Santa Monica Planning and Community Development Department. Build Out Analysis

Similar documents
Forecast of Tax Revenues for Reston Community Center Reston, Virginia. Prepared for Reston Community Center March 2013

Land Value Estimates and Forecasts for Reston. Prepared for Reston Community Center April 2013

Financial Feasibility Analysis for the Gehry Partners-Designed 8150 Sunset Blvd. Project (Alternative 9)

The Villages Master Planned Development Development Agreement. Exhibit F. Traffic Monitoring Plan

The Miramar Santa Monica

Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee Study

MEMORANDUM. Trip generation rates based on a variety of residential and commercial land use categories 1 Urban form and location factors the Ds 2

Miami-Dade County Retail Market Report 3Q Real Capital Partners Real Estate Services. *Data Source CoStar Miami-Dade County Retail Market Report

Metro Vancouver Purpose-Built Rental Housing Inventory and Risk Analysis. Profile for the District of West Vancouver

VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

CHAPTER 4. MANAGER Single-Family Multi-Family Total. CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS Housing Needs Analysis

Land Capacity Analysis

A View Like Never Before

Informed Decisions Are Based on Actionable Data.

City of Santa Monica Inclusionary Housing Policy

THE ADVISORY. READY FOR CHANGING TIDES? How Real Estate Companies Can Prepare for a New Cap Rate Era. Eric Willett, Senior Associate

The Seattle MD Apartment Market Report

Existing Conditions: Economic Market Assessment

MEMORANDUM TO: Process

Downtown Area Plan Development Feasibility Study

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY MANAGERS

1828 S. Gramercy Pl OFFERING MEMORANDUM LOS ANGELES, CA 4 UNITS IN MID-CITY! 3 UNITS DELIVERED VACANT! PRESENTED BY: KW COMMERCIAL Ventura Blvd

City of Bellingham Urban Growth Area - Land Supply Analysis Summary

2019 DC Study External Stakeholder Committee Minutes

Analysis of Infill Development Potential Under the Green Line TOD Ordinance

Downtown Housing Study City of Albuquerque. Housing Demand 3-1. By Todd Clarke CCIM

PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

Will Hartford s Booming CBD Apartment Market Continue to Thrive?

FY General Revenue Forecast Presentation

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

>> Asking Rents Increase As Space Remains Limited

4.0 CUMULATIVE SCENARIO

Pueblo Regional Development Plan, Addendum

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

MEMORANDUM ADDENDUM. Dan Moye, Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City, Missouri

RESOLUTION NO ( R)

Bidders Conference 4 th /5 th & Arizona

OWNERS AND DEVELOPERS

How Does the City Grow?

DOWNTOWN PARKING IN-LIEU FEE DRAFT REPORT

Manhattan New Dev. Market Report st Quarter mns.com

Presentation Outline. Purpose and Objectives of Comparative Analysis Characteristics of comparable locations Comparative Data Summary Findings

7. DISTRICT OF MUSKOKA HOUSING SUPPLY AND DEMAND

2008 Buildable Lands Inventory and Capacity Analysis

Guide Note 12 Analyzing Market Trends

III. Environmental Setting

Housing in the Evolving American Suburb The Houston Story

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

Suite TM SERVICE PROVIDERS. Move Your Business Forward

ARCH PLAZA Arch St., Santa Clarita, CA 91321

HOUSING MARKET OUTLOOK

2013 Fredericton Housing Outlook Seminar Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

For the Reno MSA employment has historically been based largely on construction and the leisure and hospitality industry. The construction industry

Using Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

University of St. Thomas Minnesota Commercial Real Estate Survey

17th Annual Real Estate Review & Forecast

>> Negative Net Absorption Despite Completions

Key findings of the study include:

M EMORANDUM. Attachment 7. Steve Buckley and Margot Ernst, City of Walnut Creek. Darin Smith and Michael Nimon, EPS

INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY IN LANDHOLDING DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL BANGLADESH

Detroit Inclusionary Housing Plan & Market Study Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Executive Summary August, 2016

CENTRE STREET

INDUSTRIAL MARKET REPORT. San Antonio. 4th Quarter Q4 Market Trends 2016 by Xceligent, Inc. All Rights Reserved

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates

Financial Analysis of Urban Development Opportunities in the Fairfield and Gonzales Communities, Victoria BC

BUILD-OUT ANALYSIS GRANTHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: WINCHESTER AND SANTANA ROW/VALLEY FAIR URBAN VILLAGE PLAN BASELINE AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK ANALYSIS

Miami-Dade County Retail Market Report 4Q Real Capital Partners Real Estate Services. *Data Source CoStar Miami-Dade County Retail Market Report

Item # 9 September 13, 2006

MEMORANDUM. Ariel Socarras, Associate Planner City of Santa Monica. Jing Yeo, Acting Principal Planner

Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing Preservation. March 1, 2018

4th St. & Elm Ave. Offering Summary

Subject: LandWatch s comments on Salinas Economic Development Element FEIR. Dear Mayor Gunter and Members of the Salinas City Council:

Planning Commission Report

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

Build-out Analysis. City of Cape Coral CITY OF CAPE CORAL Department of Community Development

CHAPTER 2 VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE LAND INVENTORY

Metropolitan Milwaukee Office Market Report Third Quarter 2015

THE UA TAKE FIRST QUARTER 2017: LOW SUPPLY HIGH DEMAND HIGHER PRICES THE CYCLE CONTINUES

Commercial (Non-Residential) Nexus Study & Linkage Fee Analysis

Research in Brief. August Rent Control Changes in California Posing Significant Uncertainty. ARA Research and Strategy. Research in Brief 1

Estimating Commercial Land-Use Conversion: Case Study of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia

Commercial Real Estate

Emerging Trends in Real Estate

TO: CC: RE: Report was Comments comment period, on November 19, draft report. receive comment. the West. finalized to.

717 EAST 1ST STREET LONG BEACH, CA 90802

Housing Elements and SB 375

INDUSTRIAL QUICK STATS SUMMARY & OUTLOOK MARKET TRENDS VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION ECONOMIC STATS

FOR SALE Value-Add Apartment/Live-work Property Broadway. Santa Monica, Ca Steve Walbridge Craig Newlands

OFFICE QUICK STATS SUMMARY & OUTLOOK MARKET TRENDS VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION ECONOMIC STATS

NINE FACTS NEW YORKERS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT RENT REGULATION

Ottawa Residential Unit Sales

A Brief Overview of H-GAC s Regional Growth Forecast Methodology

16 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY PORTFOLIO LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

We thank you for the opportunity to provide our services, and we look forward to discussing the report with you at your earliest convenience.

Owners and Investors

126 BONITO AVENUE LONG BEACH, CA 90802

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

Transcription:

Santa Monica Planning and Community Development Department Downtown Community Plan 8.11.16 I. Background and Data Sources Build Out Analysis The City faces many policy questions relating to future development and its location and type within the Downtown. To inform this discussion, the Planning Department relies on a number of data sources to analyze existing and future land use trends and possibilities. This build out analysis is an important tool to estimate and describe the amount and the location of future development that may be allowed to occur within Downtown Santa Monica in accordance with the proposed Downtown Community Plan regulations. It is important to note that this build out analysis is not a prediction of the future, but a reasonable forecast of the growth that is expected to occur. For the purpose of evaluating the environmental impacts of the Downtown Community Plan, a net new of 3.2M square feet was forecasted. This is the amount of potential development that could reasonably occur within the next 15 20 years while still achieving the City s goal of No Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trips (see section III for more information on the development cap). The results of the analysis were used as a geospatial tool for understanding possible future development patterns in the Downtown. Further, a real estate market outlook was developed to understand the potential future demand for office, residential and retail/hospitality uses in Santa Monica s Downtown. Below are data sets and reports utilized to conduct the build out analysis. Data Source(s) Building Square Footage Office Parcel Square Footage Office Year Built Office Public Facilities and Utilities City of Santa Monica GIS Landmarks and Historic Resource Inventory Planning Department Places of Worship, Institutional Office, Google Street View Market Demand RCLCo 2012 Market Demand Study, 2015 AECOM Economic Peer Review Long Term Leases CoStar, Housing and Economic Development Department, Interviews

II. Market Demand for Net New Land Uses To verify that the potential build out is aligned with reasonable market absorption and economic activity, the analysis was compared to a real estate market outlook study, which was conducted by RCLCo. This study utilized a wide range of information sources, including demographic, economic and market data real estate industry publications, as well as interviews with real estate industry experts to forecast the square footage amount of typical Downtown uses (hotel, office, housing and retail) that could be reasonably expected to be absorbed in the Downtown over the life of the Plan. The market outlook findings were peer reviewed by AECOM as part of the 2015 4CO (City owned TOD site) planning efforts. The AECOM analysis confirmed the market outlook findings. The real estate market outlook forecasts the development potential available for capture/location in Downtown Santa Monica as a whole over the next 15 years, assuming an unconstrained development environment. The analysis considers all of the major private sector land uses that comprise the existing built environment within Downtown: retail (local and regional serving), commercial office, residential (rental apartments and condominiums), and hotel. The analysis builds on current and forecasted demographic data and other key regional demand drivers and considers the Downtown s competitiveness vis à vis existing and potential locations in the West Los Angeles area. The following table summarizes the findings of the 2012 market outlook report. LAND USE CATEGORY ABSORPTION POTENTIAL (KSF) Regional Retail 100 200 Local Retail 43 58 Office 400 500 Residential (units) 1,750 2,500 Units Hotel 1,500 Rooms

III. Cap on Future Development Based on the results of scenario testing using the City s Travel Demand Forecast Model, 3.22 million square feet of net new floor area represents the maximum development that could occur in the Downtown while achieving its LUCE citywide goal of No Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trips by 2030. This 3.22 million square foot cap on development Downtown reflects the City s commitment to managing and monitoring change by ensuring that new projects are balanced with circulation investments, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) mechanisms, programs, and congestion relief measures that will enable the City to achieve the citywide goals of No Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trips. Any project proposal that would result in exceeding the maximum cap of 3.22 million square feet would not be able to be approved consistent with the Downtown Community Plan until it is determined that the project would be consistent with the No Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trips goal of the LUCE. The following land use totals were studied in the DCP Environmental Impact Report (EIR). LAND USE CATEGORY NET NEW SQUARE FOOT (KSF) Residential 2,326 (2500 units) Retail/Restaurant/Entertainment 199 Creative Office 209 Office 204 Hotel 283 (974 rooms) Totals 3,221

IV. Assumptions Evaluating Potential for Change Assumptions were developed about the likelihood of change on each Downtown parcel within the 15 20 year time horizon of the Downtown Community Plan. These assumptions, or filters, are described below: SITES NOT CONSIDERED TO HAVE BUILDOUT POTENTIAL (60% of total Downtown Land Area) Properties Containing Landmark Sites containing designated City Structures Landmarks are unlikely to change due to protections provided by Landmark designation. Properties with Buildings that Exceed Current or Proposed Height and Floor Area Ratio Limits Places of Worship and Institutional Properties Properties Developed or Significantly Redeveloped Since 1990 Government Owned Properties Utility Owned Properties Properties Containing Structures Identified on the Historic Resources Inventory Parcels containing existing buildings that exceed current or proposed zoning standards for height and floor area ratio are not anticipated to change. Existing religious institution owned properties are unlikely to change. Similarly, some institutional entities, such as the Salvation Army, are unlikely to change. Parcels that have experienced new development or significant investment in improvements within the past 25 years are not likely to experience substantial additive change. City and State owned properties, such as most Downtown parking garages and the Big Blue Bus site, are not likely to experience development as they provide valuable services to the community. Utility owned parcels, such as the Edison sub station at Lincoln and Colorado are unlikely to change. Many sites containing buildings on the HRI are unlikely to change due to protections included in the DCP and/or their value as unique commercial properties. DATA SOURCE Planning Department Office, Field Study Office, Field Study Office, City GIS, Field Study Office, City GIS Office, City GIS Planning Department

SITES CONSIDERED TO HAVE UNLIKELY POTENTIAL FOR CHANGE (20% of Total Downtown Land Area) Properties with Limited Future Sites that contain existing buildings with a Development Potential FAR that is equal to 75% of the DCP s proposed FARs are considered to have limited development potential. Single Lot Properties under Sole Ownership Commercial Properties The development of single 7500 SF parcels is challenging in the Downtown due to parking and other on site requirements. While some exceptions are likely to exist, by and large it is not anticipated that the majority of single lot parcels under single ownership will significantly change. Commercial office is increasingly scarce in Santa Monica. The assumption is that most existing commercial office and longstanding retail spaces are not likely to change. SITES CONSIDERED TO HAVE POTENTIAL FOR CHANGE (20% of Total Downtown Land Area) Pipeline Projects (Entitled) Projects that have received entitlements since 2013. DATA SOURCE Office Office Field Study, Office DATA SOURCE Planning Department Pipeline Projects (Proposed) Properties with at least 2.0 FAR remaining within proposed building envelope Properties that have low improvement/land value ratio Projects that are currently proposed but have yet to receive entitlements. Sites that could achieve an increase in FAR of 2.0 or more over existing conditions through redevelopment or the addition of new square feet. Sites that have an existing improved value that is 50% or less than the overall assessed value of the site. Planning Department Office, Proposed Zoning Regulations office

V. Build Out Analysis A. Sites Not Considered to Have Build Out Potential Code Assumption Land Area % of Downtown NLM Properties Containing Landmark Structures 241,968 3.13% OHFAR Properties with Buildings that Exceed Current or Proposed Height and Floor Area Ratio Limits 1,257,551 16.29% NW Places of Worship and Institutional Properties 176,414 2.28% N90 Properties Developed or Significantly Redeveloped Since 1990 1,711,991 22.17% G Government Owned Properties 988,469 12.80% U Utility Owned Properties 15,006 0.19% HRI Properties Containing Structures Identified on 374,049 4.84% the Historic Resources Inventory Total 4,765,448 61.70%

B. Sites Considered to Have Unlikely Potential to Change Code Assumption Land Area % of Downtown LF Properties with Limited Future Development Potential 101,926 1.32% LS Single Lot Properties under Sole Ownership 425,240 5.51% LC Commercial Office Properties 864,525 11.20% Total 1,391,691 18.03%

C. Sites Considered to Have Potential to Change Code Assumption Land Area % of Downtown Development Potential (Net New) PE Pipeline Projects (Entitled) 203,643 2.64% 535,510 PP Pipeline Projects 1,591,393 723,707 9.37% (Proposed) PFAR Properties with at least 1,834,694 2.0 FAR remaining within proposed building envelope 601,756 7.79% PV Properties that have low 57,646 improvement/land value ratio 35,006 0.45% Total 1,564,112 20.25% 4,019,243 *The 3.22M Square Foot development cap would limit potential change (see Section III for more information).