 24-hour community. he centerpiece of 2A-3

he Reconstruction of the Pike and Allen Street Median Malls LMDC s efforts is the creation of a permanent Memorial for the World rade Center site. In addition, LMDC has funded numerous projects to enhance access to the waterfront, including the development of the East River Esplanade, pathways to the water at Catherine, Montgomery, Peck and Rutgers Slips; as well as the Pike and Allen Malls. NEW YORK CIY S VISION FOR LOWER MANHAAN On December 12, 2002, Mayor Michael Bloomberg released New York City s Vision for Lower Manhattan with the stated purpose of connecting Lower Manhattan to the world around it, building new neighborhoods, and creating public places that make Lower Manhattan one of the most appealing places in the world. he Vision discusses various recommendations to help revitalize and improve Lower Manhattan as a global center of business by creating new regional transportation links. Other goals include improvements to streetscapes, the expansion and creation of public plazas and parks, and the continued revitalization of and enhanced access to the waterfront. he Vision aims to spark private market reactions from these public investments. LOWER EA SIDE BUSINESS IMPROVEMEN DIRIC he Lower East Side Business Improvement District (BID) was established in 1992 to revitalize the Orchard Street Shopping District while preserving its unique and diverse character. he BID consists of more than 400 merchants and property owners and includes the following areas: Orchard Street from East Houston to Canal Streets; Delancey Street from Allen to Clinton Streets; and Grand Street from Forsyth to Clinton Streets. he Lower East Side BID promotes local businesses, hosts events, and provides various community beautification services, including maintenance of the Orchard Street Pedestrian Mall. NEW YORK CIY WAERFRON REVIALIZAION PROGRAM Because the Proposed Project would occur within the City s Coastal Zone, it is subject to the policies of the New York City Waterfront Revitalization Program (WRP). he WRP was originally adopted in 1982 and approved by the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) for inclusion in the New York State Coastal Management Program. he WRP establishes the City s policies for development and use of the waterfront and provides a framework for evaluating activities proposed in the Coastal Zone. he City s WRP was revised to include 10 consolidated policies and adopted by the City Council in October 1999. In May 2002, NYSDOS approved the City s new WRP, and the United States Department of Commerce concurred in August 2002. PLANYC In April 2007, the Mayor s Office of Long erm Planning and Sustainability released PlaNYC: A Greener, Greater New York. It includes policies to address three key challenges that the City faces over the next twenty years: 1) population growth; 2) aging infrastructure; and 3) global climate change. Elements of the plan are organized into six categories land, water, transportation, energy, air quality, and climate change with corresponding goals and objectives for each. CHINAOWN ACCESS AND CIRCULAION UDY he LMDC Chinatown Access and Circulation Study addresses transportation and access issues in the area generally bounded by Rivington Street to the north, the East River to the east and 2A-4

Chapter 2, Section A: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy south, and Centre Street to the west. his study proposes seven recommendations: (1) improvements at Park Row; (2) physical reconfiguration of Chatham Square; (3) a new bus plaza at Forsyth Street; (4) consolidation of commuter van stops; (5) a new crosstown bus route; (6) streetscape enhancements; and (7) parking improvements. For the crosstown bus route, the desire and potential need for which was recognized from community outreach efforts, the study recommends Grand/Broome Streets and Canal Street as the two most likely routes. hese streets traverse the project site. he study also recommends the creation of an outdoor bus plaza along Forsyth Street between Canal Street and East Broadway just outside the study area to consolidate intercity coach bus operations. he new plaza would improve coach bus operations and passenger access to the coaches and reduce vehicular and sidewalk congestion elsewhere primarily at the various bus terminal points located throughout Chinatown in the community. C. HE FUURE WIHOU HE PROPOSED PROJEC LAND USE here are five developments currently under construction in the study area that are expected to be complete by 2011 in the future without the Proposed Project. hese projects are: A 6,500-square-foot vertical addition to the existing building at 60 Orchard Street between Grand and Hester Streets. his residential building will contain seven dwelling units; A new 16-story building at 86 Canal Street, west of Eldridge Street. his 73,514-square-foot building will contain 23 dwelling units, ground-floor commercial space, and community facility space; A new 7-story 38,878-square-foot building at 1 Orchard Street (at Division Street) for commercial and community facility use; A new 13-story building at 136-138 East Broadway between Pike and Rutgers Streets. his 35,932-square-foot building will contain 22 dwelling units and ground floor commercial space; and A recently completed 16-story 123,134-square-foot building at 38 Delancey Street. Located at Forsyth Street at the northwest edge of the study area, this building contains 57 dwelling units, ground-floor commercial space, and 34 accessory parking spaces. ZONING AND PUBLIC POLICY here are no known changes to zoning or public policy currently being contemplated in the study area. D. PROBABLE IMPACS OF HE PROPOSED PROJEC LAND USE As described in Chapter 1, Project Description, the Proposed Project would reconstruct the median malls on Allen Street between Delancey Street and East Broadway and on Pike Street between East Broadway and South Streets. his reconstruction would create a linear park linking the adjacent neighborhoods and the East River and providing expanded public green space, recreational space, and amenities, and protected bike lanes. he Proposed Project would be consistent with surrounding residential, retail, and institutional uses and would enhance the Allen and Pike Street corridor for the enjoyment of the area s many residents, workers, and 2A-5

he Reconstruction of the Pike and Allen Street Median Malls visitors. In addition, it would be consistent with the current trend of residential, commercial, and community facility development in the study area. ZONING AND PUBLIC POLICY he Proposed Project would not entail any changes to zoning or public policy on the project site or in the study area and would be consistent with the area s residential and commercial zoning districts. By providing expanded public open space with new plantings and street trees to an area currently underserved by open space and by creating enhanced linkage to the East River waterfront, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the multiple initiatives described above to improve the quality of life in Lower Manhattan and would promote waterfront access for pedestrians and cyclists. herefore, the Proposed Project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to zoning or public policy. 2A-6