Planning Commission Research Topic No. 1 (1995)

Similar documents
nd Quarter Market Report

White Oak Science Gateway Master Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS. March 8, 2013

Ontario Rental Market Study:

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development

Residential Construction in Farmland Preservation Zoning Districts

Orange Avenue Corridor Study

2015 First Quarter Market Report

Affordable Housing Bonus Program. Public Questions and Answers - #2. January 26, 2016

Affordably- Priced Housing

Single Family Sales Maine: Units

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development. Development Plan & Policies

The State of Renters & Their Homes

Charlottesville Housing Market Report Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS )

2013 Year-End Market Report

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

CAAR Market Report 2010 First Quarter Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics December 2018

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

CITI HABITATS. Manhattan Residential Sales Market Report

The Manhattan real estate market

Shaping Our Future. Return-on-Investment Study. June 2017

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eight-Year Report

Infill Housing Analysis

Agenda Report. Agenda Item No. 5a. Attachment 6 DATE: JULY 5, 2016 CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING

Modeling Housing Affordability in Corpus Christi, Texas

Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price May May 2018

Appendix D HOUSING WORK GROUP REPORT JULY 10, 2002

See Full Corridor Study Volumes I and II as separate attachments.

410 Land Use Trends Comprehensive Plan Section 410

A. Location. A MRD District may be permitted throughout the County provided it meets the standards established herein.

The Corcoran Report 4Q16 MANHATTAN

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report

Household Affordability Prescription

August 2017 Loudoun County Market Trends Report Sales Price Reaches Record High; Sales Decline; Inventory Remains Low

Hennepin County Economic Analysis Executive Summary

URBAN INFILL HOUSING OPTIONS

Town of Washington, New Hampshire Master Plan 2015

2016 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

CHAPTER 4. MANAGER Single-Family Multi-Family Total. CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS Housing Needs Analysis

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

rd Quarter Market Report

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON SEWER SYSTEM FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MARCH, 2018

2004 Cooperative Housing Journal

OVERVIEW OF RECENT/EXPECTED ECONOMIC/ HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS

8Land Use. The Land Use Plan consists of the following elements:

Napa Valley and Sonoma Valley Real Estate Market BI-ANNUAL REPORT

The Seattle MD Apartment Market Report

Truckee Development Code User s Guide TOWN OF TRUCKEE. A. Introduction...3. B. Organization of the Development Code 3

Matthew Mourning Research Analyst Direct Line:

Analysis of Infill Development Potential Under the Green Line TOD Ordinance

ARLA Survey of Residential Investment Landlords

BUILD-OUT ANALYSIS GRANTHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

Boone County, Kentucky Cost of Community Services Study Executive Summary

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

research RetailTrends Report compiled by IPD

Thomas M. Surak Adamsboro Drive Newhall, CA May 27, Mr. Jason Smisko, Senior Planner. City of Santa Clarita

Economic Impacts of MLS Home Sales and Purchases in Canada and the Provinces

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

CHAPTER 2: HOUSING. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Existing Housing Characteristics

Filling the Gaps: Active, Accessible, Diverse. Affordable and other housing markets in Johannesburg: September, 2012 DRAFT FOR REVIEW

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Planning Commission Application Summary

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT SAVOY DRIVE AREA ZONING MAP AMENDMENT II

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

Mohave County General Plan

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price Mar Mar 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. School Impact Analysis of GMU Forecasts for Tysons Corner to 2050

M A N H A T T A N 69 THE FURMAN CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE & URBAN POLICY. Financial District Greenwich Village/Soho

What does the Census of 2000 tell us about

New affordable housing production hits record low in 2014

REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT THE MAPPING OF MANDATORY INCLUSIONARY HOUSING (MIH) AND THE EAST HARLEM REZONING

AN ANALYSIS OF THE LAND USE AND VALUE OF WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY S MOUNTAINSIDE PARCEL. Prepared For Weber State University

Quarterly Market Detail - Q Single Family Homes Miami-Dade County

Comprehensive Plan 2030

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases One Year Report

MARKET WATCH: Dakota County

Prepared For: Pennsylvania Utility Law Project (PULP) Harry Geller, Executive Director Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

Housing affordability in England and Wales: 2018

A Dillon commercial lot with a Walgreen's Pharmacy on it sold for an eye-popping $7.4 million at the end of June, according to local property records.

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. New Pending Sales. New Listings. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Median Days on Market

3 July 13, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: MARQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. /G.S. DEVELOPERS, L.L.C.

Table 4d-1. City of Poulsbo Residential Building Permits CITY OF POULSBO Unit Type

Transcription:

Planning Commission Research Topic No. 1 (1995) Research Question: How might various types of residential developments affect enrollment for neighborhood schools? Purpose Staff was directed to research this question by the Planning Commission to see if there is validity to concerns raised by neighborhood residents at rezoning public hearings. Residents often voice their fear that if a higher-density residential development proposal is approved, neighborhood schools will be adversely affected by significant increases in enrollment. Background Over a five-year period (1990-94), the City of Overland Park experienced substantial residential growth. Much of this growth occurred in the Blue Valley School District, which is south of I-435. Of the 6,441 residential units constructed, nearly 90 percent (5,731 units) were single-family homes. In the two years prior to this research, however, the Planning Commission reviewed several rezoning requests for apartments and R-1A, small-lot single-family subdivisions. This prompted the concern of adjacent neighborhood residents. To keep pace with growth, the Blue Valley School District had to construct a number of new schools, several of which are located within Overland Park. The lag time between site acquisition, construction and occupancy of a new school was not always able to keep up with the burgeoning enrollment, particularly in the areas at the fringe of development. The District had, in a few cases, found it necessary to construct temporary facilities to handle the growth in enrollment while a new school was under construction. This perceived overcrowding in a few schools raised the concern of some area residents about approving new developments, particularly apartment complexes that may propose 300 or more units in a relatively small area, which would be built and occupied in a short period of time. 1-1

The concern of some residents was that the influx of students coming from these higher-density residential developments (including R-1A and higher) would overwhelm the, already perceived as crowded, schools. But residents were less likely to object to the development of a residential proposal if it was developed at a comparable density and value of home as found in their own development. Methodology Used To evaluate the issue raised by the Planning Commission, staff contacted the Blue Valley School District office to obtain enrollment information by individual residential developments. The enrollment information obtained from the school district was for a four-year period of time. Yet, not all residential developments listed had occupied units for the full four years. This information was then tabulated by staff into general groups by type of residential development and by type of student (elementary, middle or high school). For example, standard single-family developments (built under the R-1, Single-Family District) were grouped together as were the small-lot single-family developments (built under the RP-1, Planned Single-Family District, R-1A, Small-Lot Single-Family District and RP-4, Planned Cluster Dwelling District). Duplex developments (R-2, Two-Family Residential District and RP-2, Planned Two-Family Residential District) have a separate category. The other categories (townhomes and apartments) were also divided by type of unit, but reflect a mixture of zoning districts (R-3, Garden Apartment District, RP-3, Planned Garden Apartment District, and RP-5, Planned Apartment House District). All categories had several developments in each. Note that the school district included all homes in any one subdivision, whether they are zoned R-1 or R-1A, under the zoning district that has the largest number of homes. This grouping should have very limited effect on the student ratios in that few subdivisions are marketed with a mixture of R-1 and R-1A homes. Table Description The table on pages 1-5 and 1-6 identifies, from the experience of the Blue Valley School District, the number of students that might be generated by each residential unit. The table further breaks down the numbers by type of student (elementary, middle or high school), and provides the average (mean), median (middle value) and range (highest and lowest values) for each type of student and the total of all 1-2

students. The ratios are so small for most categories that it may be easier to relate to the number of students that might be expected from each 100 units in a residential development. Using an example, under the Single-Family Category, the median number of, which might be expected per 100 units, is 37.9 (0.37874 x 100 units = 37.9 ). The total number of students of all three student groups (elementary, middle and high school) is 77.1 students per 100 units. The highest and lowest values are also important particularly for anticipated elementary school enrollment because of the smaller school size. Just one subdivision with unusually high student generation values may increase enrollment substantially above what might have been expected, however. The highest student generation value for elementary schools is 167 students per 100 units, which is 4.4 times the median ratio. Keep in mind, though, that this is an extreme example, and should be considered a very unlikely occurrence to repeat itself. Differences by Residential Category The findings of our research point out that, using the median values for elementary schools' ratios, a typical single-family development of 170 homes generates more than any other residential category for the same number of units, and significantly more than from the Townhome and Apartment Categories as shown on Example 1-1. Summary The findings of this report are that significant differences do exist by types of residential development. By far the largest generator of students is single-family development, followed by small-lot single-family development. Duplex, townhome, and apartment developments generate far fewer students per unit than do single-family developments. Even if you assume that a typical new apartment complex might have 680 units on a 56.7-acre site (56.7 acres x 12 units per acre = 680 units) as shown on Example 1-2, the number of generated (10.8 students) is only 16.8 percent of the number of generated by a typical 170-home single-family subdivision (64.4 students). Although the single-family subdivision is one-quarter of the apartment complex's 1-3

size in units, (170 units vs. 680 units) as shown on Example 1-2, it covers the same amount of acreage (56.7 acres x 3 units per acre = 170 homes). Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Research Topic No. 1 for use as a reference tool on Monday, May 8, 1995. 1-4

Blue Valley School District Number of Students Per Household Single-Family (R-1) Average 0.42391 0.19428 0.20225 0.82044 Median 0.37874 0.18000 0.18335 0.77148 Low 0.02822 0.05556 0.00714 0.09153 High 1.67500 0.90000 0.95000 2.67500 Single Family (Small Lot) Average 0.23015 0.15210 0.17381 0.55605 Median 0.27166 0.15344 0.20026 0.62535 Low 0.10019 0.02330 0.03046 0.17088 High 0.27166 * 0.45000 0.36000 1.03131 Duplexes Average 0.11243 0.05883 0.07739 0.24865 Median 0.07841 0.03983 0.07510 0.15252 Low 0.00383 0.00000 0.01106 0.02246 High 0.29188 0.16888 0.20938 0.63576 1-5

Townhomes Average 0.06070 0.03713 0.05070 0.14853 Median 0.03023 0.02209 0.03158 0.15526 Low 0.01873 0.00843 0.01341 0.04432 High 0.14095 0.09152 0.12196 0.28259 Apartments Average 0.04586 0.02207 0.02163 0.08956 Median 0.01597 0.01106 0.01910 0.04787 Low 0.00714 0.00143 0.00378 0.01429 High 0.16761 0.06667 0.06667 0.25966 * Several subdivisions with no history have been assigned this ratio by the school district, which explains why the median and high are identical. Source: Blue Valley School District and City of Overland Park 1-6

Example 1-1 170 Unit Development Elementary Student Enrollment Ratio Single-Family Category -.37874 X 170 units = 64.4 Small-Lot Single-Family Category -.27166 X 170 units = 46.2 Duplex Category -.07841 X 170 units = 13.3 Townhome Category -.03023 X 170 units = 5.1 Apartment Category - 0.1597 X 170 units = 2.7 Sources: Blue Valley School District and City 1-7

Example 1-2 56-Acre Site Elementary Student Enrollment Ratio 170 Lot Single-Family Development 56.7 acres X 3 units per acre = 170 homes 64.4 Elementary Students for a 170-lot single-family subdivision 680 Unit Apartment Complex 56.7 acres X 12 units per acre = 680 units 10.8 Elementary Students for a 680 unit apartment complex Sources: Blue Valley School District and City 1-8