Challenge to Implement International Cadastral Models Case Finland

Similar documents
The Challenge to Implement International Cadastral Models Case Finland 1

Cadastral Parcels in INSPIRE. Lisbon, 27 February 2013

INSPIRE Thematic Working. Cadastral parcels. September 2008

A Review and Perspective on Parcel Data Models for Urban Planning

Preprint.

Spatial Representation of Condominium/Co-ownership - Comparison of Quebec and French Cadastral System based on LADM Specifications

Towards LADM country cadastral profile case Poland

From 2D representation of the buildings into cadastral maps towards 3D GIS applications and BIM a case study for Prishtina

PROCESSES IN CADASTRE: PROCESS MODEL FOR SERBIAN 3D CADASTRE

UTILITY CADASTER, ESTONIA

Towards LADM Country Cadastral Profile Case Poland

The Digital Cadastral Database and the Role of the Private Licensed Surveyors in Denmark

The European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 1992

LADM-based Crowdsourced 3D Cadastral Surveying Potential and Perspectives

Ownership Data in Cadastral Information System of Sofia (CIS Sofia) from the Available Cadastral Map

Advances in Modern Land Administration Cadastre 2014 in the Year 2006

Quality Improvement of the Real Estate Cadastre in Serbia

Challenges for the multi purpose cadastre

Standardization in the Cadastral Domain. Sub Working Group 1: Legal Aspects

Object Oriented Unified Real Estate Registry for a Good Spatial Data Management

Cadastral Parcels in the context of INSPIRE

Utilizing 3D Building and 3D Cadastre Geometries for Better Valuation of Existing Real Estate

Land Markets and Land Rights in support of the Millennium Development Goals

Cadastre and Other Public Registers: Multipurpose Cadastre or Distributed Land Information System?

Securing Land Rights for Broadband Land Acquisition for Utilities in Sweden

Hungarian Cadastre and its relation to LADM

Design and Determine 3D Cadastral Systems: A Case Study of Turkey Hicret GURSOY SURMENELI* and Mehmet ALKAN* (Turkey)

Country report, HUNGARY

Cadastral Framework Standards

Land Administration and Spatial Enablement Victoria s Experience. Chris McRae, Executive Director Land Victoria

Cadastre and Land Registration in Europe

A Complete, Free Solution for Cadastral Map Management

Asset valuation. Advancing Methodology on Measuring Asset Ownership from a Gender Perspective

The ISO/TC 211 Land Administration Domain Model (LADM)

COORDINATED CADASTRES - A KEY TO BUILDING FUTURE GIS

Building Integrated Land Information Systems and Development of NSDI

Test and Implementation of DATR System in Hungary

Spatial Data Infrastructure in Sweden

LRIMS Cadastre Module

Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (Pan- European and Local) in the Netherlands

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB3229 Project Name. Land Registry and Cadastre Modernization Project Region

REGISTRATION OF PROPERTIES IN STRATA

Report and update from Working Group A on Core Data

Rights Responsibilities Restrictions (RRRs)

Using rules for assessing and improving data quality: A case study for the Norwegian State of Estate report

Egyptian Nationwide Title Cadastre System

LIS a motivation for SDI initiative

The Register of the Domain of the State, Cadastre 2014 and LADM

Legal Aspects of 3D Property Rights, Restrictions and Responsibilities in Greece and Cyprus

Developing Infrastructure Framework To Facilitate The Malaysia Multipurpose 3D Cadastre

Development of 3D Cadastre in Hungary

THE USE OF THE SPANISH CADASTRE FOR THE CONTROL AND MONITORING OF EU-CAP SUBSIDIES

How to implement a mandatory inspection in accordance with European directives: The example of certified workshops

Cadastral Template 2003

Demonstrate knowledge of, and extract, cadastral data from Landonline

Annex D (informative) Correspondence between INSPIRE and national levels for CadastralZonings 2

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

Country Profile for the Cadastre of the Czech Republic Based on LADM

The New Technology of a Survey Data Model and Cadastral Fabric as the Foundation for a Future Land Administration System.

Progress Report on Green Paper. Dr. Paddy Prendergast. on behalf of the. IIS Commission on Land Registration

EXPLORING OPTIONS FOR STANDARDISATION OF PROCESSES AND TRANSACTIONS IN LAND ADMINISTRATION

EduMapping + JobMapping

Universal Geo-database Connector Interface Component (UG-CIC) For Virtual Web-base GIS Server Essential For Real Estate Industry Uses

Towards Kenya s Profile of the Land Administration Domain Model

LADM in the Republic of Croatia making and testing country profile

Recent Developments in Use and Dissemination of Geospatial Data in Germany - Example Lower Saxony

Reporting Thailand Cadastral System in Cadastre 2014 Trends BY VUTTINAN UTESNAN. Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep

Support to Implementation of Multipurpose Cadastral Information system in Vietnam

The Multi Purpose Cadastre, a network approach

Property Transactions in the Digital Age. The Property Cadastre in the Context of Spatial. Dr. Jens Riecken, NRW Ministry of the Interior

The Development Strategy for Cadastre and Land Register in Finland

Advanced Principles of 3D Cadastral Data Modelling. 2 nd International Workshop on 3D Cadastres 16 th 18 th November 2011

A beautiful setting. The Evolving Role of Cadastral Systems in Support of Good Land Governance. Setting the scene

INSPIRE implementation as a link between egovernment and environmental purposes

CADASTRE 2014: New Challenges and Direction

KEY REGISTERS AS BASE OF THE DUTCH SDI

ParcelMap BC Compiling a Parcel Fabric for the Province of British Columbia. Presented by: Ellen Styner (General Manager) and Wendy Amy (GIS Manager)

Topographic Signs Important Context of 3D Cadastre

ParcelMap BC. Compiling a Parcel Fabric for the Province of British Columbia. WENDY AMY and ELLEN STYNER

Unified Land Administration for a Better Spatial Infrastructure

DATR towards e-land Administration in Hungary

A CADASTRAL GEODATA BASE FOR LAND ADMINISTRATION USING ARCGIS CADASTRAL FABRIC MODEL A CASE STUDY OF UWANI ENUGU, ENUGU STATE, NIGERIA

Digitalisation of the Real Property Rights Towards Spatially enabled E-Government

Cadastral Data Content Standard - Rights and Interests

Profile Definition for a. Standardized Cadastral Model

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE REAL PROPERTY REGISTER AND CADASTRE IN LITHUANIA

Public private collaboration model in the cadastral workflow in Denmark

TOWARDS E-LAND ADMINISTRATION - ELECTRONIC PLANS OF SUBDIVISIONS IN VICTORIA

Building a European Spatial Data Infrastructure: The Role of EuroGeographics

for taxation 2019 Finnish revaluation of land Presented at the FIG Working Week 2017, May 29 - June 2, 2017 in Helsinki, Finland

Initial inventory of 3D Cadastre use cases in the Caribbean

White Paper of Manuel Jahn, Head of Real Estate Consulting GfK GeoMarketing. Hamburg, March page 1 of 6

Land Administration in support of the Global Agenda: Current FIG Policies

Greetings from Denmark. Property Rights, Restrictions and Responsibilities - A Global Land Management Perspective. Wonderful Copenhagen

Cadastre as a crucial component of SDI ensuring sustainable development

Linking Land Registers and Other Official Registers in the Republic of Croatia based on LADM

LADM Implementation Prototype for 3D Cadastre Information System of Multi-Level Apartment in Indonesia

Towards 3D Land Registry in Hungary

PROPERTY TAX IS A PRINCIPAL REVENUE SOURCE

THE HOME INFORMATION PACK

Transcription:

FIG Articleof the Month April 20 Challenge to Implement International Cadastral Models Case Finland Tarja Myllymäki and Tarja Pykälä 200-04-5 The topics are In European level INSPIRE Experiences, similarities, differences In international level ISO/LADM Forecast: How to implement? How to model right-of-use unit? Case FINLAND 200-04-5 2 April 20

INSPIRE shortly Directive of European Union, 2007 (Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community) INSPIRE theme Cadastral Parcels has introduced a model for cadastral spatial data Purpose is to use it as reference data Ownership and rights related to parcels are outside the scope of INSPIRE 200-04-5 3 ISO/LADM shortly ISO work (952) where the objective is to provide an international standard for the information used in the land administration domain Tries to provide a terminology for land administration, to provide a basis for the development of systems and to enable communication by using a jointly shared vocabulary Conceptual schema which consists of object which model parties, basic administrative units and spatial units and rights, responsibilities and restrictions Party data, address data, valuation data, land use data, archive data and taxation data are outside the scope 200-04-5 4 April 20 2

Backgrounds of Finnish cadastre shortly In Finland all cadastral information -both map and attribute data -are registered in one integral object-oriented database (started 998, renewed 2005) managed by the National Land Survey The main objects in the cadastre include basic property units and right-ofuse units with the geometry related to them. Basic property unit is the basic unit of registration and it can consist of none, one or many parcels Since the beginning of 200 the National Land Survey has been responsible for registering titles and mortgages 200-04-5 5 The first topic In European level INSPIRE Experiences Forecast: How to implement? Case FINLAND 200-04-5 6 April 20 3

Implementing the INSPIRE Cadastral Parcels model in Finland Implementation work should start this year This forecast is based on experiences of work in thematic working group and in commenting work 200-04-5 7 Viewpoint of data provider shown with models Concept of basic property unit, parcel and boundary in the Finnish cadastre (information service model) Basic property unit + identifier + name + type + land area, water area (registered, ceased) transactions, to archives, etc. Parcel (start, end) + geometry: area + geometry: reference point..2..n Boundary (start, end) + geometry: line + type The INSPIRE Cadastral Parcels model Temporal information for all object types includes: + begin lifespan + end lifespan + valid from + valid to Cadastral boundary + INSPIRE identifier + temporal information + geometry + metadata attribute: estimated accuracy Basic property unit + INSPIRE identifier + temporal information + national cadastral reference + area value 0.. Cadastral parcel + INSPIRE identifier..2 + temporal information 0.. + geometry + national cadastral reference + area value + portrayal attributes: reference point and label Administrative Unit (another theme) 0.. 0.. Cadastral zoning + INSPIRE identifier + temporal information + geometry + national cadastral zoning reference + name, if any + level and its name in national hierarchy + portrayal attributes: reference point and label + metadata attributes: original scale denominator and estimated accuracy Unique identifier, legal area and registration date are the reasons to have object basic property unit in INSPIRE model 200-04-5 8 April 20 4

...and with words Cadastral Parcel The core object in INSPIRE Cadastral Parcels model Mandatory or available attributes in Finland. INSPIRE identifier 2. National cadastral reference 3. Geometry (parcel outlines as polygon) 4. Label 5. Reference point 6. Begin lifespan (insert or change date) 7. Association to basic property unit Basic Property Unit To be used by countries where unique cadastral identifiers are given only for basic property units and not for parcels Mandatory or available attributes in Finland. INSPIRE identifier 2. National cadastral reference 3. Area value (total area) 4. Valid from (date of registration) 5. Association to administrative unit Cadastral Boundary For metadata (e.g. estimated accuracy) Estimated accuracy is recorded only for cadastral points in Finland Cadastral Zoning For portrayal, for searches, for metadata (e.g. estimated accuracy) No zoning within scope of INSPIRE is used in Finland 200-04-5 9 All in one sentence Transferring data of valid parcels and the basic property units related to them 200-04-5 0 April 20 5

Viewpoint of data user as map + related attributes Information of the parcel: National cadastral reference: 27243206004 Begin lifespan: 2005-0-30 Association to basic property unit: A Information of the parcel: National cadastral reference: 27243206004 Begin lifespan: 2005-0-30 Association to basic property unit: A Information of the basic property unit A: National cadastral reference: 27243206004 Area: 3850 (square meters) Valid from: 2003-05-07 Association to administrative unit: 272 (municipality) 200-04-5 Experiences - INSPIRE In reality transfer file format, so called product (with rules how to make information service) The INSPIRE Cadastral Parcels model itself seems to be quite simple Transformation rules from national database structure to INSPIRE model structure including all exceptional cases can be complicated A lot of work was required to compile the terminology. It tries to be suitable for all countries If INSPIRE product does not fulfil national use cases, it means extra work and could therefore cause more costs than benefits in the short run 200-04-5 2 April 20 6

The second topic Experiences In international level ISO/LADM How to model right-of-use unit? Case FINLAND 200-04-5 3 Concept of right-of-use unit in Finland Obligatory way to register rights and restrictions Object which is mentioned in cadastral acts Experiences since 998, both users and developers have considered this concept very successful Units with unique identifiers in the whole country Different types are defined in Acts. Types are as code lists, homogenous types in the whole country Private roads, wells, landing places for boats, building easements, fishing restrictions, protected areas, mining rights etc. Own lifecycle and own attributes Associations to geometry and to right holders and restriction objects are done via subunits Right-of-use unit + identifier + type + name transactions and to archives..n Right-of-use sub-unit 0.. Location..n Right holder Restriction object 200-04-5 4 April 20 7

Two right-of-use units: A well for taking water for household consumption and a water pipe Right holder for the well and for the water pipe Restriction object for the well Restriction objects for the water pipe 200-04-5 5 Right-of-use sub-unit Sub-units have associations to geometry and to right holders and restriction objects Right-of-use unit has at least one sub-unit with or without geometry Sub-units enable flexible structure o Land surveyor decides in the legal survey how many sub-units are needed o For every geometry type o One geometry can be divided into several geometries to associate certain bunch of right holders o Different attributes (validity period, width of road etc.) Own lifecycle and own attributes Right-of-use unit..n Right-of-use sub-unit + sub-identifier + validity period etc. transactions and to archives 0.. Location + area, line or point..n 200-04-5 Right holder Restriction object 6 April 20 8

Private road registered as one right-of-use unit with three sub-units Sub-unit 3 Sub-unit 2 Sub-unit Right holder: Road maintenance association 200-04-5 7 Right holder Legal dependency to right holder is done by an association Usually cadastral units Sometimes parties (e.g. municipality or energy company) Own lifecycle and own attributes Possible to maintain the information for each right holder without any changes to the sub-unit and possible to keep history of changes Right-of-use unit Right holder + validity period etc. transactions and to archives 0.. Party..n Right-of-use sub-unit..n Restriction object 0.. Basic property unit 0.. Location 200-04-5 8 April 20 9

Restriction object Legal dependency to restriction object is done by an association Restricted object is always cadastral unit Own lifecycle and own attributes Possible to maintain the information for each association without any changes to the sub-unit Geometry overlay is used during the registration to help recognizing the Right-of-use unit Right holder 0.. Party..n Right-of-use sub-unit..n Restriction object transactions and to archives 0.. Basic property unit 0.. Location restriction objects On-the-fly geometry overlay can t be used o Does not always provide legally correct information, e.g. locations are not always registered with the same accuracy o Provides only temporary information, not lifecycle of the association o Not for legal rights with liability of damages by incorrect information 200-04-5 9 Not same accuracy Protected area as right-of-use unit Information of the right-of-use unit, as shown for consumers Identifier: 000-2005-K3874 Type: Nature reserve Authority: North Karelian local environmental centre Decision date: 2004--02 Archive reference: PKA-2004-L-382 (25) Sub-unit Date of registration: 2005-03-7 Restriction object: 46-406--44 Koivula Sub-unit 2 Date of registration: 2005-03-7 Restriction object: 46-406--44 Koivula 200-04-5 20 April 20 0

Model of right-of-use unit + LADM = Pre-analysis Right-of-use unit + identifier + type + name transactions and to archives..n Right-of-use sub-unit + sub-identifier + validity period etc. transactions and to archives 0.. Location + area, line or point Right holder + validity period etc. transactions and to archives 0.. Party..n 0.. Basic property unit Restriction object transactions and to archives 200-04-5 2 Model of right-of-use unit + LADM = Pre-analysis LADM model, version 2009-2-07, the basis for the pre-analysis of the right-of-use unit basic administrative unit as a party..n 0.. Party..n Mortgage 0.. 0....n Spatial unit group Required relationship, basic administrative unit Rights, responsibilities..n and restrictions (RRR) 0.. Basic Right administrative unit Restriction Responsibility..n Administrative source 0.. Required relationship, Spatial unit spatial unit..n..n 200-04-5 22 April 20

Model of right-of-use unit + LADM = Pre-analysis Result looked like this, the classes needed for right-of-use unit have been classified as LADM classes in this picture. Party Rights, responsibilities Basic administrative unit Required relationship, and restrictions basic administrative unit Basic property unit as a party as a party Relationship for a right Basic property unit (role right holder) Basic property unit (role restriction Relationship for a restriction object) Administrative source Right-of-use unit Spatial unit Transaction Right-of-use sub-unit Location But as one class is now missing from the newest LADM model, this preanalysis is not relevant anymore. To summarize: LADM supports the idea of administrative units with unique identifiers. It does not directly support legally registered relationships between different type of administrative units but favours geometry overlay. 200-04-5 23 Experiences - LADM The model has been changed quite a lot between meetings A lot of comments indicate difficulty of modelling? The model would benefit from some reviews to reach a more stable result Land administration as a domain is related to legal aspects which limits the freedom of modelling LADM is a conceptual model and therefore it can be seen in a positive way and accepted more easily than the INSPIRE model The present stage of LADM work shows that a common model is possible. Then again several country profiles can prove the opposite. 200-04-5 24 April 20 2

The third topic In European level INSPIRE Experiences, similarities, differences In international level ISO/LADM 200-04-5 25 Experiences, similarities, differences The scope of INSPIRE is narrow (spatial cadastral data) INSPIRE is a model for data product specification and tries to fulfil INSPIRE use case INSPIRE model is a basis of the automatic production of transfer file format -> model must be exact The scope of LADM is wider (land administration domain) LADM is a conceptual model and tries to be a basis for common understanding LADM can be general with few objects for many purposes 200-04-5 26 April 20 3

Dream work Experiences To participate in international work so fully as to create concrete models has been unique and interesting experience. It has also brought along new views to existing system that has been very useful. To have an axe to grind To be objective in the work is challenging because it is not so easy to break away from the national point of view. It is only natural since the national system is the best known for everyone. Money, money, money Practically it might be challenging to find motivation and especially resources to adjust national systems to international models or even just to make the harmonised transfer files. Future? 200-04-5 27 For more details see the paper! Thank you! 200-04-5 28 April 20 4