ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 December 14. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Similar documents
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 02. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 November 16. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 13. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 January 26. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT RICHMOND (WARD 8) RICHMOND ROAD SW AND 24 STREET SW BYLAWS 10P2018 AND 52D2018

LAND USE AMENDMENT SPRINGBANK HILL (WARD 6) ELMONT DRIVE SW AND 69 STREET SW BYLAW 114D2017

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 May 04. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 17

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 December 01

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani

LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUTHWOOD (WARD 11) MACLEOD TRAIL S AND ANDERSON ROAD SW BYLAWS 140D2018 AND 141D2018

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

PART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES

BYLAW NUMBER 256D2017

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN. PART B.8 Core Area Neighbourhood Plan

Frequently Asked Questions

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING THE CERTIFICATE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 89 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING

Highland Green Estates Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

CITY OF CAMPBELL RIVER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA

PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE

Planning Justification Report

Appendix C. Zoning Matrix

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Belmead Neighbourhood Structure Plan

Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

Planning Justification Report - Update Castlegrove Subdivision, Gananoque Draft Plan of Subdivision and Class III Development Permit

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment. 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT Committee of Adjustment Decision Regarding an Application for Consent

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TAY PUBLIC MEETING OF MUNICIPAL COUNCIL. Zoning By-law Amendment 538 CALVERT ST PORT MCNICOLL RINK LOTS

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Date to Committee: October 13, 2015 Date to Council: November 2, 2015

May 23, CANKOVIC, MLADEN AVE SW CALGARY, AB T2V 0E9, CANADA Dear Sir/Madam:

i. The only permitted uses shall be a maximum of two (2) multiple dwellings and related accessory uses;

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District ESC 44 OZ & ESC 44 SB

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de I'Ontario

Director, Community Planning, North York District NNY 23 OZ Related File Nos NNY 23 OZ and NNY 23 SA

Residential Single Detached Dwelling Districts (RS)

Regina Planning Commission

Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Reccomendation Report

MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF ROCKY VIEW NO. 44 ELBOW VALLEY WEST DIRECT CONTROL DISTRICT BYLAW C

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER :00 P.M.

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

Wapiti Ridge Estates Area Structure Plan SE W5M. December Prepared For:

It is recommended that this application be considered and that it be referred a public meeting.

FEASIBILITY REPORT. 1486, 1490 and 1494 Clementine. Prepared by: Lloyd Phillips & Associates Ltd. For: Ottawa Salus

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE ZONING BY-LAW

Municipal Council has directed staff to report annually on the nature of Variances granted by the Committee of Adjustment.

SECTION 9 RESIDENTIAL R5 ZONE

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT

1555 Midland Avenue - Zoning Amendment & Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

Planning Justification Report

(1) The following uses are permitted uses subject to:

Director, Community Planning, South District

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Section Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District

Planning & Development. Background. Subject Properties

Address: 2025 Agassiz Road Applicant: Cristian Anca. RM5 Medium Density Multiple Housing

PUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 1916, 1918 and 1920 St. Mary s Road (St. Norbert Ward) File DAV /2013D [c/r DASZ 28/2013]

740 and 750 York Mills Road and 17 Farmstead Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT INNOVATIVE PLANNING SOLUTIONS. Centreville Stroud Yonge Street, Stroud. Town of Innisfil

Proposed London Plan Amendment 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643, and 1649 Richmond Street London, ON

PUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 522 River Avenue and 99 Norquay Street (Fort Rouge-East Fort Garry Ward) File DAV /2013D [c/r DASZ 20/2013]

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Transcription:

Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application seeks to redesignate a single residential parcel from a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to a Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District to allow for either a Secondary Suite or a Backyard Suite as an additional use. The site contains an existing single detached dwelling. To Administration s knowledge there is not an existing suite located on the parcel and the application was not submitted as a result of a complaint. PREVIOUS COUNCIL DIRECTION On 2013 September 16, Council directed Administration to remove fees associated with land use amendment and development permit applications for secondary suites to encourage the development of legal and safe secondary suites throughout the city. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 December 14 That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE That Council hold a Public Hearing on Bylaw 62D2018; and 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 0.04 hectares ± (0.10 acres ±) located at 2886 Catalina Boulevard NE (Plan 8711642, Block 6, Lot 47) from Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District, in accordance with Administration s recommendation; 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 62D2018. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: The proposed R-C1s district, which allows for one of two forms of secondary suite uses (Secondary Suite or Backyard Suite), is compatible with and complementary to the established character of the community. The proposal conforms to relevant policies of the Municipal Development Plan and Burlington Area Structure Plan and will allow for development that has the ability to meet the intent of Land Use Bylaw 1P2007. ATTACHMENT 1. Proposed Bylaw 62D2018 2. Public Submissions

Page 2 of 9 LOCATION MAPS

Page 3 of 9 ADMINISTRATIONS RECOMMENDATION TO Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 0.04 hectares ± (0.10 acres ±) located at 2886 Catalina Boulevard NE (Plan 8711642, Block 6, Lot 47) from Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1) District to Residential Contextual One Dwelling (R-C1s) District. Moved by: L. Juan Carried: 9 0 2018 December 14 MOTION: Amend Administration s Recommendation, to align with Council recent decision to review the Secondary Suite process, by adding a Recommendation 3 to read: Direct Administration to forward the Report and proposed Bylaw for to the 2018 March 12 Public Hearing of Council, and advertise accordingly. Moved by: R. Vanderputten Carried: 9 0

Page 4 of 9 Applicant: Jagdish Cheema Landowner: Jagdish Cheema Sandeep Kaur Cheema PLANNING EVALUATION SITE CONTEXT Located in a low density residential R-C1 setting in the community of Monterey Park, the site is approximately 12 metres by 35 metres in size and is developed with a one-storey single detached dwelling, with an attached two-car garage that is accessed from Catalina Boulevard NE. Surrounding development consists of low-density residential to the north, east, south and west of the site. To the north-east of the site are two places of worship. According to data from The City of Calgary 2017 Census, the following table identifies Monterey Park s peak population and year, current 2017 population and the population amount and percentage difference between the peak and current populations if any. LAND USE DISTRICTS Monterey Park Peak Population Year 2015 Peak Population 10,835 2017 Current Population 10,670 Difference in Population (Number) -165 Difference in Population (Percent) -2% The proposed R-C1s district allows for an additional dwelling unit (either a permitted use Secondary Suite or a discretionary use Backyard Suite) on parcels that contain a single detached dwelling. Approval of this land use application allows for an additional dwelling unit (either a Secondary Suite or Backyard Suite) to be considered via the development permit process. A development permit is not required if a Secondary Suite conforms to all Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 rules only a building permit would be required.

Page 5 of 9 LEGISLATION & POLICY South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (2014) The site is located within the City, Town area as identified on Schedule C: South Saskatchewan Regional Plan Map in the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP). The SSRP makes no specific reference to this site. The land use proposal is consistent with the SSRP policies including the Land Use Patterns policies (subsection 8.14). Municipal Development Plan (2009) The site is located within a Residential Developed Established Area on the Urban Structure Map (Map 1) in the Municipal Development Plan (MDP). While the MDP makes no specific reference to this site. This land use proposal is consistent with MDP policies including the Developed Residential Areas policies (subsection 3.5.1), the Neighbourhood Infill and Redevelopment policies (subsection 2.2.5) and the Housing Diversity and Choice policies (subsection 2.3.1). Burlington Area Structure Plan Phase 1 & 2 (1984) The Burlington Area Structure Plan (ASP) outlines that the area will be developed as a predominantly low density suburban community. Although the ASP does not reference secondary suites it does mention that a variety of dwelling types should be provided. TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS Pedestrian and vehicular access to the site is available from Catalina Boulevard NE and the rear lane. The area is served by Calgary Transit bus service with a bus stop/light rail transit station) location within approximately 350 metre walking distance of the site on 32 Avenue NE. On-street parking adjacent to the site is unregulated through the Calgary Parking Authority s residential parking permit system. UTILITIES & SERVICING Water, sanitary, and sewer services are available and can accommodate the potential addition of a Secondary Suite without the need for off-site improvements at this time. Adjustments to onsite servicing may be required if a Backyard Suite is proposed at the development permit stage. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES An Environmental Site Assessment was not required for this land use amendment application.

Page 6 of 9 GROWTH MANAGEMENT This land use amendment proposal does not require additional capital infrastructure investment, and therefore no growth management concerns have been identified at this time. The proposal is in alignment with MDP references associated with growth management matters. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Community Association Comments Administration did not receive a response from the Monterey Park Community Association. Citizen Comments Administration received one (1) letter in opposition to the application outlining the desire for the community to remain in its present form. Public Meetings No public meetings were held by the Applicant or Administration.

Page 7 of 9 APPENDIX I APPLICANT S SUBMISSION

Page 8 of 9

Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX II IMPORTANT TERMS While there are specific Land Use Bylaw 1P2007 definitions and development rules for Secondary Suite and Backyard Suite uses, the following information is provided to simplify and enhance general understanding of these two different uses (Secondary Suite or Backyard Suite).