Public Hearing April 11, On-Table Public Input

Similar documents
Public Hearing Rezoning of 5264 Sherbourne Dr. Wednesday, April 26, :19:31 AM

PUBLIC. Public Notification. June. 11, 2013, about. invitation. 25, 2013 Community. Open House. approximately 89. Public Responsee. or unspecified).

Public Hearing November 14, On Table Items

Community Planning Advisory Committee Meeting December 5, On-Table Item(s)

2 ZONING AMENDMENT BYLAW NO BIATECKI ROAD 3-5 a. Being a Bylaw to change the zoning designation of Parcel Identification Number: :

Concept 1: Entertainment Favor/Opposed Pros Cons Favor: 56 Opposed: 7

OFF-CAMPUS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. Updated December 2nd, 2015

Eastside & Westside Neighborhoods Character Study - Tenants

Vancouver Real Estate Wave 2 July 26, 2016

Lathrop Homes Riverworks Survey Response Percentages

MINUTES of a Regular Meeting of the MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION held on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. with the following in attendance:

Summary and Minutes of the Community Land Use Meeting Wednesday Aug. 2, 2018, 7pm

First of all, how can the City proceed with annexing and zoning when the surrounding landowners have filed a lawsuit against the county?

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA

The Class of Medical Student Housing Survey Class of Hello and welcome to UCR School of Medicine, Class of 2017!

Summary of Findings. Community Conversation held November 5, 2018

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN

OFF-CAMPUS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. Updated November 25th, 2015

CITY OF WEST PARK PROPOSED TRANSIT ORIENTED CORRIDOR (TOC) EXPANSION WORKSHOP JUNE 15, 2016 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

Badby Parish. Housing Needs Survey Report

VISUAL PREFERENCE SURVEY

Dear Mr. Butler, Mr. Thomson, Mrs. Cutter, Mrs. Jackson and City Council:

Mr. Carl Shannon, Senior Managing Director Tishman Speyer One Bush Street, Suite 450 San Francisco, CA November 21, 2014

Wood Dale Comprehensive Plan Open House #2 Summary

[MPC Comment] Fwd: Opposition to Mesana Development of Westland Oaks 1 message

City of Vancouver Planning By-law Administration Bulletins

WHAT WE HEARD Grandview-Woodland Community Plan. implementation

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ADDENDUM AGENDA

2 Holiday Drive - Zoning Application - Preliminary Report

STAFF REPORT KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 11, 2018

CD-1 (264) 101 Terminal Avenue By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

City of Kingston Planning Committee Meeting Number Addendum Thursday, February 5, :30 p.m., Council Chamber, City Hall

/your guide to buying at auction. brad bell

REPORT - RIBA Student Destinations Survey 2017

Village of Queen Charlotte OCP and Bylaw Review Open House April 29, 2017 Highlights, Policy Directions, and Choices

Public Consultation Summary

ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION

Table of Contents. Concept Plan Overview. Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines. Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan

The Consequences of Residential Infill on Existing Neighborhoods in the Treasure Valley.

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Squatters No More: Singapore Social Housing

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

We want to meet with all of you at the Council Chambers at a respectable after work meeting time to voice our disappointments and objections.

Chapter 6 Summary Control of Land Use: Control of Land Use

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

Real estate: How high can it go?

Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP )

OFF-CAMPUS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. Updated November 5, 2018

Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. Summary

Request for Access to Records under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the "Act")

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 25, 2017

Central Lonsdale Planning Study

The Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in a public hearing on Tuesday June 7, 2016, at 7 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall.

A. Land Use Relationships

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 5, 2013 Page 1

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

The really ewes-ful guide to Rent Now, Buy Later It s shear good sense

We would be in agreement to the variance if:

MEMORANDUM April 30, 2018

LA. Etta Armstrong

Welcome Join us at our first open house focusing on Complete Community related updates!

Rethinking the home ownership dream

Single Family Conversion Taskforce. Six Month Moratorium Recommendation

BBC Learning English 6 Minute English 14 February 2013 Reaching for the sky

OFF-CAMPUS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. Updated July 26, 2018

ROSS RULNEY ADDITIONAL S

Landlord & Tenant Helpsheet

Digital Georgia Law

FW: For your approval: Letter to the city clerk regarding rezoning at the corner of Brisebois and Northmount.

Submission 1 - April 21, 2015

Distinguishing Your Rental Business with Customer Service

PLANNING & BUILDING REGULATIONS

April 9 th, Mayor and Council City of Victoria 1 Centennial Square Victoria BC V8W TP6. Rezoning Application 1010 Fort Street, Victoria, BC.

CityShaping: Draft Official Community Plan East Third Street Area Consultation

Shapiro: Let s start by talking about the new open and collaborative workspace and what challenges it creates for the asset manager of the property?

DL4450 TWIN CREEKS ROAD Sunshine Coast

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

Google Groups. Re: August City Council-COUNCIL FILE: AUGUST 14, > 523 N. Beachwood Dr. > Los Angeles, California 90004

1/3/14 Cont. Dear Mr. Parks,

PROFILE Exclusive: How the Melo Group Took Edgewater Real Estate To The Next Level with Aria on the Bay

TOP 10 COMMON LAW DRAINAGE PROBLEMS BETWEEN RURAL NEIGHBOURS H. W. Fraser, P.Eng. and S. Vander Veen, P.Eng.

Student Housing Survey 2013

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes November 3, 2014 Page 1

Rethinking the Sky House Apartment Building. By RADiCaL Design Solutions

CITY OF VICTORIA BOARD OF VARIANCE MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 2015

Central Bridge Revitalization Public Workshop SWOT Analysis

Private R enters. in Brent. A Simple Guide for Private Tenants

Monaco Investments Partnership December 7, 2017

!"##$%&'()*'+*,-(.' BCC'DEF'GF(DFH'D>(IJ*'('<BBJ'(D'DEF'!KGK>G(H'BCCLIF'.(>JFD'

Introduction. General Development Standards

Re: Proposed Safeway renovation and expansion on Henry/Shattuck Avenue

Business English. (Answer Keys)

CfE Higher Geography HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS: URBAN CHANGE IN MUMBAI

Minutes. Village Planning Board. March 23, 2004

Affording Coralville: A Conversation about Our Housing Needs Coralville Public Library

FOR SALE $6,500,000 CENTRALLY LOCATED 23-UNIT NORTH VANCOUVER APARTMENT BUILDING WITH EXCELLENT REDEVELOPMENT AND VALUE-ADD POTENTIAL

Open Space. Introduction. Vision. Defining Open Space. Midway City 2017 General Plan

PEDESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT. November 6, 2013 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department

Notices to Vacate and Ending a Lease

Transcription:

Public Hearing April 11, 2017 On-Table Public Input Item Type Date Item No. Ferreira, Jaime 2017 04 05 08h24 Richard, Nataliya 2017 04 07 08h50 Steve R. 2017 04 08 12h18 Pete, Capitol Hill Athletics 2017 04 08 12h31 Adreone, Bianca 2017 04 10 10h29 Oster, Vern 2017 04 10 19h21 Oster, Debbie 2017 04 11 09h30 Item Name Reason for On-Table Distribution

From: Jaime F [mailto FIPPA s. 22 Sent: April-05-17 8:24 AM Subject: NOT IN FAVOUR OF ONNI REZONING APPLICATION 6700-20-136 Date: February 7th, 2017 Attn: James Stiver General Manager of Development Services Development Services Department Port Moody, BC Dear Mr. James Stiver, Re: Rezoning Application 6700-20-136 by Onni Development I am writing this letter as an objection to the rezoning application 6700-20-136 in Suterbrook Village, Port Moody, B.C. Please see below for our concerns with the following rezoning project application: In the last five years we have resided in Suterbrook Village at our current address. Myself and my wife have already felt the impact of the increasing congestion in our previously peaceful, quaint village. My wife, myself, and my growing family are certain that adding an additional 100,000 sq ft to this existing situation will increase the traffic risks for pedestrians and add to the congestion of vehicles entering and exiting the village daily. The recently proposed development will result in additional noise from cars, people, and commuters alike. Adding such a large development will inevitably add to the increasing amount of vehicles and pollution in our community. Currently, the village has a small community vibe and promotes familiarity among neighbors. Adding too many more people to the village will result in the loss of that sense of community. Up until now the Suterbrook village project has been a success and lent itself to be a very desirable place to live. It is unfortunate that such a large, already wealthy company is seeking to steal that character of the village with the goal of maximizing profits and taking taking away from the current and future residents. Overall, the noise, increased traffic, risks of pedestrian safety, loss of privacy, and loss of community make this project very unsuitable and undesirable to our community. My family and I feel strongly that the above proposal should be rejected. Onni Development has unfortunately chose to ignore the fact that an increase of extending the permitted gross floor area of Multi Family Residential Use and Accessory Home Occupation use by 100,000 sq. ft. will impact all existing residents, our community and our neighborhood. Overall quite frankly there just is not enough space for them to cram an additional 290 residential units into our village! Thank you for taking the time to review my concerns. Yours sincerely, Jaime Ferreira FIP Capilano Road

From: Nataliya Richard [mailto FIPPA s. 22 Sent: April-07-17 8:50 AM Subject: OBJECTION: Onni Development Permission for Suter Brook Hi there, I live in FIP Capilano Road, Port Moody building in Suter Brook and I am AGAINST Onni building an extra tower and lowrise here. Rationale: It's become very dense in Suter Brook, always overcrowded and a lot of cars looking for parking. The traffic has gone worse in the recent years not just around Suter Brook and Ioco Rd but St Johns as well as more buildings are being built, more people move here but the infrastructure, roads haven't been changed to support an additional volume of people. Adding additional 290 residential units will literally kill Port Moody. Port Moody has been seen as an oasis and in recent 2 years it's become as dense as downtown Vancouver and more polluted. To preserve Port Moody heritage - nature and clean air - we should't be allowing to build more residential units especially highrises. I do object to giving the permission to build residential units here in Suter Brook. If anything there should be a small park in that area or even adding more shops, cafes or restaurants for the residents will be better for Port Moody as it will bring more revenue for the city. Thanks

From: James West [mailto FIPPA s. 22 Sent: April-08-17 12:18 PM Subject: Opposing Onni Development Hey guys this is addressed to whom it may concern regarding the Onni development permit to add in addition to the tower they will be building another 290 units. I strongly believe my property as well as the surrounding properties will be highly effected by this extreme addition creating a mass density. As of right now street parking has become rare to find and speeding cars are more and more frequent. Of course with any area as beautiful as this growth is expected. I strongly believe that by adding another tower this will not just be growth this will be mass density. There just is absolutely not enough room to add that many additional units. I have not been someone who has opposed the sky train or the additional tower I think both of those are fantastic and were only a matter of time. HOWEVER the reach for another 290 units is based on greed and a huge neglect for our habitat and what makes this Port Moody. Thank you for your time, Steve R.

From: Capitol Hill Athletics [mailto FIPPA s. 22 Sent: April-08-17 12:31 PM Subject: ONNI Development #6700-20-136 Hey I am emailing about the development that Onni is trying to do in Suter Brook Village. I really don't feel there is enough space for all of these extra homes. I moved to Port Moody from the Brentwood area because of the congestion. The area is so beautiful and serene I mean adding one tower I understand but they need to really add even more that that? There is so much housing crammed in here already. Right now kids can still ride their bikes fairly safety on the streets. The place has a real sense of community. Its going to lose its living appeal for small families! Thank you Pete

From: bianca andreone [mailto FIPPA s. 22 ] Sent: April-10-17 10:29 AM Subject: Land use amendment Application - Dispute To whom it may concern, I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and my family. We believe that our property at Capilano road will be negatively affected if the maximum permitted floor occupancy in Suterbrook village is approved. The quiet and safe streets which I walk along every day will be negatively impacted by congestion and safety concerns. Not to mention the already limited amount of street and village parking available that we struggle with daily. Please consider this my notice to dispute the Onni application. Thank you in advance, -- Availability: Office hours for the month of April 2017 M-Thursday 9am-5pm. FIP Bianca Andreone, M. Ed., BCBA Applied Behaviour Analysis t: FIPPA s. 22 e: FIPPA s. 22

From: vern oster [mailto FIPPA s. 22 ] Sent: April-10-17 7:21 PM Cc: FIPPA s. 22 Subject: Land Use Amendment Application # 6700-20-136-300 Morrison Road (Parcel D) As a long-time resident and property owner in Port Moody, I would like to see a restriction on the height of any buildings in the downtown core to be no more than 22 storeys (preferably much less), in order to protect the city's aesthetic values and small town livability. Thank you for your consideration, Vern Oster FI Wilkes Creek Drive, Port Moody

From: Debbie Oster [mailto FIPPA s. 22 ] Sent: April-11-17 9:30 AM Cc: Debbie Oster < FIPPA s. 22 > Subject: Land Use Amendment Application # 6700-20-136-300 Morrison Road (Parcel D) Hello, As a long-time resident and property owner in Port Moody, I would like to see a restriction on the height of any buildings in the downtown core to be no more than 22 storeys (preferably much less), in order to protect the city's aesthetic values and small town livability. Thank you for your consideration, Debbie Oster FI Wilkes Creek Drive Port Moody BC