RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

Similar documents
An act to add Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section ) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to housing.

MEETING February 13, Machin Avenue Novato, CA / FAX 415/

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

SENATE BILL No. 35. December 5, 2016

Memo to the Planning Commission INFORMATIONAL HEARING DATE: MARCH 14, 2019

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL. State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section 65915

Honorable Members of the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board. Chair Selawsky, Vice Chair Laverde-Levine and Commissioner Townley

SB 827 (WIENER) TRANSIT-RICH HOUSING BONUS, RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED COUNCILMEMBER JOHN D'AMICO COUNCILMEMBER LAUREN MEISTER

SB 827 Proposed Height Limits by Proximity to Transit and Right-of-Way Width

SB 1818 Q & A. CCAPA s Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding SB 1818 (Hollingsworth) Changes to Density Bonus Law

LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO SENATE BILL 1069 (WIECKOWSKI) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

IS YOUR CITY READY FOR SENATE BILL 35? Amara Morrison 1111 Broadway, 24 th Floor Oakland, CA

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

MEETING DATE: 08/1/2017 ITEM NO: 16 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: JULY 27, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER

ORDINANCE NO

AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL PACKET

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

BULLETIN NO. 5. Senate Bill No. 35 Affordable Housing Streamlined Approval PLANNING DIRECTOR. SECTION 1: ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/20/2016 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar

City of San Juan Capistrano. Agenda Memorandum

CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7, 2016 NEW BUSINESS REVIEW AND UPDATE THE CITY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS LAW MAYOR LAUREN MEISTER

Item 10 November 16, 2016

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 608

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 199

Honorable Members of the Rules, Elections, Intergovernmental Relations and Neighborhoods Committee. Resolution (Ryu-Wesson) to OPPOSE SB 827 (Wiener)

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 73. Introduced by Assembly Members Chiu and Caballero (Coauthors: Assembly Members Mullin, Santiago, and Ting) December 16, 2016

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

Page 1 of 17. Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR March 28, 2017 (Continued from February 28, 2017)

UNDERSTANDING THE 2017 HOUSING BILLS Bay Area Planning Directors Association

ORDINANCE NO

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

AB 346 (DALY) REDEVELOPMENT: HOUSING SUCCESSOR: LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND JOINT AUTHOR ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROUGH

Item 10C 1 of 69

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

/'J (Peter Noonan, Rent Stabilization and Housing, Manager)VW

IMPACT OF NEW HOUSING LEGISLATION City of Concord

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and Katy Wisinski, Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL For the meeting of January 23, 2018 Originating Department: City Attorney/City Manager

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

Guide to the California Density Bonus Law

A Closer Look at California's New Housing Production Laws

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Re: Grand Jury Report No. 1707, Homelessness in the Cities by the Contra Costa Grand Jury

18.15 (Residential Density Bonus) of Title 18 (Zoning) ofthe Palo Alto

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

ORDINANCE NO

Affordable Housing Bonus Program. Public Questions and Answers - #2. January 26, 2016

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO SENATE BILL 828 (WIENER) LAND USE: HOUSING ELEMENT

CITY OF SAN MATEO BELOW MARKET RATE (INCLUSIONARY) PROGRAM

New Planning Code Summary: HOME-SF and Density Bonus Projects

MEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Ordinance No : Density Bonus Regulations

California State Laws Relating to Solar Permits

SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE

Guide to the California Density Bonus Law

Unpermitted Dwelling Unit (UDU) Inter-Agency Referral Form

This document prepared for the City of Santa Rosa

State Policy Options for Promoting Affordable Housing

Residential Density Bonus

City of Belmont Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, Thomas Fil, Finance Director,

On Your Mark. Get Ready. Get Set GO!!!! Developing Model Inclusionary Housing Practices NALHFA Annual Conference Dallas, Texas

Title 8 - ZONING Division AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Chapter RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS

Developing an Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance

Key Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program

Response to the Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report Affordable Housing Crisis Density Is Our Destiny

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

Barbara County Housing Element. Table 5.1 Proposed Draft Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs

ASSEMBLY, No. 912 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2018 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018

City Council Draft 08/15/03

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE "AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT"-A PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE INTENDED TO REPEAL THE COSTA-HAWKINS RENTAL HOUSING ACT OF 1995

Memo to the Planning Commission JULY 12TH, 2018

ORDINANCE NO. 7,562 N.S. AMENDING BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION AFFORDABLE HOUSING MITIGATION FEE

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

(1) At least ten percent of the total units are designated for low income households.

Agenda Re~oort PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO INCLUSIONARY IN-LIEU FEE RATES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

CHAPTER DENSITY BONUS, WAIVERS AND INCENTIVES

Transcription:

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action to receive and file a report on Senate Bill 50 and its potential impacts on the City. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: (1) Receive and file a report on Senate Bill 50 which would provide significant density and parking bonuses for housing developments within a job-rich area or within a certain distance of a high quality bus corridor or a major transit stop and its potential impacts on the City; and, (2) Provide direction to Staff and the City Attorney s Office regarding the City s involvement in supporting or opposing the bill. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Amount Budgeted: Additional Appropriation: Account Number(s): N/A N/A N/A ORIGINATED BY: William W. Wynder, City Attorney REVIEWED BY: Ara Mihranian, Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: Doug Willmore, City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: A. Text of SB 50 as of February 12, 2019 (page A-1) BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Senate Bill 50 (Planning and Zoning: Housing Development Equitable Communities Incentive) is a housing bill designed to encourage housing development in high-priority housing areas, such as job-rich or transit-rich areas, by requiring local governments to offer equitable communities incentives to developers who build in those areas. The bill was introduced by Senator Scott Wiener (D - SD 11) on December 3, 2018, and is co-authored by a number of legislators, to wit: Senators Caballero (D SD 12), Hueso (D SD 40), Moorlach (R- SD 37), and Skinner (D SD 9), as well as Assembly Members Burke (D AD 62), Kalra (D AD 27), Kiley (R AD 6), Low (D 01203.0005/534376.1 1 1

AD 28), Robert Rivas (D AD 30), Ting (D AD 19), and Wicks (D AD 15). 1 It should be noted that this bill is early in the process and may undergo substantive changes before its implementation. On January 24, 2019, the bill was referred to the Committees on Housing, and Government & Finance. If additional action occurs prior to the City Council meeting on February 19 th, Staff will provide an update at the meeting. The League of California Cities has not taken a position yet, but is tracking it as a bill to watch. The bill would require cities to provide, upon request by a developer, density and parking incentives for housing developments that meet certain requirements. The requirements include: The development is either a job-rich housing project or a transit-rich housing project. A job-rich housing project means a residential development within an area identified by the Department of Housing and Community Development and the Office of Planning and Research, based on indicators such as proximity to jobs, high area median income relative to the relevant region, and high-quality public schools as an area of high opportunity close to jobs. A transit-rich housing project means a residential development that is within ½ mile radius of a major transit stop or ¼ mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor. A major transit stop means a site containing an existing rail transit station or a ferry terminal served by either bus or rail transit service. A high-quality bus corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with a frequency of every 15 to 30 minutes, depending on time of day. The development is located on a site that is zoned to allow housing as an underlying use in the zone. Depending on whether the city has adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance or not, either the development complies with the inclusionary housing requirements of the ordinance, and absent such an ordinance, the development has a certain number of affordable housing units (the number is not specified yet in the bill). The site does not, and has not, contained: housing occupied by tenants for the 7 years preceding the application; a parcel of land on which the owner has exercised his or her rights under Section 7060 to withdraw accommodations from rent in the 15 years preceding the application. The development complies with all local development standards relating to architectural design, restrictions on demolition, impact fees, and community benefits agreements. 1 The authors districts, by location: SD 11 (San Francisco and parts of San Mateo County); SD 12 (Salinas Valley and part of the Central Valley); SD 40 (Imperial County and the border regions of San Diego County); SD 37 (portion of Orange County); SD 9 (East Bay); AD 62 (portions of the Westside and South Bay regions of LA County); AD 27 (parts of eastern San Jose); AD 6 (outer ring of northern and eastern Sacramento suburbs); AD 28 (parts of the South Bay and Silicon Valley); AD 19 (western San Francisco and northern San Mateo County); and AD 15 (Berkeley and Richmond) 01203.0005/534376.1 2 2

If the requirements are met, the developer is entitled to receive the incentive upon request. The incentives include no limit on density and parking requirements of no more than 0.5 parking spaces per unit, as well as other housing density bonus incentives and concessions described under Section 65915 of the Government Code. For eligible developments that are located within certain distances from major transit stops and have an as-yet unidentified number of affordable housing units, the incentives include being able to build to a height of 45 or 55 feet, and more generous floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. FAR is a tool used to limit the size of a particular dwelling. It uses a mathematical formula to compare the square footage of the dwelling to the land it is built on. By allowing a larger FAR, the waivers here would allow for larger buildings on any given piece of property. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes primarily consists of residential-zoned properties with limited commercial-zoned properties and a single commercial corridor along Western Avenue. While there are no major transit stops (rail or ferry terminal served by either bus or transit service), the City does have bus service with a frequency of every 15 to 30 minutes (e.g. DASH along Western Avenue and Line 344 along Hawthorne Blvd.), which is considered a high-quality bus corridor. This means that a transit-rich housing development could be possible within ¼ mile radius along these bus service corridors. While the bill is in its early draft stages, the incentives for eligible projects, such as transit-rich housing development could override the City s low density zoning, as well as possibly exempting projects from adhering to the City s height, Neighborhood Compatibility, and View Ordinance discretionary review processes. There is a high concern with the passage of SB50 as it could potentially change the character of the City with high-rise projects in what is predominantly single-family residential. That said, the size of typical residential lots located along Hawthorne Blvd. would probably not support a high density project, but properties along Western Avenue would probably be more likely to qualify as a potential candidate for a transit-rich housing development if this bill were to pass. The bill also has a provision allowing sensitive communities to postpone enactment of the bill until January 1, 2020. Sensitive community is defined as an area vulnerable to displacement pressures, based on certain criteria, and designated by the Department of Housing and Community Development. These communities could postpone implementation of the bill and could instead opt for a community-led planning process aimed toward increasing residential density and multi-family housing choices near transit stops. As the City does not have any areas that would be considered a sensitive community, this provision would not apply and the bill would be enacted upon passage. 01203.0005/534376.1 3 3

Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites SB-50 Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable communities incentive. (2019-2020) SHARE THIS: Date Published: 12/03/2018 09:00 PM CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 2019 2020 REGULAR SESSION SENATE BILL No. 50 Introduced by Senator Wiener (Coauthors: Senators Caballero, Hueso, Moorlach, and Skinner) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Burke, Kalra, Kiley, Low, Robert Rivas, Ting, and Wicks) December 03, 2018 An act to add Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section 65918.50) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to housing. LEGISLATIVE COUNSELʹS DIGEST SB 50, as introduced, Wiener. Planning and zoning: housing development: equitable communities incentive. Existing law, known as the Density Bonus Law, requires, when an applicant proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of a local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or for the donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents. This bill would require a city, county, or city and county to grant upon request an equitable communities incentive when a development proponent seeks and agrees to construct a residential development, as defined, that satisfies specified criteria, including, among other things, that the residential development is either a job-rich housing project or a transit-rich housing project, as those terms are defined; the site does not contain, or has not contained, housing occupied by tenants or accommodations withdrawn from rent or lease in accordance with specified law within specified time periods; and the residential development complies with specified additional requirements under existing law. The bill would require that a residential development eligible for an equitable communities incentive receive waivers from maximum controls on density and automobile parking requirements greater than 0.5 parking spots per unit, up to 3 additional incentives or concessions under the Density Bonus Law, and specified additional waivers if the residential development is located within a 1/2-mile or 1/4-mile radius of a major transit stop, as defined. The bill would authorize a local government to modify or expand the terms of an equitable communities incentive, provided that the equitable communities incentive is consistent with these provisions. The bill would include findings that the changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather A-1 1 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM

than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The bill would also declare the intent of the Legislature to delay implementation of this bill in sensitive communities, as defined, until July 1, 2020, as provided. By adding to the duties of local planning officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section 65918.50) is added to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, to read: CHAPTER 4.35. Equitable Communities Incentives 65918.50. For purposes of this chapter: (a) Affordable means available at affordable rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and families of extremely low, very low, low, or moderate incomes, as specified in context, and subject to a recorded affordability restriction for at least 55 years. (b) Development proponent means an applicant who submits an application for an equitable communities incentive pursuant to this chapter. (c) Eligible applicant means a development proponent who receives an equitable communities incentive. (d) FAR means floor area ratio. (e) High-quality bus corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service that meets all of the following criteria: (1) It has average service intervals of no more than 15 minutes during the three peak hours between 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., inclusive, and the three peak hours between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m., inclusive, on Monday through Friday. (2) It has average service intervals of no more than 20 minutes during the hours of 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., inclusive, on Monday through Friday. (3) It has average intervals of no more than 30 minutes during the hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., inclusive, on Saturday and Sunday. (f) Job-rich housing project means a residential development within an area identified by the Department of Housing and Community Development and the Office of Planning and Research, based on indicators such as proximity to jobs, high area median income relative to the relevant region, and high-quality public schools, as an area of high opportunity close to jobs. A residential development shall be deemed to be within an area designated as job-rich if both of the following apply: (1) All parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area outside of the job-rich area. (2) No more than 10 percent of residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, of the development are outside of the job-rich area. (g) Local government means a city, including a charter city, a county, or a city and county. (h) Major transit stop means a site containing an existing rail transit station or a ferry terminal served by either bus or rail transit service. (i) Residential development means a project with at least two-thirds of the square footage of the development designated for residential use. (j) Sensitive community means an area identified by the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with local community-based organizations in each region, as an area vulnerable to displacement pressures, based on indicators such as percentage of tenant households living at, or under, the poverty line A-2 2 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM

relative to the region. (k) Tenant means a person residing in any of the following: (1) Residential real property rented by the person under a long-term lease. (2) A single-room occupancy unit. (3) An accessory dwelling unit that is not subject to, or does not have a valid permit in accordance with, an ordinance adopted by a local agency pursuant to Section 65852.22. (4) A residential motel. (5) Any other type of residential property that is not owned by the person or a member of the person s household, for which the person or a member of the person s household provides payments on a regular schedule in exchange for the right to occupy the residential property. (l) Transit-rich housing project means a residential development the parcels of which are all within a one-half mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor. A project shall be deemed to be within a one-half mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor if both of the following apply: (1) All parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area outside of a one-half mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor. (2) No more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, of the project are outside of a one-half mile radius of a major transit stop or a one-quarter mile radius of a stop on a high-quality bus corridor. 65918.51. (a) A local government shall, upon request of a development proponent, grant an equitable communities incentive, as specified in Section 65918.53, when the development proponent seeks and agrees to construct a residential development that satisfies the requirements specified in Section 65918.52. (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that, absent exceptional circumstances, actions taken by a local legislative body that increase residential density not undermine the equitable communities incentive program established by this chapter. 65918.52. In order to be eligible for an equitable communities incentive pursuant to this chapter, a residential development shall meet all of the following criteria: (a) The residential development is either a job-rich housing project or transit-rich housing project. (b) The residential development is located on a site that, at the time of application, is zoned to allow housing as an underlying use in the zone, including, but not limited to, a residential, mixed-use, or commercial zone, as defined and allowed by the local government. (c) (1) If the local government has adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance requiring that the development include a certain number of units affordable to households with incomes that do not exceed the limits for moderate-income, lower income, very low income, or extremely low income specified in Sections 50079.5, 50093, 50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code, and that ordinance requires that a new development include levels of affordable housing in excess of the requirements specified in paragraph (2), the residential development complies with that ordinance. (2) If the local government has not adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance, as described in paragraph (1), and the residential development includes or more residential units, the residential development includes onsite affordable housing for households with incomes that do not exceed the limits for extremely low income, very low income, and low income specified in Sections 50093, 50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code. It is the intent of the Legislature to require that any development of or more residential units receiving an equitable communities incentive pursuant to this chapter include housing affordable to low, very low or extremely low income households, which, for projects with low or very low income units, are no less than the number of onsite units affordable to low or very low income households that would be required pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 65915 for a development receiving a density bonus of 35 percent. (d) The site does not contain, or has not contained, either of the following: (1) Housing occupied by tenants within the seven years preceding the date of the application, including housing A-3 3 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM

that has been demolished or that tenants have vacated prior to the application for a development permit. (2) A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised his or her rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years prior to the date that the development proponent submits an application pursuant to this chapter. (e) The residential development complies with all applicable labor, construction employment, and wage standards otherwise required by law and any other generally applicable requirement regarding the approval of a development project, including, but not limited to, the local government s conditional use or other discretionary permit approval process, the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code), or a streamlined approval process that includes labor protections. (f) The residential development complies with all other relevant standards, requirements, and prohibitions imposed by the local government regarding architectural design, restrictions on or oversight of demolition, impact fees, and community benefits agreements. (g) The equitable communities incentive shall not be used to undermine the economic feasibility of delivering lowincome housing under the state density bonus program or a local implementation of the state density bonus program, or any locally adopted program that puts conditions on new development applications on the basis of receiving a zone change or general plan amendment in exchange for benefits such as increased affordable housing, local hire, or payment of prevailing wages. 65918.53. (a) A residential development that meets the criteria specified in Section 65918.52 shall receive, upon request, an equitable communities incentive as follows: (1) Any eligible applicant shall receive the following: (A) A waiver from maximum controls on density. (B) A waiver from maximum automobile parking requirements greater than 0.5 automobile parking spots per unit. (C) Up to three incentives and concessions pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 65915. (2) An eligible applicant proposing a residential development that is located within a one-half mile radius, but outside a one-quarter mile radius, of a major transit stop and includes no less than percent affordable housing units shall receive, in addition to the incentives specified in paragraph (1), waivers from all of the following: (A) Maximum height requirements less than 45 feet. (B) Maximum FAR requirements less than 2.5. (C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), any maximum automobile parking requirement. (3) An eligible applicant proposing a residential development that is located within a one-quarter mile radius of a major transit and includes no less than percent affordable housing units shall receive, in addition to the incentives specified in paragraph (1), waivers from all of the following: (A) Maximum height requirements less than 55 feet. (B) Maximum FAR requirements less than 3.25. (C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), any maximum automobile parking requirement. (4) Notwithstanding any other law, for purposes of calculating any additional incentive or concession in accordance with Section 65915, the number of units in the residential development after applying the equitable communities incentive received pursuant to this chapter shall be used as the base density for calculating the incentive or concession under that section. (5) An eligible applicant proposing a project that meets all of the requirements under Section 65913.4 may submit an application for streamlined, ministerial approval in accordance with that section. (b) The local government may modify or expand the terms of an equitable communities incentive provided pursuant to this chapter, provided that the equitable communities incentive is consistent with, and meets the A-4 4 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM

5 of 5 2/11/2019, 1:04 PM minimum standards specified in, this chapter. 65918.54. The Legislature finds and declares that this chapter addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this chapter applies to all cities, including charter cities. 65918.55. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that implementation of this chapter be delayed in sensitive communities until July 1, 2020. (b) It is further the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that does all of the following: (1) Between January 1, 2020, and, allows a local government, in lieu of the requirements of this chapter, to opt for a community-led planning process aimed toward increasing residential density and multifamily housing choices near transit stops. (2) Encourages sensitive communities to opt for a community-led planning process at the neighborhood level to develop zoning and other policies that encourage multifamily housing development at a range of income levels to meet unmet needs, protect vulnerable residents from displacement, and address other locally identified priorities. (3) Sets minimum performance standards for community plans, such as minimum overall residential development capacity and the minimum affordability standards set forth in this chapter. (4) Automatically applies the provisions of this chapter on January 1, 2025, to sensitive communities that do not have adopted community plans that meet the minimum standards described in paragraph (3), whether those plans were adopted prior to or after enactment of this chapter. SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code. A-5