On the Level of Cooperation between Agricultural & Cadastral Parcel Registration Halil Ibrahim INAN (presenter) & Tahsin YOMRALIOGLU, Turkey Peter van OOSTEROM & Jaap ZEVENBERGEN, The Netherlands 1 OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, the Netherlands http://www.otb.tudelft.nl KTU-GISLab Research Laboratory, Turkey http://www.gislab.ktu.edu.tr Naam van de presentatie & The European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 1992 Market Policy De-coupled Direct Payments Rural Development (RD) Policy Economic Development of Rural Population Preservation of the Environment Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) as a Tool for Implementation of the CAP Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) for spatial data 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 2 1
Rural Land Administration/Management Different LASs History and Social structure Fiscal and/or Legal purposes Coordinated by different Organisations Different content & technology use Different LPISs Dependant on LAS or not Reference parcels (Agricultural, Farmer or Physical) Use of Digital Ortho Photo/Imagery Products Use of Large Scale Topographic Maps 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 3 The Relation Between LAS & LPIS (1) Sub-Parcels in LAS Reference / Agri. Parcel Cadastre / Sub-Parcel (d) (c) (b) Building (a) (a) and (d): Non Agricultural Area (b): Planted Agricultural Field (c): Cultivated Agricultural Field : Cadastre Parcel Corner Point : Sub-Parcel Corner Point Cadastre Parcel*: The area composed of connecting Cadastre Parcel Corner Points. Sub Parcel*: Each area composed of connecting Cadastre Parcel Corner Points and/or Sub Parcel Corner Points. The total area of sub parcels equals the area of the cadastre parcel. * Parcels are defined by boundaries, which are specified by connecting corner points. 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 4 2
The Relation Between LAS & LPIS-2 Farmers and Farming Rights in LAS Farmers (Users) in LPIS Owners in LASs? Owners and other right holders (full land tenure info.) Leaser for any purpose Leaser for Agricultural Activity User for Agricultural Activity (with consent by owner) Consent from first order relatives Consent from share holders Some LASs cannot cover such full land tenure info. 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 5 The Relation Between LAS & LPIS (3) Geometry Overlap; Case Study in the NL Study Areas NO-Polder (400 km 2, 9300/4500 agri./ref. parcels) Newly established area With even shaped landscapes Twente (1000 km 2, 43.000/44.000 agri./ref. parcels) An old area With complex shaped landscapes 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 6 3
The Relation Between LAS & LPIS (3) Geometry Overlap; Results Boundary Overap NO-Polder Twente Intersection Tolerance any > 100m any > 100m km % km % km % km % with Agricultural Parcels 1m 1479 23 1408 22 7146 33 5479 25 2m 2140 33 2092 33 11407 53 9723 45 3m 2449 38 2412 38 12908 59 11228 52 5m 2715 42 2678 42 13408 62 11271 52 with Reference Parcels 1m 1530 35 1425 32 5800 25 4212 19 2m 2259 51 2166 49 10803 48 8956 40 3m 2556 58 2471 56 12721 57 10825 48 5m 2792 63 2693 61 12815 57 10295 46 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 7 The Relation Between LAS & LPIS (4) Admin. Info. Content Share; LAS/LPIS Person The user in LPIS/IACS Right holder in LAS Informal rights Formal rights (informal/formal land tenure) Land Use Type General Land-use types in LAS (differs) Housing, industry, agriculture, etc. Specialized Land-use types in LPIS/IACS (differs) Fallow land, vegetable garden, permanent crop, pasture, grassland, eligible land for aid no1-no2, etc. 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 8 4
Three Possible Collaborations Full Integration (proposed/ideal) Physical integration (Partly or No), Data redundancy (No). Sharing Data at a Certain Extent (acceptable) Sharing a System Development Pattern (at least) 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 9 Land Administration Domain Model the LADM History of LADM Several years of development Several versions As an ISO TC211 Standard Proposal (Accepted) to the ISO by FIG (ISO/LADM 19152) 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 10 5
Integrated Solution SII Design based on LADM (1) LADM Spatial (Cadastre) Part 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 11 Integrated Solution SII Design based on LADM (2) LADM Administrative (Land Registry) Part 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 12 6
Collaboration towards Integration Different Legacy Systems LPIS & LAS Different Systems with a certain extent of information share Person registry Registration of rights (communication between different registries) Different Systems with no information share; Only some similarities on the pattern of system development Management of land related rights in the same manner with different data sets (Person, Parcel) 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 13 MDA for Better Design and Implementation PIM (UML class diagram) to PSM (DB Schema) through MDA Easy Design at PIM level No need to care about platform specific details, Just concentrate on the nature of the data, Design information share model PSM Transformation Currently Semi-Automatic OO Relational Data Types (geometry/topology), Constraints (spatial). 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 14 7
A Possible Collaboration in View of Standardization Initiatives INSPIRE SII for Environmental Information LADM Standard domain/information model for LA Integration of LAS and LPIS via LADM LPIS Core Model MDA A Bridge between Modelling and Application 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 15 Conclusions LASs and LPISs deal with different aspects of rural land. But they have closely related spatial and administrative data content. They do not have any common collaboration rule. This causes data redundancy in a certain extent. Lack of Collaboration is caused by the fact that both systems have different system structures throughout the EU. Integration/Collaboration? Three ways/stages. LADM and LPIS core model initiatives. An initiative to define collaboration rules. 18 June, 2008 Inan, Yomralioglu, Oosterom and Zevenbergen 16 8
Thanks Halil Ibrahim INAN 17 OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, the Netherlands http://www.otb.tudelft.nl KTU-GISLab Research Laboratory, Turkey http://www.gislab.ktu.edu.tr Naam van de presentatie & 9