CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Project Staff Report 2012 First Round July 11, 2012 $443,552 $443,552 $1,774,207

Similar documents
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

EXHIBIT E LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

Request for Proposals Wake County Affordable Housing Development Program for Tax Credit Developments

California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Update. Mark Stivers Executive Director

Florida Housing Finance Corporation Qualified Allocation Plan Low Income Housing Tax Credits Program

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS. 1. Applicable Percentage

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OVERVIEW. September 18, 2017 Housing Subcommittee

National Housing Trust Fund. Alissa Ice Missouri Housing Development Commission

An Interactive Feasibility Tool

Low Income Housing Tax Credits 101 (and a little beyond 101) James Lehnhoff, Municipal Advisor

Housing 101: Getting Started Development Finance Basics

HOUSING INCENTIVE FUND ALLOCATION PLAN

MONTANA BOARD OF HOUSING LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM. - Summary of Low Income Housing Tax Credits

APPENDIX 1 THRESHOLD CRITERIA. To be considered for financing resources, Applications must meet the Threshold requirements described below.

DISABILITY HOUSING NETWORK LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENT

Neighborhood Stabilization Program

VOLUME CAP SELECTION CRITERIA APPLICATION GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tax Credits 101. Wednesday, November 7 10:45am 12:00pm

STATE OF HAWAII LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM 2018/2019 QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN. Table of Contents. I. Introduction... 2

The New Housing Market and its Effect on Infrastructure Financing Capacity

INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUMMARY

Barnstable County HOME Consortium. Rental Housing Development Project Underwriting, Subsidy Layering, and Risk Analysis Evaluation

II. NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY (NIFA) LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN

Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules

OVERVIEW OF HOUSING TAX CREDITS

PURPOSE AND ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

CHAPTER TAX CREDITS AND SUBSIDY LAYERING. The Table of Contents

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY

2019 9% Competitive Housing Credit Application

Housing Authority of the City of Tacoma. Request for Proposals: Project-Based Voucher Program AND. Property-Based Subsidies

National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL REVIEW. Reviewer Score

Affordable Housing Program 2018 Implementation Plan

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND PROGRAM RULES HFA 113

RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES

APPENDIX A. Market Study Standards and Requirements

Neighborhood Market Study/Housing Needs Assessment

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: March 5, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of March 14, 2014

LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT/HOME APPLICATION EXHIBITS

Low Income Housing Tax Credit Qualified Allocation Plan

Housing Program Application (HOME & HTF) County of Bucks, Pennsylvania Housing Services

Opening Doors to Affordable Mixed-Use Development

REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT-BASED VOUCHER PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION PARTNERSHIP NAME: GENERAL PARTNER: GUARANTOR: PROPERTY INFORMATION

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: February 3, 2006 ITEM 103. Loan to San Diego Youth and Community Services for Transitional Housing (Council District 3)

Draft Roosevelt Income Restricted Housing Analysis

will not unbalance the ratio of debt to equity.

2016 Vermont National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

Managing a Section 8, Section 236, PRAC/LIHTC Project

Housing Trust Fund Developer Advisory Group. Options and Considerations Related to the HTF Operating Assistance and Operating Assistance Reserves

STATE OF MINNESOTA HOUSING TAX CREDIT 2012 QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN (QAP)

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Capital Investment)

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Housing Tax Credit Program Procedural Manual


April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

STATE OF ALASKA ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION GOAL PROGRAM. (Greater Opportunities for Affordable Living Program) RATING AND AWARD CRITERIA PLAN

Affordable Housing Program Implementation Plan

NYS HOME Local Program Small Rental Development Initiative Pro forma Budget Workbook Instructions

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY

CHICAGO LOW-INCOME HOUSING TRUST FUND MAUI Program Guide and Application (Operating Reserve Fund)

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101. Jimmy McCune - OCCH Tim Swiney Wallick Communities Roy Lowenstein Lowenstein Development

WASHINGTON STATE HOUSING FINANCE COMMISSION LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM RULES

LIHTC. Effective as of January 2, 2018 INTRODUCTION. Go To Table of Contents

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

Affordable Housing Program Implementation Plan

DAKOTA COUNTY CDA HOUSING TAX CREDIT 2017 PROCEDURAL MANUAL

Reviewed and Approved

The Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2016

2015 Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) (Changes from 2014)

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

Reviewed and Approved

UNIFIED FUNDING 2017 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

T ECHNICAL M EMORANDUM

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

NSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template: Instruction Manual

San Francisco Housing Authority (Authority)

Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLYING WITH THE CITY OF SAN JOSE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING POLICY IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS. July 1, 2007

Lake County Consortium 2019 Affordable Housing Pre-Application Workshop. September 28, 2018

Trolley Residential Apartments Final Bond Authorization Loan Modification and Preliminary Bond Items February 13, 2015

Project Address: 721 Blake Avenue (Manor I) and 661 Bennett Avenue (Manor II), Glenwood Springs, CO 81601

The Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2017

January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report

LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN FOR THE STATE OF IDAHO ALLOCATING AGENCY: Idaho Housing and Finance Association

REVISED REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAN DIEGO

FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION Tax Credit Assistance Program Project Selection Process and Criteria

Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program

LIHPRHA, Pub. L. No , Title VI (1990), codified at 12 U.S.C et seq.

This document is available via in a Microsoft Word format upon request. LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM APPLICATION

PART 1 - Rules and Regulations Governing the Building Homes Rhode Island Program

TOWN OF LOS GATOS BELOW MARKET PRICE HOUSING PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Request for Proposals (RFP) Affordable Housing Development Opportunity within the City of Temecula Temecula, California

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016

EXHIBIT A Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Selection Criteria

Housing Credit Modernization Becomes Law

WEST PALM BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY

UNIT INFORMATION (Complete the yellow-shaded areas) Gross monthly rent per. # of baths

TDHCA Question/Answer on Housing Tax Credits

Transcription:

CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Project Staff Report First Round July, Project Number Project Name Site Address: Census Tract: CA--0 Jack Capon Villa Lincoln Avenue Alameda, CA 940 480.000 County: Alameda Tax Credit Amounts Federal/Annual State/Total Requested: $44, $,774,7 Recommended: $44, $,774,7 Applicant Information Applicant: Contact: Address: Phone: Email: Cindy Heavens University Avenue Berkeley, CA 9470-809-7 Fax: -47-08 cheavens@satellitehousing.org General partner(s) or principal owner(s): General Partner Type: Developer: Consultant: Management Agent: Housing Consortium of the East Bay Nonprofit Community Economics Project Information Construction Type: New Construction Total # Residential Buildings: Total # of Units: 9 No. & % of Tax Credit Units: 8 0% Federal Set-Aside Elected: 40%/0% Federal Subsidy: HUD Project Based Section 8 (8 Units - 0%) Average Targeted Affordability of Special Needs/SRO Project Units: 40.00% Affordability Breakdown by Units and % (Lowest Income Points): AMI: 0 % 40% AMI: 0 % AMI: 0 % CA--0 July,

Information Set-Aside: N/A Housing Type: Special Needs Type of Special Needs: Persons with physical, mental, development disabilities % of Special Need Units: 8 units 0% Geographic Area: TCAC Project Analyst: Unit Mix -Bedroom Units -Bedroom Units 9 Total Units North & East Bay Region DC Navarrette Unit Type & Number Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedrooms Bedrooms Bedrooms Rents Targeted % of Area Median Income 40% Manager s Unit Rents Actual % of Area Median Income 40% Manager s Unit Proposed Rent (including utilities) $ $70 $87 $ $,0 $0 Project Financing Residential Estimated Total Project Cost: $8,440,0 Construction Cost Per Square Foot: $ Estimated Residential Project Cost: $8,440,0 Per Unit Cost: $444,4 Construction Financing Permanent Financing Source Amount Source Amount Wells Fargo Bank $4,8, CCRC $479,000 City of Alameda $,400,000 City of Alameda $,400,000 Alameda Housing Authority Land $49,900 Alameda Housing Authority Land $49,900 City of Alameda Fee Waiver $84,08 City of Alameda Fee Waiver $84,08 AHP $80,000 AHP $80,000 Tax Credit Equity $00,000 Deferred Developer Fee Solar Credit Equity Tax Credit Equity TOTAL $9,978 $0,900 $,,44 $8,440,0 CA--0 July,

Determination of Credit Amount(s) Requested Eligible Basis: $,94,0 High Cost Adjustment: No Applicable Fraction: 0.00% Qualified Basis: $,94,0 Applicable Rate: 7. Maximum Annual Federal Credit: $44, Total State Credit: $,774,7 Approved Developer Fee (in Project Cost & Eligible Basis): $9,78 Consultant: Community Economics Federal Tax Credit Factor: State Tax Credit Factor: $.0074 $0.90 Per Regulation Section (i)(4)(a), The as if vacant land value and the existing improvement value established at application, as well as the eligible basis amount derived from those values, will be used during all subsequent reviews including the placed in service review, for the purpose of determining the final award of Tax Credits. Per Regulation Section 7(c)()(C), Once established at the initial funded application, the developer fee cannot be increased, but may be decreased, in the event of a modification in basis. Eligible Basis and Basis Limit Requested Unadjusted Eligible Basis: Actual Eligible Basis: Unadjusted Threshold Basis Limit: Total Adjusted Threshold Basis Limit: $,94,0 $,98,09 $4,4,48 $,79,0 Adjustments to Basis Limit: Required to Pay Prevailing Wages 0% of Units for Special Needs Population Seismic Upgrading Environmental Mitigation Local Development Impact Fees 9% of Upper Floor Units are Elevator-Serviced Tie-Breaker Information First: Second: Special Needs 4.4% Cost Analysis and Line Item Review Staff analysis of project costs to determine reasonableness found all fees to be within TCAC s underwriting guidelines and TCAC limitations. Annual operating expenses exceed the minimum operating expenses established in the Regulations, and the project pro forma shows a positive cash flow from year one. Staff has calculated federal tax credits based on 7. of the qualified basis, or, in the case of acquisition credit or credit combined with federal subsidies,.%. Applicants are cautioned to consider the expected federal rate when negotiating with investors. TCAC's financial evaluation at project completion will determine the final allocation CA--0 July,

Special Issues/Other Significant Information: TCAC regulation section (g)(4)(h) and 7(g)() require a % vacancy rate assumption for Special Needs projects, unless approved by the Executive Director. The applicant received approval from the Executive Director to utilize a % vacancy rate assumption as the project is 0% subsidized by HUD Project Based Section 8 Vouchers. Legal Status: Staff has reviewed the Applicant's responses to the questions contained in the Legal Status portion of the Application. No information was disclosed that raised any question regarding the financial viability or legal integrity of the applicant. Local Reviewing Agency: The Local Reviewing Agency, the City of Alameda, has completed a site review of this project and strongly supports this project. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee make a preliminary reservation of tax credits in the following amount(s) contingent upon standard conditions and any additional conditions imposed by the Committee: Federal Tax Credits/Annual $44, State Tax Credits/Total $,774,7 Standard Conditions The applicant must submit all documentation required for a Carryover Allocation, any Readiness to Proceed Requirements elected, and a Final Reservation. Failure to provide the documentation at the time required may result in rescission of the Credit reservation and cancellation of a carryover allocation. TCAC makes the preliminary reservation only for the project specified above in the form presented, and involving the parties referred to in the application. No changes in the development team or the project as presented will be permitted without the express approval of TCAC. The applicant must pay TCAC a performance deposit and allocation fee calculated in accordance with regulation. Additionally, TCAC requires the project owner to pay a monitoring fee before issuance of tax forms. As project costs are preliminary estimates only, staff recommends that a reservation be made in the amount of federal credit and state credit shown above on condition that the final project costs be supported by itemized lender approved costs and certified costs after the buildings are placed in service. All unexpended funds in reserve accounts established for the project must remain with the project to be used for the benefit of the property and/or its residents, except for the portion of any accounts funded with deferred developer fees. All fees charged to the project must be within TCAC limitations. Fees in excess of these limitations will not be considered when determining the amount of credit when the project is placed-in-service. The applicant/owner shall be subject to underwriting criteria set forth in Section 7 of the regulations through the final feasibility analysis performed by TCAC at placed-in-service. CA--0 4 July,

Credit awards are contingent upon applicant's acceptance of any revised total project cost, qualified basis and tax credit amount determined by TCAC in its final feasibility analysis. The applicant must ensure the project meets all Additional Threshold Requirements of the proposed project. If points were awarded for service amenities, the applicant will be required to provide such amenity or amenities identified in the application, for a minimum period of ten years and at no cost to the tenants. Applicants that received points for sustainable building methods (energy efficiency) must submit the certification required by Section (c)() at project completion. Applicants that received increases (exceptions to limits) in the threshold basis limit under Section 7(c)() must submit the certification required by Section (i)() at project completion. Additional Conditions: None CA--0 July,

Points System Cost Efficiency / Credit Reduction / Public Funds Public Funds Owner / Management Characteristics General Partner Experience Management Experience Housing Needs Site Amenities Within ¼ mile of transit stop, service every 0 minutes in rush hours Within ¼ mile of public park or community center open to general public Within ¼ mile of public library Within. miles of a full-scale grocery/supermarket of at least,000 sf Within mile of medical clinic or hospital Within ¼ mile of a pharmacy Service Amenities SPECIAL NEEDS AND SRO HOUSING TYPES Case Manager, minimum ratio of FTE to 0 bedrooms Service Coordinator/Other Services Specialist, min. ratio FTE to 0 bdrms Adult ed/health & wellness/skill bldg classes, min 84 hrs/yr instruction Health/behavioral services provided by licensed org. or individual Sustainable Building Methods NEW CONSTRUCTION/ADAPTIVE REUSE Develop project in accordance w/ requirements of: GreenPoint Rated Develop project to requirements of: GreenPoint Rated Lowest Income Basic Targeting Deeper Targeting at least % of units @ AMI or less Readiness to Proceed Miscellaneous Federal and State Policies Universal Design Smoke Free Residence Total Points Max. Possible Points 9 Requested Points 9 0 0 48 48 Points Awarded 9 0 48 Please Note: If more than the maximum Site Amenity points were requested, not all amenities may have been scored and/or verified. DO NOT RELY ON SCORING IN THIS COMPETITIVE CYCLE FOR FUTURE APPLICATIONS. ALL RE-APPLICATIONS ARE REVIEWED WITHOUT RELIANCE ON PAST SCORING. CA--0 July,