WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, :00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA

Similar documents
WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING Thursday, November 3, :00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA

To: Stillwater Town Board Reference: Horst Variance Request Stillwater Township, Minnesota Copies To: Town Board Kathy Schmoekel, Town Clerk

Paper copies & an electronic copy (pdf) of the following drawings or plans: 1 full size scalable certified survey and 1 (11 x 17) copy

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

BOA David Hollerich Centerline Setback Variance 09/05/2012

PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING VARIANCE APPLICATIONS

KANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FARMSTEAD EXEMPTION IN THE A1 DISTRICT

ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

Please complete each entry and check off each item. An incomplete application will be returned.

To navigate through agenda, click on the bookmark icon on the left hand side to open bookmarks/links. WASECA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING

Please complete each entry and check off each item. An incomplete application will be returned.

WASECA PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, :00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 508 SOUTH STATE STREET

STAFF REPORT. Arthur and Kathleen Quiggle 4(b)

1105 SUBDIVISIONS, PARTITIONS, REPLATS, CONDOMINIUM PLATS, AND VACATIONS OF RECORDED PLATS

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES JUNE 14, Chairman Garrity thanked ZBA Member Michael Waterman for his many years of service on the ZBA.

MINUTES PARK TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Park Township Hall nd Street Holland, MI Regular Meeting April 27, :30 P.M.

Meeting Minutes New Prague Planning Commission Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Taylor Lot Coverage Variance Petition No. PLNBOA North I Street Public Hearing: November 7, 2012

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

City of Independence

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REGULAR AGENDA

1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: a. November 15, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting

Philomath Low-Density Residential Zone (PR-1)

SECTION 6. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

TOWN OF LINWOOD ANOKA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 169

Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TAKE A ROLL CALL TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A QUORUM OF MEMBERS PRESENT

(If you do not have a 911 address, please complete an E-911 New Property Address Assignment Application )

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION May 26, 2015

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Tim Larson, Ray Liuzzo, Craig Warner, Dave Savage, Cynthia Young, Leo Martin Leah Everhart, Zoning Attorney Sophia Marruso, Sr.

EDGERTON CITY HALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REGULAR SESSION March 12, 2019

Legal Description Part of the Western Half of the Eastern Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Le Ray Township

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

206 8 th Ave SE Suite #290 Baudette, MN Phone: Fax: Instructions to Applicant

MEMORANDUM. DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas. FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer

A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan.

BOA Howard Tauer Centerline Setback Variance 07/11/12

ARTICLE 759. PD 759. PD 759 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 27, (Ord. Nos.

ANDERSON HALL PUD TEXT AMENDMENT PRESENTED BY STEVEN D. HARDIN, ESQ.

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

CHECKLIST INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR ZONING PERMITS

** If your lot does not meet the requirements above, please read Sec below

Board of Adjustment Variance Process Guide

TOWN OF EASTCHESTER BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION PACKAGE SUBDIVISIONS

MASTER SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS

(if more than one, give square footage for each) ANNEXATION LOT LINE Adjustments PRE/FINAL PLAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT

MINOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina

Manor Township Zoning Permit Application (Section 702) Application Number Application Date / /

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Public Hearing Item

VICINITY MAP. Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR & VAR January 9, 2014 Page 2 of 11 ATTACHMENTS

ZONING COMPATIBILITY & WORKSHEET

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

TOWNSHIP OF SOLON COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN. Members: Robert Ellick, Fred Gunnell, Mark Hoskins, Mary Lou Poulsen

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

ZONING VARIANCES - ADMINISTRATIVE

A favorable recommendation to the City Council is requested.

10 acres Width: 300 feet. Width: 100 feet interior lots; 120 feet corner lots

ARTICLE 435. PD 435.

NOTICE OF MEETING. The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Wednesday, November 14, 2012 at 7:00 p.m.

CITY OF WISCONSIN DELLS MEETING AGENDA

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

SECTION 8 - GENERAL RURAL DISTRICT

LEGAL NOTICE. If you have any questions, you may also contact Marysville Zoning Administrator at (937) or

VARIANCE PROCEDURE The City Council will consider the request and either grant or deny the variance.

Planning and Zoning Commission

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES MAY 28, 2013

Approved: May 9, 2018 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

STAFF REPORT. R-PUD (Residential Planned Unit Development) District

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

Article XII. R-1 Agricultural-Low Density Residential District

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

PART 3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. Designation of Residential Zoning Districts and Purpose Statements.

Anyone speaking to the Planning Commission shall state their name and address for the record. Thank you.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA PACKET

NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Monday July 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. AGENDA

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay

c a s a v a n t p r o p e r t y

CHAPTER 6 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-1)

DESIGN AND PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DAPR) Wednesday, September 20, :30 P.M. Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue, Room 2404

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

AGENDA STATEMENT NO BUSINESS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION City of Victoria, Minnesota STAFF REPORT. Casco Ventures (Developer)

Board of Adjustment Staff Report Meeting Date: June 1, 2017

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

FINAL SITE PLAN PLAT APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina

PLAIN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PLAIN TOWNSHIP HALL 2600 EASTON STREET NE, CANTON, OHIO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2004

PUBLIC NOTICE 11/13/ /3/ /3/ /1/2014. Date of Notification: Application Received: Application Complete:

MINNEHAHA COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JULY 23, 2018 MEETING MINUTES. MINUTES OF THE MINNEHAHA COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 23, 2018

ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100, Rochester, MN

DAUPHIN CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION

GENOA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING MINUTES

ARTICLE 504. PD 504.

LINN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Jean Oxley Public Service Center nd Street SW, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. MINUTES Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Transcription:

To navigate thru agenda, click on the bookmark icon on the left hand side to open bookmarks/links WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, 2015 7:00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ESTABLISH A QUORUM 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 4, 2015 (in process) 4. VARIANCE REQUESTS PUBLIC HEARINGS Dale R. and Dixie L. Johannsen request variance of 10 from sideyard setback requirement of 20 to construct a proposed 30 x40 detached garage in the west frontyard. Located in the Village Mixed Use District of Section 1, Wilton Township in the former Village of Wilton, T106N R023W 5. MISCELLANEOUS 6. ADJOURNMENT AGENDAS AND ATTACHMENTS CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE AT http://www.co.waseca.mn.us/agendacenter 1

WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING ON VARIANCE REQUEST July 9, 2015 7:00 P.M. Property Address: 11323 Wilton Bridge RD Waseca, MN. 56093 Applicants: Dale R. and Dixie J. Johannsen Figure 1. Aerial view of Johannsen residence REPORTED BY: Hannah Neigebauer Planning and Zoning Intern Figure 2. Proposed location where garage is to be built ATTACHMENT A Staff prepared criteria response ATTACHMENT B -- Full legal description ATTACHMENT C Application Information Page 1 of 15

Applicant: Dale R. and Dixie L. Johannsen Property Address: 11323 Wilton Bridge RD, Waseca, MN. 56093 Township Name: Wilton Township Parcel Identification #: 11.001.0200 Date of application: June 11, 2015 60 days: August 10, 2015 120 days: October 9, 2015 Figure 3. Johannsen residence VARIANCE REQUEST: The Johannsens are requesting a variance to construct a 30 x 40 detached steel garage 10 feet from the western boundary of the property line in Wilton Township T106N R023W, Sec 1, in NW 1/4 of SW 1/4. The standard side yard setback for an accessory structure is 20 feet in a Village Mixed Use District. Page 2 of 15

COMPREHENSIVEE PLAN: Village Mixed Use Figure 4. Comprehensive Map SITE ZONING DISTRICT: The Zoning Map contained within the Uniformed Development Code for Waseca County places the property withinn the Village Mixed Use Zone. Stream Overlay Village Mixed Use Trinity Lutheran Church Figure 5. Waseca County Zoning Map of Wilton Township = Site = Feedlot Page 3 of 15

Article 6 Zoning District Regulations Section 21 VMX Village Mixed Use District Standards 4. Dimensional Standards. Development within the Village Mixed Use District shall be subject to the following minimum dimensional standards: a) Lot area: (i) Single family dwelling- 30,000 square feet or additional area as necessary to provide adequate on-site wastewater treatment, as regulated by the Waseca County SSTS standards (ii) Other principal permitted and conditional uses- 1 acre minimum or as specified by conditional use permit (iii) No minimum lot area required for utilities, public uses, and communication towers except as otherwise required b) Minimum lot width 75 feet c) Minimum setbacks from property or road right-of-way lines, principal structures: (i) Front yard-35 feet (ii) Side yard-20 feet (iii) Rear yard-30 feet d) Minimum setbacks from property or road right-of-way lines, accessory structures: (i) Front yard- Same as principal structures (ii) Side yard- 20 feet (10 feet if structure is 100 square feet or less in area and no greater than 14 feet in sidewall height) (iii) Rear yard- 20 feet (10 feet if structure is 100 square feet or less in area and no greater than 14 feet in sidewall height) e) Minimum setbacks, windbreaks and trees (i) Road right-of-way of less than 100 feet- 20 feet from right-of-way (ii) Road right- of- way of 100 feet or greater- 15 feet from right-of-way (iii) From side or rear parcel boundary -10 feet for windbreaks consisting of shrubs and 20 feet for trees, as defined (iv) Side or rear windbreak and tree setbacks may be reduced or eliminated by agreement of adjoining property owners when the agreement is filed with the Zoning Administrator and recorded by the County Recorder of Deeds f) Maximum impervious coverage- 50% of lot area g) Maximum height for all structures except agricultural structures, utilities and communication or wind towers - 35 feet ADJACENT USES: The site is in the historic plat of Wilton. The LeSueur River watershed is 720 feet from the northeast corner of parcel 11.001.0200. Trinity Lutheran Church is 0.5 miles south of the site on W Wilton River Road (County Road 23). The closest feedlot is to the northwest of the property around 0.3 miles away. There are two feedlots to the southeast and southwest roughly 1/2 mile away. Page 4 of 15

Figure 6. Ten neighboring residences within 500 feet of the Johannsen property and five Wilton Township officers received notices about the variance. CURENT LAND USES: The current site is on Wilton Bridge Road in Wilton Township. It is zoned Village Mixed Use with a residence on the property and neighbors directly north and east. There is a neighboring residence across the road to the south west. Directly to the west and south is zoned A-1 Agricultural. Past Road Uses: In January of 1969, the village of Wilton vacated several roads for public easements. The roadways, streets, alleys, and Public Square were terminated and the Petitioners according to their respective interests were to take care of them. The only road still remaining from that time period is 318 th Avenue that connects to Wilton Bridge Road from both ends. This can be found on Deed Records Book 57, pages 445-446. Page 5 of 15

Vacated Road 318 th Ave Vacated Road Figure 7. Image of vacated roads in the old Village of Wilton PROPOSAL: Dale and Dixie Johannsen would like to build a new detached steel garage in the west corner of their front yard to storee various items and utilize as a personal shop. They are proposing to have a 10 foot setback instead of the required 20 feet in order to place the garage in the desired location. The only alternate location would be to the east of the house. However, three large trees would need to be cut down and the ground isn t level as it slopes down several feet.. This would create additional impervious surface coverage. They wouldd also need to extend the driveway to the opening of the garage. SURVEY REQUIREMENT: The applicant s parcel is part of a platted subdivision of Wilton. Many of the roadways in Wilton have been vacated. Because of the drive location, the applicant wants to locate the new accessory structure in the front yard of the property. The property corners (pins) along the west side of the site need to be located to determine the location of the west line and where the right-of-way is located. If the corners cannot be found, a survey will be required. Page 6 of 15

Figure 8. Photograph of the alternate location with the three large trees Figure 9. Staff prepared site plan for detached garage IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE Wasecaa County Code allows 50% impervious surface coverage. Page 7 of 15

ISSUES WITH THIS REQUEST: Applicant requested use of the site plans prepared by staff for the variance request No survey was submitted because the applicant indicated that they could find the property corners. STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS This request involves a variance to allow a setback of 10 feet instead of 20 feet for the construction of a new detached steel garage. Staff is of the opinion that the Board of Adjustment could approve this variance if they feel the proposed project meets the criteria for approval for this variance. Staff recommends approval of the request based upon the site plans provided by staff and subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey. If the property owner can locate the surveyed property corners (monuments or pins), no survey will be required. If the surveyed property corners cannot be located, a licensed Minnesota Land Surveyor will need to locate the lot corners and replace the pins. The applicant must provide this information to the Waseca County Planning & Zoning Department prior to installation of the new accessory structure. The new structure location must be accurately measured from the pins or survey line as stated before a Zoning Permit can be issued. 2. If any of the surveyed property corners (monuments or pins) are removed during construction, they must be replaced following the completion of the work. Page 8 of 15

ATTACHMENT A STAFF PREPARED CRITERIA RESPONSE FINDINGS OF FACT SUPPORTING/DENYING AN AREA VARIANCE The Board of Adjustment should also weigh each of the criteria when deciding whether the Variance Application should be granted: a) Is the request a substantial variation from the intent of the zoning ordinance? Yes No_x_ Why: The variance would reduce the side yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, reducing it in half. There is limited space to find a different location for the detached garage on this parcel of land. b) Will the request have an adverse effect on the density of the area and will it have an impact on governmental services? Yes No x Why: Since there is no new residence being built there won t be an increased need for public services such as transportation or health services. The garage will just be used for the owner s personal use. c) Will the requested variance effect a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or will it result in a substantial detriment to neighboring properties? Yes No x Why: The variance will give the property a more balanced appearance and the colors will match the house. Many other neighbors have detached garages so the appearance of the neighborhood shouldn t change. d) Is there another feasible method to alleviate the need of a variance? (economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties) Yes No x Why: An alternate site would require removing three large trees and installing another driveway. The ground to the east of the house isn t level. The proposed location is the only reasonable position for the new garage without causing more impervious surfaces and taking away natural resources. e) How did the need for a variance arise; did the landowner create the need for the variance? Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property itself and not created by the landowner? Yes x No Why: The landowner wants to build a detached garage that can be utilized as a storage and personal shop building. The position of the house, driveway, and mound system location limits other options to place the garage. Page 9 of 15

f) Whether, in light of all of the above factors, will allowing the variance serve the interests of justice? Yes _x No Why: Justice will be served due to the fact that the project will be user friendly to the owner and aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. Page 10 of 15

Page 11 of 15

Page 12 of 15

Page 13 of 15

Page 14 of 15

Page 15 of 15