PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

Similar documents
PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord.

ARTICLE 770. PD 770. PD 770 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on October 24, (Ord.

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #2

ARTICLE 410. PD 410.

East Side Community Meeting

Incentive Zoning. City Plan Commission September 20, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

ARTICLE 504. PD 504.

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #3

Amendments to the Dallas Development Code Creating Regulations for Mixed Income Housing Development Bonuses

ARTICLE 44. PD 44. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District

ARTICLE 50. PD 50. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis July 16, 2018

ARTICLE 514. PD 514.

Division S-125. PD Subdistrict 125.

Development Plan DP13-3 (Arlington Lofts) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: Document Being Considered: Ordinance

ARTICLE 851. PD 851. PD 851 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 8, (Ord.

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Residence-3. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2/Patio Home. Residence-2

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

CHARLOTTE CODE. PART 1: PURPOSE AND PART 2: MIXED USE DISTRICTS (MX-1, MX-2, and MX-3) CHAPTER 11:

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

Single Family Residential

ARTICLE 67. PD 67. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

ARTICLE 408. PD 408.

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

ARTICLE 759. PD 759. PD 759 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 27, (Ord. Nos.

ARTICLE 849. PD 849. PD 849 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on May 25, (Ord. Nos.

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

Article Zoning District Regulations

CAN TRADITIONAL ZONING ACHIEVE OUR GOALS FOR DOWNTOWN ANN ARBOR?

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

SECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.

ARTICLE 563. PD 563.

ARTICLE 585. PD 585.

ARTICLE 260. PD 260.

ARTICLE 186. PD 186.

ARTICLE 426. PD 426.

Proposed Overland Park Kansas Ordinance RE-1 Residential Estates Community

Land Use and Zoning Changes for Land Development Code Update

ARTICLE 440. PD 440.

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Article 2. Rules of Interpretation

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

Division S-37. PD Subdistrict 37.

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

ARTICLE 455. PD 455. Bluffview Special Purpose District

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

ARTICLE 383. PD 383.

FOR SALE > MULTIFAMILY/COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

ARTICLE 435. PD 435.

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

CHAPTER 21.06: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENTS...2

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

ARTICLE 598. PD 598.

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

ARTICLE 878. PD 878.

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

ARTICLE 5. R-6 Residential- Duplex, Single Family Detached and Townhouse District

NORMAN, OKLAHOMA OWNER: RCB BANK APPLICATION FOR 2025 PLAN CHANGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT. 12 December 2011 Revised 5 January 2012

ARTICLE 184. PD 184.

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

ARTICLE 438. PD 438.

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

8.14 Single Detached with Granny Flat or Coach House Edgemere

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5

Multi-family dwellings (including assisted living facilities), Public buildings, facility or land; and,

TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM ORDINANCE NO

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE PETERS TOWNSHIP PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE, E. McMURRAY ROAD McMURRAY, PA 1531 (724)

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

CHARLOTTE CODE CHAPTER 9: GENERAL DISTRICTS PART 1: TABLE OF USES AND HIERARCHY OF DISTRICTS

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

DT Downtown. a) Intent. The "downtown (DT) district" is designed for the commercial core of Lake Worth, primarily along Lake and Lucerne Avenues from

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Sec Tier 2 principal uses and structures. The principal uses of land and structures allowed in Tier 2 are provided below subject to the

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

City Avenue District Rezoning. Regional Center Area & Bala Cynwyd Retail District December 14, 2011 Public Hearing

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut

Division 3: Zoning ( Zoning added by O N.S.; effective )

ARTICLE EUCLIDEAN ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS DIV RULES FOR ALL ZONES

Transcription:

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Community Meeting No. 2 February 19, 2019 6:30 p.m. Hyer Elementary School Cafetorium 8385 Durham St Andrew Ruegg Senior Planner

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing On September 7, 2017, the City Plan Commission initiated a zoning case on property zoned Planned Development District No. 15 to determine proper zoning for the area 2

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Area 3

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Area 4

Existing Conditions PD No. 15 5

PD No. 15 Background In 1947, the area was zoned a C-2 Commercial District which allowed multiple family uses and non-residential uses In March 1965 during the citywide rezoning process, the area became Planned Development District No. 15 for apartment development Zoning amendments to PD No. 15 in 1973, 1977, 1980 Minor amendment in 2010 Generally located on the north side of West Northwest Highway between Pickwick Lane and Baltimore Avenue Approximately 14.2 acres (12.6 acres developable) 6

PD No. 15 Existing Zoning Multiple Family-3 District (MF-3 CH. 51) uses allowed, plus allowable non-residential uses for the first and second floor of Preston Tower Development standards as shown on the development plan Density limited to the number of units for each tract shown on the development plan, up to a maximum density of 52.4 dwelling units per acre 7

PD No. 15 Existing Development Plan 8

PD No. 15 Determination Maximum Density Maximum number of units that can be constructed in the PD is 660 units at 52.4 dwelling units per acre across the ~12.6 developable acres Roughly equivalent to the original density from the proposed Tract 3 tower at 125 units (1973 amendment) Approved development plan allows for 594 units across the PD 66 additional dwelling units available to meet maximum dwelling unit cap (requires zoning change to add the additional 66 units to any property) 9

PD No. 15 Determination Maximum Density Zoning change is required to amend and increase density, height, or change the building footprint other than as shown on the approved development plan To request the additional 66 available units, a property would be required to submit a zoning change application, or To modify the existing density cap, all properties within the PD would be required to submit a joint zoning change application 10

Authorized Hearing Process 1. Zoning case authorized by City Plan Commission on September 7, 2017 2. Community meeting was held on April 26, 2018 3. A steering committee was appointed by Council Member Gates 4. Eleven steering committee meetings were held between June 28, 2018 and January 7, 2019 to review the current zoning of the area, the intent or direction of possible changes, and to develop proposed zoning amendments 5. Community meeting to present the proposed amendments 6. City Plan Commission holds a public hearing to determine whether to recommend the proposed changes to the City Council 7. City Council holds a public hearing and determines whether or not to approve the proposed zoning changes 11

Staff Recommendation Steering committee input Community input Developer input Area Plan Subject matter expert recommendations Best practice Appropriate zoning for the area 12

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Creation of Subareas Section 51P-15.105 Creation of Subareas (pg. 2) Create two subareas Subarea A Preston Tower tract Subarea B Remainder of PD Rationale: Preston Tower property will continue to be allowed permitted limited uses as referenced in the original PD. The remainder of the PD will be primarily limited to residential uses (Single family, Multifamily, Retirement housing) per the Area Plan and steering committee discussion. 13

Subarea A Subarea B 14

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Development Plan Section 51P-15.106 Development Plan (pg. 2) Development plan is required except for interior remodel of existing structure, sidewalk construction, and landscaping improvements Rationale: Development plan must be approved by CPC before building permit will be issued. Add certainty to plan for new development 15

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Main Uses Permitted Section 51P-15.107 Main Uses Permitted (pg. 2&3) Residential uses (single family, handicapped group dwelling unit, multifamily, and retirement housing) Church, local utilities, and mounted cellular antenna uses Rationale: Primarily residential uses per Area Plan and steering committee discussion. Standard uses for MF districts (local utilities and mounted antenna for cellular communication) 16

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Limited Uses Permitted in Subarea A Section 51P-15.108 Limited Uses Permitted in Subarea A (pg. 3) Allowed limited uses in Preston Tower from current ordinance Limited uses to be called forward from CH. 51 to CH. 51A Rationale: Continue to allow limited uses in Preston Tower only per steering committee discussion (office, laundry service, barber shop, etc.) Limited uses to be updated to CH. 51A zoning for consistency with conditions 17

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Accessory Uses Section 51P-15.109 Accessory Uses (pg. 3) Accessory uses permitted in any district in which the main use is permitted Certain accessory uses are not permitted (accessory waste incinerators, accessory outside storage, and accessory amateur communication tower) Rationale: Allow accessory uses which are consistent with the development code and other MF PD s 18

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Perimeter Setbacks Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 3 & 4) Minimum setback from NW Hwy is 70 Rationale: Currently Preston Tower and Athena have porticos in the front yard and Royal Orleans has their pool area with structures and walls in the front yard. There is no consistent front yard sight line at 100 Blocks to the east and west do not have consistent setback from NW Hwy 19

20

21

22

23

24

25

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Perimeter Setbacks Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 3 & 4) Minimum setback from Pickwick, Baltimore, and north alley is 20 Rationale: Steering committee discussion to ensure room for sidewalks. Maintain existing rear yard setback Ensure consistency throughout PD 26

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Interior Setbacks Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 4) Minimum setback from interior property line that runs east/west is 40 Minimum setback from interior property line that runs north/south is 20 Rationale: Steering committee discussion to ensure room for sidewalks. Ensure space for walkable pedestrian areas throughout the PD. 27

28

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Encroachments Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 4) Benches, street lamps, utility equipment, and landscaping items may be located in the required setback. Stoops, porches, retaining walls, ramps, handrails, etc. may extend five feet into required setback. Balconies, bay windows, awnings, signs may project five feet into required setback if located 12 feet above grade. Porticos may encroach 15 feet into required setback. Rationale: Standard language from other MF PD s for items that may encroach within the required setback. Existing porticos (Preston Tower/Athena) extend beyond build line from structure. 29

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Urban form setback Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 4) Additional 20 setback for the portion of the structure over 45 in height from NW Hwy and interior property line that runs east/west Rationale: To maintain and promote the pedestrian areas in the PD and concentrate height (if provided) to the center of the property. Most important on the main pedestrian thoroughfares: NW Hwy pedestrian area and interior east/west pedestrian areas. 30

Urban form setback example Setback + 20 Setback 31

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Tower spacing Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 4) Additional setback of one foot for each two feet in height for the portion of the structure over 45 in height from Pickwick, Baltimore, and interior property lines that run north/south, up to a total setback of 30 Rationale: To maintain and promote the pedestrian areas in the PD and concentrate height (if provided) to the center of the property. Standard language from development code and found in other MF PD s 32

Tower spacing example 33

Northwest Highway Section View Developable area facing north 34

Preston Place Section View Developable area facing east 35

Diplomat/Royal Orleans Section View Developable area facing east 36

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Base density Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 5) Maximum 90 dwelling units per acre Rationale: MF-3(A) base zoning district is maximum 90 du/a 37

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Open space density bonus Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 5) To obtain a density bonus of five additional dwelling units per acre, an additional five percent of the building site must be reserved as open space Rationale: Steering committee and community responses for the creation of pedestrian friendly areas/greenspace Greater density for more open space 38

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Mixed-income housing density bonus Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 5) To obtain a density bonus of 100 dwelling units per acre, 10 percent of the total residential units must be set aside for mixed-income housing in the specified income bands To obtain a density bonus of 120 dwelling units per acre, 15 percent of the total residential units must be set aside for mixed-income housing in the specified income bands Rationale: Base density at 90 du/a City receiving a benefit for increased density 39

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Combined density bonuses Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 5) Development bonuses can be used independently or be combined Rationale: Flexibility to achieve desired density provided the applicable incentives are met 40

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Floor area ratio Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 5) No maximum floor area ratio Rationale: Not typical for residential zoning 41

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Height Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 5 & 6) Max height for southern half of PD is 240 (20 stories) Max height for northern half of PD is 96 (8 stories) Elevator/mechanical and screening may project 6 above max structure height Parapet walls/guard rails may project 4 above max structure height Residential Proximity Slope applies (SF RPS & MF RPS) Rationale: Visually consistent with existing high-rise and mid-rise structures Consistent language for projections above max structure height 42

Developable area under RPS 43

Developable area under RPS 44

Developable area under RPS 45

Developable area under RPS 46

Northwest Highway Section View Developable area facing north 47

Preston Place Section View Developable area facing east 48

Diplomat/Royal Orleans Section View Developable area facing east 49

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Lot coverage Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 6) Southern half of PD: 65% lot coverage for structures less than or equal to 96 (8 stories) 55% lot coverage for structures 96-168 (8-14 stories) and must provide an additional 10% of open space 45% lot coverage for structures over 168 (14+ stories) and must provide an additional 20% of open space Northern half of PD: 65% lot coverage for structures less than or equal to 60 (5 stories) 55% lot coverage for structures over 60 (5+ stories) and must provide an additional 10% of open space 50

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Lot coverage Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 6) If a lot contains a structure that has increased height and decreased lot coverage, lot coverage for the entire building site is subject to the lowest of the lot coverage percentages used Aboveground parking structures are included in lot coverage, surface and underground parking is not Rationale: Area plan states increased height as a trade-off for reduced lot coverage Create additional open space from reduced lot coverage 51

65% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 52

65% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 53

65% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 54

65% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 55

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 56

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 57

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 58

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 59

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 60

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 61

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 62

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 63

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 64

55% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 65

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 66

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 67

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 68

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 69

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 1 70

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 71

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 72

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 73

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 74

45% Lot Coverage Example Scenario 2 75

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Lot size Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 7) Minimum lot size for single family and handicapped group dwelling unit use is 2,000 square feet No minimum lot size for all other uses Rationale: Not used in MF PD s Minimum lot size for single family and handicapped group dwelling unit per TH District regulations Base standards 76

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Stories Section 51P-15.110 Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations (pg. 7) No maximum number of stories above grade. Rationale: General agreement through steering committee discussion Maximum structure height regulations are more exact than number of stories 77

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Structured Parking Section 51P-15.111 Off-Street Parking and Loading (pg. 7) Parking must be located in aboveground or underground parking structure Aboveground parking structure must be screened or wrapped Single family and handicapped group dwelling unit required parking must be an enclosed parking garage Rationale: General agreement through steering committee discussion Area plan preference for underground parking 78

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Surface Parking Section 51P-15.111 Off-Street Parking and Loading (pg. 7) Surface parking cannot be used for required parking Excess surface parking is only allowed as parallel parking with minimum 4 wide bump outs along interior property lines that run east/west or within NW Hwy setback Rationale: Parallel parking to enhance pedestrian environment 79

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Service, loading, and garbage storage Section 51P-15.111 Off-Street Parking and Loading (pg. 7) Service, loading, and garbage storage areas must be enclosed within a main structure Rationale: Steering committee discussion for screened/enclosed Typical of modern MF developments 80

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Environmental Performance Standards Section 51P-15.112 Off-Street Parking and Loading (pg. 7) See Article VI. Rationale: Base standards Not typically associated with MF developments 81

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Article X Section 51P-15.113 Landscaping and Pedestrian Amenities (pg. 8) Landscaping must be provided in accordance with Article X Rationale: Base standards Requirements for site trees, planting area, and other landscaping items 82

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Pedestrian zones Section 51P-15.113 Landscaping and Pedestrian Amenities (pg. 8) Pedestrian zone for NW Hwy setback between 50 and 65 and all interior property lines that run east/west require: One medium or large tree per 30 along the setback One bench per 60 along the setback One pedestrian street lamp per 50 along the setback Rationale: Steering committee and community responses for the creation of pedestrian friendly areas/greenspace 83

84

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Northwest Highway landscape buffer Section 51P-15.113 Landscaping and Pedestrian Amenities (pg. 8) Minimum 10 wide landscape buffer with screening provided along NW Hwy frontage Plant screening requirements with existing or improved wall or fence Rationale: Article X street buffer zone requirements do not fit with existing configuration of access drive Create customized regulations to enhance existing screening along NW Hwy 85

86

87

88

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Signs Section 51P-15.114 Signs (pg. 8) Signs must comply with non-business zoning districts in Article VII. Rationale: Base standards 89

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Required Open Space Section 51P-15.115 Open Space (pg. 9) Minimum of five percent of building site must be reserved for open space Open space includes areas for recreation, groundwater recharge, landscaping, pedestrian amenities, etc. Must be located between the exterior structure facade and the property line Parking and areas primarily intended for vehicular use are not considered open space Rationale: Steering committee and community responses for the creation of pedestrian friendly areas/greenspace 90

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Sidewalks Section 51P-15.116 Sidewalks (pg. 9 & 10) Sidewalks with minimum average width of six feet along all street frontages and interior east/west setbacks except for the rear yard setback Sidewalks with a minimum width of four feet along all interior north/south setbacks Rationale: Steering committee and community responses for the creation of pedestrian friendly areas/greenspace 91

92

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Design Standards Section 51P-15.117 Design Standards (pg. 10 & 11) 30% ground story transparency and 20% upper-stories transparency required One pedestrian building entrance per 125 of building facade Maximum blank wall area is 30 feet Highly reflective glass is prohibited Non-required fences must be a minimum of 50 percent open allowing for visibility Rationale: MF development standards to ensure compatible development 93

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Street Frontages Section 51P-15.118 Street Frontages (pg. 11) Lots can front on dedicated street, private street, or access easement Rationale: Ensure proper regulations in place when properties redevelop and go through platting process 94

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Mixed-Income Housing Section 51P-15.119 Mixed-Income Housing (pg. 11-15) Developer must submit incentive zoning plan and affirmative fair housing marketing plan prior to the issuance of a building permit Rental affordability period is 15 years Annual report required Rationale: Standard requirements for MF PD s with mixed-income housing 95

PD No. 15 Staff Draft Conditions Additional Provisions & Compliance with Conditions Section 51P-15.120 & 15.121 Additional Provisions/Compliance with Conditions(pg. 15-16) Development and use of the Property must comply with all federal, state, and city ordinances, rules, and regulations Paved areas, drives, drainage structures must be constructed in accordance to standard city specifications Building office shall not issue a building permit to authorize work until there has been full compliance with this article, the Dallas Development Code, construction codes, and all other ordinances, rules, and regulations of the city Rationale: Standard requirements for all PD s 96

Next Steps and Timeline City Plan Commission Public Hearing (tentative date March 21, 2019) Reply forms Condo ownership reply forms Comments to CPC City Council Public Hearing 97

Questions? Andrew Ruegg Senior Planner andrew.ruegg@dallascityhall.com 214-671-7931 PD No. 15 Authorized Hearings webpage: https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/planning/pages /pdd15.aspx 98