RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No to establish parkland fees for secondary units; and

Similar documents
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER 4.46 AND SECTION OF CHAPTER 4

RESOLUTION NO. RD:TDM:CER 6/1/2017

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DOWNTOWN HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE FOR POST STREET TOWER AT 171 POST STREET

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

ORDINANCE NO

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

ORDINANCE NO. RD:SSG:LJR 7/24/2017

RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and

INFORMATION SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DOWNTOWN HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE FOR THE GRADUATE AT 88 E. SAN CARLOS STREET

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T15-058

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1228

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

DA TE: September 8, Date

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

ORDINANCE NO

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, a map showing the location of such territory is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL ~ ORDINANCE NO. C.M.S.

PUBLIC HEARING Agenda Item No.: 9a CC Mtg.: 05/24/2011

ORDINANCE NO XX

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047

IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY MEASURE City of Emeryville

ORDINANCE NO ( 2ND READING) AMENDING TITLE 17 ( RENT STABILIZATION) OF THE WEST HOLLYWOOD. and adopt Ordinance No ,

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

Memorandum /14/17. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. DATE: February 9, 2017 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. Date.

ORDINANCE NO REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD)

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

MEMORANDUM. Mayor and City Council. Eric Berlin, City Administrator. DATE: June 2, Purchase of 1041 Burlington

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

WHEREAS, public notice was provided in accordance with Government Code Section of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; and

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

Item 10C 1 of 69

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT NO

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

.. ~ ORDINANCE NO. 3068

RD:JVP:JMD 01/10//2017 RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx

ORDINANCE NO The Bear Valley Community Services District Board of Directors ordains as follows:

Guidelines for Implementation of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance of the City of San José, Chapter 5.08 of the San José Municipal Code.

ORDINANCE NO. Part 12 Tenant Protection Ordinance. This Part shall be known as the Tenant Protection Ordinance.

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, many Vacation Rentals are currently operating throughout Mendocino County; and

GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE SUNSET DATE FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM TO DECEMBER 31, 2016; AND

TOWN OF WINDSOR TOWN COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

ALLENDALE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO RENTAL HOUSING REGISTRATION ORDINANCE RESTATEMENT

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

Short-Term Measures: At this time, the Subcommittee is presenting its recommendations on short-term measures, which are as follows:

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO ESTABLISH A HOTEL DEVELOPMENT

RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

ORDINANCE NO

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO to amend subsection A to add subsection (15) which shall read as follows: (15) Attached dwelling units such as townhouses.

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PENTICTON NON-PROFIT REGISTRATION

The City Council makes the following findings:

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Planning and Zoning Staff Report; and

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

TOWN OF CUTLER BAY 4. PUBLIC HEARING: MOTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE:

FILE OF THE CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATION ORDINANCE NO ADMINISTRATION BILL NO INTRODUCED NOVEMBER 24, 2009

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DAVIS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND AMENDING CHAPTER 6A OF THE WOODLAND MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

ORDINANCE NO. O-5-10

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

direct that agriculture is the primary land use in the County, minimize conflicts arising from

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE SETTING FORTH THE SCHEDULE OF PARKLAND FEES CHARGED PURSUANT TO CHAPTERS 14.25 AND 19.38 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND SECTION 2 OF EXHIBIT B OF RESOLUTION NO. 73587, AS AMENDED, TEMPORARILY SETTING THE PARKLAND FEES CHARGED FOR HIGHRISE MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWELVE (12) STORIES OR MORE LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE AT FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OF THE APPLICABLE PARKLAND FEES FOR MULTI-FAMILY 5+ UNITS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND DEFERRING COLLECTION OF PARKLAND FEES TO THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, SUBJECT TO DEVELOPERS MEETING CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) enacted the Parkland Dedication Ordinance, San José Municipal Code ( SJMC ) Chapter 19.38 ( PDO ) in 1988 and the Park Impact Ordinance, SJMC Chapter 14.25 ( PIO ) in 1992 to meet the demand for new neighborhood and community parkland generated by development of new residential subdivisions and new non-subdivided residential projects, both of which have been amended since that time; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2007, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 73587 which set forth the Schedule of Parkland Fees and Credits charged under the PDO and PIO to reflect the land values identified in the 2005 Residential Land Value Study, to temporarily reduce the parkland fees for developments in the Downtown Core Area, and to revise the credits for private recreation improvements; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2007, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 74152 reflect the land values identified in the 2006 Residential Land Value Study; and WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 74314 to establish parkland fees for secondary units; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 74608 reflect the land values identified in the 2007 Residential Land Value Study; and T-9459.023/1371974_4 1

WHEREAS, on April 20, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 75346 which set forth the Schedule of Parkland Fees charged under the PDO and PIO to reflect the land values identified in the 2009 Residential Land Value Study; and WHEREAS, on August 24, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 75540 to establish parkland fees for low-income units at fifty percent (50%) of the applicable parkland fees for each residential unit type; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 75799 which set forth the Schedule of Parkland Fees charged under the PDO and PIO to reflect the land values identified in the 2010 Residential Land Value Study; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 75824 to clarify the definition of Low-Income Units exempt from the payment of parkland fees for residential projects that have obtained an approved discretionary permit or tentative or parcel map on or before October 24, 2010, and subsequently obtain an amendment for essentially the same project without changing the type or increasing the number of units; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 76220 which set forth the Schedule of Parkland Fees charged under the PDO and PIO to reflect the land values identified in the 2011 Residential Land Value Study, to amend Section 2.B of EXHIBIT B of Resolution No. 73587, as amended, and set the parkland fees charged for high-rise multi-family residential projects of twelve (12) stories or more located in the Downtown Core at fifty percent (50%) of the applicable parkland fees for multifamily 5+ units in the Downtown Area; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 76631 which set forth the Schedule of Parkland Fees charged under the PDO and PIO to reflect the land values identified in the 2012 Residential Land Value Study and continued the incentive program for downtown high-rise construction by keeping parkland fees there at $7,650 per unit; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 77153 reflect the land values identified in the 2012 Residential Land Value Study trended to 2013 and the updated 2010 Census data; and WHEREAS, on September 29, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 77538 reflect the land values identified in the 2012 Residential Land Value Study trended to 2014 and the updated 2010 Census data; and T-9459.023/1371974_4 2

WHEREAS, on September 20, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 77926 reflect the land values identified in the 2012 Residential Land Value Study trended to 2015 and the updated 2010 Census data, and authorized the City Manager to determine the applicable parkland fees for any residential units in the City of San José that are not included in the Schedule of Parkland Fees based on the nearest Multiple Listing Service districts; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 78039 which amended Section 2 of EXHIBIT B of Resolution No. 73587, as amended, to temporarily set the parkland fees charged for high-rise multi-family residential projects of twelve (12) stories or more located in the Downtown Core at fifty percent (50%) of the applicable parkland fees for multi-family 5+ units in the Downtown Area, subject to the issuance of a building permit prior to July 1, 2018, and to defer the collection of parkland fees to the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy, which must occur by December 31, 2020; WHEREAS, this Resolution amends Section 2 of EXHIBIT B of Resolution No. 73587, as amended, to temporarily set the parkland fees charged for high-rise multi-family residential projects of twelve (12) stories or more located in the Downtown Core at fifty percent (50%) of the applicable parkland fees for multi-family 5+ units in the Downtown Area, subject to the issuance of a building permit prior to July 1, 2018, to defer the collection of parkland fees to the time of issuance of a certificate of occupancy, which must occur by December 31, 2020, and to encourage developers who receive the reduced parkland rate to utilize apprentices and perform specified outreach; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San José that: SECTION 1. DOWNTOWN HIGH-RISES. Section 2 of EXHIBIT B of Resolution No. 73587, as amended, is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: Section 2. Fees for Highrise Multi-Family Residential Projects located in the Downtown Core Area. A. Definitions. 1. The "Downtown Core Area" shall mean that area in the City of San José bounded by Coleman Avenue/Julian Street/St. James Street to the north, 4th Street and Civic Plaza to the east (Civic Plaza area is bounded by East St. John Street to the north, 7th Street to the east and San Fernando T-9459.023/1371974_4 3

Street to the south), State Route 280 to the south, and Highway 87 to the west as depicted in Attachment 2 to Resolution No. 73587. 2. For purposes of this Section and Section 3, a story shall be defined per the California Building Code and shall include any above-grade podiums. B. Reduced Fees Eligibility and Application. Notwithstanding the Parkland Fees set forth in Resolution No. 77926, as may be amended from time to time, the parkland fees charged for multi-family units in residential projects of twelve (12) stories or more which are located in the Downtown Core Area ( Downtown Units ) shall temporarily be reduced to the rate of fifty percent (50%) of the applicable parkland fees for multi-family 5+ units in the Downtown Area (MLS Zone 9) if they meet the following criteria: 1. Developers of projects containing Downtown Units shall be eligible for the reduced parkland fees as specified in this Subsection for projects that secure their first building permit prior to July 1, 2018 and for which a certificate of occupancy is issued by December 31, 2020. 2. Developers shall retain contractors licensed by the State of California. 3. Developers shall employ only construction workers who possess necessary licenses and certifications required by the State of California. C. Deferred Payment. Developers of projects containing Downtown Units shall be eligible to defer payment of parkland fees as specified in this Subsection, which would otherwise be due and payable to the City no later than the issuance of the first building permit for the project. The parkland fees shall be due and payable to the City prior to the scheduling of the final inspection for eighty percent (80%) of the residential units within the Downtown High Rise Structure, for residential occupancy. Certificates of occupancy include temporary certificates of occupancy permits, for residential occupancy. D. Private Recreation Credit. Projects in the Downtown Core Area that are subject to the temporary parkland fee reduction set forth in this Section shall not be eligible to receive credit for private recreation improvements under Section 3 of this Exhibit. E. Expiration of Temporary Reduction and Deferred Payment. T-9459.023/1371974_4 4

1. This Section shall expire automatically on December 31, 2020. Upon expiration of this Section, the fees and credits, imposed pursuant to Chapters 14.25 and 19.38, applicable to Downtown Units will be the fees and credits then in effect and except as provided in Chapters 14.25 and 19.38 of the SJMC or in subparagraph 2, below, payment of the parkland fees shall occur no later than the issuance of the first building permit for the project. In the event that the High Rise Structure that was eligible for the suspension provided for in this Resolution has not received final inspection for eighty percent (80%) of the residential units within the Downtown High Rise Structure on or before December 31, 2020, then the High Rise Structure shall be subject to the fees and credits in effect after the expiration of this Section. Payment of all the parkland fees shall occur as specified in Subsection C, above. 2. In the event that there is a project with a number of units that will cause the automatic expiration of this Section, the units up to and including the 21,500th unit will be at the reduced rates specified in Exhibit A, Table 2. All other units within the project shall be subject to the fees and credits in effect after the expiration of this Section. Payment of all the parkland fees shall occur as specified in Subsection C, above. F. No Retroactive Application This Resolution shall not apply retroactively to any parkland agreements or parkland obligations that have been entered into or satisfied prior to the effective date of this Resolution. G. Any person who enters into a Parkland Agreement for the reduced parkland fees pursuant to this Section is encouraged to make good faith efforts to: 1. Comply with the State of California s apprenticeship program requirement that at least sixteen point seven percent (16.7%) of the hours worked on the Downtown High Rise Residential Structure must be worked by registered apprentices from approved apprenticeship training programs; 2. Ensure that twenty-five percent (25%) of the registered apprentices working on the Downtown High Residential Structure have a barrier to employment such as being homeless, a veteran or an at-risk youth; and 3. Post or cause the posting of bids for subcontracting work on the Downtown High Rise Residential Structure on websites such as the Bay Area Builders Exchange in order for subcontractors to be able to access work for workers in the nine Bay Area counties. T-9459.023/1371974_4 5

SECTION 2. MISCELLANEOUS. A. If not otherwise defined in this Resolution, capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in SJMC Chapters 14.25 and 19.38. B. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of any provision of this Resolution, including its attachments, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution. Each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution, including its attachments, is severable from all other sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases. ADOPTED this day of, 2017, by the fol lowing vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: ATTEST: SAM LICCARDO Mayor TONI J. TABER, CMC City Clerk T-9459.023/1371974_4 6