AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

Similar documents
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

Item G-1: Rent Board Regulation Regular Meeting of the Richmond Rent Board July 19, 2017

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM. Department: Rent Program Department Head: Nicolas Traylor Phone:

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM. Department: Rent Program Department Head: Nicolas Traylor Phone:

City of Richmond Rent Program Implementation Progress Update. ITEM D-4 Special Meeting of the Richmond Rent Board April 5, 2017

City of Richmond. Just Cause Eviction Policy Options. Community Working Group Meeting July 1, :00 PM 1:30 PM

AGENDA REPORT ITEM D-3 RENT PROGRAM. DATE: April 5, Members of the Rent Board. Bill Lindsay, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 16, 2016 NEW BUSINESS

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE "AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT"-A PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE INTENDED TO REPEAL THE COSTA-HAWKINS RENTAL HOUSING ACT OF 1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Owner s Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury. General Information About the Property. Adjustment of Base Year Net Operating Income

CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT:

City of Richmond. Just Cause Eviction Policy Options

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

Rent Stabilization, Vacancy Decontrol and Reinvestment in Rental Property in Berkeley, California

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

CITY OF RICHMOND. Stakeholder Meeting I April 2, 2015 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND JUST CAUSE EVICTION

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Research in Brief. August Rent Control Changes in California Posing Significant Uncertainty. ARA Research and Strategy. Research in Brief 1

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

Rent Control and its Implications to the Real Estate Industry

CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD, ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:

~RLY AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: D-3

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE RATE ADJUSTMENT

CITY OF PACIFICA COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT 5/8/2017

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO


SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

R&D Report. Bay Area Fourth Quarter 2015

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR 1855 AND 1875 CLAYTON ROAD

Frequently Asked Questions

ORDINANCE NO ( 2ND READING) AMENDING TITLE 17 ( RENT STABILIZATION) OF THE WEST HOLLYWOOD. and adopt Ordinance No ,

Rent Control A General Overview of California s Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act

The Impact of Market-Rate Vacancy Increases

SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BOARD

Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance Frequently Asked Questions

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

Investment without Displacement: Neighborhood Stabilization

WHEREAS, Alameda voters passed Measure L1 with 55.5% of the voters in favor of the measure; and

December 13,2011. Resolution No Resolution of the Board of Directors Marina Coast Water District Approving a District Surplus Property Policy

Councilmember Heilman, Mayor Pro Tempore Meister, and Mayor Horvath. Councilmember Duran. Councilmember D'Amico. None.

Apartment Operating Cost Increases in Berkeley. Analysis for the 2004 Annual General Adjustment

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

OFFICE LEASE. By Richard R. Goldberg Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania All Rights Reserved 1999 AGREEMENT OF LEASE

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Issue Details Beverly Hills -- Chapter 5 Beverly Hills -- Chapter 6 Berkeley Campbell

OAKLAND PEOPLES HOUSING COALITION PROPOSAL FOR A MODEL CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION POLICY

HR&A ADVISORS, INC. SURVEY OF CALIFORNIA CITIES WITH RENT CONTROL PROVISIONS WORKING DRAFT

CITY COUNCIL JUNE 6, 2016 PUBLIC HEARING

RESOLUTION NO

AGENDA REPORT. Susan Healy Keene, AICP, Director of Community Development

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WILDWOOD GLEN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT C-91

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Honorable Chair and Agency Board Members Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager/Executive Director

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO THE CITY'S

RENT STABILIZATION REGULATIONS THE CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Resolution No : 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule

Guide for Estimating Affordability and Cap Exclusions for 2018 Deliveries

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and

AGENDA # July 21, 2009 Alameda County Public Defender. Harold G. Friedman (510) Chief Assistant

NOTICE OF RECORDED DEED RESTRICTIONS

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL ~ ORDINANCE NO. C.M.S.

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER 4.46 AND SECTION OF CHAPTER 4

RESOLUTION NO

RENT ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM REGULATIONS

Economic and Housing Market Outlook ( ) October 31, Contra Costa AOR

SUBJECT: APARTMENT RENT ORDINANCE STAFFING AND FEE IMPLEMENTATION

Mayor and City Council, as and constituting The Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 6 (Board)

RESOLUTION NO

AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: November 6, 2018 Item Number: To: From:

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

AB 346 (DALY) REDEVELOPMENT: HOUSING SUCCESSOR: LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND JOINT AUTHOR ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROUGH

Item 10C 1 of 69

AMENDMENT TO COVENANT AND AGREEMENT REGARDING AFFORDABIITY RESTRICTIONS FOR LA TERRAZZA AT COLMA STATION

BOARD AGENDA MEMO. A. Accept the fiscal year Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Special Tax Summary Report (Attachment 1); and

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

SHERWOOD FOREST AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE NO

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report

Legislative Update for Oregon Landlords Passing of Senate Bill 608

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Transcription:

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Department: Rent Program Department Head: Bill Lindsay Phone: 620-6512 Meeting Date: July 19, 2017 Final Decision Date Deadline: July 19, 2017 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE: At their meeting on June 21, 2017, the Rent Board directed that staff present at a future Board meeting options concerning if rent increases permitted by the Annual General Adjustment were not taken in full, whether the increase could be banked, and if so, for how long and to what amount. Regulation 17-09 is necessary to establish such policies. INDICATE APPROPRIATE BODY City Council Redevelopment Agency Housing Authority Surplus Property Authority Joint Powers Financing Authority Finance Standing Committee Public Safety Public Services Standing Committee Local Reuse Authority Other: Rent Board ITEM Presentation/Proclamation/Commendation (3-Minute Time Limit) Public Hearing Regulation Other: Contract/Agreement Rent Board As Whole Grant Application/Acceptance Claims Filed Against City of Richmond Resolution Video/PowerPoint Presentation (contact KCRT @ 620.6759) RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT Regulation 17-09, regarding the right to raise the Rent up to the Maximum Allowable Rent level, also known as banking rent increases, under certain limitations (Nicolas Traylor/Michael Roush 620-6576). AGENDA ITEM NO: G-1. rev 2/06 P:\City_Managers\Agenda Rqst Formrev.doc

ITEM G-1 RENT PROGRAM AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 24, 2017 TO: FROM: Chair Gray and Members of the Rent Board Nicolas Traylor, Executive Director Michael Roush, Legal Counsel SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AMENDED REGULATION 17-09, REGARDING THE BANKING OF ANNUAL GENERAL ADJUSTMENT RENT INCREASES STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE: At their meeting on June 21, 2017, the Rent Board directed that staff present at a future Board meeting options concerning if rent increases permitted by the Annual General Adjustment were not taken in full, whether the increase could be banked, and if so, for how long and to what amount. Regulation 17-09 is necessary to establish such policies. RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT Regulation 17-09, regarding the right to raise the Rent up to the Maximum Allowable Rent level, also known as banking rent increases, under certain limitations (Nicolas Traylor/Michael Roush 620-6576). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City at this time. DISCUSSION: Regulation 17-09 is modeled after Oakland s banking rules (see Case Study Matrix) and is intended to strike a balance between landlord and tenant concerns, providing Landlords the right to raise the rent up to the Maximum Allowable Rent level, with certain limitations. The following is a summary of the proposed regulation: 1. A Landlord may, but is not required to, increase Rent by the Annual General Adjustment as provided by Board Regulation. July 19, 2017 Page 1 of 2

ITEM G-1 2. Based on the Annual General Adjustment, a Landlord may increase Rent only once in any twelve month period. 3. To the extent that a Landlord has not increased Rent by the full amount of the allowable Annual General Adjustment and subject to item 2 above, a Landlord may increase Rent in excess of the Annual General Adjustment but by no more than (a) 10% in any twelve month period and (b) 30% in any five year period. 4. Nothing in this Regulation shall preclude a Landlord from petitioning for a Rent Increase in excess of the Annual General Adjustment. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED: Attachment 1 Regulation 17-09 Attachment 2 Case Study Matrix July 19, 2017 Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT 1 RICHMOND RENT BOARD REGULATION 17-09 Regarding the right of Landlords to raise the Rent up to the Maximum Allowable Rent level, also known as banking rent increases, under certain limitations Whereas, the Richmond Fair Rent, Just Cause For Eviction and Homeowner Protection Ordinance (Chapter 11.100, Richmond Municipal Code) provides that no later than June 30 of each year the Board shall announce the percentage by which Rent for eligible Rental Units will be generally adjusted effective September 1 of that year. Section 11.100.070 (b), RMC; and Whereas, the Annual General Adjustment shall equal one-hundred (100%) percent of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Urban Consumers, San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose region, or any other successor designation of that index that may later be adopted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)(CPI) as reported and published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the 12-month period ending as of March of the current year and Whereas, on December 30, 2016, Landlords were entitled to increase the Maximum Allowable Rent in an amount not to exceed 3.0% for tenancies in effect prior to September 1, 2015, as provided in Section 11.100.070 (b) (3), RMC, assuming a Landlord served a Tenant with the legally required notice of a rent increase under State law; and Whereas, the percentage increase in the CPI from 2016-2017, as set forth in recital 2, was 3.4%; and Whereas, in recognition that some Landlords may elect not to impose in any given year the full amount of the Annual General Adjustment but have concerns that if they do not, they will lose the opportunity to impose some or all of the Annual General Adjustment in a subsequent year or years, the Board, by this Regulation, providing Landlords the right to raise Rent up to the Maximum Allowable Rent to address those concerns, but include limitations such that to protect tenants, a Tenant will receive no more than one Rent increase in a twelve-month period, no more than a ten percent (10%) Rent increase in a twelve month period and no more than a thirty percent (30%) rent increase in any five year period. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RICHMOND RENT BOARD ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING REGULATION: 1. A Landlord may, but is not required to, increase Rent by the Annual General Adjustment as provided by Board Regulation. 2. Based on the Annual General Adjustment, a Landlord may increase Rent for a Controlled Rental Unit occupied continuously by the same Tenant only once in any twelve-month period. 3. To the extent that a Landlord has not increased Rent by the full amount of the allowable Annual General Adjustment and subject to section 2 above, a Landlord may increase Rent in excess of the Annual General Adjustment, up to the Maximum Allowable Rent, but by no more than (a) ten percent (10%) in any twelve month period and (b) thirty percent (30%) in any five year period. 4. Nothing in this Regulation shall preclude a Landlord from petitioning for a Rent Increase in excess of the Annual General Adjustment. Regulation 17-09 Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 1 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Regulation was duly adopted and passed by the Richmond Rent Board in a regular meeting assembled on July 19, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: Rent Board Secretary David Gray Chair Approved as to form: Michael Roush Rent Board Legal Counsel State of California } County of Contra Costa City of Richmond } :ss. Regulation 17-09 Page 2 of 2

City of Richmond Rent Program Case Study Comparisons: Banking Annual General Adjustment Rent Increases ATTACHMENT 2 BERKELEY EAST PALO ALTO LOS ANGELES OAKLAND SANTA MONICA WEST HOLLYWOOD RICHMOND (PROPOSED) Application of the Annual General Adjustment Can AGA Increases Be Banked, such that there is a Maximum Ceiling, not to exceed all applicable Annual General Adjustments? YES. Rent may be increased so long as the Tenant is noticed in accordance with California Civil Code Section 827(b). 1 YES, with limitations. Rent increases may not exceed 10% in any 12-month period. A written notice of banking must be given to the tenant by February 1 in the program year for which an AGA is authorized and will not be used that lists which, if any, authorized AGAs have not been taken. A landlord may not bank more than three AGAs during a tenant s occupancy. NO. The annual increase may be imposed only if twelve (12) months or more have elapsed since the last such rent increase. The increase is neither cumulative nor retroactive. YES, with limitations. An owner may increase the rent on a covered unit occupied continuously by the same tenant only once in a 12-month period. No individual rent increase can exceed the existing rent by more than ten percent in any 12-month period. No series of rent increases in any five-year period can exceed 30 percent for any rent increases based on the CPI Rent Adjustment, with exceptions. YES. Rent may be increased so long as the Tenant is noticed in accordance with California Civil Code Section 827(b). 1 NO, unless tenancy commenced prior to January 1, 1996. 2 The annual general adjustment announced by the Commission each year shall be available only for annual rent increases which first become effective at any time during the period of September first of the year in which the adjustment is announced through August thirty-first of the following year. YES, with limitations. A Landlord may increase the rent on a Controlled Rental Unit, occupied continuously by the same tenant, only once in a 12- month period. No individual rent increase can exceed the existing rent by more than ten percent in any 12- month period. No series of rent increases in any five-year period can exceed 30 percent. In banking AGA increases, are increases compounded, as to create a Maximum Rent Ceiling? YES YES, subject to the limitations described above NO YES, subject to limitations described above YES NO YES, subject to the limitations described above Amount of Annual General Adjustment 65% of CPI-U (SF-Oakland- San Jose region) for 12-month period ending June 30 80% of CPI-U (SF-Oakland-San Jose region) for 12-month period ending in February 100% of CPI-U (Los Angeles- Long Beach-Anaheim-SMSA) for 12-month period ending September 30, not to exceed 8.0% PLUS an additional 1.0% for each electric or gas service if Landlord pays all costs, not to exceed an additional 2.0% 100% of the average of the percentage increase in the CPI U (SF-Oakland-San Jose region) for the 12-month period starting March 1 of each year and ending the last day of February 75% of CPI-U (Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange County region) for 12-month period ending in March 75% of CPI-U (Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange County region) for 12-month period ending in May, not to exceed 7% 100% of CPI-U (SF-Oakland- San Jose region) for 12-month period ending in February 2017 AGA 1.8% 2.4% 3.0% 2.3% 2016 AGA 1.5% 2.0% 3.0% 2.0% 2.0%, with a $40 cap for all Maximum Allowable Rents of $1,975 or higher 3 1.0% 3.4% 1.3%, with a $25 cap for all Maximum Allowable Rents of 1.75% 3.0% $1,913 or higher 3 1 Section 827(b) of the California Civil Code of Procedures requires 30 days notice for rent increases of 10 percent or less of the rental amount charged to that tenant at any time during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the increase, or 60-days notice for rent increases more than 10 percent. 2 See Section 17.08.010(1) of the City of West Hollywood Rent Stabilization Ordinance (http://qcode.us/codes/westhollywood/) 3 Santa Monica s City Charter Section 1805(b) allows the Rent Board to impose a dollar-amount limit to the annual general adjustment. The methodology for determining such ceiling is based on averaging the 85 th percentile of the maximum allowable rent for all controlled units and those controlled unit with a base rent established before January 1, 1999, and multiplying that amount by the Annual General Adjustment. See memorandum dated June 8, 2017: https://www.smgov.net/uploadedfiles/departments/rent_control/about_the_rent_control_board/staff_reports/2017/item%2011a%20ga%20and%20ceiling%202017(1).pdf.

ATTACHMENT 2 BERKELEY EAST PALO ALTO LOS ANGELES OAKLAND SANTA MONICA WEST HOLLYWOOD RICHMOND (PROPOSED) COMBINED MAXIMUM AGA INCREASE (reflects compounding) 2015 Fair Market Rent (FMR) for a 2- Bedroom Apartment 4 Application of 2016 & 2017 AGAs on Fair Market Rent Section Reference 3.3% 4.4% N/A Increases cannot be banked 4.3% 3.3% 2.8% (for tenancies commencing prior to 1/1/96) $1,585 $2,062 $1,424 $1,585 $1,424 $1,424 $1,585 $1,637 $2,153 Rent Stabilization and Good Cause Ordinance, Section 13.76.110; The Berkeley Rent Board Mailbag 5 Rent Stabilization Ordinance, Section 14.04.100 N/A Increases cannot be banked RAC Regulation 360.00; Rent Stabilization Ordinance Section 151.06(D) & Section 151.07(A)(6) $1,653 $1,471 Residential Rent Adjustments and Eviction Ordinance, Section 8.22.065 & Section 8.22.070; Oakland CPI Banking Calculator Santa Monica Rent Board Regulations, Chapter 3; Santa Monica Rent Control Law Charter Amendment, Section 1805 $1,464 (for tenancies commencing prior to 1/1/96) Rent Stabilization Ordinance, Section 17.36.050 6.5% $1,688 Rent Board Regulation 17-05 4 The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) determines Fair Market Rents (FMRs) by county. Figures shown do not include the utility allowance. Source: HUD User 2015 Final Fair Market Rents. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmrs/fy2015_code/select_geography.odn. 5 http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/rent_stabilization_board/home/faqs AGA_and_other_rent_increases.aspx