HEALTH POINTE NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Similar documents
Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. Summary

Cover Photo by William Broekhuizen

Overview. Review Zoning Rewrite Project Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance

Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes

How to Set Permit Fees

5. SALE OF SURPLUS LAND, CENTREPOINTE, NEPEAN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. That Council:

City of Westminster

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED AND USED FOR STRICTLY CHARITABLE OR SCHOOL PURPOSES

ARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG

Transit-Oriented Development Specialized Real Estate Services

RAILS- TO- TRAILS PROGRAM IN MICHIGAN. in implementing so- called rails- to- trails programs, which seek to convert unused

Allegan County Equalization Department

How to Set Permit Fees

Recent Developments: Proposition 218 s Fees and Charges Provisions

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ERVIN HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC

BISCAYNE BAY CAMPUS REPLACEMENT STUDENT HOUSING

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: August 4, 2014

CRITERIA AND INFORMATION FOR CITY OF PRINCE GEORGE PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS

Report and Recommendations of the Chelsea City Study Committee

MEETING MINUTES GRAND HAVEN CHARTER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 18, 2016

Provost v. Moulton, No. S CnC (Katz, J., Dec. 29, 2003)

CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP 2865 Thornhills SE Grand Rapids, Michigan

VALUATION OF PROPERTY. property. REALTORS need to keep in mind first, that the Occupational Code limits what

Greenbelt Group Weighs Gordon Hall Issue Change in land preservation deal could have broader implications

CITY OF AIRDRIE ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION

APPLICATION FOR TAX INCENTIVES. Town of Clarence Industrial Development Agency

Central Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

City of Lincoln Park Class C, Tavern, and Class B-Hotel Liquor License Criteria

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Equipment Leasing & Finance Association Statement to the Government Accounting Standards Board April 8, 2015

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014

Assurant Health. Time Insurance Company. Summary of Benefits and Coverage for Assurant Health individual major medical Platinum plans

RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS

PROPERTY VALUE GUARANTEE AGREEMENT

DATE: TO OWNER: Washington State Housing Finance Commission Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program 1000 Second Avenue Suite 2700 Seattle WA

CHAPTER House Bill No. 963

BUSINESS INCENTIVES POLICY June 17, 2008

Housing Affordability Research and Resources

IN RE CLINTON TOWNSHIP, ) NEW JERSEY COUNCIL HUNTERDON COUNTY ) ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Ann Item # AGENDA MEMORANDUM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Minnetonka Planning Commission Minutes. April 20, 2017

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Filing a property assessment complaint and preparing for your hearing. Alberta Municipal Affairs

ASSESSORS ANSWER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REAL PROPERTY Assessors Office, 37 Main Street

Impact Fees in Illinois

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009

ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

Cranes in the air! Amari & Locallo

Feasibility Study Report for the establishment of a rural community for Campobello Island.

Franklin Township Somerset County, New Jersey

MULTIPLE CHALLENGES REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL INDUSTRY FACES QUALITY CONTROL. Issues. Solution. By, James Molloy MAI, FRICS, CRE

What is a conservation easement?

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

NEW JERSEY COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. COAH In Re: PETITION FOR SUBSTANTIVE CERTIFICATION OF RAMSEY BOROUGH, BERGEN COUNTY

08/07/ STATE PRIMARY MANISTEE COUNTY

MINUTES PARK TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Park Township Hall nd Street Holland, MI Regular Meeting April 28, :35 P.M.

Office of the City Auditor. Audit Report

SoccerCity Versus Friends of SDSU: An Analysis of Two Competing Initiatives

Transit Oriented Workforce Housing Solutions

THIS IS THE TITLE OF THE DOCUMENT. What You Should Know About CRE Leases

$0 See the chart starting on page 2 for your costs for services this plan covers.

Housing Commission Report

Equalization. Equalization. Statutory Duties. Statutory Authority

COMPLAINT ON REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT FOR 20. BEFORE THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW FOR (city, town village or county) PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION

Summary Report on the Economic Impact of the State Center Project Baltimore, MD

CHAPTER 18 SITE CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS

Subject: Affordable Housing Reserve Fund Policy Bylaw No. 3866, 2008

The phasing schedule set forth in NJ.A.C. 5:93-5.6(d) is identical to that set forth in COAH's current rules at5:97-6.4(d).

AEI Fund Management, Inc Wells Fargo Place 30 Seventh Street East St. Paul, MN (fax)

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF. May 08, Staff members present: Jim Hewitt, Ginny Owens, David Mahoney

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Chapter 12 RMH MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

MINUTES TOWN OF NAGS HEAD NAGS HEAD MUNICIPAL COMPLEX BOARD ROOM WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 2016

Important Questions Answers Why this Matters: $100 Member/$200 Family for PCP Benefit level. $250 Member/$500 Family for Self-Referred Benefit level.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON

Borowski v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Wis: Court of Appeals, 1st...

Essential Services Assessment Annual Return

A Homeowners Guide HOW TO PRESENT YOUR CASE AT AN INFORMAL HEARING.

COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET MORRIS COUNTY FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, et al. #

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. PROJECT NAME Cedar Riverside. DEVELOPER Cedar Riverside Land Company. APPROVAL Offer of Commitment: June 1971

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

Report on Inspection of Plante & Moran, PLLC (Headquartered in Southfield, Michigan) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

o School crowding. This is probably the biggest concern of many of our residents. The type of rentals proposed are targeted towards young

VOTE: The motion passed on a voice call vote of 5-0.

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Getting More Value for Your Practice

KENT COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITY REVIEW DECEMBER 2018

Funding capital improvements

You can see the specialist you choose without permission from this plan.

Building & Site Sinking Fund Election

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: Our website is changing! Please click here for details.

TRIUMPH GULF COAST, INC. PRE-APPLICATION FORM

The Department s Role

Reappraisal Important Property Tax Information

Chapter 8 Category 11e Changes in Eligible Basis

Transcription:

HEALTH POINTE NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Health Pointe is a collaboration between Spectrum Health and Holland Hospital to construct a new medical office building on the last remaining lots located on the north end of the Meijer store property. The local Spectrum Health physicians are leasing space in the Harbor Dunes building from the North Ottawa Community Health System (NOCH). This lease will expire in October of 2017, but could be renewed for an additional five years. However, rather than renew their lease with NOCH, the physicians plan to expand their practice (which currently serves about 20,000 patients) and construct a new 105,000 square foot medical office building. If successful, the facility could be expanded by an additional 15,000 square feet. The new medical office building will house additional physician services including specialties such as cardiology, endocrinology, neurology and urology. Plans also include radiology, laboratory services, CT scans, MRI scans, and an outpatient surgical suite, which was recently granted a Certificate of Need by the State of Michigan. The goal of the Health Pointe facility is to provide local access for Holland Hospital and Spectrum Health patients who now have to travel for services. About 80% of the Health Pointe patients' health care needs can be met at this single, local facility. Health Pointe also addresses an Ottawa County Community Health Needs Assessment finding which indicates a need for greater access to primary and specialty care. This is supported by recent statistics that show that there is a poor provider-to-patient ratio in Ottawa County. Although the state average is 1 physician per 1,240 patients Ottawa County has a ratio of 1 physician per 1,620 patients, which is about 31% worse than the state average. And, because Ottawa County is the fastest growing county in the State, this ratio could continue to decline without additional health care options for residents. Once completed, it is expected that Health Pointe will employ 250 individuals and will create about 160 new jobs. However, the Health Pointe project was controversial and a number of objections were raised. These objections will be discussed on the following pages, which will both correct misinformation and explain why the elected officials approved the Health Pointe medical office building. 1

Economic Impact on North Ottawa Community Health System (NOCH) Opponents focused heavily on the potential negative economic impact that Health Pointe would have on NOCH. In brief, opponents to Health Pointe argue that health care is not truly a free market and that Health Pointe will be able to focus on the most profitable health services drawing monies away from NOCH, who is required as a hospital to provide many services that are not profitable. The predicted outcome of this dynamic is that NOCH would eventually fail financially. Although the opponents may not be wrong, the Board felt that this is a tenuous argument for denying zoning approval. Further, the Board felt that residents deserve a Choice for health care services without having to leave the community. Elected officials should not use zoning regulations to pick winners and losers in the health care market. The Board's vote espoused a governance philosophy that elected officials should not use zoning regulations to pick winners and losers in the health care market. Two days after the Township Board approved the Health Pointe facility, NOCH announced it had entered into a strategic alliance with the Mercy Health group to ensure its patients had improved access to health care. With this collaborative agreement, NOCH should be able to continue to operate as a small local hospital even with competition from Health Pointe. Property Taxes Opponents note that the Health Pointe facility could apply for an exemption from property taxes as early as 2018. This is true. Because of a precedent-setting Michigan Supreme Court decision (i.e., Wexford Medical Group v. City of Cadillac), a non-profit health care corporation can be exempted from property taxation as a charitable institution under the Michigan General Property Tax Act. This decision means that any non-profit health care corporation could seek an exemption from property taxes including the Harbor Dunes facility owned by NOCH. It should be understood that Health Pointe has not asserted any property tax exemption with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. And, Grand Haven Township would oppose such a request. But, because of the Michigan Supreme Court decision, the Township agrees with opponents that if the Health Pointe facility received a property tax exemption from the State of Michigan, the facility would become a net drain on the Township since it would be a significant user of Township services; but, would not pay property taxes. To protect against that possibility, the Township negotiated a Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreement that would become effective if the Michigan Tax Tribunal granted a property tax exemption to Health Pointe. The Township has a similar PILOT agreement with the Grand Haven Board of Light and Power (BLP) for the facilities that BLP maintains in the community. Specifically, the PILOT agreement guarantees an annual payment equal to the Township s millage rate (i.e., about 4.32 mills) on a $10 million Taxable Value, which is equal to a $20 million market value. Further, payments will be adjusted annually for inflation. This $43,200 annual payment will ensure there are monies to cover services that the Health Pointe facility would directly receive from the Township (e.g., Fire and Rescue services, Harbor Transit services, police services, street maintenance, ordinance enforcement, etc.). The opponents also argued that this annual PILOT payment is too little for the purported $50 million dollar investment related to Health Pointe. 2

In response, it should be understood that a $50 million dollar investment by Health Pointe is not a $50 million dollar building. The investment also includes the 160 new jobs being created, the transfer costs, the infrastructure costs, new medical equipment, etc. None of these items are subject to property taxes. The formula utilized for the PILOT agreement was simply based upon the Township s current millage rate (i.e., General Operating = 0.91710 mills; Fire/Rescue Service = 1.9 mills; Police Services = 0.55 mills; Transportation Services = 0.95 mills for a total of 4.3171 mills rounded up to 4.32 mills) multiplied by an estimated Taxable Value of $10 million (or a market value of $20 million). The $10 million Taxable Value estimate was based upon the following: Facility Square Footage Taxable Value NOCH Lakeshore Health Care facility 53,682 $2.86 million Holland Spectrum Health Medical Facility 58,710 $3.73 million Grand Rapids Township Spectrum Health Integrated Care Campus 95,205 $6.17 million Taxable Value / Square Foot Average Taxable Value Estimate for 120,000 sq./ft. Health Pointe facility The table indicates that the Taxable Value for the Health Pointe facility when constructed will likely be about $7.38 million. Therefore, the Township began negotiations at a $10 million Taxable Value number expecting that there would be some compromise and we would end at a number closer to an $8 million Taxable Value. However, Health Pointe agreed to this initial Taxable Value number without complaint. The PILOT monies are only meant to cover any Township revenue loss should a property exemption on the Health Pointe facility be granted by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The PILOT agreement is not meant to cover services that do not directly benefit the Health Pointe facility (e.g., museum, education, County parks, etc.). It would be difficult to assert that a tax exempt entity had to pay for services it did not directly receive. It is believed that this is the first and only example in Michigan where a PILOT agreement was used to protect a municipality from the negative impacts of a possible future property tax exemption. Traffic Opponents claim that the traffic impact study was too limited and should be conducted over a larger area. In response, it was noted that Health Pointe hired AECOM to complete a traffic impact study of the project with a study area that was already larger than what is typically required and that the study was competed pursuant to established traffic engineering industry standards. Further, this study was independently reviewed by the Ottawa County Road Commission, which concluded that the level of service on Robbins Road could be maintained at a C rating with improvements to the Robbins Road and 172nd Avenue traffic signal and the re-striping of certain portions of Robbins Road. These recommended improvements were already part of the City s Capital Improvement Plan for Robbins Road. And, Health Pointe voluntarily agreed to contribute $132,000 toward these off-site improvements. Building Height Health Pointe originally proposed a building that was 55 feet in height. Opponents claimed that this was too tall. The elected officials agreed and required that the building be reduced to 45 feet. Total 207,597 $12.76 million However, opponents were not satisfied and demanded that the zoning limit of 35 feet be applied. $61.47/sq. ft. $7.38 million 3

To understand this issue, it is important to understand the difference between a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a site plan. A site plan follows strict zoning regulations without option for exceptions and must be approved by right if all standards are met. However, a PUD is a legal form of contract zoning that allows departures if the development is improved and the applicant provides something of value. Two examples cited where developers were not granted departures were the Generation Care building located near US- 31 and Lincoln Street and the strip mall located along US-31 just south of Ferris Street. However, the owners for both of these developments chose to use the site plan approval process as opposed to the PUD approval process. Still, pursuant to the Zoning regulations, both developments were eligible for one departure related to the placement of the access drives. And, the Planning Commission granted this departure to both developments. It is noted that all of the previous PUD developments within the Township also received departures that were determined to improve the overall design and value of these developments (e.g., Speedway, Piper Lakes Apartments, etc.). In this instance, the Planning Commission and Board authorized four departures from the strict zoning regulations. These included: 1. Building Height - The Board allowed the height of the building to be 45 feet, in part, because (1) the Master Plan encourages commercial developments to be taller in order to reduce sprawl ; (2) the Fire department has a vehicle that can reach 75 feet; and, (3) the nearest single family residential structures are over 1,100 feet distant. 2. Parking - The zoning rules limit parking to a maximum number, unless the applicant completes a parking study to demonstrate that additional spaces are necessary. In this instance, using data from similar medical facilities, the applicant was able to prove that the parking should be increased. 3. Landscape Islands - Certain landscape islands within the parking lot were allowed to be 2 feet longer and are expected to calm traffic and provide for additional landscaped areas. 4. Signage - Because this was an amendment to the existing 1998 Meijer PUD, the exception was a blend of the 1998 rules and the current rules. The end result is that the amount of ground signage was reduced by 116 square feet; but, the signs could be six feet tall pursuant to current zoning standards. So what did the Township receive in return for these four exceptions? The Township placed 23 conditions on the PUD, including the following: Health Pointe will provide $132,000 to the City of Grand Haven for off-site improvement to Robbins Road; Health Pointe guarantees that they will provide monies for direct Township services, even if the Michigan Tax Tribunal provides an exemption to property taxes; Health Pointe will provide an easement for the purposes of aligning Whittaker Way and DeSpelder Street should this planned collaborative project between the City and Township occur; Health Pointe will remain a Class B office building and will never be developed into a hospital; and, The parking areas are back loaded to improve safety and vehicular flow. Permitted Uses The final argument against Health Pointe was that Permitted Uses in Commercial districts allows office buildings ; but does not specifically list medical offices. Further, because medical offices are only listed in the Service/ Professional District, Health Pointe should not be allowed in a Commercial PUD. The elected officials acknowledged that there is ambiguity in the Zoning Ordinance with regard to the term office buildings. Large and complex developments often will raise issues that were not anticipated when the ordinances were originally drafted. But, after reviewing numerous legal opinions and case law, the Board sided with the Township attorney and determined that the term office buildings in the Commercial zoning district was broad enough to include medical offices. 4

In reaching this decision, the Board continued a governance philosophy that encourages ambiguities in any ordinance to be interpreted to the benefit of the property owner not the Township. Because of the concerns that were raised during the Health Pointe zoning review process, the Board did benefit of the property owner instruct the Planning Commission to address the issues not the Township. that were found. However, because of delays in processing the Health Pointe PUD amendment application, the ordinance to address these concerns was actually approved two weeks prior to the final vote on Health Pointe. In response, opponents opined that the Township was changing the rules for Health Pointe. But, it is important to note that the elected officials used the zoning standards that were in place when Health Pointe originally applied for zoning approval during the vote on March 28th the Board did not utilize the standards contained within the new zoning regulations. The Township began work on the Health Pointe project in March of 2015. The Planning Commission held eight public meetings during which the Health Pointe project was discussed beginning with a pre-application conference held in September of 2015 and including a joint meeting with the City of Grand Haven Planning Commission. The Township Board held one public hearing and reviewed the Health Pointe application at four additional public meetings. A total of 66 people spoke at these meetings. Some of these individuals spoke at each of the five aforementioned meetings. A breakdown of these 66 speakers indicates the following: A Long Process Ambiguities in any ordinance should be interpreted to the 44 (or about 67%) of the speakers were non-residents; 22 (or about 33%) of the speakers were residents of the Township. Because the Township s population is about 16,101, these 22 residents that spoke represent about 14/100ths of 1% of the residents. This sample size is too small to make any extrapolations regarding whether township residents support or oppose the Health Pointe project. 23 (or about 35%) of the speakers were affiliated with NOCH; 11 (or about 17%) of the speakers were affiliated with either Spectrum Health or Holland Hospital. Not surprisingly 100% of the speakers affiliated with NOCH opposed the Health Pointe project while 100% of the speakers affiliated with Spectrum Health or Holland Hospital supported the project. Public comments are an important part of the decision making process for elected officials. And, the 22 Township residents that spoke showed a deep commitment to their positions on Health Pointe. However, these comments were not sufficiently persuasive to convince the elected officials to vote against the recommendation from the Planning Commission to approve the Health Pointe project. At the end, the Township Board voted 6 to 1 to approve the Health Pointe application and amend the Meijer Planned Unit Development. If you would like to review any of the Health Pointe documentation or plans, please contact Township Manager Bill Cargo by either calling (616) 402-0350 or emailing him at bcargo@ght.org. 5