Table Tax Parcel ID Assessed Value

Similar documents
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Promenade on Welsh Development Upper Dublin Township, Montgomery County

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

The Township of Montclair Seymour Street Redevelopment Plan Fiscal Impact Report

Tahoe Truckee Unified School District. Developer Fee Justification Study

ANNUAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE ANALYSIS OF THE 13 th FLOOR INVESTMENTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN TAMARAC, FLORIDA

Monroe County, Tennessee Property Tax Incentive Program Policies and Procedures

APA National Conference Monday, May 8 10:30 a.m. -11:45 a.m. Room: Hall 1E09 (JCC)

RIVER DANCE RV PARK ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT REPORT TOWN OF GYPSUM - SEPTEMBER RPI Consulting LLC.

Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities

3. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29

The Economic & Fiscal Impacts of the Blanche Hotel Redevelopment Project

School Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvement Plan

Date: January 9, Strategic Housing Committee. IZ Work Group. Legacy Homes Program

AN ECONOMIC, FISCAL AND CAPITAL ASSET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THIRTEEN PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON THE TOWN OF DENTON, MARYLAND.

Central Bank of Kansas City New Markets Tax Credit Program Transaction Intake Form & Community Impact Questionnaire

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

MEMORANDUM. Ariel Socarras, Associate Planner City of Santa Monica. Jing Yeo, Acting Principal Planner

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY[261]

Appendix A. Factors Affecting City Current Expenditures

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Promenade at Upper Dublin Development Upper Dublin Township, Montgomery County

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of Future Station Transit Oriented Development

CITY OF OAKLAND COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

OVERVIEW OF TAX-EXEMPT AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONDS

The Department s Role

Appendix A. Factors Affecting City Expenditures

60-HR FL Real Estate Broker Post-Licensing Learning Objectives by Lesson

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM

Understanding the Cost to Provide Community Services in the Town of Holland, La Crosse County, Wisconsin

City of North Las Vegas HOME Program Overview (FY18/19)

BUILD-OUT ANALYSIS GRANTHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

New Rochelle Industrial Development Agency

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

2016 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FEE WAIVER INFORMATION and APPLICATION

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS

Financial Assistance Application SUN8 PDC, LLC Cost / Benefit Analysis

Residential Demographic Multipliers Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research

City of Philadelphia

Tax Credit Finance Primer. Tim Favaro. Partner Cannon Heyman & Weiss, LLP.

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY Request for Proposals - Workforce Housing Initiative Pilot Program November 2016

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

APPENDIX A. Market Study Standards and Requirements

ATTACHMENT B DRAFT NON-RESIDENTIAL NEXUS ANALYSIS. Prepared for City of Sonoma. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

HANSFORD ECONOMIC CONSULTING

MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Fifth District Supervisor Hilda L. Solis Supervisor Mark Rid ley-thomas Supervisor Sheila Kuehl Supervisor Don Knabe

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

THE IMPACT OF REAL ESTATE ON THE FLORIDA ECONOMY. --UPDATE FOR (Using Roll Year 2002 Property Appraiser Data)

Housing 101: Getting Started Development Finance Basics

1 of 2 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

PURSUANT TO AB 1484 AND AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION TO THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS. 1. Applicable Percentage

This document is available via in a Microsoft Word format upon request. LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM APPLICATION

INTRODUCTION TO THE WHITEFISH LEGACY HOMES PROGRAM SUMMARY SHEET UPDATED

B-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

TOWN OF HINESBURG POLICE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS. Prepared By. Michael J. Munson, Ph.D., FAICP

0,...0 Los Angeles W orld Airports

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE HISTORIC REHABILITATION TAX CREDIT AND THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT

Treasury Regulations 1.42

Title 8 - ZONING Division AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Chapter RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS

Rent Stabilization, Vacancy Decontrol and Reinvestment in Rental Property in Berkeley, California

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

AN ORDINANCE BY COUNCILMEMBERS ANDRE DICKENS, KWANZA HALL, AND CLETA WINSLOW

City of Philadelphia

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

(a)-(g) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see T(a) through (g).

002 - Assessor GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES ASSESSOR Assessor. At a Glance:

Published in Spring 1986 Issue The Real Estate Appraiser & Analyst Society of Real Estate Appraisers 1

AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW

FINANCIAL IMPACTS REPORT

Assessment-To-Sales Ratio Study for Division III Equalization Funding: 1999 Project Summary. State of Delaware Office of the Budget

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

MEMORANDUM ADDENDUM. Dan Moye, Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City, Missouri

H. Chart of Accounts. Please note that accounts marked with an (*) are not used for budget purposes.

ACT 381 BROWNFIELD PLAN

2004 Cooperative Housing Journal

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

City of Philadelphia

ARTICLE 1.18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE

Inclusionary Affordable Housing Implementation & Monitoring Procedures

RHODE ISLAND HOUSING Application for Letter of Eligibility

Hennepin County Economic Analysis Executive Summary

Fiscal Impact Analysis Multi-family Development 20 Corporate Drive Burlington, Massachusetts

MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LOAN PROGRAM TERM SHEET

FY General Revenue Forecast Presentation

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications

Reviewed and Approved

Risk Management Insights

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017. Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No June 20, 2016.

Transcription:

3.9 3.9. xisting Conditions 2 Property Tax Revenues The Project Site, in 29, had a market value of $,349,2. Based on an equalization rate of 2.55, the total assessed valuation was $263,9 for the 29-2 tax year. Tax lot numbers and current assessed values of the parcels are summarized in Table 3.9-. Table 3.9- Tax Parcels and 2 Assessed Value Tax Parcel ID Assessed Value 5223 $8,5 West Side BVA 522 $3,9* 527 $22, 525 $,6 523 $,5 52 $7,3 Trolley Barn 52 $66,3 524 $7,8 ast Side BVA 525 $9,6 527 $6,4* Total Assessed Value $263,9 *Lots receiving a $,65 STAR exemption. The assessed value above is reduced by this amount when calculating taxes to the City of Yonkers and Yonkers School District. Source: City of Yonkers Assessor s Office, 2. All lots are in Section of the city tax roll. City of Yonkers GIS, 2. Table 3.9-2 provides a summary of the taxes paid by the subject property in 29-2. xisting annual property taxes are approximately $2,779. 3.9-

Table 3.9-2 29-2 Property Tax Revenues Tax Rate (per Taxing Jurisdiction $, AV*) except where noted Westchester County $22.5 County Waste Disposal $.48 South County Sewer $7.4 City of Yonkers $62.23 CC - Frontage Fee $.4 - unit charge CC2 - Housing Unit Fee $3. - unit charge CC4 - Safety Inspection Fee Variable - unit charge Property Tax Revenues $32,235 $3,3 $4,594 $42,277 $,8 $59 $3,25 Yonkers City School District $438.52 $4,278 TOTAL $2,779 Source: City of Yonkers Tax Assessor s Office; Tim Miller Associates, Inc., 2. * AV = Assessed Value. Westchester County The County receives approximately $39,859 in annual property tax revenues. Of this total, the majority of the revenues, or $32,235, is used to fund general County expenditures. Approximately $3,3 is used to pay costs associated with County refuse disposal. Another $4,594 pays for county sewer service. City of Yonkers Property taxes that accrue to the City of Yonkers pays for general government, police, fire, recreation, social, and other services as set forth in the City s adopted budget. The property generated $42,277 in annual property tax revenues in 2. The Bureau of Water Works collects a frontage tax (CC) of $.4 a front foot annually on all real estate facing on a street or alley in which a water main is presently laid, or shall be laid (see City Charter, Section C9-4). The Project Site generated $,8 in frontage fees in 2. The City of Yonkers also charges a safety inspection fee (CC4) which amounted to $3,25 in 2. The fee is to pay for the City of Yonkers Fire and Building Safety Inspection Program (refer to Chapter 55 of the Code of the City of Yonkers). A housing unit fee is also collected on all buildings with two or more dwellings. This amounted to $59 in 2. Yonkers City School District The Project Site generated $4,278 in property tax revenues during the 29-2 fiscal school year. 3.9-2

mployment The site is presently a mix of vacant industrial and commercial properties and residential properties except that the Trolley Barn is a mixed use building with 4 lofts and commercial space that fronts to Main Street. The apartment complex in the Trolley Barn employs two (2) persons. Based on an estimate provided by the Applicant, approximately 2 full- and part-time employees are employed by the nonresidential uses that front to Main Street. No other employment is generated by the Project Site. xisting Costs No unusual existing costs are generated by the Project Site. The site presently demands a conventional level of community services associated with the existing residential uses such as police, fire, governmental, and to a lesser degree - school services. 3.9.2 Potential Impacts Consistent with fiscal impact methodology, future property tax revenues have been determined by considering the amount of taxes that would be generated if the development were complete and occupied today. This approach recognizes that development often requires several years to be completed and that inflation will increase costs and revenues over time. It assumes that the rising costs of public services would be matched by an essentially comparable increase in revenues through increases in the tax rate, all other things being held constant. Projected annual property tax revenues were calculated by estimating the future assessed value of the new development applicable to each taxing jurisdiction and multiplying same by the tax rate applicable to each taxing jurisdiction. To determine local municipal costs, various local service providers were contacted and interviewed to determine what demand, if any, would be created by the new development. This is consistent with the Case Study method described in The Fiscal Impact Handbook. The method projects future local costs based on specific future service demand determined by interviewing municipal department heads and school district administrators. Based on these interviews that are summarized in Section 3.7 of the DIS, there should be no significant demand created by the development that would require a major expansion of service capacity or major capital investment. Thus, costs to serve the project are anticipated to be minimal, and the property tax revenues generated by the project will be adequate to address service demand. Projected Tax Revenues The estimated property tax revenues for the new apartment building have been calculated utilizing the income capitalization approach to establish the market value of a property that will produce rental income from its tenants. The income capitalization approach to market value is based on the premise that the value of a property is directly related to the income it will generate. The City Assessor analyzes both the property s ability to produce future The Fiscal Impact Handbook, Robert Burchell and David Listokin, 978. The Handbook has been updated by the publication The New Practitioner s Guide to Fiscal Impact Analysis, Robert Burchell, David Listokin, and William R. Dolphin, 985. 3.9-3

income and its expenses, and then estimates the property s value. The Assessor develops a capitalization rate by analyzing the sales of similar income generating properties and determining the relationship between the sales price and net income. The steps in applying the income capitalization approach and determining net operating income are: stimate potential gross income from all sources; Deduct income lost due to vacancies; and Deduct all direct and indirect expenses. The resulting net operating income is capitalized by a market rate, which reflects the property type and effective date of valuation to produce an estimate of overall property value. The Applicant, as owners of two existing rental buildings in close proximity to the site, used the data set forth in Table 3.9-3 to establishing the market value for the proposed apartment building. It is noted that these assumptions are comparable to those used in the SFC DIS fiscal impact analysis. Also, note that a market value has not been assigned to the hydroponic garden. Thus, the market value described herein is considered somewhat conservative. Table 3.9-3 Market Value Assumptions Vacancy Rate 5% Average Rent per SF per Year $27. xpense Ratio 35% Capitalization Ratio % Rental Area 329,42 sf Source: Teutonia Buena Vista, LLC, 2. * AV = Assessed Value. Based on the foregoing, the market value of the new apartment building is estimated to be $54,922,55. Applying the equalization rate of 2.55 percent to the market value results in an assessed value of $,4,525. Applicable tax rates identified in Table 3.9-2 are multiplied by the assessed value of the new apartment building which yields in the property tax revenues identified in Table 3.9-4. 3.9-4

Projected Annual Property Tax Revenues - New Apartment Building Tax Rate (per $, AV*) except where noted Taxing Jurisdiction Table 3.9-4 Property Tax Revenues Westchester County $22.5 $7,74 County Waste Disposal $.48 $6,78 South County Sewer $7.4 $24,383 City of Yonkers $62.23 $2,535 Yonkers Public School District $438.52 $64,58 CC - Frontage Fee $.4 - unit charge $673 CC2 - Housing Unit Fee $3. - unit charge $,233 CC4 - Safety Inspection Fee Variable - unit charge $625 TOTAL $,39,759 Source: City of Yonkers Tax Assessor s Office; Tim Miller Associates, Inc., 2. * AV = Assessed Value. The property tax revenues generated presently by the properties on the east side of Buena Vista Avenue and by the Trolley Barn would remain the same. Total annual property tax revenues to be generated by the Buena Vista PUR are identified in Table 3.9-5. The taxes are calculated on a total assessed value of $,59,625. Projected Annual Property Tax Revenues - Buena Vista PUR Tax Rate (per $, AV*) except where noted Taxing Jurisdiction Table 3.9-5 Property Tax Revenues Westchester County $22.5 $332,427 County Waste Disposal $.48 $3,242 South County Sewer $7.4 $47,38 City of Yonkers $62.23 $257,779 Yonkers Public School District $438.52 $696,797 CC - Frontage Fee $.4 - unit charge $673 CC2 - Housing Unit Fee $3. - unit charge $,356 CC4 - Safety Inspection Fee Variable - unit charge $,75 TOTAL $,9,45 Source: City of Yonkers Tax Assessor s Office; Tim Miller Associates, Inc., 2. * AV = Assessed Value. It is estimated that the Project will generate $257,779 to the City of Yonkers annually, with an additional $3,779 generated annually in miscellaneous fees. Westchester County and various county agencies would receive a total of $4,5 annually. The Yonkers Public School District would receive approximately $696,797 annually in property tax revenues. This represents a total net annual property tax revenue of $,68,626 compared to the existing condition. The Project is not seeking any reduction in property tax revenues through a PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes) or other arrangement. Tax credits are not being sought for the hydroponic 3.9-5

garden. No reduction in taxes is anticipated from any action by the Yonkers IDA or other funding sources. Municipal Revenues/Costs As per the analyses described in Section 3.8., Community Services, of the DIS, the project will add approximately 79 persons to the City of Yonkers population. Based on interviews with police, fire, and ambulance providers, it is not anticipated that the Project would create significant additional demand for the services these agencies provide. The apartment building will generate additional net property tax revenues of $2,535 annually to offset any increase in municipal costs. School District Revenues/Costs It has been estimated by the District that its 29-2 enrollment is 25,532 students. The new apartment building would add approximately 56 students, increasing the District s enrollment by.3 percent. An additional 8 students in grade levels K through 2, 7 students in grade level 3 through 6, 2 students in grade level 7 through 9, and 9 students in grade levels 9 through 2, would be added to the District s enrollment. Based on an annual cost of $8,572 per student to be raised in property taxes, educating the additional 56 students would cost $48,32 to be raised in annual property tax revenues. As per discussions with the xecutive Director of School Facilities Management 2, the district is operating at 95-96 percent of its capacity. Thus, there is sufficient capacity at this time to handle the demand of the additional students generated by the project. The new apartment building would generate $64,58 annually in property tax revenues to the School District. The addition of $34,26 in net revenues over costs would be used to supplement the District s budget. City of Yonkers Federal mpowerment Zone As per the City of Yonkers website: mpowerment Zones (Zs) originated from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's initiative to address high unemployment, crumbling infrastructure, minimal access to business capital and loss of hope in inner cities and distressed rural areas during the past few decades. The initiative assists in offering to residents and businesses of these areas opportunities and resources to overcome seemingly insurmountable problems. The objective is to form relationships between residents, private and public partners to effect positive changes in the community. Based on a review of the mpowerment Zone map available for review at the City of Yonkers website at http://www.cityofyonkers.com/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=73, the project is not located in the federal empowerment zone. City of Yonkers mpire Zone The Project Site is located in the Yonkers mpire Zone (Z). According to the Yonkers website, the empire zone consists of designated areas within the city that offer special incentives to encourage economic development, business investment and job creation. Certified 2 Phone interview with Mr. John Carr, October 4, 2. 3.9-6

businesses located within the Yonkers Z are eligible to receive significant tax credits and benefits. Under the program, eligible businesses in these areas can qualify for property tax refunds, wage-based tax credits, state sales tax exemptions and reduced utility and telephone rates. A primary goal of the Z program is to assist eligible companies which are committed to growing their labor forces. In exchange for creating new jobs these companies, known as Qualified mpire Zone nterprises (QZs), are given the opportunity to operate on an almost "tax free" basis for up to ten years, with additional savings available on a declining basis during years through 5. QZs within Yonkers' mpire Zone are eligible for state sales tax exemptions, as well as real property and business tax credits. The applicant is not seeking tax credits for the hydroponic garden. The residential development is not eligible for these credits. Thus, no reduction in property tax revenues is anticipated. It is noted that the Brownfields Cleanup Program provides a credit based on property taxes or PILOT payments. However, this is an income tax credit, not a credit against property taxes. Property taxes are still paid to the local taxing authorities. Thus, there will be no effect on real property taxes generated by the project as a result of its inclusion in the Brownfields Cleanup program. Temporary Construction mployment For purposes of calculating construction employment, the construction cost must be estimated. Based on a per square foot cost of approximately $25 per square foot, the construction cost for the new apartment building would be approximately $3 million. 3 It is estimated that 42 full-time equivalent on-site and 7 off-site construction jobs would be created. The methodology uses 9.2 labor hours per, construction and.5 labor hours for off-site construction. The full time equivalent construction jobs is estimated by dividing the total number of construction hours by 2,. Anticipated Long-Term mployment It is estimated that approximately 5- full time jobs would be created by the hydroponic garden operation. These would range from highly skilled positions in greenhouse maintenance and operations to mid level employment in packaging and distribution. The entity selected to operate the hydroponic farm operation would work with the local Yonkers mployment Center to target local residents for job placement and training programs. Specifically, Carol Holman, Business Services Liaison, Yonkers mployment Center was contacted to discuss services offered by the agency. The Center maintains a database of thousands of individuals who are seeking jobs. At the time the operator of the hydroponic garden is ready to hire, a job order would be posted with the Center for each position type. The Center can screen prospective job applicants including selecting them by place of residence, e.g., City of Yonkers, and refer them to the employer who would then interview them for various positions. The new apartment building would generate approximately 6 full-time equivalent jobs. Jobs would created for building maintenance and office management, a concierge, and full-time leasing agents. The Yonkers mployment Center would be contacted for these job hires. 3 Development Impact Assessment Handbook, The Urban Land Institute, 99, xhibit 7.2. 3.9-7

Affordable Housing Program The Applicant proposes to voluntarily set aside approximately 2 percent of the dwelling units as affordable dwellings - rents would be targeted to be approximately one-half the monthly rental value of a comparable market rate rental dwelling. The 42 rental dwellings will consist of the following bedroom mix: 24 efficiencies, 266 one-bedroom dwellings, and 22 two-bedroom dwellings. The Applicant has provided the following rental data: the one-bedroom rentals would be rented at $,85 per month, the two-bedroom rentals at $2,2 per month, and the studios at $,65 per month. Thus, the affordable rentals would be approximately $925 per month for a one bedroom unit, $, per month for a two bedroom unit, and $825 for a studio. These units are not being subsidized by any other affordable housing programs. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) bases its income limits for a variety of housing programs on a standard called Area median Income (AMI). HUD estimates the median family income for each metropolitan statistical area. The maximum income by family size is then adjusted from the base number by a percentage determined by HUD - for more information, see: Http://www.westchestergov.com/pdfs/HOUSING_HUD_IncomeRentLimits.pdf Housing cost limits by family size and AMI are available at the above referenced website. HUD also published HOM Rent limits for each metropolitan statistical area based on affordability for households with incomes at or below 6% AMI or 5% AMI. There are two levels of rents: the High HOM Rent for units targeted to 6% AMI units; and the Low HOM Rent for units targeted to 5% AMI units. The following are the HOM Program 29 4 Rent Limits: Table 3.9-6 Rental Unit Affordability - 29 HOM Program Rent Limits Unit Size fficiency High HOM $, Low HOM $92 Proposed Affordable Rent Levels $825 Source: Westchester County Department of Planning, 2. -Bedroom $,8 $986 $925 2-Bedroom $,48 $,85 $, HUD does not publish separate AMI data for the City of Yonkers. According to the Mr. Frank Martinez, Housing Manager, Yonkers Bureau of Community Development, the most recent median income data is from the 2 U.S. Census. The 2 median income for a household of four (4) persons was $44,663 in 2. Table 3.9-6 indicates that the proposes rental limits would be affordable to those earning approximately 6 percent AMI after netting the utility costs from the maximum high HOM rental limits. The Applicant will work with the City of Yonkers and/or Westchester County to develop appropriate arrangements or enroll in a program to ensure the units remain affordable. At this time, the Applicant has not established the details of the affordable housing program for the project. The details, including length of affordability, overseer, and 4 2 limits not available at the time this DIS was submitted. 3.9-8

anticipated selection process will be determined after substantive comment is received on the DIS, and the City has provided substantive comment with regard to the proposal. 3.9.3 Mitigation Measures As the proposed project is not anticipated to have a significant impact on any service provider, no mitigation measures are proposed. 3.9-9

9 2 9 4 97 9 2 2 BOULV 923 93 N V BURTO N A ASH 96 9 9 9 9 82 NORTH BROADWAY 9 9 3 2 W AY RK 93 R 9 PA CR S O CR 7 9 ND T K UC AH ARA 2 O RO RA IN BR O 924 SP UTHBOUND CNTRAL PARK AVNU SO OK PA R KW AY NO HB 92 7 9222 926 ND T OU TR RT S LD FI IS 9 2 2 4 VR 4 5 9 9 SOUT H BR AY OADW 3 692 5 9 RO AD 9 2 SAW MIL L RIV R RO AD NU 9 2 5 5 9 2 9 22 SCARSDAL ROAD 3 6 9 24 2 MIDLAND AV NU RKWAY RIVR PA 923 BRONX RIVR ROAD ND 3 6 9243 AY KW 3 NU 942 U AN AVN McL 43 H WAY NORT H W MILL RIVPA SAMILL PARK RR KWAY SO UT RIVR SAW PARK HILL AV N U 3 3 9 WAY NO RT H 9 2 RIV RDAL U AVN Source: City of Yonkers mpire Zone Program Approx. Scale: " = 3,5' Buena Vista Teutonia PUR City of Yonkers, Westchester County, New York Figure 3.9-: mpire Zones V ARA ND LOCAL WAY WST BOU CRO SS COUNTY PARK XPRSS CROSS COUNTY PARKWAY WSTBOUND AD CR 9244 Tim Miller Associates, Inc., North Street, Cold Spring, New York 56 (845) 265-44 Fax (845) 265-448 L RIV T D STR RADFOR U D 22 3 FOR TH UND File 944 /4/ JS/944 4 ROBRT S AVNU X CUTIV ARA 3 Project Site Boundary ligible Contiguous Original to be Removed Project Site 972 Grandfathered 9 5 9 Z Boundaries 2/3/5 NPPRHAN AVNU Proposed Redesignation 235.38 Acres RUMSY ROAD Tract Boundaries 94 SAW MILL RIVR ROAD 6 9 3 6 G RAS SY SPRA IN ROAD AST Legend PA LM R 983 4 92 CNTRA L PARK AVNU City of Yonkers mpire Zone # 29 S AW MIL 9 8 92 O S S S C CO OU U NT N T Y Y PA P R K AR W K AYWA AY W ST S BOT UNBOU D D AR 23 9 8 9 CNTRAL PARK AVN U H BO UND CNTRAL PAR SOUTHB K AV NU OUN D AV N ORT 9 9 9 9 2 4 3 6 SAW MILL RIVR PARK 9 NORTH BOU ND 9245 87) A STAT THRUWAY (INTRSTAT BROOK P UND ARKWAY SOUTHBO RS YONK GH NW YORK R PA UR SPRAIN 87) TY D NB PARKWAY NORTH BOUND BROOK AT T RST THRUWAY (IN N OU SS C CRO KIMBALL AVNU AIN K STAT NW YOR 955 SPR OA D B R ONX A L R BRONX RIVR P H BOU ARKWAY NORT RO IL NXV R IVR PARKWA SOUTH BOUND Y L IL BRO BRONX BRONX RIVR PARKWAY SO UTH BO 3