MARKET WATCH: Dakota County

Similar documents
MARKET WATCH: Twin Cities Trends in the unsubsidized multifamily rental market

New affordable housing production hits record low in 2014

March 3, 2017 Prepared by

The State of Renters & Their Homes

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

Minneapolis Trends. Permitted residential conversions, remodels and additions. Permitted non-residential conversions, remodels and additions

Housing Indicators in Tennessee

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

Housing Study & Needs Assessment

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Analysis of Condo Converted Properties in Minneapolis

Housing Characteristics

2015 First Quarter Market Report

Addressing the Impact of Housing for Virginia s Economy

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2017

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2018

Minneapolis Trends. Permitted residential conversions, remodels and additions. Permitted non-residential conversions, remodels and additions

PROFILE. Cultivate Hopkins Comprehensive Plan 8/21/18 DRAFT. Cultivate Hopkins Appendix B3: Housing 1

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Out of. Reach. The growing gap between. Minnesota 2017 WAGES AND RENT. An annual report from

State of Renters and Their Homes

Minneapolis Trends. Permitted residential conversions, remodels and additions. Permitted non-residential conversions, remodels and additions

Detroit Inclusionary Housing Plan & Market Study Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Executive Summary August, 2016

CHAPTER 2: HOUSING. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Existing Housing Characteristics

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

City Center Market-Rate Housing Study

White Oak Science Gateway Master Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS. March 8, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Brenda Morton Dulles Area Association of REALTORS

Wi n t e r 2008 In this issue: Housing Market Update Affordable Housing Update Special Focus: Tracking Subsidized Housing

Metro Atlanta Rental Housing Affordability: How Hot is Too Hot for Low-Income Workers?

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

Highlights. U.S. and the 25 Largest Metropolitan Area Trends Twin Cities Residential Construction: Glimmers of Hope in 2010 July 2011

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

Nonresidential construction activity in the Twin Cities region was robust in 2013

REGIONAL. Rental Housing in San Joaquin County

OUT OF REACH IOWA 2018 THE HIGH COST OF HOUSING

Money Talks, but Most Landlords Aren t Listening

Minneapolis St. Paul Residential Real Estate Index

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eight-Year Report

Dakota County 2015 Rental Market Survey. 30th Annual Market Survey

Subsidized. Housing. in 2017

2015 New York City. Housing Security Profile and Affordable Housing Gap Analysis

Housing Needs in Burlington s Downtown & Waterfront Areas

APARTMENT MARKET TRENDS

HOUSINGSPOTLIGHT. The Shrinking Supply of Affordable Housing

WHERE WILL WE LIVE? ONTARIO S AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING CRISIS

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 5 Issue 2 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Key Findings, 2 nd Quarter, 2015

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

APARTMENT MARKET TRENDS

nd Quarter Market Report

Housing Affordability in Lexington, Kentucky

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

Repo. gional Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program Status Report. Twin Cities Metropolitan Area

Regional Snapshot: Affordable Housing

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

Multifamily Market Commentary September 2016

3 RENTAL HOUSING STOCK

Housing & Neighborhoods Trends

Multifamily Market Commentary December 2018

City of Mitchell RENTAL HOUSING UPDATE

APARTMENT MARKET TRENDS

City of Exeter Housing Element

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2019

5 RENTAL AFFORDABILITY

While the United States experienced its larg

WASHINGTON STATE APARTMENT MARKET REPORT SPRING 2018

Single Family Sales Maine: Units

August 2017 Loudoun County Market Trends Report Sales Price Reaches Record High; Sales Decline; Inventory Remains Low

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Introduction. Sidney Ainkorn, Peter Mathison, and David Tomporowski. General History and Context. Geographic Context

About Streams. Streams is 2017 by HousingLink

Dan Immergluck 1. October 12, 2015

UC Berkeley Fisher Center Working Papers

May 2016 Loudoun County Market Trends Report Homes selling twice as fast as 2015 with re-emergence of seller s market

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

The supply of single-family homes for sale remains

Minneapolis St. Paul Residential Real Estate Index

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report

Introduction. Charlotte Fagan, Skyler Larrimore, and Niko Martell

Methodological Appendix: The Growing Shortage of Affordable Housing for the Extremely Low Income in Massachusetts

San Diego County Vol. XX, Issue I Rental Trends Executive Summary March 2007

A Tale of Two Canadas

Connecticut First Nine Months Housing Report 2014

JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOOD HOUSING ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER West Jasper Place. Glenwood. Britannia Youngstown. Canora

Manhattan Rental Market Report August 2013 mns.com

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

Little Haiti Community Needs Assessment: Housing Market Analysis December 2015

The Knox County HOUSING MARKET

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Brenda Morton Dulles Area Association of REALTORS

Washington Apartment Market Fall 2017

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 4, Issue 3. THE Introduction SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY

High-priced homes have a unique place in the

quarter andd Figure % (2009 Q3) 15.68% Drop $741 (2013 Q1) Average Vacancy Rate (%) Average Rent

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

Demographic and Housing Trends

H o u s i n g N e e d i n E a s t K i n g C o u n t y

CHAPTER 3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Trends. Trends in Condominiums, Co-Ops and PUDs. Condominium Summary

ARLA Members Survey of the Private Rented Sector

Massachusetts 2016 First Quarter Housing Report

Transcription:

MARKET WATCH: Dakota County Trends in the unsubsidized multifamily rental market Minnesota Housing Partnership OCTOBER 2018 Across the Twin Cities, the growing ranks of renter households are facing an increasingly challenging housing market with rising rents and declining vacancy rates. While developers are leveraging public and private resources to create new affordable units, current owners of unsubsidized rental properties have few tools to preserve and improve aging properties to maintain homes for current and future tenants. In this research series, Minnesota Housing Partnership tracks key trends in the unsubsidized multifamily rental markets across the Twin Cities. This report analyzes data for 23,800 unsubsidized rental units in properties with four or more units in Dakota County from the CoStar database. Data information and limitations on page 2. SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN RENTER HOUSEHOLDS, THOUSANDS PAYING TOO MUCH IN RENT 1 In 2016, slightly more than 1 in 4 households in Dakota County were renters, significantly lower than St. Paul and Minneapolis, where renters make up the majority of households. However, Dakota County has seen a higher rate of growth in the number of renter households, rising 18% since 2000 to a total of 40,564 renter households. This is notably higher than the 12% increase in renters statewide and 12% and 13% increases in St. Paul and Minneapolis respectively. A number of cities in Dakota County have seen dramatic increases in renter households, including (112%) and Inver Grove (71%). The cities with the highest renter populations are those that are closest to Hennepin and Ramsey counties, including West St. Paul (42%), (36%), South St. Paul (34%), and (31%). These are also the cities with the largest percentages of people of color. Overall, 52% of Dakota County renter households are people of color, with West St. Paul (70%), (60%), and South St. Paul (61%) containing the largest proportion of renter communities of color. Like the rest of the Twin Cities and the state, households of color are far more likely to be renters; for instance, only 22% of white households in Dakota County are renters compared to 66% of Black and 55% of Latino households. From 2000 to 2016, median rent in Dakota County increased 6%, while median renter income decreased 8%. Of the 40,564 renters in Dakota County, 18,601 earn under 60% of AMI, and 15,376 of those renters earning under 60% of AMI (or 83%) are cost burdened, with 54% (8,275) paying more than half of their income on housing. 2 Percent renter households Change in renters, 2000-2016 % households of color that are renters Dakota County 26% 18% 52% West St. Paul 42% -2% 70% 36% 17% 60% South St. Paul 34% 22% 61% 31% 36% 54% Inver Grove 31% 71% 59% Hastings 28% 64% 78% 21% 112% 39% Rosemount 15% 114% 29% 13% 133% 26% 13% 86% 14% Mendota 12% 64% 33% 46% In Dakota County, 46% of renter households (18,601 families) earn less than 60% of area median income } 83% 54% Of those households, 83% pay more than 30% and 54% pay more than half of their monthly income on housing 1- Unless otherwise noted, information in this section comes from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 2- Metropolitan Council staff analysis of U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample five-year data 1

DATA NOTES AND LIMITATIONS: DATA SOURCE: Unless otherwise noted, data on pages 3-11 in this report comes from CoStar, a commercial real estate database that tracks multifamily properties with four or more units. This includes 6,627 market rate, existing multifamily properties in the 7-county Twin Cities metro, for which data is directly sourced from property management by CoStar researchers. This report analyzes data for approximately 23,800 unsubsidized rental units in 330 properties with 4 or more units in Dakota County, excluding those that are currently under construction or renovation. Data for this report was accessed and downloaded the first week of June 2018. RENT DATA: CoStar provides average, rather than median, rent data. Of the approximately 23,800 unsubsidized rental units in Dakota County tracked by CoStar and included in this analysis, 56% include rent data. All rent data in this report is adjusted for inflation. BOUNDARIES: This report analyzes Dakota County cities by city boundary. In the county, there are a total of 21 cities, 14 of which have properties in the CoStar database. Cities that do not have any rental properties in CoStar include: Coates, Mendota, Miesville, New Trier, Randolph, and Sunfish Lake. CLASSES: CoStar defines building class in the following way. CLASS A buildings represent current trends and standards in design and/or are of a timeless, perhaps historic quality. They include high quality finishes such as hardwood floors, granite countertops, and/or stainless steel appliances, as well as on-site shared facilities like clubhouse/ party room, fitness center, business center, etc. CLASS B buildings are aesthetically average and contextually appropriate. They include average quality finishes and a few on-site shared facilities and spaces. CLASS C buildings are purely functional, often with below average finishes, small windows and likely no on-site facilities or shared spaces. Lilydale Mendota West St Paul Sunfish Lake South St Paul Inver Grove Rosemount Nininger Hastings Coates Empire Vermillion Marshan Ravenna Eureka Castle Rock Hampton New Trier Douglas Miesville Randolph Greenvale Waterford Sciota 2

AVERAGE RENT OUT OF REACH FOR MANY From 2010 to June 2018, average rent in Dakota County for multifamily properties with four units or more rose 13% to $1,171. Average rent is lower than that of the 7-county metro ($1,217 in Q2 2018) and the magnitude of increase has been slower (compared to a 17% increase for the 7-county region since 2010). Still, rent is moving out of reach for a large segment of the renting population. Unsubsidized units that are affordable to households earning 40% to 60% of the area median income (AMI) 3 for instance, a family of four earning $34,340 to $51,480 annually are often referred to as naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH). By traditional measures, rent is considered affordable when a household spends no more than 30% of its gross income on housing costs. Countywide, rent is largely affordable to families making 60% of AMI but not for those at lower incomes. For instance, as of June 2018, the average rent for a onebedroom apartment is $1,041 a full $363 more per month than a household at 40% AMI could afford. Similarly, the average two-bedroom apartment costs $1,245, just over $430 a month more than what a 40% AMI household could pay. While 89% of the buildings in our dataset were constructed prior to 2010, new units that have been built in the past eight years are commanding much higher rents. The average rent in properties that have come on the market since 2010 is $1,722 47% higher than that of the county average. These new buildings are concentrated in just a few cities: (4), (3), (1) and Lilydale (1). Dakota County Average Rent by Unit Size $1,036 $1,171 $1,722 Average rent for properties constructed since 2010 $764 $937 Average rent 2010 $949 $633 Average rent June 2018 Rent adjusted for inflation $856 $915 % increase in average rent $1,041 $1,017 $678 Affordable to 60% area median income $1,092 Affordable to 40% area median income $1,245 $1,220 $814 13% 23% 15% 14% OVERALL STUDIO 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3- Area median income is calculated for the 13-county HUD Metro MN-WI area of Minneapolis- St. Paul- Bloomington. 3

DRAMATIC RENT INCREASES IN NORTH/WESTERN CITIES From 2010 to 2017, rent has increased the most in, with a 27% increase, followed by Inver Grove (16%), Rosemount (15%) and (13%). Nine of the 14 cities in our analysis have seen gains of more than 10%. South St. Paul is the only city that saw rent remain flat from 2010 to 2017. % change in rent, 2010-2017 +27% Rosemount +15% AVERAGE RENT BY DAKOTA COUNTY MUNICIPALITES, 2010-2017 $978 $1,073 $1,241 $1,238 Mendota +13% +12% +13% Burnville +13% $1,068 $1,070 $1,049 $1,007 $1,207 $1,193 $1,183 $1,138 Inver Grove +16% $948 $1,095 +3% $1,055 $1,082 West St. Paul +5% Hastings +2% $918 $857 $877 $962 South St. Paul 0% This graphic only includes cities with more than 100 units in our dataset $849 $849 # of units in dataset 2000+ units 250-2K units Less than 250 units $883 $976 Rent 2010 Rent 2017 Rent adjusted for inflation RENTAL HOUSING IN 1-3 UNIT PROPERTIES Our dataset includes only properties with four or more units, not townhomes, condos, duplexes, or single family rental homes. HousingLink s Twin Cities Rental Revue for the second quarter of 2018 tracked 323 rental unit listings (or vacant, available units) in Dakota County, for which the average rent was $1,567. This is slightly below the average across the 7-county metro ($1,645). The majority of these listings were for townhomes (51%) and single family rental homes (36%). Countywide, condos had the lowest average rent at $1,146, while single family rental homes had the most expensive average rents at $1,835. Average rent for a two-bedroom unit was $1,350 and $1,509 for a three-bedroom units. Two and three-bedroom units in condos, townhomes or single family rental homes were more expensive than the multifamily market, where two-bedroom units average $1,225 and threebedroom units average $1,361., and had the most listings tracked by HousingLink for the first quarter of 2018. In these cities, the rental properties are majority townhomes, with rent averaging from $1,424 in to $1,658 in. Learn more about this data source at housinglink.org. 4

SIGNIFICANT NEED FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL PRESERVATION IN DAKOTA COUNTY Unsubsidized affordable rental housing is typically Class C 4 : older properties that provide basic shelter without additional amenities. In Dakota County, the vast majority of buildings and units in our dataset are Class C: 83% of properties and 71% of units. Class B buildings comprise 24% of units, while Class A buildings comprise just 5% of the county's units in our dataset. A UNITS Class C: 71% (16,885) Class B: 24% (5,619) Class A: 5% (1,399) B C A B BUILDINGS Class C: 83% (275) Class B: 15% (48) Class A: 2% (8) C Average rent in Class C buildings during the second quarter of 2018 in Dakota County was $1,200, higher than that of the 7-County region at $1,023. In contrast to the 7-county region, which sees a 33% difference in average rent in Class C and B buildings, there is little variation between the two in Dakota County. However, there is a $423 distinction between Class B rents, and those of Class A. AVERAGE BUILDING SIZE BY CLASS (# of units) CLASS A Dakota County Twin Cities Minneapolis / St. Paul 145 155 200 Like other cities in the region, there is a dramatic distinction in building size by class. While Class A buildings in Dakota County average 200 units, Class C buildings average 61 units. This is dramatically larger than the central cities. For comparison, in Minneapolis the average Class C building contains just 17 units, and in St. Paul just 21 units. CLASS B CLASS C 29 19 61 61 90 117 Average rent by building class in Dakota County $2,500 Class A Class B Class C Difference in rent b/w Class C and B Difference in rent b/w Class B and A $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,705 $1,282 $1,200 +33% +7% $1,573 $1,042 $825 +51% +26% $1,556 $1,144 +36% $976 +17% $1,862 $1,316 $1,171 +41% +12% $500 0 Overall Studio 1 bedroom 2 bedroom 4- Full descriptions of CoStar class designations on page 2. 5

DESPITE UPTICK IN 2017, VACANCY RATES PLUNGE COUNTYWIDE In Dakota County, the vacancy rate 5 has fallen from 5.1% in 2010 to 3.2% in the second quarter of 2018, a drop of 37%. 8% Vacancy Rates Dakota County Twin Cities metro When vacancy rates fall below 5%, renter households struggle to find affordable housing choices as property owners are able to be more selective in tenant screening and potentially more inclined to increase rent. This has been the case in Dakota County since 2011. 7% 6% 5% 4% 6.5% 5.7% 5.5% 4.5% 3.8% Into the second quarter of 2018, vacancy rates are extremely low in the cities of Inver Grove (1.8%) and Mendota (1.3%). These two cities have seen enormous changes in vacancy rates over time, falling 64% since 2010 in Inver Grove, and falling 58% in Mendota.. 3% 3.5% 2% 2007 2011 2017 Vacancy rate change, 2010-2018, by municipality 8% 6% 6.7% 5.9% 8.5% 4.6% 5.4% 5.2% 5.4% 6.1% 5.1% 6.1% Vacancy rate 2010 3.3% Vacancy rate Q2 2018 6.1% 4% 4.6% 4.4% 4.4% 4.3% 3.1% 5- For our vacancy data points, we remove any building in its first year of leasing. CoStar vacancy rate data is higher than reported by other data sources, like Marquette Advisors. This may be due to the fact that the sample size is much larger, includes properties with 4 or more units, as opposed to 10 or more, and is directly sourced rather than relying on survey data. 2% South St Paul 3.5% 3.4% 3.1% 2.5% 2.5% Rosemount West St Paul Hastings 1.8% Inver Grove 1.3% Mendota Vacancy by Building Class Class A 6% Class B 3.4% Class C 3.3% Similar to regional trends, in Dakota County vacancy rates are significantly higher for Class A buildings, at 6% in the second quarter of 2018, than Class B or Class C. However, this is markedly lower than the 7-county average of 10%. Like rent levels, Class C and Class B properties in Dakota County have similar vacancy rates 3.4% for Class B and 3.3% for Class C. Again, for Class B, this is markedly lower than the regional average of 5%. 6

MORE THAN 9,000 NATURALLY OCCURRING AFFORDABLE UNITS IN DAKOTA COUNTY In Dakota County, renters with low or moderate income 40 to 60% of AMI are able to afford housing by renting in unsubsidized, naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH). These properties are typically built from 1960 to 1990, and are basic, safe structures without extra amenities. In our dataset, there are a total of 9,320 units in 111 buildings that are affordable to households earning 40% to 60% of AMI or NOAH units. This accounts for 39% of all units in our dataset, which is notably higher than the 7-county region, in which 19% of units are NOAH. Geographically, the distribution of affordable units across Dakota County follows the cities that contain the most overall multifamily units in our dataset. contains the most NOAH units with a total of 2,517 units. West St. Paul (2,001), (1,902), and Inver Grove (1,121) also have more than 1,000 NOAH units. Properties containing NOAH units are on average larger than similar properties in Minneapolis and St. Paul. Only 23% of these buildings contain less than 25 units, while 42% contain more than 100 units, with the average size of 108 units. Nearly half of NOAH units are two-bedroom apartments (4,521 or 48%), with one-bedroom apartments accounting for 42% of NOAH units (3,892). Like the central cities, though, three- and four-bedroom units are very scarce with just 374 three-bedroom NOAH units and 20 four-bedroom NOAH units in our dataset. BUILDINGS WITH UNITS AFFORDABLE TO HOUSEHOLDS EARNING 40-60% OF AMI Lilydale Mendota Eureka Rosemount Empire West St Paul Lilydale West St Paul South St Mendota Paul Sunfish Lake Sunfish Lake Inver Grove Rosemount Empire Castle Rock Inver Grove Coates South St Paul Coates Vermillion Vermillion Hampton Property containing units affordable to 40-60% AMI Nininger Nininger New Trier Hastings Marshan Douglas Miesville Median Renter Income under $35,000 $35,001 - $46,000 $46,001 - $53,000 over $53,001 No Data Ravenna Hastings Marshan Ravenna Median und $35 $46 ove No City 40%-60% AMI units 2,517 West St. Paul 2,001 1,902 Inver Grove 1,121 686 377 Hastings 357 South St. Paul 239 Greenvale Waterford Sciota Randolph 112 Eureka Castle Rock Hampton New Trier Douglas Miesville Hampton 8 Greenvale Waterford Sciota Randolph 42% 23% 13% Size of buildings with NOAH units Less than 25 units 25-49 units 22% 50-99 units 100+ units 7

BUILDINGS WITH UNITS AFFORDABLE TO HOUSEHOLDS EARNING 40-60% AMI West St Paul South St Paul Inver Grove 8

MORE THAN 8,000 UNITS IMPACTED BY PROPERTY SALES SINCE 2010 From 2010 to 2017, 8,158 units in 103 buildings were sold in Dakota County. These property sales peaked in 2016 with 24 buildings sold, impacting 2,975 units or 13% of all units in our dataset in that year. In 2017, sales declined slightly to 21 impacting 1,215 units but still remained higher than the previous seven years. In line with the regional trend, the overwhelming majority of sales were Class C properties, comprising 81% of buildings and 63% of units sold from 2010 to 2017. Class B buildings represented 17% of buildings and 33% of units. Only two Class A buildings experienced a sale. In contrast to the regional trend, sales in Dakota County impacted larger properties. The average size of buildings sold from 2010 to 2017 was 76 units significantly higher than that of the overall 7-county metro, which saw an average of 45 units. Of these sales, only 10% were built prior to 1960, while the vast majority were built between 1960 and 1989 (76%), and just 11% in buildings built in 1990 or after. PROPERTIES SOLD IN DAKOTA COUNTY UNITS SOLD IN DAKOTA COUNTY 25 Class C 24 BLDGS 20 18 21 18 3000 2500 2,975 15 10 5 0 4 14 2000 13 11 11 9 10 10 1500 7 5 7 1000 4 500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1,607 1,275 683 594 428 503 153 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 76% of buildings sold from 2010-2017 were built between 1960 and 1989 9

PROPERTY SALES CONCENTRATED IN NORTHWEST CITIES From 2010 to 2017, the largest number of sales occurred in (20), (13), Hastings (13) and West St. Paul (10). However, the largest number of units impacted is slightly different with 2,623 units impacted in, 2,388 in, 902 in Inver Grove and 428 in. Lilydale Mendota West St Paul Sunfish Lake South St Paul PROPERTY SALES, 2010-2017 Property Sale No Data Inver Grove Rosemount Nininger Hastings Coates Empire Vermillion Marshan Ravenna Eureka Castle Rock Hampton New Trier Douglas Miesville Greenvale Waterford Sciota Randolph # bldgs # units 20 2,623 13 2,388 Inver Grove 6 902 5 428 Hastings 13 228 West St. Paul 10 183 South St. Paul 9 114 3 50 Hampton 2 16 Rosemount 1 11 10

SUBSIDIZED AFFORDABLE HOUSING NOT FILLING THE GAP NEW MULTIFAMILY PRODUCTION IN DAKOTA COUNTY, 2010-2016 Not included in this analysis are affordable rental housing developments created with public and/or private capital funding that include affordability obligations. Therefore, in addition to the 23,800 unsubsidized rental units analyzed in this report, the Metropolitan Council reported there were 913 new units of affordable rental housing created in Dakota County from 2010 to 2016. Over this timeframe, there were no rental units produced that were affordable to under 30% of AMI; the vast majority of units created were affordable at 60% or 80% of AMI with fewer than 30% of units affordable to those earning 50% of AMI. These production counts are similar to the distribution at the 7-county level; regionally, 54% of affordable housing units were affordable at 60% of AMI, followed by 25% affordable to 50% AMI, 17% affordable at 80% AMI, and finally 4% of all produced units were affordable to 30% of AMI. Over that same timeframe, 1,869 unsubsidized rental units were created in Dakota County, with an average asking rent of $1,585 in 2016. 80% AMI 60% AMI 50% AMI 913 units 238 421 254 1,869 units Average rent $1,585 in 2016 Data for rental housing production is based on building permits issued during each calendar year by cities and citys within the 7-county Twin Cities region. Data is collected via an annual survey of community officials, in conjunction with collection of data on residential building permits. The data on returned surveys were verified by Metropolitan Council staff. Subsidized Unsubsidized This report was published in August 2018, with data analysis, writing and mapping by Gabriela Norton, Research Associate at Minnesota Housing Partnership, with editing, graphics and design by Carolyn Szczepanski, MHP Director of Research and Communications. Research assistance and input provided by Matt Schroeder (Metropolitan Council), and Erin Olson. Minnesota Housing Partnership Learn more: mhponline.org