COMPLAINT. Introductory Statement. 1. This lawsuit arises from a new Providence zoning ordinance that prohibits more

Similar documents
1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a

CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.

IN THE FLORIDA FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2014

8:19-cv LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/31/ :25 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/31/2017

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOW COME Plaintiffs Elizabeth Zander and Evan Galloway (collectively, "Plaintiffs"),

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Township of Denville Affordable Housing Update Facts & Frequently-Asked Questions

Case 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9

Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

1. As of January L,20L4,legaI title to the Subject Property was vested in The

Case 9:13-cv RNS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2013 Page 1 of 15

COMMISSION AGENDA ;. 1<1. 1./ t1 llc

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

JOH. Plaintiff, Randolph Township Industrial Complex, a New Jersey. Partnership, by way of Complaint against the defendants, says: FIRST COUNT

DRAFT- SUBJECT TO REVISIONS BEFORE FILING

Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :42:23 PM

CITY OF AUSTIN S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Daniel M. Schwarz of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ) ) Defendant.

Case 2:17-cv JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC LOWER CASE NUMBER: 3D THOMAS KRAMER, Petitioner,

BOOKHAMMER ESTATES ) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. v. ) ) GEOFFREY W. KLOPP and ) LYNNETTE L. KLOPP, ) ) Defendants.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

) ) LUCCI, ) Case No. ) Plaintiffs, ) In Chancery ) Inj unction/temporary Restraining Order v. ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) CLERK DOROTHY BROWN

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF PAGE 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

How to Sue Your Landlord in Texas

HISPANIC AIDS FORUM, Index No. 01/112428

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 4001

Case 1:15-cv TWP-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

CASE NO.: DIV.: COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs GEORGE FREEEMAN, an individual, and

1. Ptaintifl Andrew A. Greenstein, in his capacity as Trustee of the Andrew. 2. Defendant CAREY BAKER is sued in his official capacrty as Lake County

Case 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Meeting Date: July 16, 2018 Mayor and Council Brigid Reynolds, Director of Community Planning Moratorium on Short-Term Rentals

TSB Holdings, LLC (hereinafter referred to as TSB Holdings), a limited liability

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY. This consent decree is made and entered into by the Plaintiff and Defendant in the

Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, having its principal. office at 130 Davidson Avneue, Somerset, Somerset County, New

1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

Plaintiff, ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2016. Index No. [type in Index No]

INTERPLEADER COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/18/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2010

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv JHP-TLW Document 2 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 11/21/14 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Jurist Co., Inc. v 175 Varick St. LLC 2006 NY Slip Op 30756(U) September 8, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /05 Judge:

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016

ORDINANCE NO. 130 BLACKMAN TOWNSHIP TAX EXEMPTION ORDINANCE PARK FOREST APARTMENTS 2017

Specimen Complaint to Establish Easement Rights 1

Supreme Court of Florida

BACKGROUND. Earnest money dispute. Should the money be released to the seller? Why should the

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

1. This action arises out of the denial for the Tax Years 2016 and 2017 by the St. Lucie. Filing # E-Filed 04124/2017 ll:04:01 PM COMPLAINT

Case 2:08-cv TS -BCW Document 2 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 6

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/ /30/ :39 06:55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

l. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR JOHNSON COUNTY PHILIP AMOR, et al., CVCV75753

AMENDED VERIFIED COUNTERCLAIMS. Counter-Plaintiff, Patricia Cohen (Cohen), by and through undersigned counsel, sues

Supreme Court of Florida

Case 5:07-cv F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Wholesale Relators Supply Co., by and through its attorneys Margolis Edelstein,

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS CONSERVATION EASEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF STAFFORD COUNTY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN JUNE 4, 2009 CRUCIBLE, INC.

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF. Plaintiff, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :37:26 PM 18-CA-9531

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

1. The Plaintifl, FGHP FUNDING WEST LP (hereinafter "Plaintiffl'), owns real

1. The Plaintiff, IA LODGING ORLANDO DOWNTOWN, LLC (hereinafter. 2. The Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to transact -1-

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/ /29/ :03 11:10 PM AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2016

Supreme Court of Florida

COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, RESTITUTION, CIVIL PENALTIES, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF

1. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the partial removal

2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

RECErVED FOR FlUNG AMERICAN MARKETING GROUP, LLC.

INDIAN MOUNTAIN METROPOLITAN DISTRICT S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

l. This is an action to contest the decision of the Osceola County Value 2. The plaintiff, Katrina Scarborough, is the duly elected Osceola County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Transcription:

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, S.C. SUPERIOR COURT FEDERAL HILL CAPITAL, LLC, CHRISTOPHER MUSACCHIO, ALEJANDRO AMAYA, WILLIAM SMITH, AND COREY KOSSIN, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. PC-2016- CITY OF PROVIDENCE by and through its Treasurer, James Lombardi, JORGE ELORZA, in his official capacity as Mayor of Providence, and JEFFREY L. LYKINS, in his official capacity as Director of the Providence Department of Inspection and Standards, Defendants. COMPLAINT Introductory Statement 1. This lawsuit arises from a new Providence zoning ordinance that prohibits more than three university students from living together in a single-family home in neighborhoods that are zoned primarily for single-family homes. The City Council enacted the ordinance in response to complaints of loud parties and rowdy behavior in the areas around Providence College and Rhode Island College, yet there is absolutely no reason to believe that restricting the number of student tenants in a small subset of available rental housing (i.e., single-family homes will make the affected neighborhoods any quieter, safer or cleaner. On the contrary, the ordinance is an unconstitutional intrusion into the rights of college and graduate students to choose with whom they wish to live, and the rights of property owners to rent their homes to tenants of their choice. This Court should invalidate the ordinance. 1

2. Parties, Jurisdiction, and Venue 3. Plaintiff Federal Hill Capital, LLC ( FHC is a Rhode Island limited liability company with its principal place of business in Providence, Rhode Island. FHC owns a single family home located at 15 Oakdale Street in Providence, Rhode Island (the Oakdale House. 4. Plaintiff Christopher Musacchio ( Musacchio is a junior Hotel Management major at Johnson & Wales University in Providence, Rhode Island. Musacchio resides at the Oakdale House. 5. Plaintiff Alejandro Amaya ( Amaya is a junior Food Service Management major at Johnson & Wales University in Providence, Rhode Island. Amaya resides at the Oakdale House. 6. Plaintiff William Smith ( Smith is a junior Business Management major at Johnson & Wales University in Providence, Rhode Island. Smith resides at the Oakdale House. 7. Plaintiff Corey Kossin ( Kossin is a junior Business Management major at Johnson & Wales University in Providence, Rhode Island. Kossin resides in Providence, Rhode Island. 8. Musacchio, Amaya and Smith are parties to a lease with FHC dated February 5, 2015 through which they and one other tenant rented the Oakdale House from June 1, 2015 through May 24, 2016. 9. Musacchio, Amaya, Smith and Kossin (together, the Student Plaintiffs are parties to a lease with FHC dated January 12, 2016 through which they have rented the Oakdale House from June 1, 2016 through May 24, 2017. 10. Defendant City of Providence ( Providence or the City is a Municipal Corporation and political subdivision of the State of Rhode Island. 2

11. Defendant Jorge O. Elorza ( Mayor Elorza is the Mayor of Providence. As chief executive of the City, Mayor Elorza has ultimate authority over the Department of Inspection and Standards, which is charged with enforcement of the zoning ordinance at issue in this case. 12. Defendant Jeffrey L. Lykins ( Lykins is the Director of the Department of Inspection and Standards for the City of Providence. 13. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter pursuant to RIGL 8-2-13, 8-2-14 and 8-2-17. 14. Venue is proper in this County pursuant to RIGL 9-4-3. The Student Housing Ordinance 15. Prior to September 17, 2015, the Providence Zoning Ordinance did not purport to regulate the number of college students permitted to reside in a single-family dwelling in Providence. 16. On or about September 17, 2015, the Providence City Council voted for the second time to approve an amendment to the Providence Zoning Ordinance that prohibits more than three College Students from living together in a non-owner-occupied single-family dwelling in an area zoned R-1 or R-1A (the Student Housing Ordinance. The Student Housing Ordinance is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 17. Prior to passage of the Student Housing Ordinance, the term College Student was not defined in the Providence Zoning Ordinance. The Student Housing Ordinance defines College Student as [A]n individual enrolled in, or attending academic courses at, any college, university or other post-secondary education institution for academic credit, whether in an undergraduate or graduate capacity. Significantly, the Student Housing Ordinance does not 3

distinguish between graduate, undergraduate, full-time and part-time students. All are merely College Students for the purposes of the ordinance. 18. A press release issued by the Providence City Council on or about September 17, 2015, explains the rationale behind the new law according to Councilwoman Jo-Ann Ryan, its sponsor: Ryan introduced the legislation in response to concerns from residents in the Elmhurst and Mount Pleasant neighborhoods she represents, who are frustrated that single-family homes were being purchased and rented to numerous college students. Ryan, whose ward borders the Providence College campus, said that, The change in intended use of singlefamily homes is undermining the character of our neighborhoods, diminishing the quality of life, and creating health and public safety concerns. She said, The new zoning ordinance will give the City a critical tool in addressing the negative impacts of student housing in single-family districts. A copy of the press release, obtained from the City Council s website, is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 19. Upon information and belief, permitting more than three College Students to live together in a single-family home in a neighborhood zoned R-1 or R-1A is not undermining the character of [the City s] neighborhoods, diminishing the quality of life, and creating health and public safety concerns. 20. Prior to enactment of the Student Housing Ordinance, there were laws in effect to address the legitimate concerns of City residents regarding noise, parties and traffic in residential neighborhoods. Those laws remain in effect following the passage of the Student Housing Ordinance. Upon information and belief, the Student Housing Ordinance will not have any additional impact on these issues. 21. The Student Housing Ordinance was signed by Mayor Elorza in or about September 2015, following its second passage by the City Council, and is presently in effect. 4

The Oakdale House 22. FHC purchased the Oakdale House on or about June 18, 2013. 23. Upon information and belief, the Oakdale House was vacant and abandoned for more than one year before FHC purchased it. 24. The Oakdale House is zoned R-1, which the Providence Zoning Ordinance defines as a residential district intended for detached single-family dwellings of low density residential development. The Student Housing Ordinance purports to restrict the right of FHC to rent the Oakdale House to more than three College Students. 25. On or about February 5, 2015, before the Student Housing Ordinance took effect, plaintiffs Musacchio, Amaya and Smith entered into a lease with FHC for the Oakdale House, along with one other tenant (the 2015 Lease. A copy of the 2015 Lease is attached hereto as Exhibit C. The 2015 lease term runs from June 1, 2015 through May 24, 2016. All four of the tenants on the 2015 Lease are College Students as defined in the Student Housing Ordinance. 26. On or about January 12, 2016, after the Student Housing Ordinance took effect, the four Student Plaintiffs entered into a lease with FHC for the Oakdale House, the 2016 Lease. A copy of the 2016 Lease is attached hereto as Exhibit D. The 2016 lease term runs from June 1, 2016 through May 24, 2017. All four of the tenants on the 2016 Lease are College Students as defined in the Student Housing Ordinance. COUNT I (Due Process 27. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate Paragraphs 1through 26 as fully stated above. 28. Enforcement of the Student Housing Ordinance would interfere with FHC s right to lease the Oakdale House to the Student Plaintiffs, as well as the Student Plaintiffs right to choose with whom they may live, and where they may live. Enforcement of the Student Housing 5

Ordinance would therefore deprive all Plaintiffs of their right to due process of law in contravention of Article 1, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution. 29. Enforcement of the Student Housing Ordinance would also deprive all Plaintiffs of a protected property right without due process of law in contravention of Article 1, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution. COUNT II (Equal Protection All Plaintiffs 30. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate Paragraphs 1through 29 as fully stated above. 31. The Student Housing Ordinance denies FHC and the other Providence property owners who choose to rent single family homes zoned R-1 or R-1A to more than three College Students the equal protection of the law in contravention of Article 1, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution. 32. The Student Housing Ordinance deprives the Student Plaintiffs of equal protection of the law in contravention of Article 1, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution, by discriminating against them based solely on their occupation and/or educational status, and attempting to restrict with whom they may live, and where they may live. COUNT III (Declaratory Judgment 33. Plaintiffs repeat and incorporate Paragraphs 1through 32 as fully stated above. 34. There exists at the current time a dispute and controversy between the parties sufficient for a declaratory judgment. 35. Accordingly, Plaintiffs request that the Court issue a judgment for declaratory relief concerning the Constitutionality of the Student Housing Ordinance pursuant to R.I. Gen. Law 9-30-1. 6

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court enter judgment as follows: 1. Declaring the Student Housing Ordinance unconstitutional pursuant to Article 1, Section 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution. 2. Entering an order enjoining the Defendants from enforcing or attempting to enforce the Student Housing ordinance. 3. Awarding Plaintiffs compensatory and exemplary damages in an amount to be proven at trial. 4. Awarding Plaintiffs their costs and reasonable attorneys fees. 5. Awarding Plaintiffs such other and further relief as the Court finds just and equitable. PLAINTIFFS DEMAND A TRIAL BY JURY FEDERAL HILL CAPITAL, LLC, CHRISTOPHER MUSACCHIO, ALEJANDRO AMAYA, WILLIAM SMITH, AND COREY COSSIN, By their attorneys, Dated: February, 2016. /s/ Jeffrey L. Levy Jeffrey L. Levy (#9233 Charles D. Blackman (#5522 LEVY & BLACKMAN LLP 469 Angell Street, Suite 2 Providence, Rhode Island 02906 Phone: (401437-6900 Fax: (401632-4695 jlevy@levyblackman.com Cooperating Attorneys, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Of Rhode Island 7