Architectural Review Board Report

Similar documents
MASTER SIGN PLAN AMBERLY PLACE. Carpenter Fire Station Green Level Church Road

ALTON TOWN CENTER SIGN PROGRAM DECEMBER 2017

Architectural Narrative Columbia & Hawthorn responds to its unique location as a gateway to Little Italy and the Bay in several ways. 1. The visual ch

SCHEDULE B. Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Village Square 88-USP-004

Lone Tree Landing Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way Antioch, CA

SIGNS MASTER SIGN PROGRAM

MEMORANDUM. TO: Plan Commission. FROM: Jeff Ryckaert, Principal Planner and Dan Nakahara, Planner. DATE: October 5, 2017

DESIGN CRITERIA Ridegedale Center-Outparcel Restaurant, Minnetonka, MN

Composition of traditional residential corridors.


Planning Commission June 25, Lincoln Boulevard

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

Sub Major Tenant Building Signage (7,000 to 34,999 square feet)

OVERALL SIGN PLAN May 12, 2014

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

652 Lockhaven Drive, Pacifica, CA Shattuck Avenue, B100 Berkeley, CA 94704

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 14, 2011

TENANT STOREFRONT SIGNAGE CRITERIA

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

MASTER SIGN PROGRAM SERRA CENTER COLMA, CALIFORNIA. Approved by the Town of Colma City Council on March 22, 2017

Comprehensive Sign Package

ZA and ZA Zoning Change and Concept / Site Plan Preliminary Plat Delta Southlake Center

ARTIST WALK Fremont, California #

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report

Pender Sign Guidelines

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

2075 BROADWAY LOFTS DOWNTOWN ARAPAHOE SQUARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUBMISSION OCTOBER 8, 2015

00usp005 (Preston Walk) Page 1 of 10

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT


MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

RED LOBSTER GROUND SIGN 450 S. ORANGE AVE.

Text Amendment July 29, Charlotte - Mecklenburg Planning Department

TENANT DESIGN CRITERIA Section s Signage Updated: March 2018

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Planning Commission Report

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

For Plaza Del Norte Home Furnishings Center. Oxnard, Ca'

3435 MAIN 3435 Main Street Kansas City, MO RESTAURANT SPACE Available for Lease 1. BUILDING LOCATION

Plainsboro Plaza Comprehensive Sign Plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

ARTICLE 9: Sign Standards

RIVERSIDE MEDICAL PLAZA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

RESOLUTION NO

B. G E N E R A L L A N D L O R D / T E N A N T REQUIREMENTS

Multi-unit residential uses code

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, February 15, 2016

UCB - STILES RESIDENCE HALL CITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PACKAGE

It is recommended that the Development Committee take the following actions:

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

AAR SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay

CHAPTER SECOND DWELLING UNITS

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

SAFEWAY - OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA PLANNING REVISIONS 1 - JULY 26, 2010

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Robert Davis

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #12-21 AGENDA ITEM: 4.1

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Harrison Pointe 01-USP-002

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012


4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.1

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing

Appearance Review Board Staff Report

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

STAFF BRIEF. Identifying Sign Design and Principles Pages:

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

Development Permit No Government Road Amblepath Townhomes

R E S O L U T I O N. Residential 384,918 sq. ft. To be demolished Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0 0.7

Planning Commission Agenda Item

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION Feb. 15, Amendments to the design criteria for the Ridgedale Restaurant Properties at Wayzata Boulevard

Request Subdivision Variance (4.1 (m)(1) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

FACTS & HIGHLIGHTS. The community will attract young professionals and provide a housing option for empty nesters.

MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)

Transcription:

Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 19, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.3 Architectural Review Board Gina Szilak, Associate Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED AP, Design & Historic Preservation Planner Rathar Duong, Associate Planner, ARB Liaison 17ARB-0203 to approve the façade design, colors, and materials; landscaping plan; lighting plan; sign program and sign adjustment for a new commercial building for multi-tenant retail and restaurant/café uses. Address: Applicant: 2919 Wilshire Boulevard URB 2919 Wilshire SM, LLC/ Co Greg Fick (Tait) Recommended Action It is recommended that the Architectural Review Board approve application 17ARB-0203 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained within this report. Executive Summary Proposed is a new two-story commercial/ food serving 14,999 square foot building with 53 subterranean parking spaces located at the northwest corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Stanford Street. Outdoor dining is proposed along Wilshire and Stanford and on second floor terraces. The design is a fresh modern design with a clear design concept that provides a well-scaled solution and a lively pedestrian environment. Staff recommends approval of the proposal with the conditions contained in this report. Background The existing building (Jerry s Liquor) and site improvements were constructed in 1949. 16ADM0082: Administrative Approval was approved on April 12, 2017 for the proposed retail/commercial project. Project / Site Information The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Stanford Street and consists of two parcels with the existing liquor store and a surface parking lot located to the west of the building. The existing building is 5,270 SF in size and approximately 17-feet tall with 50 feet of frontage on Wilshire Boulevard and 130 feet of frontage on Stanford Street. Vehicular access is provided from Stanford Street; pedestrian entrances are provided along both street frontages. Surrounding uses include an office building, retail, and personal services to the east and west, multi-family residential to the north, and multi-level office and retail buildings to the south. 1

The following table provides a brief summary of project data: Zoning District / Design Guidelines: Parcel Area (SF): Parcel Dimensions: Existing On-Site Improvements Mature Vegetation Historic Resource CEQA Adjacent Zoning & Use: Mixed Use Boulevard (MUB) District (building parcel) Existing Liquor Store and Parking lot; Total: ~22,120 SF (project site) Irregular One-story building: Jerry s Liquor store and surface parking lot None Existing building is not listed Exempt pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) North MUB/R2 -Two-story multifamily residential South R2 - MUB - MUB Two-story multi-family residential East Multi-story commercial/ retail West Four-story commercial Analysis Proposed is a multi-tenant commercial building with approximately nine tenant spaces for retail and restaurant/café uses. The building s corner location is highlighted by multiple food serving tenant spaces (2,500 sq. ft. or < each) with entries and transparent storefront on both Wilshire Boulevard and Stanford Street. The applicant proposes a contemporary design with a clear architectural concept, transparent ground floor and outdoor dining that will enliven the corner and the street along Wilshire Boulevard. This project is similar in the design aesthetic as the project at 3032 Wilshire Boulevard (16ARB0396). The Board approved a remodel of the existing structure creating a food court like structure at their January 23, 2017 meeting. We have reviewed the projects together, and believe they will be complementary. Site and Landscape Design The building is setback from both streets for a generous outdoor dining patio creating a pedestrian oriented experience. The proposed two-story structure is appropriate for the site, fits well next to the existing residential structure to the north, and is generally smaller in scale than the commercial development along Wilshire Boulevard. The building is sited on the corner, and the parcel has a three foot grade differential from east to west, with the southwest corner at the low point. The architect has created an inviting outdoor patio with the building setback to give the restaurant/ commercial spaces active outdoor dining, seating with some landscaping. 2

The landscaping shown in the perspective is appealing and complements the building design. However, the landscape plans provided are conceptual and hard to read. A condition has been added to require a detailed planting and landscape plan for review. Building Design/Architectural Concept The building design has multiple tenant storefronts to maximize visibility at the corner and along the Wilshire frontage. There is a two story bar building along the north side of the lot clad in a dark wood siding. Along the Wilshire Boulevard frontage, a one story bar building is punctuated with two story Corten Steel elements cantilevered in front with V braces. The multi-level building will include outdoor patio seating at the ground and 2 nd floor levels, a varied roof line that reinforces the building design. Mass and Scale The relative small scale (30 feet maximum height) and mass of the proposed building in comparison with the existing Wilshire Boulevard street scape is in part a factor of the new Zoning Ordinance approved in July 2015. It allows a developer s right to maximize the number of 2,500 SF or less food serving tenants. Prior to July of 2015, small food serving uses had a very stringent parking requirement. By allowing smaller food serving uses, the opportunity for creating additional options besides retail are now available. The building s proposed proportion, scale, articulation and fenestration create a distinct, well-designed building. Design, Details and Materials The 2-story bar building is clad in dark wood siding, while the one-story bar is clad in medium grey siding and punctuated by corten steel 2-story elements that cantilever out over the one-story building. The one story bar building has horizontal metal panels in a medium gray color. The color should be lighter to provide greater contrast with the wood siding, closer to what is shown in the renderings. The design is unique as it weaves in and out and use of open railings creates a pedestrian-oriented design. The slope along Wilshire Boulevard requires use of a railing and a change in grade. The corner is designed at grade with the sidewalk, and the open railing with vines is a nice way to handle the grade change, providing an open feel. The outdoor dining activates the street on both the Wilshire and Stanford elevation. Staff recommends a full landscape plan be provided with more planting than shown in the conceptual landscape plan. DESIGN ELEMENTS Façade Windows Doors PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIAL, FINISH AND COLOR Plaster, (tarnished silver) Stucco-sand finish, painted (Spruce Blue) Plaster, smooth (Tarnished Silver) Metal Wall Panel (Charcoal grey, Silversmith) Dark wood siding (Black Stain Finish) Rustic Panel (Corten Steel) Aluminum frame (clear anodize) Clear glazing Wood frame, frame (clear anodize) 3

Roof Mechanical Screening Refuse Screening Lighting Canopy/Awning/ Trellis Railings/ P Other Flat Metal screen, (black); [Note: all buildings need exterior equipment, which must be screened. The screening design needs to be consistent with the building s architecture.] Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) wall with metal roof Up/down lights, Flex light strip light, Edge lighting, step kit Halogen & LED Metal wall panel (Charcoal grey, Silversmith) Impact on Historic Resources The subject property is not listed on the City s Historic Resources Inventory. Code Compliance This application has been preliminarily reviewed for compliance with the base district s development standards which address aspects of the plan that could result in significant changes to the project s design. A complete code-compliance review will not occur until the application is submitted for plan check. Any significant changes to the design subsequent to any ARB approval will require Board approval. CEQA Status The project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that the proposed project does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment in that the project involves the review of design-related issues associated with the proposed structure(s) in terms of general architectural design, proposed materials, colors, mechanical screening and/or landscape plans. Sign Plans/ Program/ Sign Adjustment A sign program is being established with this application to provide criteria for the future commercial tenants in the building. The proposed sign program applies to identification for the nine tenant spaces associated with the property. SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS Multi-tenant Building Yes Existing New building projects require a sign program. Sign Program Permitted Sign Area 255 SF (170 frontage x 1.5 corner lot = 255 SF) Existing Sign Area (signs that will remain) Existing meritorious pole sign Jerry s Liquor proposed to be removed. Proposed Sign Area (this application) 25 square feet per tenant 8 x 25= 200 SF Two monument signs 5 x 8= 40 x 2 signs+ 80 SF Total Sign Area Upon Completion 280 SF Total 9 wall sign areas + two monument signs= 11 total signs 4

Total Number of New Signs Compliance See sign program dated 4/26/17 Requires a sign adjustment for two monument signs per parcel and to exceed total allowable sign area of 255 SF Sign pg. C-1 Walls Sign Copy + Logo Proposed Sign Type: Logo and individual letters on raceway, non-illuminated Proposed Dimensions (Area): 25 square feet including logo Proposed Colors: Brushed stainless steel (tenant spaces x 25 SF @) Pg. C-8 Proposed Sign Type: Proposed Dimensions (Area): Proposed Colors: Two monument signs, non-illuminated channel letters 5 x 8 +40 square feet (copy is for two 2 nd floor tenants (suites I & H) ONLY)) may include text and or logo individual cut out letters, ground illuminated for Board formed concrete monument base Sign Program The program calls out style, font, and individual tenant signs options including stainless steel letters mounted to horizontal brushed stainless steel raceway signs with a backer option behind the individual letters but no full back panel or sign can for halo-lit letters. Colors and style of letters proposed would be at the individual tenant s discretion. Staff recommends a more limited color palette be determined. The nine tenants are proposed to have 25 square foot sign allowance which is consistent with our sign policy of allowing multi tents to have a minimum of 25 square feet. As proposed the two single faced monument signs (located at the corner intersection and the property wall perpendicular to the street located along the Wilshire fronting property wall) require a sign adjustment, i.e. the Sign Code allows a maximum of one ground sign per parcels. Two upper level tenants have a pedestrian access via stairs facing Wilshire Boulevard. The sign program has been designed to allow those upper level tenants some sign area. Therefore the sign adjustment is warranted given the unique corner site and project program/organization. Summary The proposal is a pedestrian-oriented commercial/retail/restaurant building that has a strong design concept reinforced with quality materials, and therefore, staff recommends approval. Staff is also recommending the Board make findings for a sign adjustment to allow two ground signs on one parcel. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the proposal with the conditions and findings contained in this report. FINDINGS: A. The plan for the proposed building or structure is expressive of good taste, good design, and in general contributes to the image of Santa Monica as a place of beauty, creativity and individuality the proposed new design is pedestrian-oriented with a strong design concept. Small tenant spaces proposed as restaurant with ample outdoor dining will create a lively frontage along Wilshire Boulevard. 5

B. The proposed building or structure is not of inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local neighborhood or environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value in that high quality material such as IPE wood, Corten Steel metal panels trim/fascia, and clear glass store front systems that reinforce the architectural concept are detailed in the application submittal and as presented to the Architectural Review Board. C. The proposed design of the building or structure is compatible with developments on land in the general area the proposed building enhancements incorporates and outdoor dining promotes an active street frontage which is appropriate and consistent with the variety of commercial in the immediate neighborhood along Wilshire Boulevard. D. The proposed development conforms to the effective guidelines and standards adopted pursuant to Chapter 9.55 Architectural Review Board, and all other applicable ordinances insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. Specifically, the location and appearance of the buildings and structures comply with required findings set forth in Chapter 9.55, as documented by the Architectural Review Board, and as conditioned, the plans will fully comply with all applicable regulations prior to the issuance of a building permit. FINDINGS FOR SIGN ADJUSTMENT: A. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships for the business or property owner which would be inconsistent with the purposes of this Chapter and which would arise from unique physical or topographic circumstances or conditions of project design in that two monument signs are being proposed for site identification of upper level food serving tenants that have no frontage at the ground level. Two monument signs require a sign adjustment. As conditioned, the allocation of sign area between the nine tenants is appropriately distributed so that amount of signage corresponds to the size of the tenant spaces and addresses the need for addition size for a tenant space that do not have direct street frontage at the ground level. Additionally, the Sign Code allowance of 225 SF of sign area is not sufficient for a 22,120 SF corner building with nine tenant storefronts on two building elevations with 170 feet of frontage on Wilshire Boulevard and approximately 90 feet of frontage on Stanford. As conditioned, the allocation of sign area between the nine tenants is appropriately distributed so that amount of signage corresponds to the size of the tenant spaces and addresses the need for addition size for the two upper level tenants that do not have direct street frontage. B. The granting of the requested variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations imposed on similarly zoned properties or inconsistent with the purposes of the zoning regulations in that it is difficult to provide adequate signage for upper level tenants. One additional ground level sign is for exclusive use of the two upper floor tenants. (suite H and I) thereby giving them signage they would not otherwise be afforded. Additionally, the multi- 6

tenant commercial building with smaller retail and restaurant/café establishments, there will be with nine tenant storefronts on two building elevations, with 170 feet of frontage on Wilshire Boulevard and approximately 90 feet of frontage on Stanford Street. The code-allowed allocation of 255 SF of sign area is not sufficient to provide adequate business identification and visibility, including for the upper level tenant proposed to have identification on monument signs since these tenants do not have frontage on a public street. C. The granting of the requested variance would not be incompatible with other nearby signs, other elements of street and site furniture and with adjacent structures in that. The sign Code discourages text and logos placed more than 30- inches above the second floor line, however in lieu of additional wall signs, the applicant has proposed two monument signs which require the findings for a sign adjustment. Staff considers the two ground signs appropriate with the site development given the number of tenants and the limited amount of wall space. The proposed sign program and request for two ground signs proposed for the building facilitates the development of pedestrian-oriented uses in a commercial area and creates visually interesting and well-developed building design that is compatible with neighborhoods, responds to the surrounding context, and creates a comfortable pedestrian environment. (LUCE Goal LU15). Additionally, the granting of the requested sign adjustment would not be materially detrimental to the property owners in the vicinity in that in that the proposed sign area for the property will be appropriately allocated between the nine tenants so that the amount of signage for each tenant corresponds to approximately 25-30 square feet. Furthermore, all signs will be composed of quality materials and installed and illuminated in a manner that will not have visual impacts to nearby commercial and residential property owners in vicinity. The proposed sign program with the additional sign area allotment also addresses the need for additional sign area for two upper level tenants which do not have direct street frontage along either Wilshire Boulevard or Stanford Street. CONDITIONS: 1. Provide a detailed landscape and planting plan for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Provide a more limited color and material palette for the signage to ensure the signage complements the building. 3. The ground floor building shall be clad in metal panel that is varied light gray color to provide contrast with the two-story building element on the north side of the site. 4. Provide details through the cantilevered elements, railing details, column details and other details typical for the project, to ensure high quality implementation. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revised the Landscape and irrigation plans to provide more detailed planting plan that better reflects 7

and to rethink the planter at the corner intersection adding vertical plantings as well as upgrading the plan sizes from one gallon to 15 gallon containers. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by Staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. This approval shall expire when the administrative or discretionary entitlements, not including any Subdivision Map approvals, previously granted for the project have lapsed. If no such entitlements have been granted, this approval shall expire 24 months from its effective date, or 30 months if in the Coastal Zone unless appealed. 7. The applicant shall submit a color photograph of all installed signs demonstrating compliance with the Architectural Review Board approval to the staff liaison, prior to Planning final. 8. This sign program includes the plans dated April 26, 2017 as modified by these conditions, a copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the City Planning Division. Future signs shall be consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions of approval. Exposed conduit, wiring or transformers are not permitted. Conductors, transformer and other equipment shall be concealed within the building and sign. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise project drawings or provide additional and/or supplemental drawings and/or details to provide details of the proposed trach enclosure and add additional landscape plantings subject to staff review and approval. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate landscape and irrigation plan compliance with the City s Green Building Ordinance standards (SMMC 8.108) subject to staff approval. Modifications to the landscape plan that effect less than 300 square feet of area may be reviewed and approved by the Staff Liaison to the Board. 11. Prior to the issuance of a building permit a hydrozone matrix shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans that describes for each hydrozone the following: the square footage, percentage of total landscaped area, plant type and plant form, hydrozone basis, hydrozone description, exposure or micro-climate, irrigation method, irrigation devices (including manufacturer, make and model), zone pressure, precipitation rates, zone gallons per minute and controller station numbers. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that the plans comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Significant changes to a project s design shall require review and approval of the Architectural Review Board. Minor changes may be approved administratively pursuant to all applicable guidelines. 8

The Architectural Review Board s approval, conditions of approval, or denial of this application may be appealed to the Planning Commission if the appeal is filed with the Zoning Administrator within ten consecutive days following the date of the Architectural Review Board s determination in the manner provided in SMMC 9.61.100. Attachments A. Applicant s Submittal Material f:\cityplanning\share\arb\stfrpt\sr17\17arb-0203 (2919 Wilshire Blvd.) bdcm and sign.docx 9