Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed As of September 2014

Similar documents
Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No.

Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development

13 Sectional Map Amendment

Annotated Outline of a New Zoning Ordinance... 1

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

City of Oshkosh Zoning Update

AURORA UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES MAY 2018

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

Unified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

CONSOLIDATED DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE MARCH 2018

NEW AND REVISED. Organization, format and editing. Numbering, page layout, tables, charts, illustrations General editing and plain English voice

Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6

Presentation. Agenda Item # 1. Meeting Date February 3, Erkin Ozberk, Planner. Prepared By. Brian T. Kenner City Manager.

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE September 19, 2018

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

Overview. Review Zoning Rewrite Project Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance

An Introduction to the City of Winnipeg s New Zoning By-Law

PUBLIC DRAFT May 2017 Zoning Districts Use Regulations Definitions (partial)

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

Prince George s County Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations Rewrite January 3, 2018

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

ABILENE ZONING REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit A-1. Piney Creek Bend Planned Development

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

A Zoning Ordinance Comprehensive Update Zoning Ordinance Study Group Meeting August 20, 2012

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

ZONING ORDINANCE PRESENTATION

ORDINANCE City of DeBary Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 3

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Reviewing Mixed Use Proposals

CONFIRMATION OF DIRECTION APRIL 2010

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS

South San Francisco Lanes Project. May 2, 2017 San Francisco State University Austin Gates, Ellen Edgar, Ziyun Li

MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use

1101 MAIN STREET ANDREWS NC PHONE FAX MAYOR NANCY J. CURTIS MEMORANDUM

MARKHAM BYLAW REVIEW URA MARKHAM BYLAW SUB-COMMITTEE

The summary of zoning regulations for each site is provided in the same order (and using the same names for each site) as the RFEI.

Indicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO.

Module 1: Zoning Districts and Uses

Land Use Code Streamlining 2012

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

Compatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH. CITY COUNCIL POLICY No HOUSING POLICY

CITY OF FARMERSVILLE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 17, :30 P.M. 1, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

Residential Neighborhoods and Housing

MEMORANDUM. City Council. David J. Deutsch, City Manager. County Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Briefing. DATE: June 11, 2015

Zoning Analysis. 2.0 Residential Use. 1.0 Introduction

oak park zoning update TECHNICAL REVIEW REPORT Prepared by Camiros For the Village of Oak Park, IL

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

Land Development Code Update Workgroup AGENDA

Economic Empowerment District (draft) Enhanced Factsheet

Planning Commission Agenda Item

SECTION 3.1 ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED

Understanding the Development Review Process in the City of Minneapolis

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Public Hearing Item

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

Rapid City Planning Commission

Proposed Changes to Conservation District Regulations. Quality of Life Committee March 25, 2013

oak park zoning update TECHNICAL REVIEW REPORT Prepared by Camiros For the Village of Oak Park, IL

Omnibus Zoning Amendment (FILE # D ) Proposals

June 28, Technical Director File Reference No Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT

The Zoning Committee voted 4-2 to APPROVE this petition.

Puyallup Downtown Planned Action & Code Changes. January 10, 2017

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

To Download the Guidelines Document:

Representative Name. Address. City, State, Zip. Telephone.

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT

Final Draft Ordinance: Matrix

CHAPTER 40R LOCAL ZONING BYLAW GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

AFFORDABLE WORKFORCE HOUSING REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP Recommendations for our Region Approved February 22, 2006

TOD Sub-cabinet roles

SECTION CORRIDOR DISTRICTS

Diagnosis of the. Annotated Outline of a new. Unified Development Code. Prepared by: PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

5. Housing. Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws. Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals

Attachment A TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS POLICY DOCUMENT

Rapid City Planning Commission

Chapter 15: Non-Conformities

Transcription:

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed As of September 2014 PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS High Priority Amendment/Issue Comments Exterior Lighting Standards Section 26-503 establishes states that exterior lighting must be designed so that substantially all of the directly emitted light falls within the property boundaries. It may be helpful to set specific maximum levels in footcandles depending on land use/adjacent uses. Potentially consider changing the height limit of 18 feet for exterior pole lights to be higher. CMRS CMRS regs may be out of date compared with current technology and best Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) and lot sizes for duplexes in the R-2 zone district practice, eg roof-mounted height. Accessory dwelling units (ADU) are generally smaller, self-contained residential units built on the same lot as an existing single family home. A common ADU is a carriage house (unit above a large detached garage). Some properties in older neighborhoods in Wheat Ridge already have ADUs that were constructed prior to adoption of the zoning code. ADUs are increasingly common in cities to encourage infill reinvestment, allow for diverse family housing situations in an aging population, and to increase housing affordability. The current code does not allow these types of units, where they may be appropriate in some areas of the City. The R-2 zone district requires a 12,500 SF lot size and 100 foot lot width for duplexes and many duplexes do not meet this requirement, making them legal nonconforming structures. These limits could be adjusted to make the duplexes conforming and encourage reinvestment in them. Regulation of Microbreweries The zoning code currently does not address microbreweries or breweries, which often are a blend of manufacturing/production and retail uses. These businesses are becoming more prevalent and it would be helpful to clearly define a microbrewery use and where it is allowed and not allowed. Sign Code Updates Create standards for electronic/led signs so that they are not too bright Consider allowing A-frame signs in the right-of-way or other code changes that correspond with the 38 th Avenue Corridor Plan Clarify and create regulations for some temporary sign categories: human signs, tear drop banners, etc. Remove some temporary signs, such as inflatables, from a permit requirement or create a separate planning permit. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS Medium Priority Amendment/Issue Comments Updates to Mixed Use Zone District, including The mixed use zones do not have any specific design or development standards for accessory structures. regulations for accessory structures Similar to other zone districts, the mixed use zones could be amended to include setbacks, size limits, and design standards specific to accessory structures Allow gardens as usable open space Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 1

Medium Priority Continued Membrane Accessory Structures in Residential Districts NOTE: requires Building Division involvement. Could be an admin policy. Tree Protection Ordinance Membrane structures are framed structures, typically of some type of fabric. A common use is to provide shelter for vehicles in a side or back yard. The current code does not adequately address membrane structures as an accessory building. The structure needs to be defined in the zoning code and regulated as a temporary use, but not a permanent one. Many of the established neighborhoods in the City are blessed with a substantial tree canopy. There are no regulations currently that protect any and all trees from being removed from any site during redevelopment, and any required replacement of these trees. Many communities have successfully enacted tree protection ordinances to address this. New regulations could allow removal of trees where infeasible to retain them, but new trees of certain caliper must be provided elsewhere on site. Further consultation is needed with the Parks Department. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS Low Priority Amendment/Issue Comments Update Code to Support In general, the code was written prior to current trends that help promote Sustainability Goals sustainable communities. Updates and revisions could address: o Alternative energy (e.g. geothermal, wind, and solar power) o Landscape requirements/tree protection Some alternative energy uses were added to the code through the I-E zone district zoning code amendment. Vested Rights NOTE: Involves City Attorney Historic Preservation Review Body Vested rights are defined a number of ways. Essentially, they address the rights to develop and use a property under the conditions of an approved development plan, whether a zone change, subdivision, or site plan approval. Vested property rights often occur earlier in the entitlement process in other communities than what is set forth in the City s zoning code. For instance, approval of a final development plan for a zone change would constitute a vested right in many jurisdictions. This is not the case in the City, where an applicant could go through an approval process, including public hearings, and apply for a building permit and still not obtain a vested right. The current vested property rights provisions do not provide much certainty for a property owner/developer who might incur substantial expense to go through an entitlement process, and still not have a vested property right. City Council passed an ordinance eliminating reference to the Wheat Ridge Historic Society this year and their review authority, as it was not a cityappointed body. This creates a void in the zoning code for review on historic preservation matters. New language may include standards for appointing members of this body and a clearly defined role. Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 2

Low Priority Continued Extended Stay Lodging Extended Stay Lodging is currently not defined as a land use in the zoning code. This land use exists where hotel/motel properties are intended for long term lodging, or existing hotels/motels transition into allowing more long term accommodations. While these properties may provide a valuable service, some have become problematic. The City has experienced crime and property maintenance issues on some of these properties. In order to address this issue, 1) a definition needs to be written which first defines the land use, and 2) the code needs to adequately regulate this as a land use. R-3 (Residential-Three) Zone Changes The current code has a restriction on the ability to consolidate lots in the R-3 zone district for the purposes of multi-family development. In order to encourage high quality multi-family development at certain locations in the City, more flexibility may be needed with this regulation. The goal is to use this tool to protect predominately single family neighborhoods while allowing flexibility for desirable projects. Consider allowing neighborhood commercial uses on collector streets in the R-3 district so that appropriately-scaled neighborhood services can be provided in walking distance of residence Legal Protest Provisions The City s Charter contains a provision that for any zone change, a legal protest triggers a supermajority (3/4) vote by the decision-making body as opposed to a simple majority. A legal protest is one that is signed by 20 percent or more of the property owners in the area. Staff will evaluate this legal protest provision to potentially make it less restrictive. Ultimately, any changes will require a vote./change to the City Charter. Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 3

COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS Amendment/Issue Subdivision Design Standards and Public Improvements (Section 26-110) Effective May 16, 2014 Ordinance No. 1547 Sustainability/Public Notice Requirements Effective May 16, 2014 Ordinance No. 1548 Updates to Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) Effective July 16, 2012 Ordinance not required Planned Development Regulations and Rezoning Criteria Effective July 27, 2012 Ordinance No. 1515 Revisions to Sight Triangle Regulations Effective Sept 14, 2012 Ordinance No. 1518 Modify Industrial (I) District Effective Oct 26, 2012 Ordinance No. 1523 Public and Charter Schools Effective Oct 26, 2012 Ordinance No. 1524 Survey Requirements An administrative policy addressing this issue was adopted in January 2012 Modify/Clarify Building Permit Process Completed Spring 2012 Revise Subdivision Technical Submittal Requirements Effective Oct 28, 2011 Ordinance No. 1503 Updated Streetscape Design Manual Adopted March 28, 2011 Comments Subdivision design standards in a zoning code can help ensure logical block and lot layouts when new subdividing and platting occur, as well as road and pedestrian connectivity. The current subdivision design standards provide little guidance for the City to ensure proper design when these plats occur. Section 26-110 on public improvements needs to be updated to match recent changes to Chapter 5 on the same topic. Section 26-109 establishes public noticing requirements. Certified letters are expensive and get returned more frequently that first class mail. Amend to remove certified mailing requirement, allow for full legal notice on web, and fix the inconsistencies in the posted notice (10 v 15 days before a public hearing). The ASDM is five years old and needs updates, including: 1) Separate design standards for heavy commercial/light industrial uses 2) Updated architectural standards 3) Improved formatting and organization Note: not a code amendment but requires City Council input The planned development (PD) regulations and rezoning would be updated for consistency and to create a streamlined, clearer process for applicants pursuing a PD. This change will create separate criteria for specific plans that are not a rezoning. Update how sight triangles are measured. This will include new, more userfriendly graphics. Assess Industrial (I) district s allowed and special uses are still appropriate and add contemporary uses (e.g. office/flex) that support employment uses Enable the option for a straight rezoning to new Industrial-Employment district Amend use chart and definitions to clarify that public and charter schools are permitted in any zone district but must follow site plan review. The City has no formal policies on what level of survey work is required in conjunction with building permits and land use case processing. Staff will develop a formal policy on when surveys are required in order to ensure compliance with applicable setbacks and height standards Streamline the building permit handouts and other materials so that the permitting process is succinct and understandable Ensure consistency between Public Works submittal requirements and procedures and language in zoning code for subdivision platting. The Architectural and Streetscape Design Manual originally adopted in 2011 contains outdated street typologies and is difficult to implement due to a lack of objective standards Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 4

Ordinance No. 1481 Urban Agriculture Uses and Activities Adopted May 23, 2011 Ordinance No. 1491 Create Mixed Use Zone Districts and Reduce Reliance on Planned Developments Adopted Sept 13, 2010 Ordinance No. 1471 Create Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay District Adopted Sept 13, 2010 through mixed use zoning ordinance Ordinance No. 1471 Accessory Structures in Commercial Districts Adopted August 8, 2010 Ordinance No. 1468 Zoning District Boundary Discrepancies Effective March 13, 2009 Ordinance No. 1430 Floodplain Administrator Decision-Making Authority Effective March 13, 2009 The new Streetscape Design Manual will remove the architectural standards and establish clear, objective standards for streetscape design in the City, with a focus on priority corridors Adopting clearer standards will help clarify development requirements for potential development applications The current code is largely silent on activities related to urban agriculture and where they are allowed, including: o Community gardens o Farmers markets o Yard sharing Updating the zoning code to address these issues would provide clarification for staff and interested citizens. The current code has very limited allowance for a mix of land uses on one property or within one building unless a planned development (PD) district is utilized. All zone changes to nonresidential zoning require a PD process. Each PD has its own set of standards that are independent of the zoning code. While there are benefits to the PD approach, Wheat Ridge has over-relied on this method resulting in a negotiation process for each development, with no predictability or certainty in the end result. Tracking all approved PDs is a challenge for the City and the development community. Base mixed use districts would allow desired development types, such as residential apartments over ground floor retail, that are identified in the NRS and Envision Wheat Ridge (the City s comprehensive plan). Mixed use zone districts would provide for a predictable, consistent, and less timely option to create the forms of high-quality development desired in target areas, such as Wadsworth Blvd and the Ward Road station area. An overlay district can address a geographic area with unique characteristics such as the future commuter rail station at 52 nd and Ward Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is a development pattern that encourages access to public transit, increases public transit ridership, and promotes mixed land uses and pedestrian-friendly environment. TOD emphasizes pedestrian-friendly development rather than automobile dependent patterns. There are some examples throughout Denver and around existing light rail lines (e.g. Englewood City Center TOD district-specific standards may include increased allowance for density, reduced parking, and other incentives for desirable development. No accessory structures (e.g., storage shed, garage) are allowed by right in commercial districts. A Planned Building Group process must be undertaken, with a minimum size of 1,000 square feet for the structure. More allowance may be needed for such structures to accommodate the needs of businesses. Many properties in the city have split zoning meaning more than one zone district boundary on the property. Some zoning boundaries even run through buildings. This makes development/redevelopment very difficult without a rezoning on these properties. The code was revised to allow an administrative process for adjusting zoning boundaries so that they are more consistent with property lines Many properties in Wheat Ridge lie within floodplain boundaries, thus limiting the ability to make improvements to the property with any type of structure. Many of these properties have existing buildings on them. The floodplain administrator (Public Works Director) has limited authority to Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 5

Ordinance No. 1431 make administrative determinations/waivers to certain standards for floodplain permits. This makes improvements to property in floodplain areas difficult where it clearly will not have a detrimental impact on the floodplain. The goal is to allow flexibility for minor improvements such as fences in the floodplain. City-Initiated Zone Changes Effective March 27, 2009 Ordinance No. 1434 Planned Development Amendments Effective March 27, 2009 Ordinance No. 1433 Residential Density in Planned Developments Effective May 1, 2009 Ordinance No. 1440 Residential Development Standards Effective Aug 31, 2009 Ordinance No. 1448 Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No. 1454 The code was revised to reduce restrictions on City-initiated rezonings City-initiated zone changes of property to nonresidential districts can be a very proactive activity to create incentives for redevelopment by the private sector. Each planned development (PD) in the City contains its own set of development standards (e.g., site characteristics). As market conditions change or new development/redevelopment is proposed within planned developments, these changes may not fit within the approved PD which requires an amendment involving public hearings and essentially the same process as a rezoning. The code was revised to ease the requirements for amending planned developments so that they may more easily adapt over time to changing land uses, development patterns, and market conditions. Planned developments are land use applications that involve a process with public hearings. The intent of this process is to allow flexibility and a masterplanned approach to certain developments. The code was updated to allow a maximum density of 21 units per acre in planned developments, which matches the maximum density allowed by the City charter. Increasing the density allowance in planned developments to match the charter at 21 dwelling units per acre may encourage desirable development at strategic and appropriate locations in the City. Minimum required front setbacks in most residential districts were reduced from 30 feet to 25 feet to matching neighborhood context and encourage pedestrian friendly neighborhoods Residential development standards related to accessory buildings were revised to provide more consistency and flexibility in the treatment of principal versus accessory buildings. The former parking regulations established high minimum requirements and did a poor job of allowing for creative shared parking, mixed use parking, and parking reductions. The code was revised to establish lesser parking ratios and create allowances for parking reductions. These changes may encourage redevelopment, create more pedestrian-friendly environments, and make it easier for redevelopment to occur. Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 6

Completed and Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 7