Community Based Public Private Partnership (CBP3) Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives

Similar documents
2013 Wisconsin Real Estate and Economic Outlook Conference: City of Milwaukee Interventions in the Wake of Private Market Failures

Surface Water Management District. Summit County Engineer Alan Brubaker, P.E., P.S.

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and the Hurricane Katrina Relief Effort

Innovations in Solar Financing for Non-Profits and Affordable Housing CESA Workshop on Deploying Solar in Public and Affordable Housing

National Legislative Program Evaluation Society September 19, Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

DISABILITY HOUSING NETWORK LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENT

I. The Affordability Problem in Boston II. What is Affordable? III.Housing Costs IV.Housing Production V. What Can Public Policy Do? I.

City of Bellingham Redevelopment Incentive Recommendations at a Glance

CBRE INDUSTRIAL & LOGISTICS SPECIAL PROPERTIES GROUP

LPS Home Price Index Report: October Transactions U.S. Home Prices Up 0.3 Percent for the Month; Up 4.3 Percent Year-Over-Year

Introducing Transparency and Rationality into the Home Buying Process A RESNET Policy Proposal October 2013

Chapter 10: Implementation

Marshall & Ilsley Corporation Credit Quality 2007 Third Quarter

1SUPPORT TRANSPORTATION POLICY TO BUILD DIVERSE, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

Using Incentives to Promote Green Stormwater Practices. Ed MacMullan Senior Economist

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Bruce Katz, Director

City Council Committee Meeting

SPECIAL PROPERTIES GROUP INDUSTRIAL SERVICES

Housing Reset :: Creative Advisory Accelerating Non-Profit / City Partnerships What We Heard

Developing an Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit: Overcoming Barriers to Affordable Housing in Rural America

Results of the Sept Survey. Presented By Heidi Bonnaffon January 21, 2011

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 437

AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM AGRICULTURAL LAND EASEMENTS

March 25, Wet Weather Community Engagement Board of Directors Workshop. What are our requirements? 8/28/2015

RE: REALTORS Support Climate Goals; Oppose Energy Scoring at Time of Sale TISH

Introduc*on of the Team. Planning Considera*ons. Site Selec*on Considera*ons. Due Diligence Considera*ons. Next Steps and Ques*ons / Answers

Managing and Funding Local Government Stormwater Enterprises: Fee Options and Calculation Procedures. S. Wayne Miles, PE, DEE

Housing. Imagine a Winnipeg...: Alternative Winnipeg Municipal Budget

Halifax Water Rate Pricing and Stormwater Management Programs. March 4 th, 2013

Stormwater Finance Update

SPECIAL EDITION INNOVATION+CITIES THE HOME STRETCH 14

Community Investment Corporation. real returns

Commercial Real Estate Debt Finance This course is presented in London on: 26 February 2018, 29 November 2018

City of St. Petersburg, Florida Consolidated Plan. Priority Needs

Stormwater Finance: Trends and Emerging Issues

At Home in the Lake Region A Regional Housing Study

PROPOSED $100 MILLION FOR FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Models for Vacant Property Disposition and Community Stabilization

BUDGET PRESENTATION The Pennsylvania State University

Front Yard Residential Corporation Announces Transformative Acquisition and Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results

Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015

MOTION NO. M Roosevelt Station Central TOD Site Property Transaction Agreements PROPOSED ACTION

REALTOR.COM MARKET OUTLOOK

City of Southgate Shared Services Plan Increasing Governmental Efficiency Through Collaboration

Value-added P3 s: two case studies Long Beach Civic Center & Los Angeles Convention Center

CWSRF and Land Conservation Matt Zieper, Research Director Copyright 2006 The Trust for Public Land

Understanding the Economics & Financing Structures of Moderately Priced Life Plan Communities

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

4/18/2016. Preservation of Existing Affordable Housing Housing Summit Oklahoma City

Breaking Down Barriers: Exploring Program Models

Rail-Volution. Public-Private Partnership Overview

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY

Follow the Numbers: Why We Oppose the Inclusion of the Illiana Expressway in GO TO 2040 August 30, 2013

Financing Solar Projects for Public and Affordable Housing. February 15, 2018

PURPOSE OF STUDY. physical and social environments, as well as our political and economic institutions. As a commodity,

Understanding Texas TIRZ Statute Chapter 311 Texas Tax Code

Shaping Housing and Community Agendas

GPR STANDING ADVOCACY and PUBLIC POLICY POSITIONS

State Housing Trust Fund Revenues 2017

R E Q U E S T F O R P R O P O S A L S

Improvements to the Open Space Law: What You Need to Know

NINE FACTS NEW YORKERS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT RENT REGULATION

A National Housing Action Plan: Effective, Straightforward Policy Prescriptions to Reduce Core Housing Need

Public Service Commission

Presenter: Arch. Emma Miloyo President (Architectural Association of Kenya)

Kent Land Trust Strategic Reassessment Project Final Report

REQUIRED WITNESSES FOR A MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST

Conservation & Development Policies: The Plan for Connecticut

TOWNSHIP SERVICES POLICY PREPARED BY: ALAN BRUBAKER, P.E., P.S. SUMMIT COUNTY ENGINEER

Equitable Development Principles and Strategies

If you Build It, Will They Come? Presentation at ACEEE s Energy Efficiency Finance Forum May 23, 2017

Housing as a Business (HaaB)

Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing Preservation. March 1, 2018

B8 Can public sector land help solve the housing crisis?

Nova Scotia Community Lands Trust Discussion Paper. Approaches to Enable Community Participation In the Purchase of Land

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report

Phoenix, Central and Northern Arizona

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

HOUSING & RESIDENTIAL AREAS

Douja Promotion Groupe Addoha. An African leader of Real Estate Development

Founded 2000 Midwest LEED for Homes Provider 501(c)3 non profit; mission:

Scottish Election 2007 Summary of Party Manifestos. Scottish Labour Party Election Manifesto 2007

Housing is a key component in the history of community. Getting to Scale: The Need for a New Model in Housing and Community Development

The Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2016

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

City deals and affordable housing

Retail Installment Sales Act

ESTES VALLEY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

FAIRFAX COUNTY LUNCH + LEARN. Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing

EX16.4 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED. City-wide Real Estate Review SUMMARY. Date: June 13, Executive Committee. To: Peter Wallace, City Manager

NAHMA strongly agrees with the Physical Inspection Alignment Report statement:

ROLE OF SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT IN SOCIAL HOUSING. Section 26 of the Constitution enshrines the right to housing as follows:

The Market Value Analysis (MVA)

Affordable Housing Case Studies: Massachusetts & Maryland

FACTS MISUNDERSTANDINGS. HOC Staff Report: HOCs Support For Westbard Memorialization SUPPORT FOR MEMORIALIZATION.

Implementing the Housing Now Initiative

SOCIAL HOUSING THE WAY FORWARD

Transcription:

Community Based Public Private Partnership (CBP3) Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives

COMMON REASONS FOR PARTNERING Purpose Create long-term value by solving the essential problems you can t solve solely on your own. More efficient design, construct new (and/or upgrade existing) capital improvements by transferring risk (planning, design, construction cost, financing, certification, management and maintenance, etc.) to private sector Access new capital markets for non-essential project financing thus freeing credit capacity for essential programs. Save time & costs in project delivery Reduce outstanding debt burden by transferring debt obligations and performance accountability to private sector Tap scalable capacity, expertise, and resources offered by private sector Keep government staff focused on core mission while allowing private sector partner to concentrate their expertise in planning, procurement, project delivery, community outreach, and operations & maintenance Create greater connectivity and impact with the community. Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives March 22, 2017 2

COMMUNITY BASED PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Greater impact through private sector commitment, investment, and accountability CBP3 Improved transparency and confidence through Government oversight 3 Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives March 22, 2017

INVEST FOR LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY Benefit local economic development by creating a market place for a meaningful water quality impact. Aggregated vs. Piecemealed approach Integrated delivery methodology Local Economic Development/Job Creation Community Outreach/Educational programs Long-term reinvestment program Efficiency/Savings reinvested Compensation earned through performance and value creation Meet Regulatory Compliance requirements 4 Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives March 22, 2017

CRITICAL FACTORS Critical Factor for Government & Rating Agencies Reduction of Deferred Maintenance Government Control and Priorities Improving local business and private property owner engagement and capacity Risk Transfer Municipality Maintains Asset Ownership and easement controls. Affordability Partnership Solution Creation of a reinvestment reserve to fund an out-year development program through annual reserve deposits of savings. Gov t drives environmental priorities and approaches A holistic approach to infrastructure that allows an integrated, comprehensive plan and offers a consistent experience to community. Municipality does not provide financial support through subordinate expenses or guarantees etc. Title and certification of real assets stays with the Municipality and does not transfer to the SPE in a SCA and Municipality retains easement control and access through the SPE. Stormwater revenue setting and control process remains with the Municipality. 5 Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives March 22, 2017

CASE STUDY: PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY Provided a feasible master delivery plan and cost structure to retrofit and maintain 2,000 acres of long-term regulatory compliance The Clean Water Partnership has: - Reduced the overall cost of retrofits by 30% to 40% - Streamlined the procurement and delivery process - Exceeded socio-economic metrics - Positioned the County as regional stormwater management leader - Obtained innovative financing through a State Revolving Fund loan at 1.9% Nationally recognized community based infrastructure program by the White House CEQ and Environmental Protection Agency 6 Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives March 22, 2017

CREATING A MARKET PLACE FOR SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES 7 Great Lakes & St Lawrence Cities Initiatives March 22, 2017

March 23, 2017

Outline Evaluation of CBP3 enablers Storm water utilities P3 enabling legislations The new administration and its approach to P3s Green infrastructure and its benefits Large-scale versus small-scale Market drivers Market size A decision tree Some recommendations

Enacting a CBP3 How to Pay Return on Investment

As of 2015, there were over 1500 storm water utilities (SWU) in the country, with an average monthly fee for a single family home of $4.57 Smallest utility in the country is in Indian Creek village in Florida (population of 88, as of 2010) Largest utility in the country is for the city of Los Angeles (population of 3,000,000, as of 2010) Average SWU community population = 73,900 Median SWU community population = 19,200 Source: WKU 2016

MS4 communities: Ann Arbor Appleton Green Bay Kenosha Consortium of communities CSO communities: Toledo Fort Wayne Lima Cleveland Milwaukee

Enacting a CBP3 Your State Legislation

Source: AIAI (Association for the Improvement of American Infrastructure) 2017

STATE DESCRIPTION STATUTE Michigan Currently has enabling legislation for diverse public entities MCL 125.1871 Indiana Law is focused on public facilities that could be used if expanded definition of facilities is read Ind. Code Ann. 5-23- 1-1 - 5-23-7-2 Illinois Has many different P3 laws, but all are focused on transportation projects and in some cases, explicitly on a targeted project 605 ILCS 5/10-802 605 ILCS Ohio State DOT may enter into P3s, but legislation is transportation Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 5501.71 focused and not broadly applicable Wisconsin Law explicitly authorizes state DOT to enter into agreements Wis. Stat. Ann. 84.01 (30) Pennsylvania Law permits P3s for transportation projects in the commonwealth Pa. Cons. Stat. 74 9101 thru 9124 Minnesota Very narrow legislation focused on road authorities. Very stringent requirements on what can and cannot be built under the aegis of Minn. Stat. 160.84 thru 98 this legislation New York Currently no P3 legislation N/A

STATE VILLAGE TOWN CITY TOWNSHIP COUNTY Ohio Home Rule Home Rule Home Rule Home Rule if Home Rule if opted by the county (such adopted as Summit and Cuyahoga counties) Michigan Home Rule Home Rule Home Rule Dillon's Rule Home Rule if opted by the county (such as Macomb and Wayne counties) Indiana Home Rule Home Rule Home Rule Dillon's Rule Home Rule if opted by the county Illinois Any municipality with a population over 25,000 is automatically "Home Rule" Dillon s Rule Home Rule if adopted (such as Cook county) New York Home Rule Home Rule Home Rule Dillon's Rule Home Rule if opted by the county Pennsylvania Dillon's Rule Dillon's Rule Home Rule Home Rule Home Rule if opted by the county (such as Alleghany, Delaware, Erie, Lackawanna, Lehigh, Luzerne, and Northampton counties) Home Rule Dillon's Rule Home Rule if opted by the county Wisconsin Home Rule Dillon's Rule Minnesota Dillon s Rule Home Rule Home Rule Dillon's Rule Home Rule if opted by the county (such as Ramsey County)

New Administration and P3s

A trillion dollar plan 1:5 leverage Tax Credits ($167 billion) Lower required equity returns, making P3 more competitive Address viability gap for rural and poorer communities Accelerated delivery Streamline approval processes by reducing regulations Legislation for federal projects

Green Infrastructure Rain Gardens Trees Greenways, Park Space Bioswales Wetlands Native Green Roofs Landscaping or Soil Amendments Green Streets, Alleys, Parking Rainwater Catchment Porous Pavement

Benefits of Green Infrastructure Lower costs, higher savings Reduced water bills Stormwater fee credits and other financial incentives Reduced infrastructure costs Energy savings Reduced flooding costs Other social benefits Increased mental health and worker productivity Reduced crime Contribute to climate resiliency

United States Environmental Protection Agency Report to Congress on Implementation and Enforcement of the CSO Control Policy, January 29 2002

Number of MS4 Permitted Communities in Great Lakes Watersheds by State 240 223 200 160 Number of MS4 Permitted Communities 120 95 80 40 0 57 55 29 22 5 1 Michigan Ohio New York Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Minnesota Pennsylvania Great Lakes Information Network, Indiana State Map, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, New York Department of Environmental Conservation

New development is less than 1% of existing development Major initiatives: Philadelphia: 10,000 impervious acres to be retrofitted District of Columbia: 415 impervious acres to be retrofitted MS4 $100 Mil of GI in CSS areas CSO Prince George s County, MD: 8,000 impervious acres to be retrofitted MS4 Montgomery County, MD: 4,300 impervious acres to be retrofitted MS4

Is Green Infrastructure Cheaper?

(ASLA 2011)

MEASURE MILWAUKEE NEW YORK CITY PHILADELPHIA PORTLAND (OREGON) Stormwater volume detained 14.8 billion gallons annually 12.1 billion gallons annually 19.9 billion gallons annually 116 million gallons annually Scale of GI investment $1.3 billion $1.5 billion $1.2 billion committed (total anticipated $3 billion through the addition of leveraged activities) Total savings by the use of GI (dollars) $850 million (calculated from $2.15 billion cost of gray infrastructure) $9 million in GI (additional $48 over four years) $8.5 billion $5.6 billion over 25 years $224 million (maintenance and repair) Savings-to-cost ratio.65 5.67 3.35 3.92

Market Size of Investments in Green Infrastructure

Leadership Financial ability Enabling legislation Regulatory drivers Efficient and cheaper project delivery Performance-based risk transfer Situational constraints

In states of Ohio, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana: A third of utility revenues from the can support over a billion dollars investment > $50 Mil => $912 Million market Between $10 and $50 Mil => $225 Million market Caution - Market valuation models: future is the same as the past New York, Pennsylvania, and Michigan are at a significant disadvantage

Storm water utilities help P3 enabling legislations are very helpful New administration seems motivated to promote P3s Market size of GI investment in Great Lakes is pretty substantial Think of its impact on algal blooms Private finance will continue to emerge as a key way to fund water sector investment gap Large-scale aggregation has economies of scale and other benefits that are hard to ignore

Adoption of stormwater utilities Consistent P3 legislations across all states Provide guidance to USEPA for continued focus on green infrastructure Assessment of water infrastructure needs Consistent green infrastructure ordinances

ssinha@ectinc.com 734-769-3004