MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

ORDINANCE NO

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ORDINANCE No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO

TOWNSHIP OF EAST HEMPFIELD. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania ORDINANCE NO.

Item 10C 1 of 69

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

PUBLIC HEARING Agenda Item No.: 9a CC Mtg.: 05/24/2011

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

CHAPTER 23A: SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO

NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Council of the City of Alpharetta, Georgia hereby ordain:

ORDINANCE NO REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD)

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

The City Council makes the following findings:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: JUNE 21, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING

WHEREAS, the extreme shortage of housing in the City of Los Angeles has been well documented;

Andrew P. Powers, City Manager. Mark A. Towne, Community Development Director

ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE ZONING AMENDMENTS

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1296 Page 2

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1228

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

Temporary Housing Ordinance Attachment. Draft 3, 11/05/10 ORDINANCE NO.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

Mammoth Lakes Town Council Agenda Action Sheet

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

The commercial land uses will provide for increase in employment opportunities as well as an increase in retail and construction sales tax revenues.

CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Transitional and Supportive Housing Ordinance Amendments 1.0 REQUEST

MEMORANDUM. Mayor and City Council. Eric Berlin, City Administrator. DATE: June 2, Purchase of 1041 Burlington

ORDINANCE NO ( 2ND READING) AMENDING TITLE 17 ( RENT STABILIZATION) OF THE WEST HOLLYWOOD. and adopt Ordinance No ,

WHEREAS, the extreme shortage of housing in the City of Los Angeles has been well documented;

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows:

FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY EDMONTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VICINITY PROTECTION AREA REGULATION

CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

I Click Here to Return to ~OARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS ACTIONbGENDA SUMMARY

TOWNSHIP OF DENNIS COUNTY OF CAPE MAY STATE OF NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION ONE: Chapter shall be added to the Inyo County Code shall be added to read as follows: Chapter 18.73

ORDINANCE NO. RD:SSG:LJR 7/24/2017

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Barton Brierley, (707) )

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner

EDMONTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VICINITY PROTECTION AREA REGULATION

November 21, The City Council reviewed and discussed a report setting forth the existing regulations pertaining to vacation rentals.

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, many Vacation Rentals are currently operating throughout Mendocino County; and

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II

ORDINANCE 115. Whereas, the District is desirous of promoting the most efficient use of water by promoting water conservation; and

.. ~ ORDINANCE NO. 3068

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

SECTION 838 "C-6" - GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2017-

2/16/2016. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

ORDINANCE NO The Bear Valley Community Services District Board of Directors ordains as follows:

CITY OF SAN MATEO URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2018

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL File Temporary Emergency Housing. Emergency Ordinance for Temporary Housing and Support Facilities for Camp Fire

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

City of Brisbane Memo

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

Item # 17. Page 1 of 4. Bill No NYE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

ORDINANCE NO. STRTF Review

Chapter MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF RICHLAND CENTER CHAPTER 408 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS AFFECTING LANDS IN A "C-DT" CENTRAL [DOWNTOWN] BUSINESS DISTRICT

Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)

TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO SERIES OF 2014

Transcription:

ITEM 8.C. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council ) t-4_ FROM: Prepared By: Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner \. DATE: September 27, 2013 (CC Meeting of 10/16/2013) SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05, to Amend Section E (Public and Semi-Public Uses) of Table 17.20.060 of Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones), of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone), of Title 17 (Zoning), of the Moorpark Municipal Code Related to Health Clubs, Gymnasiums, Fitness Centers, and Fitness Studios, and Making a Determination of Exemption under CEQA in Connection Therewith BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On September 4, 2013, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to provide a recommendation to on a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to simplify the processing requirements for small fitness type uses. As discussed in the attached Planning Commission agenda report, health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers, spas, martial arts studios, yoga and Pilates studios, and dance studios are currently permitted in the C-1, C-2, CPD, C-OT, and M-1 zones, subject to an Administrative Permit, except when within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property, when a Conditional Use Permit () is required. Under the current regulations, smaller fitness facilities (less than 3,000 square feet) have been required to go through the same process as larger facilities when near residential areas, even though they do not pose the same potential neighborhood impact. Staff has not seen impacts from the smaller uses that would warrant a review process, which requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission and a $5,000 deposit to cover costs of this process. The Planning Commission considered a draft ordinance on September 24, 2013, and concurred with staff's recommendation for an amendment to the list of permitted uses in Table 17.20.060 to allow for a tiered entitlement process, based on square footage of the fitness use. Under the recommendation, fitness uses up to 3,000 square feet would 27

Honorable City Council October 16, 2013 Page 2 be allowed subject to an Administrative Permit (staff level) review process regardless of the proximity to residential zones, and fitness uses over 3,000 square feet should follow the current review process. Amendments to the permit requirements for places of religious assembly are also proposed with a similar 3,000 square-foot threshold as fitness uses to ensure compliance with the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA}, so that religious assembly uses are not treated less favorably. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the form of this ordinance. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) by the general rule that CEQA only applies to "projects" that may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance would amend the Municipal Code provisions related to the permit review process for health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers and fitness studios, would add specificity examples of uses under the category of fitness studios to improve clarity, such as martial arts, yoga, dance, and other similar uses, and would amend the permit process for places of religious assembly to be similar to fitness uses in zones where fitness uses are allowed. It does not change the zones in which these uses are permitted, the development standards for these uses, or the permit review process for new construction involving these uses. In this case, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance may have a significant impact on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Introduce Ordinance No., approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05, for first reading, waive full reading, and place this ordinance on the agenda for November 6, 2013 for purposes of providing second reading and adoption of the ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. September 24, 2013 Planning Commission Agenda Report (Without Attachments) 2. Ordinance No., approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 28

ITEM: 8.8. MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission.~. FROM: Prepared by Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner' DATE: September 17, 2013 (PC Meeting of 9/24/201 SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05, to Amend Section E (Public and Semi-Public Uses) of Table 17.20.060 of Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones), of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone), of Title 17 (Zoning), of the Moorpark Municipal Code Related to Health Clubs, Gymnasiums, Fitness Centers, and Fitness Studios, and Recommending that the City Council Make a Determination of Exemption under CEQA in Connection Therewith BACKGROUND On September 4, 2013, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, hold a public hearing, and provide a recommendation to the City Council on a Zoning Ordinance Amendment, to Amend Section E (Public and Semi-Public Uses) of Table 17.20.060 of Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones), of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone), of Title 17 (Zoning), of the Moorpark Municipal Code related to fitness type uses. The intent was to determine if a process less burdensome on the applicant than a Conditional Use Permit could be used for small fitness uses when they are within 100 feet of residential zones. DISCUSSION On September 15, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance 304, which was a comprehensive amendment of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone) of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Table 17.20.060 describes the various land uses and entitlements required for those land uses. Health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers, spas, martial arts studios, yoga and Pilates studios, and dance studios are currently permitted in the C-1, C-2, CPD, C-OT, and M-1 zones, subject to an Administrative Permit, except when within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property, when a Conditional Use Permit () is required. Under the current regulations, smaller fitness facilities (less than 3,000 square feet) have been required to go through the same process as larger facilities when near residential CC ATTACHMENT 1 29

Honorable Planning Commission September 24, 2013 Page 2 areas, even though they do not pose the same potential neighborhood impact. Staff has not seen impacts from the smaller uses that would warrant a review process, which requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission and a $5,000 deposit to cover costs of this process. Staff recommends an amendment to the list of permitted uses in Table 17.20.060 to allow for a tiered entitlement process, based on square footage of the fitness use. At this time, staff believes that applications for fitness uses up to 3,000 square feet should be allowed subject to an Administrative Permit (staff level) review process regardless of the proximity to residential zones, and that fitness uses over 3,000 square feet should follow the current review process. Amendments to the permit requirements for places of religious assembly are also proposed with a similar 3,000 square-foot threshold as fitness uses to ensure compliance with the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), so that religious assembly uses are not treated less favorably. The proposed ordinance also includes other minor clean-up amendments to this section of the use matrix as shown in Attachment 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. The Director has reviewed this project and determined that proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) by the general rule that CEQA only applies to "projects" that may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance would amend the Municipal Code provisions related to the permit review process for health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers and fitness studios, would add specificity examples of uses under the category of fitness studios to improve clarity, such as martial arts, yoga, dance, and other similar uses, and would amend the permit process for places of religious assembly to be similar to fitness uses in zones where fitness uses are allowed. It does not change the zones in which these uses are permitted, the development standards for these uses, or the permit review process for new construction involving these uses. In this case, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance may have a significant impact on the environment. \\DC1\Department Share\Community Development\DEV PMTS\Z 0 A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\20130924 PC Report.docx 30

Honorable Planning Commission September 24, 2013 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. PC-2013- recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05. ATTACHMENT: 1. Draft Resolution \\DC1 \Department Share\Community Development\DEV PMTSIZ 0 A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\20130924 PC Report.docx 31

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-05 TO AMEND SECTION E (PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC USES) OF TABLE 17.20.060 OF SECTION 17.20.060 (PERMITIED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES}, OF CHAPTER 17.20 (USES BY ZONE), OF TITLE 17 (ZONING), OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO HEAL TH CLUBS, GYMNASIUMS, FITNESS CENTERS, AND FITNESS STUDIOS, AND TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, on September 4, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2013-3223 to initiate proceedings to consider a Zoning Ordinance Amendment that would amend the permit process for fitness uses; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of September 24, 2013, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 to amend Section E (Public and Semi-Public Uses) of Table 17.20.060 of Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones}, of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone}, of Title 17 (Zoning), of the Moorpark Municipal Code related to health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers, and fitness studios, and to make a determination of exemption under CEQA in connection therewith, received public testimony on the proposed amendment, and after receiving oral and written public testimony, closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC-2013-590 recommending approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 to the City Council; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 16, 2013, the City Council conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 to amend Section E (Public and Semi-Public Uses) of Table 17.20.060 of Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones), of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone), of Title 17 (Zoning}, of the Moorpark Municipal Code related to health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers, and fitness studios, and to make a determination of exemption under CEQA in connection therewith, received public testimony on the proposed amendments, and after receiving oral and written public testimony, closed the public hearing and reached a decision; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director determined that proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) by the general rule that CEQA only applies to "projects" that may have a significant CC ATTACHMENT 2 32

Ordinance No. Page 2 effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance would amend the Municipal Code provisions related to the permit review process for health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers and fitness studios, would add specificity examples of uses under the category of fitness studios to improve clarity, such as martial arts, yoga, dance, and other similar uses, and would amend the permit process for places of religious assembly to be similar to fitness uses in zones where fitness uses are allowed. It does not change the zones in which these uses are permitted, the development standards for these uses, or the permit review process for new construction involving these uses. In this case, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance may have a significant impact on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council has reviewed the Community Development Director's determination that proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) by the general rule that CEQA only applies to "projects" that may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance would amend the Municipal Code provisions related to the permit review process for health clubs, gymnasiums, fitness centers and fitness studios, would add specificity examples of uses under the category of fitness studios to improve clarity, such as martial arts, yoga, dance, and other similar uses, and would amend the permit process for places of religious assembly to be similar to fitness uses in zones where fitness uses are allowed. It does not change the zones in which these uses are permitted, the development standards for these uses, or the permit review process for new construction involving these uses. In this case, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance may have a significant impact on the environment. The City Council, based on its own independent judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption. SECTION 2. GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY: The City Council finds Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 to be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and all adopted Specific Plans. SECTION 3. Section E (Public and Semi Public Uses) of Table 17.20.060 of Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones), of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone), of Title 17 (Zoning), of the Moorpark Municipal Code, is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A: Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\Z 0 A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\Draft Ordinance 131016.docx 33

Ordinance No. Page 3 any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall publish notice of adoption in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this_ day of, 2013. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk Exhibit A: Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2013-05 S:\Community Oevelopment\DEV PMTS\Z 0 A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\Draft Ordinance 131016.docx 34

Ordinance No. Page4 EXHIBIT A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-05 Amendment to Section E (Public and Semi-Public Uses) in Table 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones) of Chapter 17.20 (Uses by Zone) of the Zoning Ordinance Table 17.20.060 PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES [Blank] =Not permitted AP= Administrative Permit =Conditional Use Permit NZC =No Zoning Clearance required TUP =Temporary Use Permit ZC = Permitted by Zoning Clearance Zones E. Public and Semi-Public Uses 1. Amusement and recreational facilities as defined in Chapter 17.08 a. Arcades (video and computer) and cyber caf es b. Health club./gymnasium/fitness eenteflspa, gymnasiums, fitness centers, and fitness studios for uses such as martial arts, yoga, dance, and other similar uses or combination of uses. C-0 C-1 Alli CPD C- C-2 OT Alli Alli Alli M-1 M-2 I l. up to 3,000 square feet AP AP AP AP - - 11. over 3,000 square feet AP* AP* AP* AP* -- (*if within one hundred [100] feet of a residentially zoned property, a conditional use permit is required) c. Auditoriums, community centers, dancehalls, and indoor motion picture theaters d. Billiard and pool establishments, and bowling alleys, with or without alcohol e. Gelf afi:ving rnnges, gelf putting gfeens ana miniatufe gelf, pafk:s ana GYP GYP S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\Z 0 A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\Draft Ordinance 131016.docx 35

Ordinance No. Page 5 Zones playgrnmias 2. Care facilities, including adult day care facilities, Alzheimer's day care facilities, congregate living health facilities, child day care centers, community treatment facilities, foster family and adoption agencies, hospices, long-term health care facilities, residential care facilities for the elderly, residential care facilities for persons with chronic life-threatening illness, skilled nursing and intermediate care facilities, social rehabilitation facilities, and therapeutic day services facilities 3. Emergency shelters in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 17.28 (*allowed in C-2 zone only, not permitted in CPD zone; emergency shelters are also allowed in conjunction with permitted places of religious assembly) 4. Single room occupancy unit development in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 1 7.28 (*allowed in C-2 zone only, not permitted in CPD zone) 5. Clubhouses, social clubs, service clubs with or without alcohol 6. Energy production from renewable resources 7. Governmental uses including, but not limited to, city offices, community rooms, fire stations, human service centers, libraries, police stations, public utility facilities C-0 C-1 CPD C- C-2 OT M-1 M-2 ZC* ZC* I S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\Z O A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\Draft Ordinance 131016.docx 36

Ordinance No. Page 6 Zones 8. Hospitals including urgent care (*if within one hundred [100] feet of a residentially zoned property, a conditional use permit is required) C-0 C-1 CPD C- C-2 OT AP* M-1 M-2 AP* I AP* 9. Places ofreligious assembly, with or without schools and/or social services, including emergency shelters GtW Ap.!. A-JI!. Ap.!. Ap.!. GtW GtW 1. up to 3,000 square feet AP AP AP AP - - 11. over 3,000 square feet AP* AP* AP* AP* (*if within one hundred [ 100] feet of a residentially zoned property, a conditional use permit is required) 10. Private education facilities including, but not limited to, colleges and universities, elementary, middle and high schools 11. Private training facilities including, but not limited to, professional and vocational schools, art and craft schools, music schools not part of a music store, and driver training schools (*if within one hundred [ 100] feet of a residentially zoned property, a conditional use permit is required) 12. Recreational facilities (private), indoor or outdoor, with or without food services, including, but not limited to, batting cages, bicycle and skate-pafk:s facilities, golf courses (including miniature golf and driving ranges), gymaasittms, fitaess, health spas, maftial afts, rnee}ttetaall, yega and AP* AP* AP* Alli AP* Alli AP* S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\Z 0 A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\Draft Ordinance 131016.docx 37

Ordinance No. Page 7 Zones sports fields. Bicycles and skate parks shall be in compliance with Chapter 17.28 (*if within one hundred [!00) feet of a residentially zoned property, a conditional use permit is required) 13. Utility structures (electrical boxes, transformers and valve apparatus that have no covered floor area and are attached to the ground by poles, columns or pedestals shall not require a zone clearance) 14. Wireless communications facilities, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.42 a. Major wireless communications facilities b. Minor wireless communications facilities c. Collocation wireless communications facilities (consistent with definition of "collocation facility" in Section 17.42.020) C-0 C-1 AP AP AP AP zc zc CPD C- M-1 M-2 I C-2 OT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP zc zc zc zc zc (Ord. 415 2, 2012; Ord. 398 4, 2011; Ord. 396 2, 2011; Ord. 361 1 Exh. A, 2007; Ord. 360 2 Exh. A, 2007: Ord. 304 2, Exh. A, 2004: Ord. 297 Exh. A, 2003) S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\Z O A\2013\2013-05 Fitness Centers\Draft Ordinance 131016.docx 38