ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR

Similar documents
FINAL ENGINEER S REPORT FOR. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (Golden Valley Ranch) Fiscal Year

ENGINEER S REPORT FOR. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (Golden Valley Ranch) Fiscal Year CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

CITY OF LAFAYETTE ENGINEER S REPORT LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO (RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING) FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018

6/10/2015 Item #10B Page 1

City of Lafayette Staff Report

5/20/2015 Item #8C Page 1

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WILDWOOD GLEN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT C-91

PRELIMINARY ENGINEER S REPORT

Town of Danville. Danville street lighting and landscape assessment district no

City of Calabasas. Landscaping Lighting Act District Nos. 22, 24, 27 & 32 (1972 Act Districts) FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 ENGINEER S REPORT

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director

Engineer's Report. City of Santa Clarita Drainage Benefit Assessment Area No (Golden Valley Ranch Commercial) For. Fiscal Year

CITY OF PLACENTIA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 81-1

CITY OF EL CENTRO ENGINEER S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT BUENA VISTA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010

EXHIBIT C. Assessor s Parcel or Parcel means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor s Parcel number.

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Preliminary Analysis

RESOLUTION NO

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

BRENTWOOD VILLAGE PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN

Intent Meeting: May 20, 2009 Public Hearing: June 17, 2009

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. December 11, 2018

City of Santa Clarita

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO (West Lake Elsinore Public Improvements)

CORDOVA RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT MEASURE J

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

City of Santa Clarita

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 91-2 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI)

Tarzana Safari Walk Business Improvement District Management District Plan

SUMTER COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRE RESCUE SERVICES ASSESSMENT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATE RESOLUTION THE VILLAGES FIRE DISTRICT

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 98-1 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017. Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No June 20, 2016.

OLD GRANADA VILLAGE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN

NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ALAMEDA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (ALAMEDA LANDING MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT)

Public Works Staff Report Prepared: June 24, 2014 Subject: Public Hearing for Approving the Amended Assessment Engineer s Report, Conducting a Special

City of Santa Clarita

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

ELSINORE VALLEY (ZONE 3) FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. April 14, 2015

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE


EXHIBIT B COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (NORTH VINEYARD STATION NO. 1)

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. May 19, 2015

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Policy Agenda Number: 60.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELmhurst Street Hayward, CA

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

Management District Plan Downtown Roseville PBID July 28,

TOSCANA ISLES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CALENDAR YEARS 2009 TO 2018 (FY 2008/2009 TO 2017/2018) Intent Meeting: June 17, 2008 Public Hearing: August 5, 2008

City of Edwardsville, Kansas Special Benefit District Policy

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

SUNSET BOULEVARD AND VAN NESS AVENUE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR 1855 AND 1875 CLAYTON ROAD

WILSHIRE BOULEVARD AND SAINT PAUL AVENUE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF A SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO OF THE TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992

WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY

VAN BUREN SEWER PROJECT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MEETING APRIL 20, 2017

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN NOVEMBER 13, 2014 SISKIYOU COUNTY TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

This report submits the proposed Ordinance of Intention to institute maintenance assessment proceedings for the above street lighting project.

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

The 6-foot wide walk connecting Ventura Boulevard to Sunswept Drive, adjacent to Lot 8, Tract No. 5896

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF PITTSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR June 1, 2015

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

CITY OF PAIMDALE REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM THE CITY MANAGER. DATE: January 9, 2013

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL SURFACE WATER RATE RESOLUTION

OAKLEY -~- STAFF REPORT CA LIFO RN I A. To: Agenda Date: 06/28/2016 Agenda Item: 3.3. Date: Tuesday, June 28, Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

County Of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

BEETHOVEN ST. & WASHINGTON BLVD. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE SIXTEENTH COUNCIL

PROFFER STATEMENT FAIRFAX MARBLE & GRANITE SUMMIT AT DULLES ZRTD

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT To provide responsive service to our growing community that exceeds expectations at a fair value

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. O Kji ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR ARTS DISTRICT LOS ANGELES BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PROPERTY BASED)

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDED AND RESTATED INITIAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

SUNSET BOULEVARD AND WESTERN AVENUE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

INTERDEPARTMENTAL M E M O R A N D U M. Preliminary Water Control District Rate Resolution

Transcription:

ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 A. BACKGROUND Until July 1979, the County of Los Angeles financed street lighting maintenance exclusively with ad valorem property taxes in accordance with the Municipal Improvement Act of 1911 County. Lighting Maintenance District No. 10052 (CLMD 10052) was established by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles in the unincorporated territory which is now the City of Westlake Village in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1911. When the passage of Proposition 13 reduced the amount of ad valorem tax funds available to the County-administered street lighting districts, the Board of Supervisors formed a County-wide lighting maintenance assessment district to provide supplemental funding for the continued operation of existing County districts. County Lighting Assessment District LLA-1 (LLA-1) was formed on July 24, 1979 in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). Pursuant to the Act, the County levied annual assessments against properties located in the City territory which benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the City street lighting system. In 1988, to acquire the desired degree of control by the City over the lighting in the Three Springs subdivision located within the City, the Three Springs subdivision was withdrawn from CLMD 10052 and detached from LLA-1. At its June 8, 1988 regular City Council meeting, the City Council formed City of Westlake Village Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 to provide for the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 1988-89. City of Westlake Village Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 included the territory within the Three Springs subdivision in the City of Westlake Village. The purpose of forming the Three Springs lighting district was to establish street lighting standards that better meet the particular needs of the Westlake Village community. In 1991, the City Council annexed to the District all territory located within the boundaries of the City but outside the boundaries of the City of Westlake Village Landscape and Lighting District No. 1. In addition, the City consolidated the District with CLMD 10052. Following such annexation and consolidation, the resulting district was designated "City of Westlake Village Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 111 After adoption of the joint resolution by the City Council and the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors, the transfer and consolidation of Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 1 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1

No. 1 was processed by LAFCO and the State Board of Equalization to allow the transfer of the property tax revenues to the City. This process was completed by the beginning of the 1992-93 fiscal year. B. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS This report covers the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. The improvements which are to be funded are briefly described as operation and maintenance of streets and sidewalks within the City, including the maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities, and related facilities, installed in public streets, roadways and rights-of-way in the City, and are more specifically described as follows: Servicing of public lighting facilities, including traffic signal facilities, as defined in Section 22538 of the California Streets and Highways Code to include the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the public lighting facilities. Such service shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance of traffic signal systems including, but not limited to, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures, detectors, controllers, traffic engineering and all appurtenances. Maintenance of street lighting including, but not limited to, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. The street lights and traffic signal systems are located in and along public rights-of-way including major arterial streets and interior public streets and roadways. Major arterial streets and roadways include Agoura Road, Lakeview Canyon Road, Lindero Canyon Road, Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Triunfo Canyon Road and Russell Ranch Road. An inventory of street lights maintained and serviced in the City is provided below. The inventory is comprised of both arterial street lighting and interior street lighting. Interior street lighting consists of publicly maintained lighting systems. The current street light inventory is: 5,800 lumen lamps 127 each 9,500 lumen lamps 684 each 16,000 lumen lamps 42 each 22,000 lumen lamps 234 each 27,500 lumen lamps 41 each 50,000 lumen lamps 8 each Total Lamp Quantity 1,136 2 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 2 of 14

The improvements do not include privately maintained street lighting and related facilities within neighborhoods or commercial areas where private street lighting is maintained by property owner associations. There are 13 existing City traffic signals maintained by the District. The City also shares the annual maintenance cost with Caltrans for the two traffic signals located at the Lindero Canyon Road interchange. As part of the City's City-wide Streetscape Master Plan, power and lighting may be added to existing arterial street medians to light advance street name signs, sidewalk lighting and entry monuments. These lighting improvements may be added when these street medians are re-landscaped. District maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk at Westlake Village City Hall and are incorporated herein by reference. Plans, specifications and maps of the improvements showing the nature, location, and extent of the public lighting, traffic signal and appurtenant facilities are incorporated by reference. The referenced material shows the District and the locations of the public lighting facilities and related facilities within the District. C. ZONES The Act provides that the diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements. Two separate benefit zones have been established for the District. The following is a description of the two zones: Citywide Arterial Street Lighting Zone: The boundary of the Citywide Arterial Street Lighting Zone coincides with the City of Westlake Village City boundary and is comprised of all assessable parcels within the City. All assessable parcels, including commercial and private residential parcels, are assessed for the maintenance and servicing of street lighting, traffic signals and related facilities along major arterial streets. Interior Street Lighting Zone: The assessable parcels within the boundaries of the Interior Street Lighting Zone include all areas with publicly maintained street lighting, excluding areas with privately maintained street and/or driveway lighting systems. The following is a list of those areas which are excluded from the Interior Street Lighting Zone (i.e., areas with privately maintained lighting): 3 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 3 of 14

Westlake Spectrum Commercial Development The Colony Community The Cove Community Oak Forest Estates Community Summer Shores Community Watergate Community West Park Community Westlake Pointe Community Renaissance Community Street and/or driveway lighting maintenance in the above listed areas is funded through property owner associations. The assessable parcels within these private lighting areas receive special benefits from the maintenance and servicing of street lighting and traffic signals along major arterial streets and are, therefore, assessed accordingly in the Citywide Arterial Street Lighting Zone. Reference is made to the Diagram of the District (see Appendix "A") which indicates the exterior boundaries of the District and the boundaries of the zones within the District and the lines and dimension of each parcel of land within the District. The lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within the boundary of the District conform to those shown on the Los Angeles County Assessor's maps and are incorporated by reference. D. METHOD AND FORMULA OF COST SPREAD The Act states, in part, that "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements". As is discussed above in Section C, the District is divided into zones because each zone includes specific improvements which benefit that zone. The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District is allocated by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities, including street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities, within public streets, roadways and rights-of-way within the District. The maintenance and servicing of public lighting facilities, including street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities installed and constructed in public streets, roadway and rights-of-way in the District provides a special benefit which is received by each and every assessed lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance its value. The method of spread selected is related to the type of facilities to be maintained and serviced and the type of benefits received. The land use/zoning designation method of spread in which the apportionment of the assessment is determined according to the present or ultimate use of the parcel, which thereby determines the level of service 4 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 4 of 14

required by the parcel, is a method that is typically used for spreading the costs for street lighting and traffic signal operational maintenance and servicing. The primary benefits of street lighting and traffic signals are for the convenience, safety, security, protection of people and property as set forth below: Westlake Spectrum Commercial Development Improvement to traffic circulation and safety Improved pedestrian safety Increased illumination after sunset and therefore a reduction in vandalism, damage to improvements and other criminal acts Increased illumination for emergency vehicles Reduction in illegal dumping on vacant lands Improved ingress and egress to parcels in the District Enhanced visibility for commercial properties The enhancement to the value of the property which results from the foregoing benefits. The intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with the type of street, date of installation and the use of adjacent property. The recommended lighting intensities for commercial and other non-residential properties is generally three to four times greater than residential. The cost of providing the recommended level of lighting for commercial and other non-residential parcels is therefore approximately three to four times the cost of providing lighting for residential properties. Each land use evaluation takes into consideration foot traffic, vehicular traffic, and hours of occupancy. A base value of one unit has been assigned to single family detached homes. Based on engineering judgment of factors involved, a value of 2 was given to Circulation while Intensity and Property Security were each rated 1/4 to form the basic unit. Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit. Commercial and industrial properties have been assigned additional units based on the comparative traffic circulation benefits and security and intensity benefit of the light provided. The average light intensities and energy consumption for commercial areas is greater than that required for residential areas. The land use method of distributing the maintenance and servicing cost is similar to the method of spread used by the County of Los Angeles since the establishment of the County Lighting District LLA-1 in 1979. Appendix C of the County of Los Angeles Road Department Engineers Report is hereby incorporated by reference and is on file in the office of the City Engineer. The City of Westlake Village has fewer land use categories than the County Lighting District LLA-1 and therefore the land use evaluation is less complex. A sample of the different land use categories and how the average benefit values are assigned is indicated below: 5 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 5 of 14

Land Use Circulation Property Security Total Intensity Single Residential Unit 0.5 0.25 0.25 1.0 Office Buildings 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 Churches 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 Service Station 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 Restaurant 1.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 Stores 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 Supermarkets 2.0 4.0 2.0 8.0 Vacant - - 0.25 0.25 Warehouse Stores 2.0 4.0 2.0 8.0 The assessments, as required by the 1972 Act, must directly relate to the benefits received. As previously described above in Section C, the District is divided into two separate distinct zones based on the facilities to be maintained and serviced, and the resulting benefits received. In past years, the County had exempted from the lighting assessments those areas or neighborhoods with privately maintained lighting systems. Descriptions of those areas are included in Section C of this report. All parcels within the District, however, receive traffic circulation, safety and security benefits from the street lighting, traffic signal and appurtenant facilities in and along the arterial street corridors. The arterial streets improve access to all lots and parcels throughout the District. Such street lights and traffic signals improve ingress and egress from such lots and parcels by controlling access and illuminating access after sunset. Furthermore, such street lights, by so improving ingress and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels and improve access for emergency vehicles. In the case of commercial lots or parcels, street lights facilitate the opening and operating of businesses after sunset. These benefits enhance the value of the lots and parcels. All parcels in areas with privately maintained lighting systems should therefore share in the cost to maintain and service the arterial street lighting system. Traffic signal maintenance and servicing was added to the citywide arterial street lighting cost beginning in the 1993-94 fiscal year. As in the past, parcels exempt from assessment include nonbuildable parcels dedicated for open space, flood control purposes, public easements and public utilities. In accordance with the previously described Los Angeles County Engineer's Report, all assessable vacant parcels within the District receive some benefit from public lighting and should be assessed accordingly. In the past the County had not assessed vacant parcels within the City of Westlake Village. Based on the conclusions in the described report, and on sound engineering judgement, vacant parcels receive security benefits 6 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 6 of 14

from illumination along the frontage of the parcels. The vacant parcels receive approximately 1/4 of the benefits received by occupied parcels. Therefore, those assessable vacant parcels within the District not previously assessed by the County have been assessed by the District. In accordance with the Act, any surplus or deficit in the improvement fund for the District shall be carried over into the next fiscal year. The following table identifies the total assessments and assessment per parcel. 2017-2018 Fiscal Year Assessments Zone Number Assessment Net Assessment of EDUs per EDU per Zone Arterial Street Lighting Zone (including traffic signal maintenance) 3998.01 $ 6.36 $25,427.34 Interior Street Lighting Zone 2886.26 $14.15 ~40,840. 59 Total $20.51 $66,267.93 For Fiscal Year 2017-2018, single family homes with private interior lighting systems will receive a $6.36 assessment for benefits received from the arterial street lighting systems and traffic signal maintenance. Single family homes with publicly maintained interior street lighting systems will receive an assessment of $20.51 ($6.36 + $14.15) based upon benefits received from both the arterial and interior street lighting systems. E. FUND ACCOUNTS The District will be financed by the 2016-2017 fiscal year fund balance, 2017-2018 fiscal year ad valorem taxes, and supplemental special assessments generated by the District. The annual revenues must fund the District operations from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. However, the special assessment revenues will not be available to the City until after property tax payments are made in December 2017 and April 2018. If necessary, the City has advanced monies from the General Fund to finance operating expenses from July through December of individual fiscal years. The estimated 2017-2018 fiscal year expense budget for the District consists of the following components: Street lighting service and maintenance; Traffic signal service and maintenance; Assessment engineering; City traffic engineering; City administration; and Legal Counsel. 7 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 7 of 14

Assessment district revenues for the 2017-2018 fiscal year include the following components: 2016-17 fiscal year reserves; Ad valorem property tax; and Special assessments. A summary of the expenses and revenues is summarized in Appendix "B". F. ASSESSMENT ROLL All assessed parcels of real property are listed on the Assessment Roll which is on file in the office of the City Clerk at City Hall and is hereby made a part of this Report by reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon assessable lands within the District, shows the assessment upon each parcel within the District, and describes each assessable lot or parcel of land within the District. These lots and parcels are more particularly described in the County assessment roll which is on file in the office of the Los Angeles County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Report. G. COST ESTIMATES The estimated costs of operating the District are listed in Appendix "B" of this Report. These estimates are based on the financial summary and proposed budgets prepared by the City Manager and City Engineer. Engineer's Report submitted by: John F. Knipe, P.E. City Engineer Date 8 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 8 of 14

APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (Reduced) 9 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 9 of 14

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR LIGHTING MAINTENANCE PURPOSES CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 10 of 14 VENTURA COUNTY.---i----------, I ~ I I ) I ~" ' <:::''... '"'---- - - - ~li.te~s.!j~k~j~q_e~ V ~-' - ------L- C1ty of Agoura Hills -- -- - ----- -~ NOTE: AU. PARCELS ARE INCLUDED IN THE INTERIOR STREET LIGHTING ZONE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PARCELS ARE INCLUDED IN THE ARlERIAL STREEr LIGHTING ZONE. I SCIU I M IA M.. ASSESSMENT DISlRICT BOUNDARY ~ - - - - CllY NE ~DISTRICT BQUHMRI' (ary-'mde ARTERIAL ljcffl1no 2flNE) W//4 ~~~~:i.=o~ UClfTHQ ~ RESIOEKl\liL ZONE (EXEMPT) WllH P!ll\IAlE ~ STIEl'S AHO P!ll\IAttl.Y ~ S'IR ET l.ighting. HEIGH80RHOODS; WEST PARK. W.mRG.\'1. 111 COLON'I'. SUMMER SHORES, CW< f1lresi' ES'l'AltS, WESllAkE l'ointe. 1N COYE, RDWS!WICE Nm Sf'ECTRIJll AA'tERIAL STREElS; JOOURA RO.ID, ln<eview CNMIH RQIC. llndero CNM1H ROllD. lliousnid or.ks BLVD'""'.~ CNfYON RIWI N«> RUSSa IWCI lluoll (FUMif) w ~~4~ ' '~t=,._, SHEET 1 or 1 ol\lll.l \ f~.ot.rrl.i..,-1j'e\oo 1t_iol.W ".T... ~ t:~1d +..ci

APPENDIX B ESTIMATED BUDGETS -10- Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 11 of 14

WESTLAKE VILLAGE LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FY 2016-17 FUND BALANCE Beginning Revenue FY 16-17 FY 16-17 Projected FY 16-17 Fund Balance Ending Fund Ad Valorem & Expense 6/30/16 Assessments Balance Earned Interest $448,450 $267,100 $66,300 <$384,720> $397,130 FY 2017-18 FUND BALANCE Beginning Revenue FY 17-18 FY 17-18 Projected FY 17-18 Fund Balance Ending Fund Ad Valorem & Expense 6/30/17 Assessments Balance Earned Interest $397,130 $267,100 $66,300 <$304,320> $426,210 FY 2018-19 FUND BALANCE Beginning Revenue FY 18-19 FY 18-19 Projected FY 18-19 Fund Balance Ad Valorem & Ending Fund Assessments Expense 6/30/18 Earned Interest Balance $426,210 $275,000 $66,300 <$307,780> $459,730 5/3/2017 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 12 of 14

City of Westlake Village Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1 CITY WIDE AND IN-TRACT LIGHTING BUDGET (FY 2017-18) ACCOUNT NO. 4730 3998.01 EDUs Arterial Street Lighting 2886.26 EDUs Interior Street Lighting A. CITYWIDE STREET LIGHTING Approved FY 16-17 Budaet Projected Proposed Proposed FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 Exoenses Budaet Budaet 1 Employee Services 015 Administration & Inspection $ 7,000 $ 6,030 $ 6,500 6,660 2 Ooerational Services 110 Contract Services Legal $ 3,500 $ 4,400 $ 3,500 3,500 206 Signal Maintenance (LA County) $ 49,000 $ 53,900 $ 56,970 60,220 206 Signal Maintenance (Energy) $ 13,500 $ 12,800 $ 13,500 13,500 206 Signal Maintenance (Telephone) $ 1,200 $ 790 $ 850 900 207 Street Lighting Maintenance $ 175,000 $175,800 $1 80,000 180,000 206 Contract Services City Traffic Engineer $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 15,000 260 Contract Services - Assessment Engineering $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 16,000 391 Contingency $ 12,000 $ - $ 12,000 12,000 3. Capital Outlay 432 Agouira Road Sidewalk Lighting $ 100,000 $100,000 TOTAL DISTRICT COST $ 392,200 $384,720 $304,320 $ 307,780 B. REVENUE SOURCE 22 Projected FY 2017-18 Beginning Fund Balance (District Reserves) 22 FY 2017-2018 Ad Valorem Tax Funding and Earned Interest 22 Projected FY 2017-2018 Assessment Funding $397,130 $267,100 $ 66,300 5/4/2017 Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 13 of 14

Public Hearing 3 - Attachment 1 14 of 14