MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

Similar documents
MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Jack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436)

Zoning Administrator. Agenda Item

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT

MONTEREY COUNTY STANDARD SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

Peter Pan Investors LLC (PLN030397)

Gilbert and Joanne Segel (PLN020561)

1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

Sven & Katrin Nauckhoff (PLN030156)

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

10. GENERAL PLAN 11. ZONING 12. LAND USE 13. ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER 18. PROPOSED ZONING 19. PROPOSED LAND USE 20. NO. UNITS 21.

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

STAFF REPORT FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT CDP# STANDARD PERMIT June 11, 2013 CPA-1. Victor Suarez Fern Drive Mendocino, CA 95460

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING

STAFF REPORT. Arthur and Kathleen Quiggle 4(b)

Variance THIS PACKAGE CONTAINS AND, IF 'D, ALSO CONTAINS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

In the matter of the application of FINDINGS & DECISION Daniel & Charmaine Warmenhoven (PLN020333)

MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

HOW TO APPLY FOR A USE PERMIT

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Meiners Oaks Water District Public Ut lityyard and Bu lding

Architectural Control Board Handbook

APPLICATION PACKET for a VARIANCE to ZONING REGULATIONS

Town of Scarborough, Maine

SISKIYOU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 21, 2018

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Planning Commission Report

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS

That the Planning Commission finds and advises EBMUD that the proposed disposal of property is in conformance with the County General Plan.

INSTRUCTIONAL PACKET FOR VARIANCES

Special Use Permit - Planned Unit Development Checklist. Property Address:

Planning&Development Fee Standards

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO A.P. #

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.

Accessory Dwelling Units

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of December 7, Agenda Item 5A

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT

RESOLUTION NO

COUNTY OF NEVADA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Eric Rood Administration Bldg. 950 Maidu Avenue Nevada City, California

APPENDIX E FORMS INDEX OF ZONING FORMS

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the amendment to Article 4, Article 7, and Article 14 as presented by Staff on 6/19/17.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT

Instructions to the Applicant

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

8 Maybeck Twin Drive Use Permit ZP# to construct a new, three-story, 2,557-square-foot single-family dwelling on a vacant lot.

Residential Project Convenience Facilities

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GENERAL INFORMATION AND

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION

City of High Point Development Fee Schedule

The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: March 16, 2011 Project Planner: Shannon Werneke

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW

PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR ZONE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPLICATION

CITY OF ELSMERE 318 Garvey Avenue, Elsmere KY 41018

EXTRA TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY CASE ANALYSIS

FERRY COUNTY BUILDING ORDINANCE # UPDATED

Oceanside Zoning Ordinance

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY DEPENDENT HOUSING

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura, State of California, ordains as follows: Section 1

State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section

FINAL MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR NOVEMBER 8, 2007 MINUTES

SUMMARY: The proposed project includes two basic components:

Community Development Department Staff Report. FILE NUMBER: GPA 06-01, ZC 06-01, SPR 06-03, TPM (Boundary Line Adjustment) John Wagener

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

FEE The staff will let you know the current cost of filing an application. Make checks payable to the San Joaquin County Treasurer.

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for the Montgomery Lot Line Adjustment

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS ROSITA HILLS, LTD

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission

Ravenna Township. Dakota County, Minnesota. Variance Application. Please Print or Type All Information

AGRICULTURE & WINERY CORRIDOR APPLICATION ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER:

SECTION 5: ACCESSORY USES

PROJECT ADDRESS ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER G.P. LAND USE DESIGNATION ZONING DISTRICT FLOOD HAZARD ZONE SITE ACREAGE AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE?

Transcription:

MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT COASTAL OFFICE, 2620 1 ST AVENUE, MARINA, CA 93933 (831) 883-7500, main line / (831) 384-3261, facsimile SCOTT HENNESSY, DIRECTOR MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Meeting: February 13, 2003, 10:20 AM Agenda Item: 5 Project Description: CONLIN; PLN020328. Combined Development Permit consisting of an Administrative Permit to convert a 1,140 sq. ft. single family residence into a 997 sq. ft. caretakers unit and construct a 1,937 sq. ft. single family residence (manufactured unit) with a 710 sq. ft. detached garage; and a Variance for the reduction of the front yard setback from 50 feet to 37 feet for the caretaker s unit. Project Location: The property is located at 98A Paddon Road, Watsonville (APN 412-091-056-000), west of San Miguel Canyon Road, Royal Oaks. Plan Area: North County Area Plan (Non-coastal) Flagged & Staked: Yes Zoning Designation: Rural Density Residential (RDR/5.1) CEQA Action: Exempt under Section 15303 Date application deemed complete: January 17, 2003 Department: Planning and Building Inspection (PBI) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Combined Development Permit based on Findings and Evidence (Exhibit B) and subject to proposed conditions (Exhibit C). OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED ACTION The site consists of an irregular polygon shaped parcel, approximately 5.7 acres in area. Surrounding land uses are rural residential and agricultural. An existing single family dwelling (modular unit) and two garage/shop outbuildings are located on the eastern portion of the site. The overall site consists of a south-facing valley that extends to the east and west valley flanks. A small earth embankment pond is located on the valley floor in the center of the site. A dirt road traverses along the northern property line leading to a previously graded cut/fill pad in the northwestern property corner. Proposed development consists of the construction of a 1,865 square foot single family dwelling (manufactured unit) and a 720 sq. ft. detached metal garage, located on the existing cut/fill pad. An exterior deck will be constructed on the east and south sides of the proposed house. Approximately 143 sq. ft. of habitable living space in the existing single family residence will be converted to storage area, and the remaining 997 sq. ft is proposed to be converted into a caretakers unit. Two parking spaces will be provided. Variance Conversion of the existing single family dwelling into a caretaker s unit would require a variance for reduction in the required 50-foot front yard setback for habitable accessory structures. An

existing 60-foot access easement provides access to the subject site and intersects the parcel at its north and south property lines. The easement s eastern boundary encroaches into the proposed caretaker unit s setback by 13 feet. The variance would allow a 37-foot front yard setback for the caretaker s unit. A variance is justified due to several topographical constraints associated with the site. Moving the proposed caretaker unit 13 feet toward the east property line and away from the easement would comply with the setback requirement, but is not feasible due to existing 3:1 slopes immediately to the rear of the existing dwelling. Moving the house would require extensive grading and significant disturbance to existing natural vegetation including a Eucalyptus tree grove. A second alternative would involve moving the access easement and existing road approximately 13 feet to the interior of the parcel and away from the existing dwelling. Reconstituting the existing roadway is not feasible because doing so would require the removal of three 30-foot tall Monterey pine trees and 750 cubic yards of grading (cut 205 cubic yards and fill of 500 cubic yards). In addition, the existing road provides access to parcels to the north and south. Moving the existing road to the interior of the parcel is not feasible because site visibility from the adjacent property owner s driveway would be severely impeded due to the ascending slope of the terrain immediately south of the subject parcel. A variance to allow for a 37 foot front yard setback for the caretaker s unit would eliminate the need to remove three pine trees and eliminate the need for significant grading and/or significant disturbances to natural vegetation. The variance also would ensure safe site visibility for ingress/egress for the adjacent property owner to the south. The North County Non-coastal Land Use Advisory Committee (LUAC) reviewed the application and recommended approval of the project including the variance by a vote of 6-0 on November 20, 2002. The LUAC expressed (Exhibit G ) support for the variance because it would eliminate the need for significant grading at the access road and eliminate the need for any removal of trees. OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT: This application was reviewed by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency, Environmental Health Division, Public Works Department, the North County Fire Department and the North County Non-Coastal Land Use Advisory Committee. All have reviewed and recommended conditions that are incorporated into the conditions of approval (Exhibit C ). This project is appealable to the Planning Commission. Paul Mugan Associate Planner cc North County Fire Department; Public Works; Parks Department; Environmental Health Division; Water Resources Agency; Paul Mugan; Mike Novo; Linda Rotharmel; Project File PLN020328 Attachments: Exhibit A Project Data Sheet Exhibit B Findings and Evidence Exhibit C Conditions of Approval Exhibit D Vicinity Map/Site Plan/Floor Plans/Aerial Photograph

Exhibit E Request for Variance Exhibit F Justification for Caretakers Unit Exhibit G North County Non-coastal LUAC Minutes This report reviewed by Luis Osorio

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS AND EVIDENCE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 1. FINDING: The proposed project and/or use, as described in condition #1 of the attached Exhibit C, is consistent with the policies of the Monterey County General Plan, the North County Area Plan, and the Monterey County Zoning Code. Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.64.030 Regulations for Caretaker Unit. Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.16 Regulations for Rural Density Residential Zoning Districts. Variances Monterey County Zoning Code. unanimously (6-0) on November 20, 2002, to recommend approval of this 2. FINDING: That adequate sewage disposal and water supply facilities exist or are readily available, as approved by the Director of Environmental Health. EVIDENCE: Material in project file PLN020328 establishes that the project has been reviewed by the Director of Environmental Health and, as conditioned, has adequate sewage disposal and water supply facilities readily available. 3. FINDING: The establishment of the caretaker unit will not, under the circumstances of the particular application, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the County. Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.64.030 Regulations for Caretakers Unit. Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.16 Regulations for Rural Density Residential Zoning Districts. Variances Monterey County Zoning Code. unanimously (6-0) on November 20, 2002 to recommend approval of this EVIDENCE: To date, no issues of public controversy or concern have been brought to the attention of the Planning and Building Inspection Department. 4. FINDING: That the proposed caretaker unit complies with all of the applicable requirements of Section 21.64.030C of this title.

Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.64.030 Regulations for Caretakers Unit of the Zoning Code. 5. FINDING: That the subject property upon which the caretaker unit is to be built is in compliance with all rules and regulations pertaining to zoning uses, subdivisions and any other applicable provisions of this Title and that all zoning violation abatement costs, if any, have been paid. Variances Monterey County Zoning Code., 21.64.030 Regulations for Caretakers Unit of the Zoning Code, and 21.16 Regulations for Rural Density Residential Zoning Districts in the Zoning Code. unanimously (6-0) on November 20, 2002 to recommend approval of this 6. FINDING: The proposed project will not have a significant environmental impact. EVIDENCE: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) categorically exempts this project from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Section 15303. FINDINGS AND EVIDENCE FOR VARIANCE 1. FINDING: That because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this Title is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.64.030 Regulations for Caretakers Unit of the Zoning Code. Approval in Exhibit C, establish that the project complies with 21.16 Regulations for Rural Density Residential Zoning Districts in the Zoning Code. Variances Monterey County Zoning Code. unanimously (6-0) on November 20, 2002 to recommend approval of this 2. FINDING: That the variance not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. Variances Monterey County Zoning Code., 21.64.030 Regulations for

Caretakers Unit of the Zoning Code, and 21.16 Regulations for Rural Density Residential Zoning Districts in the Zoning Code. unanimously (6-0) on November 20, 2002 to recommend approval of this

EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. This Combined Development Permit consists of an Administrative permit to convert a 1,135 sq. ft. single family residence into a 997 sq. ft. caretakers unit and construct a 1,937 sq. ft. manufactured single family residence with a 720 sq. ft. detached garage and a variance for the reduction of the front yard setback from 50 feet to 37 feet for the caretaker s unit. The property is located at 98A Paddon Road, Watsonville (Assessor s Parcel Number 412-091-056-000), west of San Miguel Canyon Road, Royal Oaks, in the North County Non-Coastal Area. (Planning and Building Inspection) Prior to Final Building Inspection /Occupancy 2. The caretaker s unit shall not exceed 1,000 sq. ft. of habitable floor area. (Planning and Building Inspection) 3. A minimum of one covered off-street parking space shall be provided for the caretaker unit. (Planning and Building Inspection) 4. The applicant shall record a deed restriction as a condition of project approval, stating that the caretaker unit shall not be rented to any other person than the caretaker. 5. No more than 10 years shall have elapsed between the date of manufacture of the new manufactured dwelling unit and the date of the application for a permit to install the manufactured dwelling unit. (Planning and Building Inspection) 6. The manufactured dwelling unit shall have a siding material of, or having the appearance of, wood, stucco, brick, stone, or other material similar to other residential units in the immediate area. (Planning and Building Inspection) 7. The manufactured dwelling unit shall have a roofing material of wooden, fiberglass or composition shingle, tile, slate or other roofing material similar to homes in the immediate area. (Planning and Building Inspection) 8. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, a drainage plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or architect addressing on-site and off-site impacts, to include retention/percolation facilities to mitigate the impact of impervious surface stormwater runoff. Necessary improvements shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. (Water Resources Agency) 9. Certification that the stormwater retention facility has been constructed in accordance with approved plans shall be provided to the County Water Resources Agency by a registered civil engineer or licensed contractor who constructed the facility. (Water Resources Agency) 10. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 3539, or as subsequently amended, of the Monterey County Water Resources Agency pertaining to mandatory water conservation

regulations. The regulations for new construction require, but are not limited to: a. All toilets shall be ultra-low flush toilets with a maximum tank size or flush capacity of 1.6 gallons, all shower heads shall have a maximum flow capacity of 2.5 gallons per minute, and all hot water faucets that have more than ten feet of pipe between the faucet and the hot water heater serving such faucet shall be equipped with a hot water recirculating system. b. Landscape plans shall apply xeriscape principles, including such techniques and materials as native or low water use plants and low precipitation sprinkler heads, bubblers, drip irrigation systems and timing devices. (Water Resources Agency) 11. All buildings shall be issued an address in accordance with Monterey County Ordinance No. 1241. Each occupancy, except accessory buildings, shall have its own address. When multiple occupancies exist within a single building, each individual occupancy shall be separately identified by its own address. (North County Non-Coastal Fire District) 12. All parcels 1 acre and larger shall provide a minimum 30 foot setback for buildings and accessory buildings from all property lines and/or the center of the road. For parcels less than 1 acre, or when a 30 foot minimum setback cannot be reached, alternate fuel modification standards may be imposed by the local fire jurisdiction to provide the same practical effect. (North County Non-Coastal Fire District) 13. The building(s) shall be fully protected with automatic fire sprinkler system(s). The following notation is required on the plans when a building permit is applied for: "The building shall be fully protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system. Installation, approval and maintenance shall be in compliance with applicable National Fire Protection Association and/or Uniform Building Code Standards, the editions of which shall be determined by the enforcing jurisdiction. Four (4) sets of plans for fire sprinkler systems must be submitted and approved prior to installation. Rough-in inspections must be completed prior to requesting a framing inspection." (North County Non-Coastal Fire District) 14. Where multiple address are required at a single driveway, they shall be mounted on a single post, or in any fashion approved by the Reviewing Authority that provides for the same practical effect. (North County Non-Coastal Fire District) Continuous Permit Requirements 15. No other habitable structure shall be permitted on the parcel without required permits. Structure means anything constructed or erected, except fences fewer than six feet in height, the use of which requires location on the ground or attachment to something having location on the ground, but not including any trailer or tent. This includes mobile homes and/or other temporary structure used for human habitation. (Planning and Building Inspection)

16. Where one or more of the conditions of a variance have not been or are not being complied with, or when a variance was granted on the basis of false material information, written or oral, given willfully or negligently by the applicant, the appropriate authority may revoke or modify the variance following public hearing pursuant to Chapter 21.78 of this title. (Planning and Building Inspection) 17. The caretaker unit shall not be separately rented let, or leased to other than the caretaker whether compensation be direct or indirect. The caretaker shall be employed principally on the lot for purposes of care and protection of persons, plants, animals, equipment, or other facilities on-site or on contiguous lots under the same ownership. (Planning and Building Inspection) 18. Subsequent subdivision which divides a main residence from a caretaker unit shall not be permitted except where lots created meet minimum lot size and density requirements of the existing zoning. (Planning and Building Inspection) 19. In the event the proposed caretaker s unit is demolished or relocated, any new caretaker s unit shall have a minimum 50 foot front yard setback. (Planning and Building Inspection)