ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 02. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Similar documents
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 December 14. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 13. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 16. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 January 26. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT RICHMOND (WARD 8) RICHMOND ROAD SW AND 24 STREET SW BYLAWS 10P2018 AND 52D2018

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 May 04. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

LAND USE AMENDMENT SPRINGBANK HILL (WARD 6) ELMONT DRIVE SW AND 69 STREET SW BYLAW 114D2017

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 17

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 December 01

LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05

Section Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD

INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUTHWOOD (WARD 11) MACLEOD TRAIL S AND ANDERSON ROAD SW BYLAWS 140D2018 AND 141D2018

Residential Single Detached Dwelling Districts (RS)

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING THE CERTIFICATE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 89 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING

Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

PART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

Planning Justification Report

It is recommended that this application be considered and that it be referred a public meeting.

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

Planning Justification Report - Update Castlegrove Subdivision, Gananoque Draft Plan of Subdivision and Class III Development Permit

111 Wenderly Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN. PART B.8 Core Area Neighbourhood Plan

PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

Highland Green Estates Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

INNOVATIVE PLANNING SOLUTIONS

1555 Midland Avenue - Zoning Amendment & Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Director, Community Planning, South District

Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment. 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT Committee of Adjustment Decision Regarding an Application for Consent

CITY OF CAMPBELL RIVER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA

Galloway Road and 4097 Lawrence Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

BYLAW NUMBER 256D2017

Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District ESC 44 OZ & ESC 44 SB

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

LOCATION: LUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:

(1) The following uses are permitted uses subject to:

Frequently Asked Questions

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee

307 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY PUBLIC MEETING OF MUNICIPAL COUNCIL. Zoning By-law Amendment 538 CALVERT ST PORT MCNICOLL RINK LOTS

Compact Housing Sustaining Communities and the Environment

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

The City of Red Deer

4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER :00 P.M.

Sheppard Ave East and 6, 8 and 10 Greenbriar Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

3445 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

45 & 77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

Planning & Development. Background. Subject Properties

150 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

May 23, CANKOVIC, MLADEN AVE SW CALGARY, AB T2V 0E9, CANADA Dear Sir/Madam:

i. The only permitted uses shall be a maximum of two (2) multiple dwellings and related accessory uses;

MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF ROCKY VIEW NO. 44 ELBOW VALLEY WEST DIRECT CONTROL DISTRICT BYLAW C

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

Plan Dutch Village Road

355 King St W and 119 Blue Jays Way - OPA & Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Planning Justification Report

Date to Committee: October 13, 2015 Date to Council: November 2, 2015

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

Municipal Council has directed staff to report annually on the nature of Variances granted by the Committee of Adjustment.

SECTION 9 RESIDENTIAL R5 ZONE

PLANNING REPORT. 33 Arkell Road City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of OHM Arkell Inc. August 4, Project No. 1327

Appendix C. Zoning Matrix

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Transcription:

Page 1 of 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District to allow for either a Secondary Suite or a Backyard Suite as an additional use. The site contains an existing single detached dwelling. To Administration s knowledge there is not an existing suite located on the parcel and the application was not submitted as a result of a complaint. PREVIOUS COUNCIL DIRECTION On 2013 September 16, Council directed Administration to remove fees associated with land use amendment and development permit applications for secondary suites to encourage the development of legal and safe secondary suites throughout the city. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 02 That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE That Council hold a Public Hearing on Bylaw 7D2018; and 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 0.07 hectares ± (0.17 acres ±) located at 78 Citadel Mesa Close NW (Plan 0113315, Block 11, Lot 111) from Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R- C1s) District, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 7D2018. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: The proposed R-C1s district, which allows for one of two forms of secondary suite uses (Secondary Suite or Backyard Suite), is compatible with and complementary to the established character of the community. The proposal conforms to relevant policies of the Municipal Development Plan and the Crowchild Phase 4 Area Structure Plan and will allow for development that has the ability to meet the intent of Land Use Bylaw 1P2007. ATTACHMENT 1. Proposed Bylaw 7D2018 2. Public Submission

Page 2 of 8 LOCATION MAPS

Page 3 of 8 ADMINISTRATIONS RECOMMENDATION TO Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 0.07 hectares ± (0.17 acres ±) located at 78 Citadel Mesa Close NW (Plan 0113315, Block 11, Lot 111) from Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District. Moved by: L. Juan Carried: 5 2 Opposed: M. Foht and D. Leighton Reasons for Opposition from Mr. Foht: I did not support the application for a secondary suite on this site for the following reasons: o The frontage is very narrow the lot is pie shaped. o No back lane. Both of these situations reduce the options for parking for the residents of the site. Reasons for Opposition from Mr. Leighton: I opposed this land use amendment because it does not appear that there is adequate on- or off-street parking for a secondary suite.

Page 4 of 8 Applicant: Sara Karimi Avval Landowner: Laleh Soodabeh Birjandian PLANNING EVALUATION SITE CONTEXT Located in a low density residential R-C1 setting in the community of Citadel, the site is approximately 17 metres by 40 metres in size and is developed with a two-storey single detached dwelling, and a two-car attached garage that is accessed from Citadel Mesa Close NW. Surrounding development consists of low-density residential to the north, south, and west and a multi-residential site directly to the east of the parcel. According to data from the City of Calgary s 2017 Civic Census, the following table identifies Citadel s peak population and year, current population and the population amount and percentage difference between the peak and current populations if any. Citadel Peak Population Year 2015 Peak Population 10,517 2017 Current Population 10,293 Difference in Population (Number) -224 Difference in Population (Percent) -2% LAND USE DISTRICTS The proposed R-C1s district allows for an additional dwelling unit (either a permitted use Secondary Suite or a discretionary use Backyard Suite) on parcels that contain a single detached dwelling. Approval of this land use application allows for an additional dwelling unit (either a Secondary Suite or Backyard Suite) to be considered via the development permit process. A development permit is not required if a Secondary Suite conforms to all Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 rules only a building permit would be required.

Page 5 of 8 LEGISLATION & POLICY South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (2014) The site is located within the City, Town area as identified on Schedule C: South Saskatchewan Regional Plan Map in the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP). The SSRP makes no specific reference to this site. The land use proposal is consistent with the SSRP policies including the Land Use Patterns policies (subsection 8.14). Municipal Development Plan (2009) The site is located within a Residential Developed Established Area on the Urban Structure Map (Map 1) in the Municipal Development Plan (MDP). While the MDP makes no specific reference to this site. This land use proposal is consistent with MDP policies including the Developed Residential Areas policies (subsection 3.5.1), the Neighbourhood Infill and Redevelopment policies (subsection 2.2.5) and the Housing Diversity and Choice policies (subsection 2.3.1). Crowchild Phase 4 Area Structure Plan (1983) The site is within the Residential area on Map 6, Land Use Plan, of the Crowchild Phase 4 Area Structure Plan (ASP). The proposed R-C1s land use district is a low density residential district which allows for an increased mix of housing types. The ASP outlines that residential development should provide for a wide variety of housing types, including both single-family and multi-family units. The application is generally in keeping with this policy, as achieving a mixture of housing types is an objective the plan. TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS Pedestrian and vehicular access to the site is available from Citadel Mesa Close NW and there is no rear lane. The area is served by Calgary Transit bus service with a bus stop location within approximately 250 metre walking distance of the site on Citadel Way NW. On-street parking adjacent to the site is unregulated. UTILITIES & SERVICING Water, sanitary, and sewer services are available and can accommodate the potential addition of a Secondary Suite without the need for off-site improvements at this time. Adjustments to onsite servicing may be required if a Backyard Suite is proposed at the development permit stage. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES An Environmental Site Assessment was not required.

Page 6 of 8 GROWTH MANAGEMENT This land use amendment proposal does not require additional capital infrastructure investment, and therefore no growth management concerns have been identified at this time. The proposal is in alignment with MDP references associated with growth management matters. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Community Association Comments Administration did not receive a response from the Citadel Community Association. Citizen Comments Administration received three (3) letters in opposition to the application. Reasons stated for opposition are summarized as follows: Increased traffic with potential safety issues; Width of street does not allow for parking and vehicular movement; Limited on-street parking; and Decrease value of adjacent homes. Public Meetings No public meetings were held by the Applicant or Administration.

Page 7 of 8 APPENDIX I APPLICANT S SUBMISSION To whom it may concern, I, Laleh Birjandian, the owner of the property of 78 Citadel Mesa Close NW, Calgary AB, T3G- 5L1, would like to apply for the secondary suite. The reason I am applying for the secondary suite is a family member lives with me and she has disability. If she lives in my walk-out basement with some accessibilities like a small kitchen, she will get her independence back in her life. Thank you for our attention, Sincerely yours, Laleh Birjandian 16-10-2017

Page 8 of 8 APPENDIX II IMPORTANT TERMS While there are specific Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 definitions and development rules for Secondary Suite and Backyard Suite uses, the following information is provided to simply and enhance general understanding of these two different uses (Secondary Suite or Backyard Suite).