BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION I. INTRODUCTION. 1 In accordance with WAC (b), Pacific Power & Light Company

Similar documents
BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LMC-1) Property Taxes

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION WEST PENN POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of John J.

Public Service Commission

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 436

Northwest Natural Gas Company Application for an Order Authorizing the Sale of Certain Property Located in Albany, Oregon

UPN PacifiCorp Notice of Property Disposition Sewer Line Easement

IMPACT FEES. The Real Estate Industry s Perspective

Depreciation A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS AND STAFF

Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip

Clean Energy Implications from an Ad Valorem Tax Perspective

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: November 10, 2006 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the Housing Commission For the Agenda of November 17, 2006

ALI-ABA Course of Study Historic Preservation Law. Cosponsored by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. November 3-4, 2005 Washington, D.C.

RECITALS STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT. Draft: November 30, 2018

CREATIVE ENERGY CANADA PLATFORMS CORP. APPLICATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL TO ACQUIRE CENTRAL HEAT DISTRIBUTION LTD.

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UP 229 I. INTRODUCTION. Idaho Power Company ( Idaho Power or the Company ), in accordance with the

Fees and Charges Effective Cost Recovery

ACTION: 30-day notice of submission of information collection for approval from Office of Management and Budget.

POLICY: DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PROPERTY OTHER THAN REAL ESTATE

Land Use Code Streamlining 2012

SUMTER COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRE RESCUE SERVICES ASSESSMENT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATE RESOLUTION THE VILLAGES FIRE DISTRICT

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

ALGIERS RATE CASE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

DOWNTOWN JANESVILLE. Business Improvement District Operating Plan

) ) ) ) ) ) (Issued September )

In the context of a Major Disaster, this revenue procedure provides temporary

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PETITION FOR DECLARATORY STATEMENT BY SUNRUN INC.

July 17, Technical Director File Reference No Re:

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study


CIMARRON HILLS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN 2012 UPDATE

FINANCE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M

Executive Summary Montana Land Use Planning Strategies to Reduce Wildfire Risk Headwaters Economics September 2017

AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE JUNE 20, 2017 BUSINESS ITEMS

2005 Texas Local Government Code CHAPTER 422. PUBLIC UTILITY AGENCIES FOR PROVISION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE

[PEIIISKE J. September 10, PTl is a leading provider of transportation services and supply chain management. PTl operates full-service

Lessor Example Performance Obligation Approach

UPN PacifiCorp Notice of Property Disposition Private Roadway Easement

Depreciation of Property and Amortization of Leasehold Improvements

AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2019 GENERAL FEE SCHEDULE TO ADD COMMERCIAL CANNABIS FEES

MYSTIC MOUNTAIN ESTATES COMMUNITY MEETING

Plant assets are resources that have

Report on 2018 Second Quarter Operating and Financial Results

Utility M&A: A Case Study in the Sale of a Utility s Service Area

Auditing PP&E, Including Leases

City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application

Proposed Accounting Standards Update (Revised), Topic 842: Leases; issued May 16, 2013.

Clipper Realty Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2018 Results Reports Record Revenues, Income From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations

AICPA Valuation Services VS Section Statements on Standards for Valuation Services VS Section 100 Valuation of a Business, Business Ownership

MEMORANDUM. Appraisal Regulatory System Stakeholders. The Appraisal Foundation. Legislative Alert. DATE: June 1, 2015 SUMMARY:

HB 2964: Promoting Affordable Homeownership Through Expanded Eligibility for the Homebuyer Opportunity Limited Tax Exemption

AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES FOR REAL PROPERTY AND PERSONAL PROPERTY. between. and THE TOWN OF DOUGLAS

Source: Reg. Y, 55 FR 27771, July 5, 1990, unless otherwise noted.

CITY OF STEVENS POINT, WISCONSIN Territory Amendment to Tax Incremental District No. 6

AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY between AJAX SOLAR, LLC. and THE TOWN OF WEST BRIDGEWATER

Saskatchewan Municipal Financing Tools

[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 12, Volume 5] [Revised as of January 1, 2004] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax ) DECISION

Accounting Of Intangible Assets Indian as- 26

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax. This Final Decision incorporates without change the court s Decision, entered September

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

[Re. Docket No. FR 6123-A-01] Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Streamlining and Enhancements (the Streamlining Notice )

FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2018 RESULTS

Title: Ronald J. Schultz, Citrus County Property Appraiser. Jun 03, 1994 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT

Chapter 9: Long-Lived Assets and Cost Allocation

Case 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

..DID: TXT: PSC NO: 9 GAS LEAF: 28 COMPANY: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. REVISION: 0

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: December 18, 2017

The joint leases project change is coming

ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

Steven J. Pinkerton, Housing and Redevelopment Director

CHAPTER 9. Plant Assets, Natural Resources, and Intangible Assets 6, 7, 8, 24, 25, 26 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 11, , 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council June 14, 2016

Burnett County, WI LAND USE VARIANCE APPLICATION, EXPLANATION, & REQUIREMENTS

5. The cost of buildings includes all necessary costs related to the purchase or construction

Proposed FASB Staff Position No. 142-d, Amortization and Impairment of Acquired Renewable Intangible Assets (FSP 142-d)

Township Law E-Letter

Rate Case Dismissal & Asset Exchange July 24, 2017

Technical Memorandum: Framework for a Residential Parking Permit Program

~f.~ -\.0. Public Service Commission ==- .J" < rr

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

Chapter 9-Uniform Relocation Voluntary Sales Disclosure Environmental Review. Applicability

2) All long-term leases should be capitalized in the accounts by the lessee.

ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS SPECIAL BOARD MEETING 2020 N. CENTRAL AVENUE, STE. 230 PHOENIX, ARIZONA Tuesday, December 18, :00 1:15 p.m.

EXHIBIT A Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Selection Criteria

Liabilities Assumed in Certain Transactions Announcement

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION Property Tax ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC 5193; 5208 OPINION I. INTRODUCTION

Health, Housing &Human SeIVices LE CLACKAMAS COUNTY

Internal Audit Report

This article is relevant to the Diploma in International Financial Reporting and ACCA Qualification Papers F7 and P2

Confidently delivered

INTRODUCTION MISSION OVERVIEW

Investment Monitoring and Regulatory Audit

Public Service Commission

2016 Annual Report. Carmen Ottmer, Chief Appraiser AUSTIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 906 E. AMELIA ST., BELLVILLE, TEXAS 77418

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EXECUTIVE OFFICE

Transcription:

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT COMPANY For an Order Approving a Change in Depreciation Rates Applicable to Electric Property. DOCKET UE-18 PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT COMPANY S PETITION FOR ACCOUNTING ORDER I. INTRODUCTION 1 In accordance with WAC 480-07-370(b), Pacific Power & Light Company (Pacific Power), a division of PacifiCorp, petitions the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Commission) for an accounting order authorizing a change in depreciation rates applicable to PacifiCorp s depreciable electric plant consistent with the company s 2018 depreciation study (Depreciation Study). Pacific Power proposes to implement the new depreciation rates through a future rate case filing for rates effective on January 1, 2021. 2 Pacific Power is an electric utility and public service company doing business in the state of Washington under RCW 80.04.010, and its public utility operations, retail rates, service, and accounting practices are subject to the Commission s jurisdiction. PacifiCorp also provides retail electricity service under the name Pacific Power in Oregon and California and under the name Rocky Mountain Power in Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming. The company s principal place of business is 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 2000, Portland, Oregon, 97232. UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 1

3 Communications regarding this Petition should be addressed to: Washington Dockets Pacific Power 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 washingtondockets@pacificorp.com Matthew D. McVee Chief Regulatory Counsel Pacific Power 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 matthew.mcvee@pacificorp.com In addition, Pacific Power respectfully requests that data requests be addressed to: By e-mail (preferred) By regular mail datarequest@pacificorp.com Data Request Response Center Pacific Power 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 Informal inquiries may be directed to Ariel Son, Regulatory Affairs Manager, at (503) 813-5410. II. DISCUSSION A. Depreciation Study 4 Pacific Power files this Petition under RCW 80.04.350, which authorizes the Commission to determine the proper and adequate rates of depreciation of property used in the rendering of retail electric service. Under this statute, the Commission may ascertain and set the proper and adequate rates of depreciation of utility property. Each utility must conform its depreciation accounts to the rates ordered by the Commission. 5 Pacific Power last performed a depreciation study approximately five years ago. The Commission authorized Pacific Power s request to revise depreciation rates in Order 01 issued in Docket UE-130052 on December 27, 2013. The rates went into effect on January 1, 2014. On November 25, 2015, Pacific Power filed a Limited-Issue Rate Case, Docket UE-152253, which included a request to reinstitute shorter depreciation UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 2

schedules for the coal-fired generating plants included in Washington rates. The Commission authorized the company s request in Order 12 in Docket UE-152253 on September 1, 2016, with an effective date of October 4, 2016. 6 Pacific Power has performed an updated Depreciation Study, submitted as Exhibit No. JJS-3 to the direct testimony of Mr. John J. Spanos, and requests authorization to implement the depreciation rates set forth in this study. The Depreciation Study identifies the changes that have occurred since Pacific Power s last depreciation study, measures the effect of the changes on the recovery of presently surviving capital, and revises the capital recovery rate. 7 The Depreciation Study uses December 31, 2017 historical data as the basis for the analysis and develops depreciation rates based on projected December 31, 2020 plant balances. Projecting balances through December 31, 2020, aligns with the proposed January 1, 2021 effective date and ensures consideration of all anticipated plant additions in the new depreciation rates. 8 Pacific Power s accounting system maintains depreciation rates on a calendaryear basis, and the company recommends January 1, 2021, as the rate effective date to align it with the company s anticipated implementation of a new interjurisdictional cost allocation methodology. Aligning the effective date of the depreciation rates proposed in the Depreciation Study with the anticipated implementation of a new interjurisdictional allocation methodology allows for robust evaluation of both proposals, while minimizing rate changes. 9 The proposed increase in Washington depreciation rates is driven by several factors. First, steam plant depreciation expense has increased, reflecting the impact of incremental capital additions since the last depreciation study. Because Pacific Power s UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 3

steam facilities have set terminal lives, incremental capital additions are depreciated over a shorter remaining life and therefore increase depreciation expense. Given the uncertainty regarding the period in which steam generating facilities will be allowed to continue to operate, the company does not recommend extending any of the depreciable lives of the coal plants. Moreover, the economic analysis supporting the incremental capital additions did not assume a longer depreciable life. The incremental capital additions necessary to maintain compliance with existing regulatory obligations and provide safe, reliable power total over $1.4 billion since 2013 on a total-system basis, and increase Washington-allocated depreciation expense by approximately $4.1 million. 10 Second, Pacific Power recommends shortening the terminal lives for several of the company s coal-fired units. Specifically, Pacific Power recommends shortening the terminal lives of the Jim Bridger Plant (from 2037 to 2025) and the Colstrip Plant (from 2046 to 2027). The shorter depreciable lives for the Jim Bridger Plant are consistent with the accelerated depreciation adjustment approved by the Commission in Order 12 in Docket UE-152253. Avista and Puget Sound Energy, joint owners of the Colstrip Plant, have reached agreements in Washington to establish 2017 as the new depreciable life for the units. Pacific Power s proposal is to align with the other Washington utilities for Colstrip 3 and 4. Shortening these plants depreciable lives increases Washingtonallocated depreciation expense by approximate $30.0 million. 11 Third, the revised depreciation rates account for the impact of repowering many of the company s wind generation facilities in 2019 and 2020. The estimated balances in the Depreciation Study schedule for projected plant balances as of December 31, 2020, reflect both the new investment in plant due to repowering, as well as the costs of the replaced wind turbine equipment in the depreciation reserve. The treatment of the UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 4

replaced wind turbine equipment in the depreciation reserve is consistent with the composite or group procedure of depreciation Pacific Power applies to all facilities. Pacific Power also recommends that the terminal lives of the repowered facilities be extended by 10 years from the date they are repowered. In addition, the wind plant depreciation expense also accounts for the company s new wind facilities in Wyoming, which expected to be in service in 2020. Together, repowering and the new wind facilities increase the Washington-allocated depreciation expense by approximately $2.4 million. B. Overall Rate Impact of Proposed Depreciation Rate Changes 12 The Depreciation Study proposes a system-wide increase of 0.9 percent to the current composite depreciation rate of 3.11 percent for Pacific Power s electric utility plant, resulting in a new composite depreciation rate of 4.02 percent. Applying the recommended depreciation rates to the projected December 31, 2020 depreciable plant balances results in an increase in total-company annual depreciation expense of approximately $561.7 million, compared with the level of annual depreciation expense developed by application of the currently authorized depreciation rates to the same plant balances. Adoption of the proposed depreciation rates results in an increase of approximately $38 million in annual Washington depreciation expense, based on projected December 31, 2020 depreciable plant balances. Pacific Power proposes to include the impacts of the Depreciation Study in Washington rates as part of the company s next general rate case filing. UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 5

B. Testimony and Exhibits in Support of Petition 13 In support of this Petition, the company is providing the policy testimony of Nikki L. Kobliha, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PacifiCorp. Ms. Kobliha s direct testimony, provided as Exhibit No. NLK-1T, provides a summary of the company s proposal for new depreciation rates and their effect on annual depreciation expense, provides background information supporting and describing the development of the Depreciation Study, and outlines the factors related to steam generating facilities that were considered in the Depreciation Study. 14 The direct testimony of John J. Spanos, Senior Vice President of Gannett Fleming Valuation and Rate Consultants, LLC, provided as Exhibit No. JJS-1T, presents the Depreciation Study, describes how the Depreciation Study was prepared, provides the depreciation rates for which the company is seeking Commission approval, and discusses the basis for the recommended changes in depreciation rates. 15 The direct testimony of Steven R. McDougal, Director of Revenue Requirements, provided as Exhibit No. SRM-1T, summarizes the effect on annual depreciation expense from applying the proposed depreciation rates to depreciable plant balances. Mr. McDougal also provides support for the jurisdictional allocation of the new depreciation rates, and describes the company s recommendations on certain statespecific factors considered during the preparation of the Depreciation Study. 16 The direct testimony of Chad A. Teply, Senior Vice President of Strategy and Development, provided as Exhibit No. CAT-1T, describes the process used to evaluate the current approved plant depreciable lives for steam and natural gas generating stations and the procedures used to estimate the retirement date for PacifiCorp s natural gas, wind, and hydroelectric generating resources. Mr. Teply also demonstrates that the UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 6

estimated retirement dates proposed for PacifiCorp s generation plants are reasonable and appropriate for use in the Depreciation Study. Mr. Teply further explains why the rates proposed as terminal net salvage, or decommissioning costs, in the calculation of depreciation rates for thermal generating plants are reasonable and prudent. 17 Finally, direct testimony of Timothy J. Hemstreet, Director of Renewable Development, provided as Exhibit No. TJH-1T, describes PacifiCorp s project to repower its wind facilities and the process of determining an appropriate life for the repowered wind facilities. Mr. Hemstreet also describes the methodology used to estimate the retirement date for PacifiCorp wind and hydroelectric generating resources. C. Importance of System-Wide Consistency 18 For administrative and economic efficiencies, Pacific Power strives to maintain uniform utility accounts, including depreciation rates, across its six-state service territory. To maintain consistent depreciation rates across states, Pacific Power is also filing the Depreciation Study in Oregon, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming. Maintaining consistent depreciation rates across all states avoids multiple sets of depreciation accounts and records that would impose a costly administrative burden on Pacific Power and unnecessary expense for the company s customers. III. REQUEST FOR RELIEF 19 For the reasons described above and in the testimony and exhibits supporting this Petition, Pacific Power respectfully requests that the Commission issue an order finding: a. The Depreciation Study recommendations regarding depreciation rates, adjusted to take into account past Commission orders on depreciation, are proper and adequate depreciation rates for Pacific Power; UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 7

b. Adoption of the Depreciation Study s recommendations, adjusted to take into account past Commission orders on depreciation, into Washington electric rates will result in fair and reasonable rates and accurately impose costs on those customers for whom such costs are incurred; and c. The final ratemaking treatment of the depreciation rates will be addressed in a future general rate case. Respectfully submitted this 13 th day of September, 2018. By: /s/ Matthew D. McVee Chief Regulatory Counsel Pacific Power & Light Company 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 (503) 813-5585 mathew.mcvee@pacificorp.com UE-18 Pacific Power & Light Company s Petition for Accounting Order 8