Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document)

Similar documents
Farmland Preservation Plan

Working Lands Initiative

Appendix T Chapter VIII IMPLEMENTATION

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

Farmland Preservation Agreements INSTRUCTIONS

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

Dane County Land Use Handbook

Business Item Community Development Committee Item:

General Development Plan Background Report on Agricultural Land Preservation

Town zoning: A good option for your town?

Appendix J Agricultural Land Preservation in Other States

Rezoning Staff Report St. Croix County Community Development Committee Gerald & Joan Mellgren Hearing Date: July 16, 2015

ORANGE COUNTY VOLUNTARY FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM ORDINANCE

Residential Construction in Farmland Preservation Zoning Districts

ALC Bylaw Reviews. A Guide for Local Governments

Land, Agricultural Improvements, CAFO, Rural Residence, Farm

Comprehensive Plan 2030

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT A HISTORY OF PRESERVING FARMLAND IN MARATHON COUNTY April Marathon County. Land Conservation & Zoning Committee

Nassau County Department of Planning & Economic Opportunity Nassau Place Yulee, Florida 32097

CHAPTER 7 VOLUNTARY FARMLAND PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

May 12, Randy Gilbertson Burnett County Land Conservation Department 7410 County Road K, #109 Siren, WI Dear Randy:

A Guide to the Municipal Planning Process in Saskatchewan

AMENDMENT NUMBER 38 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST LINCOLN (COMPLIANCE)

Town of Onalaska. A scale map depicting the portion of Pineview Drive to be officially laid out as a Town highway is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

CHAPTER 4: STRATEGIES FOR PRESERVING FARMLAND

Summary of Recommended Changes to the Town of Ballston Zoning Law and Key Items for Ongoing Discussion

CHAIRMAN WOLPERT AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT AND URBAN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE

Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Review

Implementation TOWN OF LEON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9-1

Village of Perry Zoning Ordinance Update Draft Diagnostic Report

CHAPTER 156: FARMLAND PRESERVATION. General Provisions. Qualifications and Certification of Farmland. Voluntary Agricultural Districts

Issues in Wetland Protection

Land Use. Existing Land Use

Comprehensive Plan 2030

Working Lands Initiative WI TOWNS ASSOCIATION December 2010

Chapter VIII. Conservation Easements: Valuing Property Subject to a Qualified Conservation Contribution

WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Beaver Township Zoning Ordinance

APPENDIX C-1 DEVELOPING FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR PLANNING AND ZONING

Transitioning from the Farmland Preservation Program to the Working Lands Initiative

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

GENESEE COUNTY SMART GROWTH PLAN 2010 Review Report

Corporate Services Planning and Economic Development. Memorandum

Special Consideration Multiple jurisdictions is cumbersome

SCOPE OF WORK DEVELOPMENT OF A SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PRELIMINARY REGIONAL HOUSING PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGION

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP DONATION of DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ORDINANCE (DDR, No. 45)

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 10A

Explanatory Notes. for. The Planning and Development Act, 2007

PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWS AT THE COUNTY LEVEL

Understanding the Clean and Green Program

The Farmland Preservation Program in Sussex County

Township of Tay Official Plan

To achieve growth, property development, redevelopment and an improved tax base in the cities and boroughs in the Lehigh Valley.

PROTOCOL FOR ESTABLISHING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

CLASS 8-C: LAND USE CONTROLS AND PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT

Documentation Standard for an Individual Section 4(f) Evaluation

PIP practice note 1 planning assumptions. How to use this practice note. Planning assumptions. What are planning assumptions? Type.

LAND USE. As such, the Township has estasblished the following statement of objectives for future development within its borders:

METHODOLOGY GUIDE VALUING LANDS IN TRANSITION IN ONTARIO. Valuation Date: January 1, 2016

ANNEXATION POLICY, PROGRAM, AND PLAN. Presented to the City Council By the Planning and Development Department

Land Use. Land Use Categories. Chart 5.1. Nepeuskun Existing Land Use Inventory. Overview

619 STANDARD 2: REAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL, REPORTING

Chapter XX Purchase of Development Rights Program

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

Real Estate Acquisitions Audit (Green Line LRT Stage 1)

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

Town of. River Falls. Land Use Element Vierbicher Associates, Inc

Chapter 10 Local Protection Measures

Strathcona County Municipal Policy Handbook. Last Review Date: May 21, 2013 Next Review Date: 05/2016

RURAL GENERAL RG 1. PERMITTED USES DISCRETIONARY USES

A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF EAST TROY: 2035

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Inverness Area Planning Advisory Committee Inverness County Planning Advisory Committee Inverness County Council Planning Staff (EDPC)

Georgia Conservation Tax Credit Program Frequently Asked Questions

Community Development Department

During the time devoted to this course, we will talk about the following matters.

Yellow highlighting emphases added by A.L. Appraisal Co.

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

Town of Prairie du Sac Sauk County, WI. Land Division Ordinance 07-3

City of Brandon Brownfield Strategy

SUBDIVISION GUIDELINES (As Approved by the State Agricultural Land Preservation Board on July 10, 1996)

2030 General Plan. December 6, 7 pm

Crystal Falls Township Master Plan

Real Estate Appraisal Professional Standards

Working Together to Conserve Land

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY GOVERNING CAPITAL PROJECTS

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS OF FACT BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE (BDC) UPDATE AMENDMENT PZ

Allenspark Townsite Planning Initiative Community Meeting July 23, Boulder County Land Use Department

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PANAMA CITY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Joaquin ordains as follows:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2013

ALPINE TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

FRESNO COG AG AD-HOC COMMITTEE REPORT TTC / PAC FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 2016

Town-County Relationships in Zoning. Rebecca Roberts Center for Land Use Education UW-Stevens Point/Extension

4. If any perennial surface water passes through or along the property lines of the acreage, a minimum of 200 feet or frontage should be required.

ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPRAISAL SCOPE AND GUIDELINES December 2015

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

Transcription:

Background Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, 2012 Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document) For over 30-years, the Wisconsin Farmland Preservation Program has served to preserve Walworth County s productive agricultural resources and enable owners of farmland participate in the State Farmland Preservation Tax Credit Programs. Over 500 Walworth County landowners take advantage of the Wisconsin Farmland Preservation Tax Credit or Tax Relief Programs. In 2009, the Wisconsin Legislature approved legislation to overhaul and modernize the Wisconsin s Farmland Preservation Program. Commonly referred to as the Working Lands Initiative, this new law made significant changes to the Farmland Preservation Program, specifically to Chapter 91 of the Wisconsin State Statutes. The revisions included new tools and incentives for the preservation of Wisconsin s agricultural lands and working farms. The Wisconsin Farmland Preservation Program continues to rely on Counties and local units of government to advance the new farmland preservation initiatives and lead in the implementation of the new tools. Specifically, Walworth County is required to update and certify an updated County-wide Farmland Preservation Plan by December 31, 2013. Key Changes from the Walworth County Agricultural Preservation Plan, 1978. Walworth County has a long history of land-use planning activities and actions directed towards the preservation of the County s rich and productive agricultural lands. The initial Walworth County Agricultural Preservation Plan and exclusive agricultural zoning ordinance was approved by Walworth County Board of Supervisors and certified by the State of Wisconsin in 1978. For over 30 years, this Plan and the County s County Zoning Ordinances served as the foundation to preserve Walworth County s farms and enable owners of farmland to participate in the State Farmland Preservation tax credit program. Most importantly, the Plan influenced land use patterns and served to guide land use decisions. Most farmland losses since the adoption of the initial Plan occurred within the planned urban service and growth areas, and within the County s cities and villages. Farmland covered 68 percent of Walworth County in 1980 and even though the County s population grew by 25% over the last 20 years, 62 percent of the County is still in agricultural use. This Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update reaffirms the County s longrange commitment to preserving farmlands and working farms in the County. The preservation and protection of the most productive soils continues as the primary land use goal for Walworth County. The standards and criteria for designating prime farmland in

Walworth County is unchanged from the initial Walworth County Agricultural Preservation Plan and Agricultural Preservation Zoning Standards. The Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, continues the County s longstanding commitment to preserving productive farmland by reaffirming the following agricultural resource goals: Preservation of farmland with the most productive soils, generally comprised of soils in Land Capability Classes I, II, and III, as identified by the USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Preservation of large blocks of farmland, to promote more efficient farming and minimize conflicts between farming operations and urban-type uses. Maintenance of agriculture as an important component of the economic base of the County. Maintenance of the County s farming heritage, including the scenic values associated with rural farming areas. Maintenance of strong connections between agricultural and natural resource areas. Use of best management practices to minimize the impacts of farming activity on the environment. The major changes in the Plan Update include: A description of the changes in the nature, location and focus of agriculture and agricultural uses in Walworth County, including the production, processing, supply, sale and distribution of agricultural products. Additional goals and objectives for the preservation of farmland in Walworth County and the support for agricultural development and agricultural related businesses and uses. The adoption of a Walworth County Farmland Preservation Area Map, designating specific areas and parcels for preservation for exclusive agricultural uses. Support for the establishing Agricultural Enterprise Areas, a new program in the State Working Lands Initiative. Support of the Purchase of Agricultural Conservation Easements, (PACE) and the identification of specific areas in Walworth County for PACE Agreements. Recommendations for additional agricultural related uses allowed in Agricultural Preservation Areas. Promotion of a vision for agriculture and agricultural development in Walworth County.

The development and distribution of information for participants in the Farmland Preservation Program. Relationship between the Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update and the Multi-jurisdictional Comprehensive Plan for Walworth County: 2035. The Multi-jurisdictional Comprehensive Plan for Walworth County: 2035, was adopted by the Walworth County Board of Supervisors on November 10, 2009. The Comprehensive Plan includes the vision for a strong agricultural resource base closely connected to resource- rich open spaces. The Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Up-date reaffirms that vision by establishing Farmland Preservation Areas on those lands identified as prime agricultural lands on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The Multi-jurisdictional Comprehensive Plan for Walworth County: 2035, will be amended in November 2012, to include the text and Farmland Preservation Areas Map adopted in the Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update. The Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Multi-jurisdictional l Comprehensive Plan for Walworth County: 2035. Plan Development The Walworth County Land Conservation Committee, LCC, was designated as the Technical Advisory Committee to provide guidance for the preparation of the Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Up-date. The LCC sponsored many public information meetings, including 4 well attended public information meetings, beginning in 2009 to give citizens the opportunity to learn about the Working Lands Initiative and contribute to the preparation of the County Farmland Preservation Plan Up-date process. The LCC continued to hold regular monthly meetings during the preparation of the plan. All meeting were open to the public and included an opportunity for public comment, input and recommendations. Draft copies of the plan were posted on the Walworth County Website. A public hearing was held on the Draft Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update on April 25, 2011. A second public hearing on the Draft Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Up-date was held on June 18, 2012. Another public hearing will be held in October 2012 on the Draft Plan in conjunction with the required amendment to the Multi-jurisdictional l Comprehensive Plan for Walworth County: 2035. The sixteen Walworth County townships have received copies of the Draft Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Up-date and will review and take action as an amendment the Multi-jurisdictional l Comprehensive Plan for Walworth County: 2035.

Unresolved issues between Walworth County and other government units. In 2011, a portion of the Town of Bloomfield was approved for incorporation into a Village. It may be the intention of the Village of Bloomfield to annex the remainder of the Town of Bloomfield in the near future. The Town of Bloomfield designated their farmland preservation areas using criteria not consistent with the criteria used by Walworth County. Walworth County and the State of Wisconsin have not certified the Town of Bloomfield Exclusive Agricultural Zoning Ordinance. The Walworth County Farmland Preservation Area Map for the Town of Bloomfield uses the County criteria with a few exceptions to accommodate the Town of Bloomfield. Certified Farmland Preservation Ordinances Currently in effect in Walworth County. Walworth County Zoning Ordinance Walworth County Shoreland Floodplain Zoning Ordinance Primary Contact Person The primary contact person for correspondence related to the certification of the farmland preservation plan: Louise Olson, County Conservationist and Deputy Director Walworth County Land and Resource Management Department. 100 West Walworth Room 222 PO Box 1001 Elkhorn, WI 53121 262.741-7912.

ARM-LWR-457 Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection Division of Agricultural Resource Management P.O. Box 8911 Madison, WI 53708-8911 (608) 224-4500 Farmland Preservation Plan Certification Application COUNTY: WALWORTH COUNTY2 The above-named county hereby requests certification, under s. 91.16, Wis. Stats., of the attached county farmland preservation plan (or plan amendment). PART A: Enclosed Materials In support of its plan certification request, the county submits all of the following materials: 1. The farmland preservation plan (or plan amendment) to be certified, including plan text and maps. Each map is clearly correlated with the plan text that applies to that map. All intended farmland preservation areas are clearly identified and mapped. 2. The spatial location data used to create each farmland preservation map. 3. Cited portions of the county comprehensive plan, if any (or a website link to that plan). 4. A cover document, signed by the county planning director or chief elected official, that does all of the following: a. Concisely summarizes the farmland preservation plan (or plan amendment), including key changes from the county s last certified plan. The summary describes the extent and location of lands added to or removed from farmland preservation areas identified in the last certified plan, and explains why those lands were added or removed. b. Concisely summarizes the relationship between the farmland preservation plan and county and local comprehensive plans, if any. The summary identifies key related portions of the comprehensive plan. c. Concisely summarizes the steps (and timeline) by which the county developed the farmland preservation plan. The summary briefly describes the public hearing process, notice to other government units, input by other government units, and the process of county approval. It indicates which steps are completed, and which steps are planned but not yet completed. d. Concisely summarizes key unresolved issues between the county and other government units, if any. e. Lists all certified farmland preservation zoning ordinances (county and local) that are currently in effect in the county, and briefly describes any plans to update those ordinances. (Include exclusive agricultural zoning ordinances certified under the Farmland Preservation Law as it existed before July 1, 2009). f. Identifies the primary contact person for correspondence related to the certification of the farmland preservation plan.

5. If the Farmland Preservation Plan supersedes inconsistencies in the County Comprehensive Plan, the Farmland Preservation Plan and the Comprehensive Plan both include language clarifying this and the proposed language to be added to the Comprehensive Plan is submitted along with the Farmland Preservation Plan.

PART B: CERTIFICATION The county corporation counsel and the county planning director (or chief elected official) hereby certify that the farmland preservation plan (or plan amendment) attached to this application complies with s. 91.18, Wis. Stats., including the following applicable requirements: 1 Page Reference 2 1. The plan states the county s policy and goals related to farmland preservation and agricultural development, including the development of enterprises related to agriculture. Page 4-14 to 4-15, FLP Pages X-4 to 6, CP 2. The plan identifies, describes and documents other development trends, plans, or needs that may affect farmland preservation and agricultural development in the county, including: Population Page 3-23, FLP Page 3-25, Table 3-1, FLP Pages II-1 & 2, CP Page II-7, Table II-1, CP, Pages VII-1 to 6, CP Pages VII-7 to 14, Tables VII- 1,2,3,6,8 11, CP Municipal expansion Page 3-23, FLP Page 3-26, Table 3-2, FLP Page 3-27, Map 3-17, FLP Pages IV-1 to 3, CP Pages IV-7 & 8, Maps IV-1 & IV-2, CP Page IV-9, Table IV-1, CP Pages IX-4 to 6, CP Page IX-17, Table IX- 3, CP Page IX-19, Table IX- 5, CP Page IX-20, Table IX- 6, CP 1 For a complete farmland preservation plan, the county corporation counsel and county planning director or chief elected official certify that the plan complies with all of the listed requirements. For plan amendment, they certify that the amendment complies with all of the listed requirements that are relevant to that amendment, and that the amendment does not cause the amended plan to violate any of the listed requirements (see s. 91.18(2), Wis. Stats.). The farmland preservation plan may comply with listed requirements by incorporating, by reference, required information from other parts of the county s comprehensive plan. 2 Cite the page number(s) in the county farmland preservation plan where the requirement is met. If the citation refers to the county comprehensive plan, cite the page reference followed by CP. If the citation refers to a town plan, cite the town plan (for example, 4 CP Town of Robin).

Page IX-15, Map IX-1, CP Economic growth Pages II-4 & 5, CP Page II-25, Table II-18, CP, Page II-26, Table 19, CP Pages II-30 & 31,Table 21, CP Pages VIII-5 & 6, CP Pages XIV-1-9, CP Pages 4-1 to 4-5, FLP Business development Page II-26, Table II-19, CP Page II-27, Map II-3, CP Page XIV-1, CP Page 4-3, Map 4-1, FLP Page 4-4, Key, FLP Housing Page II-3, CP Pages II-15 to II-19,Tables II- 8, 9, 10, 11 12, CP Pages XI-1-21, CP Utilities Page V-1, CP Pages IV-11, Tables V-1-3. C CP Pages V-11, 13, 15 & 16, Maps V-2,3, 5, & 6, CP Pages XIII-1 to 13, CP Transportation Pages IV-3-6, CP Pages IV-15, 16, & 17, Maps IV-4.5,6,7, CP Pages XII-1-16, CP Pages XII-13-14, Tables XII-1, CP

Page XII-11,12,15, & 16, Maps XII-1,2,3 &4, CP Communications Page V-4, CP Page V-16, Map V-6, CP Page XIII-13, CP Community facilities and services Pages V-4 to V-41, CP Pages XIII-1 to 16, CP Energy Page V-3, CP Pages V-13 to V-15, Maps V- 3,4 & 5, CP Waste management Page V-5, CP Page V-24, Table V-7, CP Environmental preservation (may include a map of natural resource areas and environmental corridors). Pages 3-11 to 23, FLP Pages 3-14,15, 16,18,20, & 22. Maps 11-16, FLP Pages III-4 to 11, CP Pages Maps III-10, 12, 13,14,15, & 16, CP Pages X-6 to 8, CP

3. The plan identifies, describes and documents all of the following: Agricultural uses of land in the county at the time that the farmland preservation plan is adopted, including key agricultural specialties, if any (include maps where appropriate). Pages 4-1 to 4-9 FLP Page III-2, CP Page 4-3, Map 4-1, FLP Page 4-4, Key FLP Key agricultural resources, including available land, soil, and water resources. Pages 3-6 to3-17, FLP Pages 3-10 & 3-12, Maps 8 & 9, FLP Pages 4-1 to 4-7 FLP Page 4-3, Map 4-1, FLP Page 4-4, Key FLP Key infrastructure for agriculture, including key processing, storage, transportation and supply facilities. Pages 4-3, Map 4-1, FLP Page IV-5, Map IV-4, CP Page IV-17, Map IV-8, CP Significant trends in the county related to agricultural land use, agricultural production, enterprises related to agriculture, and the conversion of agricultural lands to other uses. Anticipated changes in the nature, scope, location, and focus of agricultural production, processing, supply and distribution. Page 3-26, Table 3-2, FLP Page 3-27, Table 3-3, FLP Pages 4-8 to 4-9, FLP Page 4-8, Tables 4-5 & 4-6, FLP Page 4-10 & 4-11, FLP Actions that the county will take to preserve farmland and promote agricultural development. Key land use issues related to preserving farmland and promoting agricultural development, and plans for addressing those issues. Pages 5-3 to 5-14, FLP Table 5-1, FLP Appendix C Page 4-9 to 4-11, FLP Pages 5-13 to 5-14 FLP

Policies, goals, strategies and proposed actions to increase housing density in areas other than farmland preservation areas. Page 5-8, FLP 4. The plan meets the following requirements for the designation of farmland preservation areas: Clearly identifies farmland preservation areas that the county plans to preserve for agricultural use and agriculture-related uses. (These may include undeveloped natural resource and open space areas but may not include any area that is planned for nonagricultural development within 15 years after the date on which the plan is adopted). Describes the rationale used to identify the farmland preservation areas and explains how the rationale was used to map plan areas. (The rationale may include criteria such as soil type; topography; agricultural productivity; current agricultural use; agricultural related infrastructure; and proximity to incorporated areas, major arterials, and rural subdivisions). Pages 5-1 to 5-3, FLP Page 5-3, Map 5-1, FLP Pages 5-1 to 5-3, FLP. Map 5-1, FLP Pages A-1 to 4, FLP Pages B-1 to B16, FLP Includes maps that clearly delineate the farmland preservation areas, so that a reader can easily determine whether a parcel is within an identified area (see MAP AND SPATIAL LOCATION DATA GUIDELINES ). Page 5-3, Map 5-1, FLP Pages B-1 to B-16, Maps B-1 to B1-16, FLP Clearly correlates the maps with plan text to describe the type of land uses planned for each farmland preservation area on a map. There are no material inconsistencies within the plan, such as inconsistencies within the plan text, between the plan text and maps, or between maps. Identifies programs and other actions that the county and local governments within the county may use to preserve the farmland preservation areas. Page 5-1 to 5-3, FLP Pages A1-1 to A1-4, FLP Pages 5-5 to 5-14, FLP Page 5-4, Table 5-1, FLP Pages A5-1 & A5-2, FLP Pages A6-1 to A6-8, FLP PART C: CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE FARMLAND PLAN AND THE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN If the County has a Comprehensive Plan, the County must include the Farmland Preservation Plan in its Comprehensive Plan under s. 91.10(2), Wis. Stats. The County should treat the Farmland Preservation Plan and the Comprehensive Plan as the same document rather than two separate plans. Because the Farmland Preservation Plan is part of the Comprehensive Plan, the entire document must be internally consistent. If there are inconsistencies, the County may clarify that the Farmland Preservation Plan supersedes the Comprehensive Plan and any and all inconsistencies between the two shall be resolved in favor of the

Farmland Preservation Plan. The County must include a statement in both the Comprehensive Plan and the Farmland Preservation Plan declaring that the Farmland Preservation Plan supersedes the Comprehensive Plan so that a person referring to either plan will be aware of each plan s relationship to the other. If inconsistencies appear in the maps, then the legends in both maps should include a note explaining that the Farmland Preservation Plan supersedes any inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan. If inconsistencies appear in the text, then the appropriate language should be added to the text where the inconsistencies are present. To complete certification of the Farmland Preservation Plan, the County board must officially adopt the language in both the Farmland Preservation Plan and the existing Comprehensive Plan stating that, in the event of any specific inconsistency between them, the Farmland Preservation Plan takes precedence. The County should ensure that this clarifying language appears in the Farmland Preservation Plan that is submitted to the department. In addition, the County should submit the proposed amended pages from the Comprehensive Plan with the appropriate clarifying language. Once the department approves the Farmland Preservation Plan for certification, the County board must adopt both the Farmland Preservation Plan in the form certified as well as the proposed language in the Comprehensive Plan clarifying the resolution of inconsistencies. Following adoption, the County must send documentation to the department that the Farmland Preservation Plan was adopted in the form certified and that the County also adopted the clarifying language in the Comprehensive Plan. If the County does not take this step to clarify and resolve inconsistencies, the department will compare the Farmland Preservation Plan with the County Comprehensive Plan for consistency. In the event inconsistencies are found, the County will need to reconcile these inconsistencies either by changing the Farmland Preservation Plan or the Comprehensive Plan.