SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. THE CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation

Similar documents
CITY OF BELMONT INCLUSIONARY ZONING AND IMPACT FEES

City of Salinas Nexus Studies Overview and Summary February 2016

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

OAKLAND AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE NEXUS ANALYSIS

HOUSING IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY

Fort Collins Housing Affordability Policy Study Stakeholder Workshop #1

DRAFT REPORT. Residential Impact Fee Nexus Study. June prepared for: Foster City VWA. Vernazza Wolfe Associates, Inc.

CITY OF OAKLAND COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ATTACHMENT B DRAFT NON-RESIDENTIAL NEXUS ANALYSIS. Prepared for City of Sonoma. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Nonresidential Development Housing Linkage Fee Nexus Study

2018 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy City Council Presentation August 15, 2017

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

JOBS HOUSING NEXUS ANALYSIS

MPEEM The New and Improved Residual Technique of Reserve Valuation

Consultant Team. Today s Meeting 5/7/2015. San Mateo County Multi City Nexus and Feasibility Studies

Terms of Reference for the Regional Housing Affordability Strategy

Policy Issues Regarding a Potential Non-Residential Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Program for Broward County

R E Q U E S T F O R P R O P O S A L S

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

PURSUANT TO AB 1484 AND AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION TO THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE

Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015

American Canyon Affordable Housing Nexus Study: Background Report

CITY OF MENIFEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of Future Station Transit Oriented Development

BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT 18/01. Chair and Members of the Strategic Planning Committee. Dan Sharina, Chief Building Official

The Local Impact of Home Building in Douglas County, Nevada. Income, Jobs, and Taxes generated. Prepared by the Housing Policy Department

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

ORDINANCE NO

Update Land Use Regulations For the Town of Copake, NY

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

Memo to the Planning Commission JULY 12TH, 2018

CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

IAS Revenue. By:

SUMMARY, CONTEXT MATERIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEXUS STUDIES. Prepared for: City of Albany. Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

M EMORANDUM. Attachment 7. Steve Buckley and Margot Ernst, City of Walnut Creek. Darin Smith and Michael Nimon, EPS

PIP practice note 1 planning assumptions. How to use this practice note. Planning assumptions. What are planning assumptions? Type.

Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redlands

EUROPEAN UNION ACCOUNTING RULE 7 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT

Welcome to the 9 th Annual Spring Housing Conference

Companion Document Statement of Need

HANSFORD ECONOMIC CONSULTING

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

ATTACHMENT 1: Proposed Official Plan Amendment - Affordable Housing

BASICS COOPERATIVE BYLAWS (as amended, June 2012)

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015

Perry Farm Development Co.

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

SSAP 14 STATEMENT OF STANDARD ACCOUNTING PRACTICE 14 LEASES

Palmdale Redevelopment Successor Agency

Accounting for revenue is changing

Weantinoge Heritage Land Trust, Inc. Financial Statements and Independent Auditor's Report December 31, 2016

Economic Impacts of MLS Home Sales and Purchases in Canada and the Provinces

(2) Qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily in research and development.

Table 1: Maximum Allowable PIFs Under Industry Standard Calculation Methods (3/4" Connection Size)

SUMTER COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRE RESCUE SERVICES ASSESSMENT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATE RESOLUTION THE VILLAGES FIRE DISTRICT

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

Table of Contents. Appendix...22

Technical Line FASB final guidance

MASSACHUSETTS CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY OWNER S PROJECT MANAGER SERVICES ADDENDUM NO. 1

Development Impacts Report for 388 Lerwick Tim Hortons

Transfers of Property Q Sound Transit did not transfer any properties subject to RCW (1)(b) during the first quarter of 2018.

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

MOTION NO. M Roosevelt Station Central TOD Site Property Transaction Agreements PROPOSED ACTION

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

4. HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND AFFORDABILITY

will not unbalance the ratio of debt to equity.

Housing Reset :: Creative Advisory Accelerating Non-Profit / City Partnerships What We Heard

Right-of-Way Acquisition and

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study

City of Oak Hill FY Community Planning Technical Assistance Grant Scope of Work

Short-term residential rental authorized advertisement

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Development of an Asset Management Plan

Terms of Reference for Town of Caledon Housing Study

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

CLASS 9 ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION Part I

International Accounting Standard 17 Leases. Objective. Scope. Definitions IAS 17

Independent Contractor s Agreement

FIRE FACILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY NEWCASTLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FINAL DRAFT JUNE 24, 2014

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN INTERLOCAL CONTRACT WITH MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOR OAKLAND ROAD UTILITY RELOCATION

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Public Review Draft. January 2007

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis

Commercial (Non-Residential) Nexus Study & Linkage Fee Analysis

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6490) Finance Committee Staff Report

Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982

Draft Report. Commercial Linkage Fee Nexus Study. September prepared for: City of Redwood City VWA. Vernazza Wolfe Associates, Inc.

CHAPTER 15: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

These notes will be appropriate both for both students who have chosen financial reporting as a depth area as well as those who have not.

Request for Proposal to Develop a Land Use Master Plan

ATTACHMENT C PROGRAM WORK PLAN

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA NOVEMBER 2, PRESENTATION Frank Mir and Sandra Britt, Veterans Service Organization

SLAS 19 (Revised 2000) Sri Lanka Accounting Standard SLAS 19 (Revised 2000) LEASES

LKAS 17 Sri Lanka Accounting Standard LKAS 17

Transcription:

SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT DATE: August 22, 2016 PARTIES: "CLIENT" THE CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation Designated Official: Name: Patrick Prescott Title: Community Development Director Telephone: (818) 238-5176 Mailing Address: 275 E. Olive Avenue P. O. Box 6459 Burbank, CA 91510 "CONSULTANT" Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Representative: Name: Jason Moody Title: Principal Telephone: (510) 841-9190 Mailing Address: One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410 Oakland, CA 94612 TERM: Original Commencement date: September 24, 2014 Original Completion date: September 24, 2015 1 st Amended Completion date: September 24, 2016 2 nd Amended Completion date: September 24, 2017 COST OF SERVICE: Original Cost of Service: $139,670.00 1 st Amendment to Cost of Service: No Change 2 nd Amendment to Cost of Service: $25,300.00 Revised Cost of Service: $164,970.00 THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT MUST BE EXECUTED BY THE CONSULTANT OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE AND THEN APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY BEFORE THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BURBANK.

1.0 Amendment. Client and Consultant entered into a written agreement dated September 23, 2014, for Consultant to provide a development impact fee update and nexus study. On August 17, 2015, Client and Consultant agreed to amend the Agreement in order to extend the completion date to September 24, 2016. Now, Client and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement in order to increase the cost of service by $25,300.00 and extend the completion date to September 24, 2017. 2.0 Services. Consultant, as an independent Contractor agrees to perform during the term of this Agreement, each and every service set forth on the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit A-2. The initiation of Service by the Consultant will commence upon receipt of a written notice from the Designated Official authorizing Consultant to proceed, and only to the extent of such authorization. The services of the Consultant shall include the making of all investigations, studies, and analysis required by the conditions involved in each request of the Designated Official. 3.0 Compensation. The Client shall pay the services of Consultant on a fixed-price-basis as indicated on the Schedule of Compensation set forth in Exhibit B-2. 4.0 Ratification of Professional Services Agreement. All other provisions of the Agreement dated September 23, 2014, up to and including the first Amendment, not inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. In recognition of the obligations stated in this Amendment, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date indicated above. "CONSULTANT" Signature Name (please print) Title ATTEST: Office of the City Clerk By: Signature Name (please print) Title "CLIENT" Signature Patrick Prescott Name (please print) Community Development Director Title Approved as to Form Office of the City Attorney By: Signature Name (please print) Title

EXHIBIT A-2 SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant to conduct an affordable housing nexus study to establish the nexus between the development of market-rate ownership, rental housing, and non-residential projects and the demand for affordable housing units. The nexus study will help establish an affordable housing fee to be assessed to new developments that occur in the City. Specific tasks include: Task 1: Project Initiation Consultant will participate in a project initiation work session with City staff to refine the technical work program, data requirements, and the schedule for project deliverables, as necessary. Consultant to engage the City Attorney or other legal advisors to gain their input and assure their comfort with the proposed approach. During the initiation work session, the group will discuss the history of the current affordable housing policies, the successes and challenges of its implementation to date, and potential approaches to amending current requirements. In addition, Consultant will discuss the methodologies Consultant has used in recent assignments for other jurisdictions and the linkage of the affordable housing fee nexus to the broader ongoing development impact fee update effort being conducted by the City under separate contract. Consultant will list the desired data requirements and City will help provide available data and information and policy direction necessary for the affordability analysis. Task 2: Residential Nexus Analysis Consultant will provide analysis of the nexus between development of market-rate ownership and rental housing and the demand for affordable housing units. For each tenure type, the process involves three general steps, as described below. Step 1: Compute Demand for Affordable Housing Generated by Market Rate Units The first step is to estimate the impact that the addition of market-rate housing has on job creation and household formation. Using data regarding consumer expenditure patterns and wage levels for specific types of business, Consultant will estimate the demand for local goods and services generated by the addition of market-rate housing and its occupants, convert that demand to a number for local jobs and worker households, and estimate the proportion who cannot afford market-rate housing. These figures are driven by the incomes of the households occupying the market-rate housing the higher the cost of the housing, the higher the occupants income, and the more spending and job creation is expected. Consultant will calculate impacts for a range of unit types and/or price levels to illustrate these effects. Step 2: Estimate Affordability Gap Analysis The second step is to determine whether and how much subsidy is required to provide new housing units for worker households of various income levels (e.g., moderate, low, and very low). Determination of a required subsidy amount involves an estimation of the costs of development (construction, land, fees, required financial returns, etc.), as well as an estimation of the unit values based on the prices at which the units are affordable to income-qualified households. Consultant will provide detailed initial assumptions and calculations to City staff for

review and comment and make adjustments as appropriate. If further vetting or corroboration is desired, Consultant will work with the City to identify appropriate participants (for-profit and nonprofit developers, etc.) to review the development cost and value assumptions and calculations. Following these initial discussions and further consultation with City staff, Consultant will make adjustments to the assumptions and calculations as may be appropriate. The subsidy or financing gap equals the difference between development costs and unit values under allowable rents. Step 3: Compute Impact Fee per Market Rate Unit The third step is to calculate the aggregate subsidy required to produce housing affordable and appropriate for those new worker households and allocate that aggregate subsidy back to the market-rate project driving that demand. Consultant will calculate a technically derived amount for the maximum justifiable impact fee, consistent with this nexus logic. The results will include different nexus-based fees for housing units at various sizes or price levels because the household spending and job creation associated with such households will vary by their income, as represented by price levels. Consultant will also illustrate the equivalent number of units required at different income levels, which may be used as a standard for allowing developers to address their impacts through provision of units on site rather than payment of the impact fee. It is likely that the nexus-based impacts and resulting impact fees or unit requirements will be different than the City s current or past requirements. Consultant will present the results of the nexus analysis in draft reports for City staff review. Upon receipt of comments from City staff and stakeholders, Consultant will issue revised versions of the reports for initial public workshops and hearings, and will provide final versions for City adoption. Task 3: Commercial Linkage Nexus Analysis The nexus (i.e., linkage) between new non-residential development and the demand for affordable housing will be derived by preparing employment density and compensation estimates of future employees for several non-residential land use types (e.g., retail, office, industrial, lodging, etc.). New household formation resulting from new employment will be categorized by income category (moderate, low, very low) to estimate total housing demand. These calculations include consideration of local trends in household formation (e.g., size and location of household formation). The demand by land use category will be converted into a fee, on a per-buildingsquare-foot basis, based on the affordability gap calculations. Consultant is aware of the potential double-counting of income-qualified households generated by residential and non-residential uses. For example, the same grocery store worker who needs affordable housing may be represented in the residential nexus studies, as well as the non-residential nexus study. Consultant will discuss options for reconciling these double-counting issues through implementation of the fee program for different uses. Consultant will prepare a draft report summarizing the results of the non-residential nexus impact analysis. After incorporating City staff comments, Consultant will issue a revised report for purposes of the public hearing process. Consultant will prepare a final report for City adoption.

Task 4: Meetings and Presentations Consultant will work with the City staff to develop meeting/presentation materials that offer an easily understood synopsis of the technical analysis and summary of the primary policy issues. Consultant will endeavor to coordinate any on-site meetings or presentations with those being conducted as part of the broader comprehensive fee update.

EXHIBIT B-2 SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION The fee schedule for Consultant services shall be on a not-to-exceed basis as defined in this Exhibit B. The following hourly rates shall apply by position: Principal: $260 per hour Project Manager: $205 per hour Research Analyst: $125 per hour Production Staff: $85 per hour Reimbursable expenses include travel costs, meals, shipping, printing, and data acquisition.