Decades of dysfunctional federal bureaucracy is literally dismantling the environmental well being of Nevada and the West.

Similar documents
Nevada Public Land Management Task Force Final Report, SJR 1 of the 78 th Nevada Legislature and Implementation through Federal Legislation

Nevada Land Management Task Force Established Pursuant to Assembly Bill 227 enacted in the 2013 Legislative Session

APPROPRIATIONS Congress should prohibit agencies from expending any funds for:

SEC MINERAL DEVELOPMENT LANDS AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE.

Legislative Counsel Bureau. Public Lands BULLETIN NO. 15-7

CHALLENGES IN MANAGING MULTIPLE USE LANDS & TOOLS TO ENABLE SUCCESS

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and the Hurricane Katrina Relief Effort

NEVADA NATIVE NATIONS LAND ACT

PUBLIC GRAZING IN THE WEST: THE IMPACT OF RANGELAND REFORM 94

Washoe Public Lands Management Act TITLE I FEDERAL LAND DISPOSAL

PUBLIC LANDS. NACo American County Platform and Resolutions

February 2, 2012 BOARD MATTER C - 1 WYOMING LAND AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, PROPOSAL TO ACQUIRE REAL PROPERTY IN ALBANY COUNTY, WYOMING

Measuring the Scope of Federal Land Ownership

How Could Your Recreational Access Change if Federal Lands were Controlled by the States?

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

Public Law th Congress An Act

. Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act: Operation and Issues for Congress Carol Hardy Vincent Specialist in Natural Resources Policy June 13, 201

3.23 LANDS AND SPECIAL USES

43 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Lincoln County Conservation, Recreation and Development Act of 2004

December 21, The specific provisions of P.L that apply solely to the CDCA are:

RENITA HURDSMAN BEAR RIVER STATE PARK LAND EXCHANGE PROPOSAL

Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners. FY Annual Report

Chapter HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN / NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

Q. How is Agricultural property valued? A. GENERAL INFORMATION Many states have laws regarding the preferential assessment of agricultural land.

A Presentation to the. Wyoming Solid Waste and Recycling Association (WSWRA) 2016 Annual Conference Agenda

PROJECT SCORING GUIDANCE. Introduction: National Proiect Selection:

Determination and County Apportionment of PILT Payment Amounts

ESP 172: Public Land Management. Professor Mark Lubell TA Rodd Kelsey

Experienced Professional Ranch Brokers Specializing in the sale of ranches, farms, & recreational properties.

Welcome. Tax & Ecology Seminar. presented by The Georgian Bay Land Trust

APPENDIX C. Summary of Formal Presentations to the Nevada Land Management Task

Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail. Land and Water Conservation Fund FY2015 Request

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 21 GRAZING ORDINANCE

MARK TWAIN LAKE MASTER PLAN CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE MONROE CITY, MISSOURI

Chapter 210 CONDITIONAL USES

Parking Relocation Cost Rollover

Mining on Federal Lands: Hardrock Minerals Summary Mining of hardrock minerals on federal lands is governed primarily by the General Mining Law of 187

Guernsey, Platte County, Wyoming

Contact Us. Forms for these credits and exemptions are included with the descriptions. Ag Land Credit. Low-Rent Housing Exemption

Basic Facts Claim-Patent System Leasing System General Patterns

Pursuant to AB 227 of the 2013 Nevada Legislative Session. July 18, $TEM#2c

Horse Gulch Management Plan Final Draft: April 18, 2013

Old Thomasson Range, Chico, CA

Federal Mandates and Willing Sellers: Real Estate Acquisition for the Missouri River Recovery Program

The Ironwood proclamation includes the same language and similar language is provided in the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999, which states:

16/11/2016. The relationship between planning consent and other permitting regimes. Introduction. Introduction. The developer s security

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement Executive Summary

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS. Public Policy Considerations for PRIVATE Land Management Harriet M. Hageman Hageman & Brighton, P.C.

SUBJECT: CROWN RESERVED ROAD POLICY

Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes

The Provincial Lands (Agriculture) Regulations

STATEMENT OF BASIC PHILOSOPHY

CHAPTER 352 COUNTY LAND PRESERVATION AND USE COMMISSIONS

Justification Review. State Lands Program. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability

(c:t\ol-_ Randall Doneen Environmental Review Planning Director

Game Conservation Areas Act (SFS 2000:592)

Georgia Street W, PO Box 10123, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, BC V7Y 1C6

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 115th Cong., 2d Sess. S. 2809

Niti Ranch Webb County, TX 625 Acres +/-

City of LaBelle Passive Recreational Park Management Plan

City of Stockton. Legislation Text AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 AND 509 WEST WEBER AVENUE

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

16 USC 545b. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

STATE OF NEW MEXICO GENERAL MINING LEASE SALE

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GRAZING FEES ON MONTANA PUBLIC SCHOOL LANDS AND OTHER GRAZING LANDS IN MONTANA KENNETH L. SIDERIUS

NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES MEMORANDUM January 29, 2013

FIRPTA Changes Primer

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 43 - PUBLIC LANDS CHAPTER 37 PUBLIC RANGELANDS IMPROVEMENT

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

WikiLeaks Document Release

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF EDDY ORDINANCE NO: 41 LAND USE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY

An Accounting Tradeoff Between WRP and Government Payments. Authors Gregory Ibendahl Mississippi State University

( ) Ordinance. Environmental Resources Management

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

BROCHURE # 37 OPEN SPACE

Policy Briefing Paper no. 2

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

Wood River Land Trust Staff Report

Don't Undercut Timberland Purchase And Sale Agreements

House Bill 4031 Ordered by the Senate February 26 Including House Amendments dated February 15 and Senate Amendments dated February 26

LINCOLN COUNTY CONSERVATION, RECREATION, AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2004

AGENDA ITEM 6. R Meeting No November 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM. Grazing Tenant Selection for Driscoll and McDonald Ranches

National Rental Affordability Scheme. Economic and Taxation Impact Study

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 4031

February 12, 2009 BOARD MATTER H 2 CHASE FARMS SALE PROPOSAL IN SHERIDAN COUNTY, WYOMING

Summary of the Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement

NC General Statutes - Chapter 116 Article 21B 1

SALE OF PUBLIC LAND IN ALBERTA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING REGULATION, POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Rents for Social Housing from

Notice of Continuance Land Classified as Current Use or Forest Land RCW Chapter and 84.33

54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2019

ASSEMBLY, No. 820 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

SLIDES: Livestock Grazing on the Public Lands

Fax: (413) Internet: Version: Hawaii 6.0 USDA Forest Service, National Woodland Owner Survey

HERITAGE PROTECTION AREAS

AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL ARRANGEMENTS THAT CREATE OPEN SPACE. Lisa Blake Ava Goodale Caroline Krassen Johnathan Licitra Elizabeth Ochoa

Transcription:

For All Americans!

Decades of dysfunctional federal bureaucracy is literally dismantling the environmental well being of Nevada and the West. Recent record-setting wildfires are not only destroying wildlife habitat, they kill off the animals themselves. It is estimated that between 2002-2011 nearly 41 million acres were burned in 11 western states killing approximately 122 million wild animals while spewing over 4 billion pounds of carcinogenic pollutants into the air. 1 Why? Because for nearly 30 years various federal policies and procedure have been adopted that restrict wildland firefighters from doing their job effectively. Little by little federal agencies such as the Unites States Forest Service (USFS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are restricting your access to public land. Regardless of whether you intend on hunting, ATVing, or prospecting, depending on where you are, you may be in violation of the law and find yourself pleading your case before a Federal court judge. In 2012 the USFS implemented the Travel Management Plan in Northeastern Nevada designating thousands of miles of trails and roads as unauthorized. In conjunction, they implemented policies that stated motorists could not retrieve big game harvests more than a 1/2 mile from the road, nor could recreational campers set up more than a car length from the edge of an authorized road. Mismanagement under the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 has led to a WH&B population that is more than double what the land can healthily support. 2 According to the BLM, the Western range can support a WH&B population of nearly 27,000. In 2015, the WH&B population was approximately 58,000, up 18% from the previous year. In 2016, the number continued to soar reaching 67,000 (up another 15%). At this rate WH&B herds will double every 4 to 5 years where they will continue to destroy sensitive wildlife habitats, devour rangeland feed, and severely upset ecological balance. We believe that Nevadans can do better! We are confident that our local government, comprised of individuals who have a vested interest in the well being of our own environment, will adopt common sense policies and procedures that will lead to healthier air, water, and wildlife in Nevada. 2 Since 1982, nearly 3.4 million acres of Nevada has been turned into federally protected wilderness in addition to another half a million in other protected areas. 3 A total of four million acres where your recreational access is restricted and any opportunity for economic benefit is completely removed. In 2015 the BLM proposed a mineral withdraw under a Land Use Plan Amendment that would remove 2.7 million acres from mineral exploration due to sage grouse concerns. Not only would this stifle the future of the Nevada mining Industry, it would completely destroy rural Nevada s primary economic engine. We believe that Nevadans can do better! Our county and state governments have fought diligently to ensure Nevadans have access to their own backyards.

The restriction of access coupled with failed federal management policies are severely hindering Nevada s ability to compete on a national and global scale. Since 1980 Nevada ranchers have witnessed a 50% reduction of AUMs (grazing permits) while the sheep industry has struggled to stay afloat with a 95% reduction. A single mining project has reported a potential loss of $3.4 Billion over its lifespan should the sage grouse withdraw plan come to fruition. Mine permitting in the U.S. takes, on average, 7-10 years compared to other developed countries who are putting mines into production within 3-4 years (Without compromising environmental standards). The National Mining Assoc. reports that nearly 50% of a project s value can be lost due to permitting delays. As an investor, foreign mining operations offer a far more timely return on investment. Federal regulations are overshadowing the appeal of Nevada s diverse and robust mineral portfolio. We believe that Nevadans can do better! Our experts can manage the land in such a way that we ensure environmental and economic stability now and for years to come. One of the greatest aspects of Nevada is the fact that so much of it resides in the public domain and we want to keep it that way! Unfortunately many people believe that federal land is immune to sale WRONG. In Southern Nevada alone there have been a total of 43 BLM land sales since 2000 removing nearly 19 thousand acres from the public domain. 4 Of the $3.1 Billion in revenue, Nevadans received 5% for its general education fund and 10% for the Southern Nevada Water Authority. In other words, the federal government cashed in on $2.6 Billion of Nevada public land. The State of Nevada will Identify those lands that have already been designated for disposal by the federal government ( Approximately 1 Million acres) and use them to finance a stronger state land management division. This consists of less than 3% of Nevada s total land mass meaning that private/local government ownership may increase from the current 13% to nearly 16%. After Phase II of the Lands Transfer Bill is completed, all Nevada State public land will remain in the public domain where all valid existing rights including hunting, camping, hiking, ATVing, prospecting, water, timber, mining, grazing, and other recreational activities will continue to be recognized. We believe that Nevadans can do better! It is in the best interest of all Nevadans to keep public land public. 3 Did you know that no matter what you plan to do on 61 of the 70.2 million acres that make up Nevada, you will have to ask permission from an absentee landlord in Washington D.C.; many of whom have never been to Nevada nor understand the unique environment for which we live. Every year the federal government collects billions of dollars in revenue from activities (recreation, mining, sales, etc.) on Nevada public land while the state struggles to maintain a budget that will sustain the needs our citizens. Without the ability to adequately fund state programs Nevadans are left at an enormous disadvantage. For example, in 2016 Nevada was ranked dead last in the nation in education. This comes as no surprise considering that Nevada can only tax roughly 13% of its own land mass compared to eastern states who control upwards of 99%. We believe that Nevadans can do better! As a Nevadan, you are best equipped to make decisions regarding your state. You should be the primary beneficiary of Nevada s great resources.

H ow Can We Make This A Reality? The Nevada Lands Council is in full support of a Land Transfer Bill that will soon be introduced to the 115th U.S. Congress. This Bill will set up a framework by which the State of Nevada can take ownership and control of roughly 45 million acres of Nevada s federally controlled land. Phase I Land Transfer Bill Will include the transfer of up to 7.2 million acres Once complete, the State of Nevada will identify those lands that have already been designated for disposal by the federal government (approximately 1 million acres) and use them to finance required management divisions of the state lands office Phase II Phase II will be carried out in four stages. Stage I will commence within four years of the enactment of the land transfer bill with subsequent Stages following every four years thereafter. At each Stage, the State of Nevada will provide reports to the U.S. Congress that describe: What lands have been transferred to the State of Nevada The status of those lands Annual state revenues and expenses associated with those lands Distribution of net revenue provided to select beneficiaries Recommendation for additional lands to be transferred in subsequent stage Federal Transfer Will Include: BLM Administered Lands U.S. Forest Service Land BLM I-80 Checkerboard Bureau of Reclamation Land (surplus) Other Federal Land (surplus) Federal Transfer Will Exclude: Wilderness Areas National Parks and Monuments National Recreation Areas National Wildlife Refuges and Conservation Areas Federally Recognized Indian Reservations Areas of Critical Concern Military Installations Final Transfer Net Revenue to be held in Trust for the following beneficiaries: Public K-12 Education Public Higher Education Public Specialized Education Public Mental and Medical Health Services Social, Senior, & Veteran Services Public Endangered Species Recovery Planning and Implementation Local Government Service and Infrastructure Needs 4

A nd What Would It Look Like? Current Nevada Land Allocations Federal Land Depicted in Red PHASE I Will include up to 7.2 million acres. Once complete, the State of Nevada will identify those lands that have already been designated for disposal by the federal government (approximately 1 million acres) and use them to finance required management divisions of the state lands office. PHASE II Phase II will be carried out in four stages. Stage I will commence within four years of the enactment of the land transfer bill with subsequent Stages following every four years thereafter. At each Stage, the State of Nevada will provide reports to the U.S. Congress that describe: What lands have been transferred to the State of Nevada The status of those lands Annual state revenues and expenses associated with those lands Distribution of net revenue provided to select beneficiaries Recommendation for additional lands to be transferred in subsequent stage In all, approximately 45 Million acres will be designated for transfer to the state (meaning roughly 16 million acres or 23% of the state will remain under federal ownership/management after the transfer) Assuming all other states maintain the same amount of federal land Nevada will remain #12 in the nation for percentage of federal land 5

1930 W hat has the Federal Government already taken from the Public? Since 1930 the federal government has removed 15,610,982 acres from Multiple Use access in Nevada. This means that historically, the Federal Government has withdrawn Nevada s public land from multiple use at a rate of nearly 182,000 acres/year. In addition, there are several proposed land withdraws that are currently pending which would remove approximately 3.6 to 4.1 million acres of land from multiple use. 6 Going... Going... Gone!! Proposed 6

C ommon Misconceptions. The state of Nevada does not have the resources that would be required to manage a majority of Nevada s public land. Our Land Transfer Bill addresses this concern by carrying out the disposal of approximately 1 million acres (consisting of land already designated for disposal by the federal government and designated portions of the I-80 Railroad checkerboard) that would be used to finance an expansion of various management divisions and programmatic areas within the State Lands Office. Examples include, but are not limited to, a Natural Resources Program, Real Estate Program, Land Information, Title, and Transfer Program, Public Records Program, Administrative Appeals Program, Administrative Program, Wildland Firefighting, and an Information Systems and Resource Analysis Program. Furthermore, A study completed by the Nevada Land Management Task Force in 2014 estimated that, during Phase I, the Division of State Lands would require a staffing level of 96 to 162 persons. 5 In other words, should a transfer take place, the first order of business will be to reinforce the State Lands Office in such a way that it will be able to effectively manage the anticipated increase of Nevada public lands. The state of Nevada cannot afford to manage a majority of Nevada s public land. According to the Department of Interior s Annual Revenue Reports from 2008-2012, the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada operated at -$0.91 average net revenue per acre costing the U.S. taxpayer an average of $43.5 million annually over the course of five years. Studies conducted by the Nevada Land Management Task Force have concluded that Nevada stands to gain anywhere from $7.78 to $28.59 net revenue/acre. Assuming the conservative, low observed net revenue and high observed expense/acre model is used, Nevada can expect a total revenue of $56 million within the first Phase of the proposed land transfer. This is more than double what Nevada received in Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) for FY 2015. 7 Should the average net revenue/acre model be used, Nevada could possibly net over $205 million annually within Phase I. After the transfer of 45 million acres is complete in Phase II, Nevada stands to generate more than $350 million annually. The state of Nevada will sell off the land! During Phase I of the transfer, the State of Nevada will proceed with the disposal of a little over 1 million acres of federally controlled land that is already designated for disposal by the federal government in order to finance a stronger state management division. In all, this consists of less than 3% of Nevada s total land mass meaning that private/local government ownership may increase, at the greatest, to 16% compared to the current 13%. After Phase I, all remaining public land will remain in the public domain where all valid existing rights including hunting, camping, hiking, ATVing, prospecting, water, timber, mining, grazing, and other recreational activities will continue to be recognized. This is just another land grab scheme! This generally refers to the idea that public land will be sold piecemeal to the highest bidder restricting the general public s access to the nations forests and wilderness areas while allowing corporate speculators to destroy wildlife habitat and conservation areas for capitol gain. There are many things wrong with this assumption. First, Public Means Public regardless of whether the state or federal governments owns / manages it. Second, the federal land transfer bill specifically indicates that wilderness areas, national parks, national monuments, national recreation areas, national wildlife refuges and conservation areas, federally recognized Indians reservations, areas of critical concern, and military installations are all exempt from the transfer. Third, the land that is designated for transfer to the state (save the 1 million acres used to finance the State Lands Department) will maintain all valid existing rights ensuring that the public will continue to have access for recreational and economic purposes. Fourth, consider who is more likely to sell off public land, the federal government who is $19 trillion in debt, continually manages public land at a deficit, and has already sold off more than 20,000 acres of Nevada public land in the last 15 years or the state of Nevada who stands to make over $350 million annually from public land revenue. 7

Sources [1] Eleven Western States Wildfire, Prescriptive and Fire Use History, 2002-2011 Smoked Bear Campaign. [2] Wild Horse and Burro Program Bureau of Land Management 2016. http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/ prog/whbprogram.html [3] https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with-obamas -help-harry-reid-leaving-an-indelible-mark-in-the-nevada -desert/2015/07/07/8131bd88-1e75-11e5-aeb9- a411a84c9d55_story.html [4] Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act, http://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/snplma.html [5] A Report of the Nevada Land Management Task Force to the Nevada Interim Legislative Committee on Public Lands: Congressional Transfer of Public Lands to the State of Nevada, July 18, 2014, 30. [6] Bassett,S., Berry, K., Bryan, D., Morrison, I., Nevada Land Withdrawals from Mineral Entry, a Historical Perspective. Presentation, University of Nevada Reno and Nevada Commission on Minerals. [7] Ruedy, Jennifer, Payments in Lieu of Taxes Summary, Research Division Legislative Council Bureau, January 2016 Join Today!! Office Address: 455 5th Street, Suite # 101 Elko, Nevada 89801 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1884 Elko, Nevada 89803 Phone: (775) 778-9709 Fax: (775)777-1327 info@nevadalandscouncil.org www.nevadalandscouncil.org