VII CHARLOTTESVILLE. VII Demolition & Moving. Demolition & Moving ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICTS DESIGN GUIDELINES

Similar documents
Chapter 22 Historic Preservation/Design Review

FAQs: Living or developing in a Historic District

1816, Independence Hall 1850, Washington s Headquarters

CULTURAL RESOURCES CULTURAL PROPERTIES AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW OF PROPOSED STATE UNDERTAKINGS THAT MAY AFFECT REGISTERED CULTURAL PROPERTIES

Area regulations, height regulations, and off-street parking. Lot sizes, front, side and

Guidelines for the Consideration of Applications for the Demolition or Moving of Structures Within the Northville Historic District

Portland Historic Resources Zoning Regulations

GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA. For Granting Tax Abatement in the North Killeen Revitalization Area. Designated by the City of Killeen, Texas

Cartersville Code of Ordinances Historic Preservation Commission

CHAPTER 20 HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Economic Non-Viability Application

TOWNSHIP OF FORKS NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 972 N.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES ADDING ARTICLE V. CHAPTER OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Property Tax Exemption for Multifamily Housing

DOWNTOWN FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT

Whereas, the Forests have invited recreation residence and organizational camp/club permit holders to comment on this Programmatic Agreement; and

ARLINGTON COUNTY TENANT RELOCATION GUIDELINES

The City shall support a suitable mix of housing by: [9J (3)(c)(5)]

Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Mark Reed. Location 1113 Atlantic Avenue GPIN District Size 15,651 square feet

SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

PRESERVATION EASEMENT

Sonoma County Residential Antidisplacement and Relocation Assistance Plan October 2002

Maintenance & Preservation Agreement [SAMPLE]

Chapter HISTORIC PRESERVATION

City of Medford HISTORICAL COMMISSION. City Hall Room George P. Hassett Drive Medford, Massachusetts 02155

JOHN ARENA. To: All Developers, Property Owners, and Architects Seeking Zoning Relief or an Amendment to the Zoning Code

A. Approval / Disapproval of Resolution No : Adopting a Fair Housing Policy.

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

Special Attention of: Notice CPD All Regional Directors Issued: 02/26/2008 All Field Office Directors Expires: 02/26/2009 All CPD Directors

CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

A. Approval / Disapproval of Resolution No : Adopting a Fair Housing Policy.

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

{ ( ' INCENTIVES & BONUSES

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF DEMOLITION CERTIFICATE OF RELOCATION

ARTICLE XVI HISTORIC RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS

Frequently Asked Questions about Historic Designations

City of Aspen Community Development Department

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan

CHAPTER 1A-38 TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES

December 17, VIA

Historic Preservation

HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICTS

VILLAGE OF LITTLE CHUTE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT/FAÇADE RENOVATION PROGRAM

LANDMARK. Planning, Zoning & Economic Development Department. 209 N. York Street Elmhurst, Illinois (630) (p) (630) (f) DATE

Staff Report. Planning Commission Public Hearing: October 17, 2007 Staff Recommendation: Denial

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Historic Overlay District Ordinance Chadds Ford Township, Delaware County, PA

Chapter 6A. Property Maintenance Article III. Community Preservation and Anti-Blight Enforcement

City of Long Beach Mills Act Program Pre-Application Workshop. Saturday, February 23, :00 am 12:00 pm Long Beach Gas & Oil Auditorium

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES

GUIDELINES FOR THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT. Introduction

Planning Commission Agenda Item

CITY ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF BILLINGS, MONTANA Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Historic Preservation 1

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

City of Medford HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION. City Hall Room George P. Hassett Drive Medford, Massachusetts 02155

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

FAQs about the Lakewood Ohio Historic Preservation Ordinance

MASON COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO

BOULDER COUNTY/BROOMFIELD COUNTY REGIONAL CONSORTIUM S COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS DISPLACEMENT PLAN

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

NOW THEREFORE, The Council of the City of Alpharetta hereby ordains, as follows:

Acquisition and Relocation Waivers. Guidance Outlined in CPD Notice 08-02

PENNSYLVANIA RIGHT-TO-KNOW LAW COMPLIANCE POLICY OF BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

CHAPTER 27 - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT [1]

City Of La Mesa Acquisition, Anti-Displacement and Relocation Assistance Plan This Residential Anti-displacement and Relocation Assistance Plan

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DATE: MAY 14, 2007 CMR: 131:07

Key for Understanding Integrity Rating and Architecture Rating used in the Showplace Square / Northeast Mission Historic Resources Survey

URBAN REVITALIZATION PLAN CITY OF DECORAH, IOWA 2014 DECORAH HOUSING URBAN REVITALIZATION AREA ADOPTED NOVEMBER 3, 2014

DODGE CITY HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

1. ROLL CALL Richardson (Vice-Chair) Vacant Bisbee Hamilton Wells Roberts-Ropp Carr (Chair) Peterson Swearer

Lakewood at Darby Architectural Review Committee. Approvals Process

ALC Bylaw Reviews. A Guide for Local Governments

Codified Ordinances of Pickerington, Ohio

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

ORDINANCE NO

MHDC General Relocation Assistance Policy. For Projects Funded with MHDC, Non-Federal Dollars

The Dallas City Code ARTICLE XI. HISTORIC PRESERVATION TAX EXEMPTIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES.

City of Lithonia Housing Inventory

YORK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government. Historic Landmarks and Preservation Districts

Acquisition & Relocation CDBG/HOME Guidebook

HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

National Trust for Historic Preservation Collections Management Policy INTRODUCTION

Heritage Property Owner Information Package

Brainerd City Council Agenda Request

HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: MAY 10, 2018

FORT MYERS BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

Jim Tolbert, Director NDS; Patricia Carrington, NDS; Richard Hunt, NDS

STAFF REPORT NEW BEDFORD HISTORICAL COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 2017

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

SUBJECT Housing Policy Ordinances establishing Minimum Lease Terms and Relocation Assistance

Transcription:

Demolition & Moving CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICTS DESIGN GUIDELINES Approved by City Council, September 17, 2012 Demolition & Moving A. B. C. Introduction...5 Demolition of Historic Structures...6 Moving Historic Structures...7 CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES 1

Demolition & Moving 2 CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Demolition & Moving CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICTS DESIGN GUIDELINES Approved by City Council, September 17, 2012 Copyright 2005 City of Charlottesville and Frazier Associates. All rights reserved. No part of this book, including interior design, cover design, and icons, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES 3

Demolition & Moving 4 CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Demolition & Moving A. Introduction Historic buildings are irreplaceable community assets; and once they are gone, they are gone forever. With each successive demolition or removal, the integrity of a historic district is further eroded. Therefore, the demolition or moving of any contributing building in a historic district should be considered carefully. Charlottesville s Zoning Ordinance contains provisions that require the property owner to obtain approval prior to demolishing a contributing property in a historic district or an Individually Protected Property (IPP). The following review criteria should be used for IPP s and contributing buildings that are proposed for demolition or relocation. Plans to demolish or remove a protected property must be approved by the BAR or, on appeal, by the City Council after consultation with the BAR. Upon receipt of an application for demolition or removal of a structure, the BAR has 45 days to either approve or deny the request. If the request is denied and the owner appeals to the City Council, the Council can either approve or deny the request. If Council denies the request, the owner may appeal to the City Circuit Court. In addition to the right to appeal to City Council or the Circuit Court, there is a process that enables the owner to demolish the building or structure if certain conditions have been met. After the owner has appealed to City Council and has been denied, the owner may choose to make a bona fide offer to sell the building or structure and land. The property must be offered at a price reasonably related to the fair market value of the structure and land and must be made to the city or to any person or firm or agency that gives reasonable assurance that it is willing to preserve and restore the property. City Council must first confirm that the offering price is reasonably related to the fair market value. The time during which the offer to sell must remain open varies according to the price, as set out in the State Code and the Zoning Ordinance. If such a bona fide offer to sell is not accepted within the designated time period, the owner may renew the demolition request to City Council and will be entitled to a Certificate of Appropriateness that permits the demolition of the structure. PARTIAL DEMOLITION According to Section 34-277(a)(2) of Charlottesville s Zoning Ordinance: Where the moving, removing, encapsulation or demoltion of any contributing structure or property will disturb or affect fewer than twenty-five (25) square feet total, of exterior wall, roof or other exterior surfaces, such activity shall be deemed an alteration subject to the review processes set forth within Section 34-275. Cover photos of the former Monticello Bank at the northwest corner of Main and 4th streets courtesy of the Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society. CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES 5

Demolition & Moving B. Demolition of Historic Structures Review Criteria for Demolition 1. The standards established by the City Code, Section 34-278. 2. The public necessity of the proposed demolition 3. The public purpose or interest in land or buildings to be protected. 4. Whether or not a relocation of the structure would be a practical and preferable alternative to demolition. 5. Whether or not the proposed demolition would adversely or positively affect other historic buildings or the character of the historic district. 6. The reason for demolishing the structure and whether or not alternatives exist. 7. Whether or not there has been a professional economic and structural feasibility study for rehabilitating or reusing the structure and whether or not its findings support the proposed demolition. Guidelines for Demolition 1. Demolish a historic structure only after all preferable alternatives have been exhausted. 2. Document the building thoroughly through photographs and, for especially significant buildings, measured drawings according to Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) Standards. This information should be retained by the City of Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Development Services and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. 3. If the site is to remain vacant for any length of time, maintain the empty lot in a manner consistent with other open spaces in the districts. STANDARDS FOR CONSIDERING DEMOLITIONS AND MOVINGS According to City Code Section 34-278 the following factors shall be considered in determining whether or not to permit the moving, removing, encapsulation or demolition, in whole or in part, of a contributing structure of protected property: (a) The historic, architectural or cultural significance, if any, of the specific structure or property, including, without limitation: (1) The age of the structure of property; (2) Whether it has been designated a National Historic Landmark, listed on the National Register of Historic Places or listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register; (3) Whether, and to what extent, the building or structure is associated with a historic person, architect or master craftsmen, or with a historic event; (4) Whether the building or structure or any of its features, represent an infrequent or the first or last remaing example within the city of a particular architectural style or feature; (5) Whether the building or structure is of such old or distinctive design, texture or material that it could not be reproduced, or could be reproduced only with great difficulty; and (6) The degree to which distinguishing characteristics, qualities, features, or materials remain. (b) Whether, and to what extent, a contributing structure is linked, historically or aesthetically, to other buildings or structures within an existing major design control district, or is one of a group of properties within such a district whose concentration or continuity possesses greater significance than many of its component buildings. (c) The overall condition and structural integrity of the building or structure, as indicated by studies prepared by a qualified professional engineer and provided by the applicant or other information provided to the board. (d) Whether, and to what extent, the applicant proposes means, methods or plans for moving, removing, or demolishing the structure or property that preserves portions, features or materials that are significicant to the property s historic, architectural, or cultural value; and (e) Any applicable provisions of the city s Design Guidelines. 6 CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Demolition & Moving C. Moving Historic Structures Review Criteria for Moving Historic Buildings 1. The standards established by City Code, Section 34-278. 2. The public necessity of the proposed move. 3. The public purpose of interest in land or buildings to be protected. 4. The effect upon the existing character of the setting of the structure or area and its surroundings. 5. Whether or not the proposed relocation site would have a detrimental effect on the structural soundness of the building. 6. Whether or not the proposed relocation would have a negative or positive effect on other sites or structures within the historic district. 7. Whether or not the proposed relocation site would be compatible with the architectural aspects of the structure. 8. Whether or not the proposed relocation is the only practical means of saving the structure from demolition. 9. Whether or not the structure would remain protected. Guidelines for Moving Historic Buildings 1. Move buildings only after all alternatives to retention have been exhausted. 2. Contact the Virginia Department of Historic Resources first if the building is to remain listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic Places. 3. Seek assistance in documenting the building in its original site before undertaking the move. a. Photograph the building and the site thoroughly. b. Measure and document the existing conditions and building if the move will require substantial reconstruction. 4. Thoroughly assess the building s structural condition in order to minimize any damage that might occur during the move. 5. Select a contractor who has experience in moving buildings and check references. 6. Secure the structure from vandalism and potential weather damage before and after its move. 7. If the site is to remain vacant for any length of time, maintain the empty lot in a manner consistent with other open space in the district. 8. Whenever possible, move buildings intact. CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES 7

Demolition & Moving AVAILABLE GUIDELINES SECTIONS These entrance corridor design guidelines have been divided into the following sections so that you need only read those pertinent to your project. I. Introduction II. Site Design & Elements III. New Construction & Additions IV. Rehabilitation V. Signs, Awnings, Vending & Cafes VI. Public Improvements. Demolition & Moving Guideline sections are available from the Charlottesville Department of Neighborhood Services. Online they may be accessed through http://www. charlottesville.org at the Board of Architectural Review home page. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was developed for the City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review by Frazier Associates of Staunton, Virginia. City of Charlottesville Council Members David E. Brown, Mayor Kevin Lynch, Vice Mayor Blake Caravati Kendra Hamilton Rob Schilling City of Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review Members Joseph Atkins, Chair Fred Wolf, Vice Chair Preston Coiner Lynne Heetderks, former Vice Chair John Sydney Knight William Lucy Katie Swenson Wade Tremblay Amy Gardner Joan Fenton, former member and Chair Cheri Lewis, former member City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services Staff Jim Tolbert, AICP, Director Mary Joy Scala, Neighborhood Planner Jim Herndon, Neighborhood Planner Project Consultants Frazier Associates, Architects & Planners 213 North Augusta Street Staunton, Virginia 24401 (540) 886-6230 www.frazierassociates.com Copyright 2005 Frazier Associates and City of Charlottesville. All rights reserved. No part of this book including interior design, cover design, or icons, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publishers. This document may be reproduced or transmitted in whole or in use for matters and projects directly related to applications to and review by the City of Charlottesville s Board of Architectural Review and the staff of Neighborhood Development Services. 8 CHARLOTTESVILLE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES