DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

Similar documents
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK MASTER PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FOR BLOCK 5201, LOTS 1 AND 2

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Planning Justification Report

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

PHASE 1 AMENDMENT TO THE STATION AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BOROUGH OF NETCONG, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

PC Staff Report 11/18/2013 Z Item No. 1-1

Rule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

PLANNING RATIONALE 680 BRONSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

ARTICLE B ZONING DISTRICTS

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

DIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is:

Planning Justification Report

DEPARTURE OF PARKING & LOADING STANDARDS DPLS-333

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Marcel Williams, MPC Project Planner

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

R E S O L U T I O N. B. Development Data Summary

Overview. Central Street Master Plan. Appendix B: Zoning

AH-2, B-3-R, C-R & C ZONE DISTRICTS

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

SECTION I - INTRODUCTION

Comprehensive Plan Amendment #PLN , Reserve at Cannon Branch (Coles Magisterial District)

Chapter 5: Testing the Vision. Where is residential growth most likely to occur in the District? Chapter 5: Testing the Vision

Poughkeepsie City Center Revitalization Plan

R E S O L U T I O N. 1. Request: A Departure from Parking and Loading Standards (DPLS-449) for 32 parking spaces.

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

REQUEST STAFF RECOMMENDATION. On April 26, 2012, Signature Books Inc., represented by Dave Richards, submitted petitions for the following amendments:

Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Planning Justification Report

Director, Community Planning, North York District

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS

MPC STAFF REPORT REZONING MAP AMENDMENT ALDERMANIC DISTRICT 1 COUNTY COMMISSION DISTRICT 5 April 3, 2013 MPC FILE NUMBER.

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner; (801) ; Zoning Map Amendment

Urban Design Brief. Italian Seniors Project 1090, 1092, 1096 Hamilton Road City of London

The following uses may be allowed in the CL zone with administrative approval, subject to section of this ordinance:

Residential Neighborhoods and Housing

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

INTRODUCTION ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS -- GENERAL PURPOSE STATEMENT APPLICABILITY... 3

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

Planning Justification Report - Update Castlegrove Subdivision, Gananoque Draft Plan of Subdivision and Class III Development Permit

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Evolution of the Vision for NE 181st Street Study Area

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development. Development Plan & Policies

A. Land Use Relationships

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

Article Optional Method Requirements

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

Indicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO.

ARTICLE OPTIONAL METHOD REGULATIONS

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;

From Policy to Reality

Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District ESC 44 OZ & ESC 44 SB

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

POPULATION FORECASTS

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

13 Sectional Map Amendment

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Future Land Use Categories & Nodes December 23, Future Land Use Categories

Wheaton Sector Plan. Preliminary. Recommendations. Montgomery County Planning Board

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

RM2 Low Density Row Housing RM3 Low Density Multiple Housing

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

DeKalb County Zoning Code Update: Hits, near Hits, and Misses

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

Transcription:

DRAFT Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot 18.01 Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey Prepared for: Township of Teaneck Planning Board Prepared by: Janice Talley, P.P., AICP Talley Planning Associates December 24, 2015

The original of this report has been signed and sealed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 13:41-1.2. Janice E. Talley, P.P., AICP New Jersey Professional Planner License #5059

Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION... 1 3. PROPOSED REZONING FOR BLOCK 5002, LOT 18.01.... 3 3.1 Planning Justification... 3 3.2 Advancement of Township Goals and Objectives... 3 3.3 Recommendations for the Proposed Rezoning of Block 5002, Lot 18.01... 5 4. CONCLUSION... 6 i

1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Amendment to the Land Use Element of the Master Plan for Teaneck Township is to set forth a framework to guide the rezoning of a particular 4.54 acre property referred to as Block 5002, Lot 18.01 on the Township of Teaneck Tax Maps. Historically, the subject property served as an office and call center for Verizon (previously Bell Atlantic). The building has been vacant for several years. This Amendment to the Master Plan considers a new zoning scheme for the property that would facilitate a multifamily residential use. The remainder of this Amendment summarizes the recent history of the subject property and the necessity for amending the Township s Master Plan, sets forth the planning justifications for a multifamily residential use of the tract and provides a recommended zoning framework to facilitate same. 2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property, which is also known as 1500 Teaneck Road, is located on the west side of Teaneck Road in the northeastern quadrant of the Township (see Figure 1). The property is 4.54 acres in size and contains a 104,565 square feet, two-story office building that was formerly occupied by Verizon. The property has 390 feet of frontage on Teaneck Road, but access is provided through a driveway on State Street. Emergency access if provided through a gated entrance onto Amsterdam Avenue. The existing building fronts on Teaneck Road and has a pedestrian entrance from Teaneck Road, with all of the parking provided behind the building in the rear yard and the southern side yard. A total of 352 parking spaces are provided. Figure 1: Location Map 1

The adjacent land uses to the north include single-family detached homes; a gas station at the corner of Teaneck Road and Amsterdam Avenue and an auto repair facility at the corner of Teaneck Road and State Street. A garden apartment complex is located west and south of the property along State Street. A public parking lot is located south of the property on State Street. East of the property on Teaneck Road are a variety of commercial uses including a bank, an office building and a gasoline station. There are two bus stops on Teaneck and two bus stops on State Street in close proximity to the site providing links to NJ Transit bus routes 167, 178, 753 and 772. The current zoning of the tract is Business-Residential (), as shown on Figure 2. The Residential Single-Family (R-S) zone district is adjacent to the property to the north, while the Residential Multi - Family (R-M) zone district is adjacent to the property to the west and south. Permitted principal uses in the zone include single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, two-family dwellings, retails sales of goods and services, offices and business schools, restaurants, funeral homes, theaters and assembly halls, government buildings and uses, public and private schools and financial institutions. Nursing homes and automobile service stations are permitted as conditional uses. The bulk regulations include a 25 percent building coverage, 80 percent lot coverage, maximum height of two stories and 24 feet. R-S R-S R-M R-S R-M P Figure 2: Existing Zoning Map Changes in market demand for single-user office space has led to the prevalence of vacant office space in New Jersey. When coupled with the economic challenges created by the recession that started in 2009, many of these buildings have remained vacant and create a negative impact to surrounding neighborhoods. It is highly unlikely that another office user will be interested in a specialized single user facility, such as the subject property. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the Township to evaluate zoning policies to include a wider range of reuse scenarios for vacant and underperforming office properties, including multifamily residential, because the office market has evolved away from the suburban campus model. At this time, it is necessary to reevaluate the zoning of this site to identify a future land 2

use planning scheme that provides an economically viable redevelopment of the property that advances the Township Master Plan s goals and objectives. 3. PROPOSED REZONING FOR BLOCK 5002, LOT 18.01. 3.1 Planning Justification The location of the subject property is not conducive to large office uses due to changing office market conditions. The office market is moving away from suburban office locations to more urban locations that are walkable. This section of Teaneck Road is a commercial corridor characterized by a large number of automotiverelated uses. Retail uses along this roadway are scattered, include several automobile service retailers and is intermixed with office, residential and institutional or governmental uses. This portion of Teaneck Road can be characterized more as an automobile-oriented retail corridor. Although it contains many convenience stores, and serves many residents within the adjacent residential neighborhoods, the roadway also carries a large amount of regional traffic as it passes through the community. Many shoppers park in front of retail stores or in small dispersed parking lots adjacent to retail stores. There is great variety in the types of establishments found in this area, including specialty retail and office uses. The land uses surrounding 1500 Teaneck Road create an ideal context for a multifamily residential use. In particular, the large size of the subject property, along with its frontage on both Teaneck Road and State Street, minimizes the impacts of a potential multifamily use on the property. The mix of singlefamily, multi-family and retail uses in the vicinity are compatible uses, provided that a sufficient setback is provided to the multifamily use. The subject property has frontage on both Teaneck Road and State Street, so that vehicle trips can be distributed over multiple roadways which will minimize the impact to surrounding residential neighborhoods. In addition, the regular shape and overall size of the tract is suitable for a self contained multifamily residential community of approximately 250 units. Meanwhile, there is a major demographic shift underway which is creating tremendous demand for multifamily housing. The U.S. Census Bureau reports that between 2008 and 2020 approximately 57 million members of Gen Y (those born between 1977 and 1994) will reach the age of 22. A large portion of this demographic segment will rent, because a) challenging lending standards are motivating many young households to delay buying their first home; and b) Gen Y has an inherent preference for the flexible and comfortable lifestyle associated with renting in a new upscale community. Many municipalities in New Jersey, including nearby Englewood, Fort Lee, Hackensack, are capitalizing on opportunities to redevelop aging commercial and industrial properties for high quality new multifamily housing that provide more diverse quality housing options and generate new tax ratables. As further described below, a rezoning to permit a multifamily residential use would provide the Township with an opportunity to create a well planned multifamily rental apartment development. 3.2 Advancement of Township Goals and Objectives The Township of Teaneck Master Plan was adopted by the Planning Board in 2007. Two Master Plan Reexamination Reports have been prepared since that time. The first, adopted in 2011, recommended several zoning changes related to its non residential base in recognition of the drastically changed economic environment in the wake of the Great Recession, which started in 2007 and is only now 3

beginning to end. The changes included the creation of a medical office overlay district, a hotel zone and a new zoning for the intersection of Teaneck Road and Fort Lee Road. In 2014, the Planning Board adopted another Reexamination Report which focused on one specific property which is not the subject property. Among the goals expressed in the 2007 Master Plan and repeated in the 2011 and 2014 Master Plan Reexamination Reports was the goal to provide zoning protection for existing multifamily housing, and encourage its expansion only in areas where it would not have detrimental effects on single family residential neighborhoods. As described above, the subject property is particularly suitable for multifamily housing because of its large size, location on both Teaneck Road and State Street, and the variety of land uses that surround the property. Consequently, a multifamily use will not create any land use, visual, traffic or other detrimental impacts on existing neighborhoods. The 2007 Master Plan also anticipated the opportunity to redevelop some of the Township s aging nonresidential properties with new multifamily residential uses: As a mature suburban community, additional residential development will likely be accommodated by redevelopment or infill opportunities. Opportunities for new multi family development exist above retail stores in all of the four (4) business districts. Other marginal or underutilized parcels, many of which are industrial or commercial in nature may present themselves as opportunities for redevelopment in the near future. The highest and best use for such parcels may be multifamily residential development, owing to the high demand for new housing in Teaneck. At first glance such projects may appear to have several advantages meeting the housing needs of Teaneck s growing younger population, providing ratables and improving the area s overall aesthetics. However, any decision to introduce higher density development needs to be weighed against overall trends and implications and impact to the community as a whole. (p. 25) The 2007 Master Plan states that the goal of the Teaneck Road Business District is to achieve a balance between the pedestrian and vehicular realm, while increasing the economic vitality of the district by developing new bulk and design standards that encourage mixed-use development, and respect the surrounding neighborhoods. The plan recommends adopting new zoning to achieve this balance, as well as to include increased amenities for pedestrians at established nodes to promote the connectivity of this long linear district. (p. 42) The Economic Development Element of the 2007 Master Plan further examines the issues along Teaneck Road, pointing out that the retail uses are too scattered and fragmented to promote multi-destination shopping. The plan states that neither the streetscapes nor the building facades are particularly attractive or inviting. (p. 110). The plan points out that Teaneck Road has a large number of underutilized properties and redevelopment could yield substantial gains in floor area. Redevelopment incentives in the form of added density, more permissive use and bulk requirements, and a greater maximum building height, could provide opportunities that present zoning regulations do not permit. The plan states that the creation of pedestrian nodes throughout the district should be considered to reduce the linear effect of the district and to identify areas for pedestrian-friendly uses. Moreover, establishing new bulk/zoning standards to create consistent setbacks and uses, and to relocate parking in the rear of structures, will aid in transforming the Teaneck Road corridor into a more pedestrian oriented business district. 4

Along the lines of the above, the 2011 and 2014 Master Plan Reexamination Reports emphasized that the decrease in the Township s non residential tax ratable base indicated in the 2007 Master Plan remains a substantive issue in Teaneck where the tax burden increasingly falls on the shoulders of the residential taxpayer. Furthermore, the trend is intensified by the dwindling availability of vacant land in the Township, particularly land which can be assembled for a development. Both reports go on to conclude that because of the decline in municipal revenues and state aid, there is an even greater need today to identify opportunities for the private market to develop vacant sites or redevelop marginal or underutilized sites to increase the Township s tax ratable base. A multifamily housing use of the subject property has the potential to address the fiscal concerns expressed in the prior Master Plan documentation. Self contained apartment communities require very limited municipal services. In particular, the number of public school children generated by such communities is drastically lower than single family, townhouse or garden apartment dwellings. Consequently, in reference to the above Master Plan policy statements, a well planned multifamily housing use will create a positive fiscal impact on the municipality. In addition, a multifamily use with an inclusionary affordable housing component would advance Objective #7 of the Land Use Plan Element which seeks to provide for the Township s fair share of affordable housing. The subject property is included in the Township s recently adopted Housing Element and Fair Share Plan with a minimum affordable housing set aside of 10%. In summary, a rezoning to facilitate a multifamily residential redevelopment of the former Verizon office building would advance several of the Township s Master Plan goals and objectives related to the revitalization of underperforming industrial and commercial properties and the accommodation of new multifamily housing uses in appropriate locations and in a manner which does not negatively impact the character of existing residential neighborhoods or the fiscal health of the community. 3.3 Recommendations for the Proposed Rezoning of Block 5002, Lot 18.01 A new zone district is recommended for Block 5002, Lot 18.01 to facilitate a multifamily residential use. The Township currently has a R M (Residential Multifamily) zone and a newly adopted R-M2 zone. As illustrated in Figure 4, a new multifamily zone which might be called R M3 (Residential Multifamily 3) should be created to permit multifamily dwellings and customary accessory uses. The overall yield of development should be limited to 250 units. The recommended bulk requirements for the R M3 are set forth below. Standard Lot size Lot width Building Setbacks Front Side Rear Setback to single-family property line Driveway setbacks R-M3 Zone Minimum Requirement 4 acres 250 feet 35 feet 40 feet 70 feet 80 feet 5

To property line Parking setbacks (surface) To property line To building Open space Surface open space Total open space (including roof gardens) 2 feet 10 feet 10 feet 25% of lot area 35% of lot area Building coverage 40% of lot area Impervious coverage 80% of lot area Floor Area Ratio 1.25 Building Height Stories 5 stories Feet 70 feet Additional items that should be addressed include: Design standards: Special attention should be paid to the façade of the new building on Teaneck Road. As indicated in the 2007 Master Plan, it is important that attractive building facades and pedestrian amenities be provided along Teaneck Road to help revitalize the corridor. Any new building at 1500 Teaneck Road should include a pedestrian entrance on Teaneck Road, with parking screened from view from Teaneck Road, to the extent practical, by locating the parking behind and/or underneath the building. The area will remain subject to the other standards of the Township of Teaneck Municipal Code, including the site design standards set forth in Section 33 18 as well as the signs, off street parking, fences and other related standards set forth in Sections 33 27 to 29. Affordable housing: It is recommended that a minimum of 10% of the units will be designated for low and moderate income families in accordance with Uniform Housing Affordability Controls (UHAC) in terms of unit type distribution and income requirements. Alternatively, a payment in lieu of providing affordable housing may also be considered. Parking requirement: While the zoning must technically comply with the statewide parking requirements of the Residential Site Improvement Standards (RSIS), it is likely that a new multifamily use will demand a much smaller supply of off street parking spaces. It should be noted that the RSIS parking requirements were developed based on statewide auto ownership data from the 1990 US Census. In reality, the occupants of new multifamily residential developments in the New York Metropolitan Area have much lower parking demands than garden apartments in more outer suburban or rural contexts. The Planning Board should consider allowing an exception from RSIS to require a minimum of 1.75 parking spaces per unit. 4. CONCLUSION The Amendment to the Land Use Element of the Township of Teaneck described in the foregoing chapters considered the future development of Block 5002, Lot 18.01. An amendment is necessary to develop a new zoning scheme for the former Verizon office building which is currently vacant. Based on the locational and surrounding land use characteristics of the subject property, it was determined that a multifamily residential use is appropriate for the site. By the same token, the current zoning which encourages low-scale residential and commercial development is ill suited for the property. A 6

redevelopment of the site for multifamily housing would advance a number of goals and objectives of the Teaneck Master Plan. The creation of a new multifamily zone based on the planning framework introduced in the preceding chapter is strongly recommended. 7