Housing Price and Fundamentals in A Transition Economy: The Case of Beijing Market Bing Han 1 and Lu Han 2 and Guozhong Zhu 3 2016 Conference on the Chinese Economy 1 Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Bing.Han@rotman.utoronto.ca 2 Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Lu.Han@rotman.utoronto.ca 3 Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta, guozhong@ualberta.ca.
Motivation: the Unusual Beijing Market Extremely high house price price-income ratio 30 price-rent ratio 40 price up by 500% in the past decade. FIGURE Questions: Can the high house price be consistent with economic fundamentals? In general, how to understand the link between house price and economic fundamentals?
Price and Fundamentals Tradition approach (Case and Shiller (2003)) normal relation between price and fundamentals in the data regression-based, using historical data
Price and Fundamentals Tradition approach (Case and Shiller (2003)) normal relation between price and fundamentals in the data regression-based, using historical data But...
Price and Fundamentals Tradition approach (Case and Shiller (2003)) normal relation between price and fundamentals in the data regression-based, using historical data But... China is in such a rapid growth period. It is very hard to price assets when growth is at the high level. The future matters more. In a stable economy that is not going anywhere, you have a pretty good idea of what they are worth. Robert Shiller, April 2014
Price and Fundamentals Our approach: rely less on historical data but impose a lot of structure a dynamic rational expectation general equilibrium model forward-looking and utility-maximizing households a value-maximizing home builder endogenous paths of house price and rent
What are the fundamentals? income growth rate: high but declining large scale immigration FIGURE restricted land supply FIGURE high household savings rate savings rate: 25% (NBS) 80% of urban household wealth in housing (CHFS2012) Rent is not considered fundamental. map of Beijing
Key Features no aggregate uncertainty, but with idiosyncratic shocks
Key Features no aggregate uncertainty, but with idiosyncratic shocks an economy that eventually converges to a balanced growth path (BGP) Constant price-income and price-rent ratios Everything can be re-scaled
Key Features no aggregate uncertainty, but with idiosyncratic shocks an economy that eventually converges to a balanced growth path (BGP) Constant price-income and price-rent ratios Everything can be re-scaled a reference city that operates in a BGP to pin down parameters Hong Kong, DC, SF
Key Features no aggregate uncertainty, but with idiosyncratic shocks an economy that eventually converges to a balanced growth path (BGP) Constant price-income and price-rent ratios Everything can be re-scaled a reference city that operates in a BGP to pin down parameters Hong Kong, DC, SF During the economic transition, there are changes in income growth birth rate age distribution migration
Projection of Population Distribution 0.025 0.02 Distribution of Population (2013) Beijing Urban China 0.1 0.08 Fertility Rate Old Rate New Rate 0.015 0.06 0.01 0.04 0.005 0.02 0 20 40 60 80 age 0 20 30 40 50 60 age 1 0.8 Mortality Rate 0.05 0.04 Distribution of Population 2020 2060 2100 0.6 0.03 0.4 0.02 0.2 0.01 0 20 40 60 80 age 0 20 40 60 80 age
Projection of Land Supply and Income 27 23 Land supply per capita (square meters) growth = 0.5% growth = 0% growth = 1% 1210 970 Income per capita (thousand RMB) growth = 30 yrs growth = 40 yrs growth = 20 yrs 19 730 490 15 250 11 2014 2034 2054 2074 2094 2114 year 10 2014 2034 2054 2074 2094 2114 year
Model Elements A representative firm (developer) Over-lapping generations of households Own s share of the firm housing investment Rent h unit of housing from the firm housing consumption Let d=down payment, s d h owner
The Representative Firm Production technology: H t = ZL θ t K 1 θ t L: land K: capital Z: scaling parameter θ: land share in housing production considered labor/construction cost similar results
Firm s Optimization Problem max K t,l t capital purchase land purchase {}}{{}}{ r t H t [K t (1 δ)k t 1 ] q t (L t L t 1 ) + 1 p t+1 H t R t+1 s.t. H t = ZKt 1 θ L θ t where r = housing rental rate q = land price p = house price R = firm s financing cost (household s investment return)
Housing Supply Function [ ] H t = Z 1/θ (1 θ)r (1 θ)/θ t L t 1 (1 δ)/r t+1 Housing supply increases with land provision (L t ) rental rate of houses (r t ) Housing supply decreases with financing cost of the firm (R t+1 )
Households overlapping generations of households Works for J years, then retires Lives up to T years. Before age T, death probability is taken from the data Two decisions inter-temporal allocation: save/dis-save intra-temporal allocation: housing vs non-housing
Equilibrium Need to find the trajectories of price and rent to clear two markets: rental market equity market Efficient numerical solution strategy Need to solve paths of price and rent, each has 100 years!
Results baseline results Hong Kong as reference city using income per capita as reported exogenous migration robustness results with endogenous migration
Results: Prices and Rent 147 113 79 45 House price (thousand RMB per m 2 ) 0.11 0.06 0.01 Growth rate of hous 11 2005 2025 2045 2065 2085 2105 4.3 3.3 2.3 1.3 Rental rate (thousand RMB per m 2 ) 0.3 2005 2025 2045 2065 2085 2105 year 0.04 2005 2025 2045 2065 738 558 378 198 Land price (thousand R 18 2005 2025 2045 2065 year Price in 2014 = 14,920 RMB per square meter (30,000 in the data) Annual rent in 2014 = 459 RMB per square meter (700 in the data)
Results: Ratios 22 Price income ratio 6.2 Ann 19 5 16 3.8 13 2.6 10 2005 2025 2045 2065 2085 2105 1.4 2005 2025 40.8 Price rent ratio 0.084 Ret 37.8 0.071 34.8 0.058 31.8 2005 2025 2045 2065 2085 2105 0.045 2005 2025 Land price / House price
Regression Results Dependent Variable: growth of price and rent Dependent variable: log(g p ) log(g r ) income land income land 2005-2040 0.710-0.797 0.670 0.321 2041-2080 1.161-3.020 0.761-1.135 2081-2114 0.807 0.140 0.856-0.916
Sensitivity Price Rent 2014 2114 2014 2114 Baseline 19.41 153.54 0.56 4.31 (1) Growth of land supply = 1% 18.10 86.40 0.57 2.72 (2) Growth of land supply = 0.0% 22.33 207.21 0.62 5.90 (3) Income stabilizes in 20 years 18.55 128.87 0.54 3.64 (4) Income stabilizes in 40 years 20.06 183.81 0.60 5.32 (8) Initial Fin l wealth = 2 M 20.01 161.07 0.59 4.42 (9) FAR 3 21.43 289.87 0.61 7.94 (10) Mortgage rate = 3% 21.96 176.41 0.62 4.65 (11) Down payment = 30% 24.62 179.96 0.63 4.66 (12) Minimum housing size = 20 19.41 148.06 0.56 4.19 (13) Minimum housing size = 40 18.89 153.36 0.57 4.36 (14) DC calibration 14.87 122.81 0.53 3.95 (15) DC calibration (more land) 23.69 105.34 0.81 3.39 (16) SF calibration 18.12 150.07 0.50 3.33 (17) Less income risk 18.83 144.32 0.57 4.39 (18) Less medical expense risk 19.37 151.79 0.57 4.31
What have we found? Price-income ratio declines over time as the economy converges. Housing becomes more affordable. The equilibrium house price in Beijing that can be justified by the fundamentals is around 19,410 RMB per square meter in 2014, much lower than 30,000 RMB in the data. Alternative assumptions on land supply, income growth and population structure do not help in narrowing the gap between the model-implied price and the observed price. detail However
What might explain the gap between the model and the data? Measurement error of fundamental variables Endogenous inflow of rich immigrants Features not captured by the current model
Extension 1: Underreported Income Evidence of officers grey incomes from housing purchase behavior (Deng, Wei and Wu, 2016): The higher the rank of government officials, the larger the percentage of unreported income: FU-KE: 29.5% ZHENG-KE: 55.8% FU-CHU: 63.2% ZHENG-CHU: 151.1% FU-JU: 218.7% ZHENG-JU: 694.7%
Price and Rent Given Higher Income Price Rent 2014 2114 2014 2114 Baseline 19.41 153.54 0.56 4.31 Income = 2/3 times Hong Kong 32.40 252.47 0.97 7.18 Income = Hong Kong 42.40 369.02 1.30 9.95 High price in Beijing can be rationalized if the Beijing resident income is about 70% higher than reported. Actual income of government officials is 60% higher than reported income on average (Deng, Wei and Wu 2016)
Who bought houses in Beijing? Extension 2: Migration of Rich Households
Extension 2: Migration of Rich Households Migrants: Households in second and third tier cities roughly 200 millions people in these cities Benefits: higher utility (amenity) benefit of migration 25% increase in consumption equivalence potentially higher return to housing investment Costs: high savings rate needed to afford down payment higher living cost (rent)
Endogenous Migration: Price and Rent Price Rent 2014 2114 2014 2114 Baseline 19.41 153.54 0.56 4.31 Endogenous Migration 33.19 243.26 0.702 6.685
Features We Have Not Captured Yet Cyclical variations in fundamentals Search frictions Aggregate uncertainty Illiquidity
Conclusions Link house price and rent to fundamentals in a transition economy For Beijing market, we show Price is too high unless... General lessons Historical relation between price and fundamentals is unlikely to repeat itself during the transition periods High price/income and price/rent may be consistent with the fundamentals. Underreported income or migration of rich households can drive up house price a lot. (a lesson for Toronto?)
THANK YOU!
2006Q1 2006Q2 2006Q3 2006Q4 2007Q1 2007Q2 2007Q3 2007Q4 2008Q1 2008Q2 2008Q3 2008Q4 2009Q1 2009Q2 2009Q3 2009Q4 2010Q1 2010Q2 2010Q3 2010Q4 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 2013Q4 2014Q1 2014Q2 2014Q3 京大学 林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心 华大学恒隆房地产研究中心 House Price Indices: Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Tianjian,Wuhan, Chengdu, Dalian and Xi an 500 450 CQCHPI 新建商品住房中心城区同质价格指数 (2006Q1-2014Q3) 2006Q1=100 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 RETURN 北京上海天津深圳成都 大连武汉西安 8 个城市综合
City of Beijing RETURN
Population of Beijing (millions) 21 Population of Beijing 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 RETURN
Land Supply in Beijing 2500 New supply of residential land (hectares) 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 24 Residential land (m 2 ) per person 23 22 21 20 19 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 year RETURN
Young home buyers badly need help from parents RETURN
A rich coal-mine owner owns 99 houses in Beijing, plus some commercial real estate(june 14, 2014, People s Daily Online). RETURN