TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

Similar documents
MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA (530) FAX (530)

Planning Commission Staff Report

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 6 From: Susan George, Town Manager July 26, 2011

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #12-21 AGENDA ITEM: 4.1

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Planning Commission Report

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

APPROVED CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES January 27, 2016

BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Signal Hill Gateway Center has been developed in phases. overtime; and

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

APPROVED CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 2017

CITY OF MERCED Planning Commission MINUTES

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

RESOLUTION PC NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Duarte resolves as follows:

JOEL ROJAS, COMMUNITY DE'WPfiENT DIRECTOR ACCEPTANCE OF A SEWER EASEMENT DEED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EASEMENT AREA TO ALLOW

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

AGENDA: APRIL 13,1999 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A PORTION OF AN OPEN SPACE EASEMENT, APN

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

required findings for approval of the variance cannot be made

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

R Meeting September 26, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM

RESOLUTION NO. PC

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

1. Adopted the required findings for the project specified in Attachment A of the staff report dated February 6, 2004, including CEQA findings;

, Assistant County Attorney. when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit: RESOLUTION NO.

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY OF SANTA ANA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA JANUARY 16, :30 A.M.

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

AGENDA ITEM 3. R Meeting May 14, 2014 AGENDA ITEM

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION September 6, 2018

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Resolution No : 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF OROVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 624 Oak Lawn Avenue

MEMORANDUM. 1. Approve additional expenses in the amount of $29,685 for additional work on the 2015 Street Repair project;

RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

City of San Juan Capistrano Supplemental Agenda Report

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. May 12, 2010 (Agenda)

December 13,2011. Resolution No Resolution of the Board of Directors Marina Coast Water District Approving a District Surplus Property Policy

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Trio Petroleum, Inc. (PLN010302)

BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TULARE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

And adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on May 2, 2017 by the following vote:

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION NO. Y01026 ELLWOOD BUILDING SIGN PROGRAM LOCUST STREET Secti

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

RESOLUTION TO FORM THE REDSTONE PARKWAY BENEFIT DISTRICT

Meeting Date: March 14, 2018

SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE INDEX

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Richard Thompson, Director of Community Development

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Honorable Chair and Agency Board Members Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager/Executive Director

BEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

Transcription:

gmc MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BY: PLANNING COMMISSION TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SAM ANDERSON, PLANNING TECHNICIAN SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 17-002; LOCATION 570 LEMON LANE, 212 GULARTE ROAD, AND 560A OAK HILL ROAD; APPLICANT RON LINDSTAED; REPRESENTATIVE LEAHA MAGEE, MBS LAND SURVEYS DATE: MAY 16, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment No. 17-002. IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: None. BACKGROUND: Location 570 Lemon Lane 560A Oak Hill Road 212 Gularte Road

PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 17-002 MAY 16, 2017 PAGE 2 The project site is located between Pearwood Avenue and Gularte Road and is zoned Residential Hillside (RH) (Attachment 1). Single family homes currently occupy all three lots. The applicant is requesting the lot line adjustment in order to gain additional land to expand the rear yard and create a more usable front yard space. Staff Advisory Committee The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC) reviewed the proposed project on April 12, 2017. Members of the SAC discussed items related to the project, including the steepness of the new 560A Oak Hill Road. Overall, members of the SAC were in support of the project. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Lot Line Adjustment The proposed lot line adjustment will adjust the west property line of 560A Oak Hill westward towards 212 Gularte Road by approximately 95, eliminate the eastern property line, and extend the northern property line across the width of 570 Lemon Lane. 212 Gularte Road was recently adjusted by LLA 17-001 (Attachment 2). The existing parcels are as follows: Table 1. Existing Parcel Sizes Parcel Number Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Zoning 560A Oak Hill Road 9,711 sq. ft. ~100 ~97.11 RH 212 Gularte 79,993 sq. ft. ~225.46 ~353.63 RH Road (in accordance with 570 Lemon Lane LLA 17-001) 135,129 sq. ft. ~312.25 ~375 RH The parcels resulting from the proposed lot line adjustment are as follows: Table 2. Proposed Parcel Sizes Parcel Number Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Zoning Average Slope 560A Oak 70,884 sq. ft. ~358 ~198 RH 18.9% Hill Road 212 Gularte 69,225 sq. ft. ~195 ~355 RH 19.6% Road 570 Lemon 86 769 sq. ft. ~279 ~311 RH 24.7% Lane 560A Oak Hill Road does not currently meet the minimum lot size of 49,000 sq. ft. as required in the RH zoning district. The lot line adjustment will bring the lot into

PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 17-002 MAY 16, 2017 PAGE 3 conformance with the minimum lot size standards. 212 Gularte Road and 570 Lemon Lane will continue to meet all applicable Development Code requirements. Access No changes to access are proposed nor will any changes to access be required. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Planning Commission s consideration: Adopt the attached Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment 17-002; Modify and adopt the attached Resolution approving Lot Line Adjustment 17-002; Do not adopt the attached Resolution, provide specific findings and direct staff to return with a Resolution denying the project; or Provide direction to staff. ADVANTAGES: The proposed project will bring a non-conforming lot into conformance with Development Code standards. DISADVANTAGES: None identified. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project was reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined to be categorically exempt per Section 15305(a) of the CEQA Guidelines regarding minor lot line adjustments not resulting in the creation of any new parcel. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT: Per Municipal Code Table 16.12.030-B, a public hearing is not required for approval of a lot line adjustment. The Agenda was posted at City Hall and on the City s website in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2. No comments have been received. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution 17-2269

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-002; LOCATED AT 570 LEMON LANE, 212 GULARTE ROAD, AND 560A OAK HILL ROAD; APPLIED FOR BY RON LINDSTAED WHEREAS, the applicant has filed Lot Line Adjustment 17-002 to modify interior property lines between 570 Lemon Lane, 212 Gularte Road, and 560A Oak Hill Road; and WHEREAS, The Arroyo Grande Municipal Code sets forth standards for Lot Line Adjustments, including prohibitions on Serial Lot Line Adjustments; and WHEREAS, The proposed Lot Line Adjustment meets the standards identified in the Municipal Code and will not result in a Serial Lot Line Adjustment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for implementation of CEQA and finds the project to be categorically exempt per Section 15305(a) of the CEQA Guidelines regarding minor lot line adjustments not resulting in the creation of any new parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the project at its meeting on May 16, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study and deliberation, the proposed lot line adjustment does not: 1. Create any new lots; The proposed lot line adjustment will adjust interior lot lines and will not create any new lots. 2. Include any lots or parcels created illegally; All lots associated with Lot Line Adjustment 17-002 were legally created and therefore the project will not include any lots created illegally. 3. Impair any existing access or create a need for access to any adjacent lots or parcels; All three properties currently are, and will continue to be, accessed from Gularte Road, therefore not creating a need for any new access to adjacent lots or parcels.

RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 4. Impair any existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving adjacent lots or parcels; The proposed lot line adjustment does not impair existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving adjacent lots. 5. Constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configurations due to existing environmental conditions or current zoning development standards; The proposed lot line adjustment will not constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configuration as the resulting lots will conform to all applicable development standards, including lot width, depth, and slope. 6. Require substantial alteration of any existing improvements or create a need for any new improvements; The proposed lot line adjustment does not require the alteration of any existing improvements nor create a need for any new improvements because no access or utility easements will be impaired. 7. Create a nonconforming lot in the development district in which it exists, except as allowed in Municipal Code Section 16.48.110. The lots resulting from the proposed lot line adjustment will meet all applicable development standards for the Residential Hillside zoning district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby approves Lot Line Adjustment 17-002, as presented to the Planning Commission on May 2, 2017 and as shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, with the above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On motion by Commissioner, seconded by Commissioner, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 16 th day of May, 2017.

RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 GLENN MARTIN, CHAIR ATTEST: DEBBIE WEICHINGER SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION AS TO CONTENT: TERESA MCCLISH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 17-002 570 LEMON LANE, 212 GULARTE ROAD, AND 560A OAK HILL ROAD This approval authorizes the adjustment of interior lot lines between parcels. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Lot Line Adjustment No. 17-002. 3. The project shall substantially conform to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, dated March 22, 2017. 4. The applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in any way relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. The applicant shall submit all information required by Municipal Code Section 16.20.140. 6. The applicant shall pay processing and plan check fees at the time they are due. 7. The applicant shall have a licensed land surveyor in the State of California prepare the final documents. 8. The applicant shall complete the lot line adjustment via map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. A current (within the last six (6) months) preliminary title report shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to checking the final documents.

RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 5 10. The applicant shall furnish a certificate from the tax collector s office indicating that there are no unpaid taxes or special assessments against the property.

RESOLUTION NO. 17-2269 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-001; LOCATED AT 217 PEARWOOD AVENUE AND 212 GULARTE ROAD; APPLIED FOR BY JENNIFER BOBELL WHEREAS, the applicant has filed Lot Line Adjustment 17-001 to modify interior property lines between 217 Pearwood Avenue and 212 Gularte Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande has reviewed the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Arroyo Grande Rules and Procedures for implementation of CEQA and finds the project to be categorically exempt per Section 15305(a) of the CEQA Guidelines regarding minor lot line adjustments not resulting in the creation of any new parcel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the project at its meeting on March 21, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study and deliberation, the proposed lot line adjustment does not: 1. Create any new lots; The proposed lot line adjustment will adjust interior lot lines and will not create any new lots. 2. Include any lots or parcels created illegally; All lots associated with Lot Line Adjustment 17-001 were legally created and therefore the project will not include any lots created illegally. 3. Impair any existing access or create a need for access to any adjacent lots or parcels; Access to 217 Pearwood exists through a recorded Access Easement that will also provide access to the proposed secondary dwelling unit and 212 Gularte Road is accessed from Gularte Road, therefore not creating a need for any new access to adjacent lots or parcels. 4. Impair any existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving adjacent lots or parcels; The proposed lot line adjustment does not impair existing easements or create a need for any new easements serving adjacent lots.

RESOLUTION NO. 17-2269 PAGE 2 5. Constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configurations due to existing environmental conditions or current zoning development standards; The proposed lot line adjustment will not constitute poor land planning or undesirable lot configuration as the resulting lots will conform to all applicable development standards, including lot width and depth, besides minimum lot size for 217 Pearwood, which will be brought closer to conformance. 6. Require substantial alteration of any existing improvements or create a need for any new improvements; The proposed lot line adjustment does not require the alteration of any existing improvements nor create a need for any new improvements because no access or utility easements will be impaired. 7. Create a nonconforming lot in the development district in which it exists, except as allowed in Municipal Code Section 16.48.110. The lots resulting from the proposed lot line adjustment will meet all applicable development standards for the Residential Hillside zoning district, besides minimum lot size for 217 Pearwood, which will be brought closer to conformance with Municipal Code standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Arroyo Grande hereby approves Lot Line Adjustment 17-001, as presented to the Planning Commission on March 21, 2017 and as shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, with the above findings and subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On motion by Commissioner Mack, seconded by Commissioner Schiro, and by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mack, Schiro, Fowler-Payne, Martin, George None None The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 21 st day of March, 2017.

RESOLUTION NO. 17-2269 PAGE 3 LAN GEORGE, CHAIR ATTEST: DEBBIE WEICHINGER SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION AS TO CONTENT: TERESA MCCLISH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

RESOLUTION NO. 17-2269 PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 17-001 217 PEARWOOD AVENUE AND 212 GULARTE ROAD This approval authorizes the adjustment of interior lot lines between parcels. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 1. The applicant shall ascertain and comply with all Federal, State, County and City requirements as are applicable to this project. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Lot Line Adjustment No. 17-001. 3. The project shall substantially conform to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, dated February 8, 2017. 4. The applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless at his/her sole expense any action brought against the City, its present or former agents, officers, or employees because of the issuance of said approval, or in any way relating to the implementation thereof, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his/her obligations under this condition. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. The applicant shall submit all information required by Municipal Code Section 16.20.140. 6. The applicant shall pay processing and plan check fees at the time they are due. 7. The applicant shall have a licensed land surveyor in the State of California prepare the final documents. 8. The applicant shall complete the lot merger and lot line adjustment via map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. A current (within the last six (6) months) preliminary title report shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to checking the final documents. 10. The applicant shall furnish a certificate from the tax collector s office indicating that there are no unpaid taxes or special assessments against the property.

Exhibit B