City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 5

Similar documents
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. For a Vacant 5.9 Acre Transit-Oriented, Mixed-Use Development Opportunity in the City of South San Francisco

Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition

APPROVED LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN MAJOR APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MISSION BAY

City of Port Moody. City Lands OCP and Rezoning Amendments Information Session Feedback Summary. Regular Council Meeting - January 23, 2018

General Plan. Page 44

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of Bellflower Successor Agency Civic Center Drive Bellflower, CA

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

UCSF Acquisition of Mission Bay Blocks 33-34

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

RESOLUTION NO. OB 14-02

Ohlone College Mission Blvd Mixed-Use Project OFFERING MEMORANDUM

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Brunswick Street Apartment Project Introduction

Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) Mission Bay Community Workshop #2

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Legal Services General Counsel

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR REAL ESTATE MARKETING AND BROKERAGE SERVICES Citywide Properties

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

220 ALICE JACK LONDON DISTRICT OAKLAND CALIFORNIA. Multifamily Urban Infill Transit-Oriented Development OFFERING MEMORANDUM

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

DRAFT LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN

TRANSMITTAL To: Council From: Municipal Facilities Committee

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

LINCOLN CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPDATE FOR DOWNTOWN GATEWAY FOCUS AREA

INFORMATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPOSED GOOGLE DEVELOPMENT AT DIRIDON STATION

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. WA# C.F Date:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300

N o v e m b e r 9, Concept Alternatives. J o i n t C i t y C o u n c i l a n d P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n W o r k s h o p

CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY. City of Hamilton

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES

Executive Summary Planning Code Text & Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: APRIL 2, 2015

A 290-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE

CITY OF MILLBRAE, ACTING AS SUCCESSOR TO THE MILLBRAE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD

What is a Neighbourhood Plan?

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY


Item # 9 September 13, 2006

GETTING IT BUILT: OVERCOMING THE IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS TO SMART GROWTH

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

AMENDMENT TO COVENANT AND AGREEMENT REGARDING AFFORDABIITY RESTRICTIONS FOR LA TERRAZZA AT COLMA STATION

WORLD TRADE CENTER GARAGE 1245 Fifth Avenue

Accepting Development Proposals

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.

THE DEAN. 480 San Antonio Road, Mountain View, El Camino Real

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Overview. Foundation: Physical Design Framework 2011 Phase 2 Study

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PART OF THE SOUTH HILL SAP

* * UNTAPPED RESOURCES * ** * ** ** * * * * * * * ** ** ** * * %* * * * 1 9 t h S t r e e t S t a t i o*n

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER DALY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Amended Long Range Property Management Plan. Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

CITY OF SAN LEANDRO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OVERSIGHT BOARD. Cynthia Battenberg, Business Development Manager

Building Livable Communities with Transit. Introduction to Financing Livable Communities. Portland Lindbergh City Center Case Study

5.1 Site Planning & Building Form

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

Urban Fringe Development Area Project Update And Staff Recommendation

Pre-Submittal Conference Request for Proposals for Exchange of Real Property February 7, 2018, 3:00 p.m.

MARINA LANDING 7000 MARINA BLVD. BRISBANE, CALIFORNIA

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: JULY 6, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Community Development Director PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076

DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

NORWALK LAND DEVELOPMENT. NORWALK PLANNING COMMITTEE AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOVEMBER 19 th 2014

Transfers of Property Q Sound Transit did not transfer any properties subject to RCW (1)(b) during the first quarter of 2018.

STAFF REPORT. January 25, North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North District

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Community Development

Sound Transit s Office of Land Use Planning & Development Transit Oriented Development Quarterly Status Report Q2 2018

MEMORANDUM DEBBIE MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS FOR REAL ESTATE SERVICES

Richardson s TOD Experience From ULI Panel Report to Breaking Ground. September 8, 2011

County Lot C Redevelopment

MEMORANDUM. AGENDA ITEM #3C December 5, Action. December 1, County Council TO: Marlene Michaelsognior Legislative Analyst FROM:

PROPOSED METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICIES AND PROCESS July 2015 ATTACHMENT B

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

June 8, The Honorable Eric Garcetti Mayor, City of Los Angeles Room 300, City Hall 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION

Executive Summary Planning Code Text & Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: JULY 28, 2016 EXPIRATION DATE: AUGUST 10, 2016

6284 SAN PABLO DAM EL SOBRANTE CALIFORNIA

Date: June 17, Recreation and Park Commission. Dawn Kamalanathan Planning Director

New residential and commercial developments are coming to South San Francisco. Have questions about ongoing or future construction?

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

Rosslyn Sector Plan Implementation Zoning Ordinance Amendments. NAIOP Meeting April 13, 2016

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T16-024

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

VILLAGE OF FRANKLIN PARK REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE REWRITE PROPOSALS ARE DUE ON FEBRUARY 5, 2019 BY 4 PM (CST)

Transcription:

City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Legislation Text Report regarding the Housing Standing Committee recommendation to consider selecting either AGI/KASA Partners or Blake Griggs as the preferred developer for a Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco property known as the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission site. (Mike Lappen, Economic Development Coordinator) RECOMMENDATION The Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission (the Committee ) recommends that that the joint City Council/Successor Agency consider selecting either Blake Griggs or AGI/KASA Partners as the preferred developer for development of a Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco ( Successor Agency ) property known as the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission site (the PUC Site ). BACKGROUND This report provides background information on the developer solicitation process for the PUC Site, brief descriptions of each developer proposal, the Committee s recommendation to select a preferred and alternate developer, and next steps in the disposition process. Site Description In 2007, the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco entered into an agreement with the City and County of San Francisco/San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to purchase 13.2 acres of land located in the vicinity of El Camino Real & Chestnut Ave. The sale was completed and the property was transferred to the Agency on January 31, 2008. Within this 13.2-acre property, there is a 5.9-acre site - currently referred to as the PUC Site - that is the subject of the current developer solicitation process. The PUC Site consists of two vacant lots totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified as assessor s parcel number (APN) 093-312-060 (see map, Attachment 1). The PUC Site offers an outstanding opportunity for mixed-use development, due to its large contiguous land area, extensive frontage along Mission Road, and direct pedestrian access to the South San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station, El Camino Real shopping, Centennial Trail / Colma Creek, and other amenities. Planning Background The PUC Site is located within a portion of the El Camino corridor that, due to proximity of the BART Station and other factors, has the potential to become a vibrant mixed-use neighborhood and activity node for the city. The City Council has long recognized the strategic importance of this area, and to help the area reach its full potential the City has: City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 5

Adopted the South San Francisco (SSF) General Plan which encourages transit oriented development; Implemented the SSF BART Transit Village Plan and ordinance; Prepared plans to extend Oak Avenue from Mission Road to El Camino Real; Constructed the majority of Centennial Way over the BART- San Francisco International Airport right-of-way; and Using the former South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, purchased vacant land from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and Ron Price Motors to ensure high quality mixed use development. The most recently approved housing projects in the vicinity include: Park Station at 1200 El Camino Real (99 units), the Mid-Peninsula Housing Project at 636 El Camino Real (109 affordable units and 5,700 square feet of commercial space), the Mission & McLellan project at 1309 Mission Road (20 units and 6,000 square feet of commercial space), and Summerhill Homes project at 998 El Camino Real (172 units and 6,000 square feet of commercial space). Long Range Property Management Plan Following the dissolution of redevelopment agencies across California in 2012, the City prepared a Long Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP). Housing properties were transferred to the City and the non-housing properties were transferred to the Successor Agency. The City/Successor Agency is now responsible for disposition of these non-housing properties. The LRPMP designated the PUC property for future development, specifically, for disposition and development of uses consistent with the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan. The California Department of Finance formally approved the LRPMP in 2015. El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan In 2011, the City adopted the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan ( Area Plan ), which introduced higher density development on and in the vicinity of the PUC Site. In summary, the adopted Area Plan set forth: Heights and intensities greater than existing, surrounding development to emphasize the planning area s central role as a transit-oriented destination; Overall height ranges of three to six stories, with taller buildings up to 15 stories tall disbursed throughout, and which are varied in height and bulk, to create visual interest; A new neighborhood of up to 4,400 residents housed in low- to high-rise buildings; A range of commercial uses; walking access to everyday amenities; and a new Civic Campus with library, recreation and police services, plazas, and gathering spaces for the entire South San Francisco community; and A linear park and a pedestrian-oriented Main Street lined with restaurants, cafés, and outdoor seating along a portion of the BART right-of-way. The PUC Site is zoned according to the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan, with designations including High Density Residential, El Camino Real Mixed Use North, El Camino Real Mixed Use North High City of South San Francisco Page 2 of 5

Intensity, El Camino Real Mixed Use North Medium Intensity, and Public Use. These Zoning designations allow for base maximum densities of 80 to 120 foot height limits, subject to incentive based increases, and floor area ratios of 2.0 to 3.0. Developer Selection Process In order to dispose of the PUC Site in a manner consistent with the LRPMP, on May 1, 2017, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a well-qualified development team to create a high-quality, mixed-use, transit-oriented development on the PUC Site. Twelve development teams responded. Responses to the RFQ were reviewed and reduced to a list of eight finalists, which were interviewed by a sixmember Review Panel of community members and City staff. Following the interviews, the Review Panel recommended that four developers be invited to respond to a Request for Proposals (RFP), subject to Committee approval. On October 16, 2017, the Committee reviewed the draft RFP and the Review Panel s recommended short list of developers. The Committee approved the RFP and determined that the following teams should be invited to respond to it: 1. AGI Avant/KASA Partners; 2. Blake Griggs; 3. Republic Metropolitan; 4. Sares Regis; and 5. Summerhill Housing Group. In late October 2017, staff sent the approved RFP to the selected developer teams. The 90-day solicitation concluded on February 5, 2018. Five developer teams submitted responses to the RFP: AGI/KASA, Blake Griggs, Republic Metropolitan, Sares Regis, and SummerHill Housing Group. Their proposals are summarized and attached in full to the Committee staff report dated March 12, 2018. On March 12 and 13, 2018, the Committee interviewed the five developer teams that submitted responses to the RFP. Each team presented their project and answered specific questions related to project design, architecture, project management, financing methods, proposed community benefits, and construction phasing. The two-day interview period culminated in a closed session during which price and terms were presented to the Committee. Needing more information from three of the developer teams, the Committee invited AGI/KASA, Blake Griggs, and SummerHill Housing Group to provide answers to specific Committee-directed questions on March 20, 2018. On March 20, 2018, the Committee met again to review the three developers revised project descriptions, site plans, architectural details, and amended offers. DISCUSSION Housing Standing Committee Recommendation At the March 20, 2018 meeting, the three developers presented revised proposals. AGI/KASA reduced the City of South San Francisco Page 3 of 5

parking ratio and the off-site open space and parks. Blake Griggs added a childcare facility and reduced the height of the original tower from 155 feet to 125 feet. Summerhill added 15 for-sale units, expanded retail space, and refined design of a childcare center. Based on the revised proposals presented on March 20, 2018, the Committee decided to recommend that the full City Council consider either AGI/KASA and Blake Griggs as the preferred developer of the PUC Site. The Committee is recommending the two developers because of their qualifications, project proposal, community and economic benefits, and offer prices. The Committee felt that the City Council/Successor Agency should have the opportunity to decide on the preferred developer because the two proposed projects present different visions for this critical site at the center of the City. The El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan envisions an area with public and private amenities that will attract both residents and businesses. The two recommended developer teams take different approaches to using the site to address the goals of the Area Plan. Attachment 2 includes a summary of the City expectations and evaluation criteria utilized in the selection process. The two developer team proposals for site planning, architecture, retail, parking, childcare, and parks/open space, as revised on March 20, 2018, are summarized below: AGI/KASA Partners The project team includes AGI Avant Inc., KASA Partners, Kwan Hemi Architects, BAR Architects, RHAA Landscape Architects, GLS Landscape/Architecture, and Bridge Housing. See Attachments 3 & 4 for full proposal and the associated presentation. Total Number of Units: 812 units BMR Units: 162 units (20 percent) in a stand-alone project built by Bridge Housing Rental Units: 812 units For-Sale Units: 0 units Building Height: 85 feet Child Care: 5,500 square feet Open/Park Space: 3.13 acres on site and 1.8 acres off site Retail Space: 13,000 square feet (SF Made) Parking: 1,049 spaces (reduced parking ratio) Blake Griggs The project team includes Blake Griggs, Eden Housing, Capital Senior Housing, TCA Architects. See Attachments 5 & 6 for full proposal and associated presentation. Total Number of Units: 820 units BMR Units: 167 combines 97 units in a stand-alone project built by Eden Housing and 70 inclusionary rental units Rental Units: 702 units City of South San Francisco Page 4 of 5

For-Sale Units: 118 units (all in Alternative C tower) Building Height: 125 feet for the tower and 85 feet for the two building on Site C Child Care: 5,000 square feet (located in Eden s building) Open/Park Space: 3.5 acres Retail Space: 14,000 square feet Parking: 1,000-1,100 CONCLUSION At this meeting, the Committee requests that the City Council/Successor Agency select either Blake Griggs or AGI/KASA as the preferred developer of the PUC site. Following this public hearing and Closed Session, staff will bring forward a resolution approving the preferred and alternate developer and authorizing the City Manager to enter into an exclusive negotiating rights agreement (ENRA) with the preferred developer. Following City Council/Successor Agency approval of the resolution, the City will enter into an ENRA with the selected developer, which will form the basis of agreements for the development and disposition of the PUC Site. The ENRA period is anticipated to take approximately ten months to conclude. Attachments: 1. Site Map 2. City Expectations and Evaluation Criteria 3. AGI/KASA Partners Proposal 4. AGI/KASA Supplemental Presentation 5. Blake Griggs Proposal 6. Blake Griggs Supplemental Material City of South San Francisco Page 5 of 5