Item No North West Community Council April 9, 2018

Similar documents
Item No Halifax and West Community Council July 10, 2018

Item No Halifax and West Community Council First Reading September 12, 2018 November 14, 2018

1.0 Introduction. November 9, 2017

Item No Halifax Regional Council August 15, 2017

Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council. Original Signed. . ~-----,--,----,,...--r

Item No Halifax Regional Council March 21, 2017

EXCERPTS FROM HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY CHARTER

Item No Halifax Regional Council June 5, 2018 July 31, 2018

Item No Halifax Regional Council June 5, 2018

Halifax Regional Council May 09, 2017

HALIFAX Item No. P.O. Box Halifax, Nova Scotia. 83J 3A5 Canada. Harbour East-Marine Drive Community Council.

Kelly Denty, Acting Director, Planning and Development. Case 19858: Development Agreement for 6345 Coburg Road, Halifax

Item No Halifax Regional Council October 29, 2013

PO Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada. Mayor Kelly and Members of Halifax Regional Council

Item No Halifax Regional Council February 21, 2012

Item No Halifax Regional Council August 2, 2016

Item No Harbour East Marine Drive Community Council July 5, 2018

Chair and Members of Halifax and West Community Council

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council December 2, 2014

Item No Harbour East - Marine Drive Community Council May 4, 2017

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council June 14, 2016

Item Public Hearing for Case 21618

Item No Halifax Regional Council August 15, 2017

HALIFMC. Item No P.O. Box Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada. Halifax Regional Council. July 21, 2015

Item No Harbour East -Marine Drive Community Council October 5, 2017 Notice of Motion given November 2, 2017 Public Hearing

Case Development Agreement: Inglis Street, Halifax. Halifax Peninsula Planning Advisory Committee

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax and West Community Council December 16, 2015

A BY-LAW RESPECTING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF LUNENBURG

RE: Application to Rezone the Lands of Bedford Bay Limited PID &

Item No Halifax and West Community Council First Reading August 7, 2018 September 12, 2018

Financial Impact Statement There are no immediate financial impacts associated with the adoption of this report.

Public Hearing Case #20936

Safe Waterfront Access, PID Council Report -2 - May 10, 2016 BACKGROUND

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council August 4, 2015

INSTRUCTIONS Grant of Easement Form

Item No Grants Committee April 9, 2018

H Al 111UA7 P.O. Box 1749

Item No Halifax Regional Council December 13, 2016

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

2866 & 2858 GOTTINGEN STREET AND 5518 MACARA STREET

Item No Harbour East and Marine Drive Community Council April 5, 2018 May 3, 2018

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION

PLACEMENT OF SECURITY HUTS ON CITY OWNED LAND

Municipality of Colchester. Subdivision Bylaw. March 31, Colchester

ITEM Appeals Standing Committee December 14, 2017

Community Facilities (CF) Zone Residential; community centre; post office; bed and breakfast

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

Chair and Members of Halifax and West Community Council. Original Signed SUBMITTED BY: Brad Anguish, Director of Community and Recreation Services

HAL F)O. Item No March 23, Original signed by Sheilagh Edmonds for. P.O. Box Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Ref. No Task 3. May 31, 2016

FOR SALE Gottingen Street, Halifax, NS & 2230 Maitland Street, Halifax, NS

Item No Halifax Regional Council January 30, 2018

1 Application Form 4

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NUMBER 50 RESPECTING THE DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY

Item No Harbour East Marine Drive Community Council November 2, 2017

COUNCIL REPORT. Executive Committee. Report No. PDS Date: July 26, 2017 File No: PRJ17-019

... '~i~... Comi:nJ{t$~'!d'f"{l~e Wh6Je,"M0ti0n 41 Meeting No. 11, 1993 Meeting No. 26, 1993

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, FROM: General Manager, Planning & Development FILE:

Chair and Members of Marine Drive, Valley and Canal Community Council. SUBMITTED BY: Brad Anguish, Director of Community & Recreation Services

ARTICLE III GENERAL PROCEDURES, MINOR PLANS AND FEE SCHEDULES

(1) the adoption of the following report (August 31, 2000) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services; and

P L A N N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N F O R M

REQUEST FOR DECISION Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999, Amendment Bylaw No

CITY CLERK. (City Council at its Special Meeting held on July 30, 31 and August 1, 2002, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

Development Approvals Process (Development Permits)

MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF PICTOU SUBDIVISION BY-LAW. Act means the Municipal Government Act, Stats. N.S., 1998, c. 18 and amendments thereto;

TOWN OF LERAY PLANNING BOARD Minor Subdivision Application Packet

STAFF REPORT. Financial Impact Statement There are no immediate financial impacts associated with the adoption of this report.

LAND USE PROCEDURES (LUP) BYLAW NO. 1235, 2007

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)

Site Development Proposal

CITY OF HAMILTON. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Economic Development Division

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRAMPTON BY-LAW. 'Number

M E M O R A N D U M. Origin

COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT. Chair and Members of the Committee of Adjustment

REPORT. Economic Development Committee. Tara Buonpensiero, Senior Planner - Policy

Richmond County Subdivision By-law

SUBDIVISION AND / OR LAND DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

The Chairman and Members of the Planning Committee. 189 Lisburn Street Rezoning (Glenn and Susan Field)

STAFF REPORT. September 25, City Council. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

ORDINANCE NO

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

APPLICATION TO REGISTER NOTICE OF AN AGREEMENT THE LAND TITLES ACT SECTION 74

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA

LOCATION: LUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:

BYRON TOWNSHIP ZONING APPLICATION

PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

DEED RESTRICTION AGREEMENT

SMOKY LAKE COUNTY. Alberta Provincial Statutes

APPROVAL REQUIRED... A5 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN... A6 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLAN... A7

Halifax Regional Council July 19, 2016 August 9, 2016

AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE

Item No Halifax Regional Council September 14, 2010

The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. Public Meeting - Section 34 Zoning By-law Amendment. Monday, January 8, 6:00pm

TO: CHAIR AND MEMBERS - PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE

NO: R172 COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, Locational Guidelines for Private Liquor Stores (Licensee Retail Stores)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Transcription:

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 13.1.3 North West Community Council April 9, 2018 TO: Chair and Members of North West Community Council Original Signed SUBMITTED BY: Kelly Denty, Acting Director, Planning and Development DATE: February 15, 2018 SUBJECT: Case 20975: Substantive Amendment to Development Agreement for 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford ORIGIN Application by Boris Holdings Incorporated. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Halifax Regional Municipality Charter (HRM Charter), Part VIII, Planning & Development. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that North West Community Council: 1. Give notice of motion to consider the proposed amending development agreement, as set out in Attachment A of this report, to install a ground sign on lands at 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford and schedule a public hearing; 2. Approve the proposed amending development agreement, which shall be substantially of the same form as set out in Attachment A of this report; and 3. Require the amending development agreement be signed by the property owner within 120 days, or any extension thereof granted by Council on request of the property owner, from the date of final approval by Council and any other bodies as necessary, including applicable appeal periods, whichever is later; otherwise this approval will be void and obligations arising hereunder shall be at an end.

Case 20975: Development Agreement Amendment 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford Community Council Report - 2 - April 9, 2018 BACKGROUND Boris Holdings Incorporated is applying to install a commercial ground sign on the lands at 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford. The existing development agreement, which governs the site, requires signage meet the provisions of the Bedford Land Use Bylaw (LUB). The signage requested by the applicant for their commercial tenants does not meet the requirements of the LUB. Subject Site Regional Plan Designation Bedford Land Use By-law Community Plan Designation (Map 1) Zoning (Map 2) Size of Site Street Frontage Current Land Use Surrounding Use 540 Southgate Drive at Larry Uteck Boulevard US (Urban Settlement) CMC (Mainstreet Commercial) Zone Bedford South Secondary Planning Strategy () under the Bedford Municipal Planning Strategy (Bedford South Commercial Development District) Zone 0.708 Hectares (1.75 Acres) Southgate Drive and Larry Uteck Boulevard Commercial Tenancy: restaurant, child care centre, and medical offices Commercial uses on Larry Uteck Boulevard, and low density residential along Southgate Drive. Proposal Details The applicant requested flexibility in the existing development agreement to install a monument type ground sign capable of reaching the market represented by the traffic volume on Larry Uteck Boulevard, while located on the site with a placement safe to driveway and intersection traffic patterns. The proposed amendments are considered substantive in accordance with Section 3.2 of the existing development agreement. The existing development agreement sets signage parameters using the Mainstreet Commercial Zone (CMC) of the Bedford Land Use Bylaw (LUB). The proposed sign is approximately 2.79 sq. m (30 sq. ft.) in total area and is to be constructed of non-wood materials. The proposed sign exceeds the maximum dimensions by 10 square feet per sign face and also does not meet the prescribed construction materials of the Bedford LUB which require signs to be constructed of wood or have a wood-like appearance. Therefore, an amendment is required to permit a ground sign on the subject site which does not meet these provisions of the LUB. Existing Development Agreement On September 18, 2006, Chebucto Community Council and North West Community Council approved development agreement 00624. This agreement allowed development in accordance with the following: Subdivision and development of the lands commonly known as Bedford South, with residential and commercial areas; Designation of a portion of the lands as Commercial Neighbourhoods including the (CMC) Mainstreet Commercial Zone; and The Bedford Land Use By-Law would prevail for signage on commercial properties affecting the subject site of this application within the CMC Zone; Enabling Bedford MPS Policy and LUB Context The Policy Review as Attachment B provides a comprehensive analysis of the planning rationale compared to relevant Bedford MPS and LUB policies.

Case 20975: Development Agreement Amendment 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford Community Council Report - 3 - April 9, 2018 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The level of community engagement on this file was consultation, achieved through providing information and seeking comments through the HRM website, signage posted on the subject site, a postcard mailed to property owners within the notification area and a public information meeting held on the 9th day of November, 2017 at 202 Innovation Drive Recreation Centre, Bedford. No members of the public attended. No comments were submitted to staff. Minutes were unnecessary. The public engagement process had twenty-seven recipients on the mailing list. The community engagement process is consistent with the intent of the HRM Community Engagement Strategy. A public hearing must be held by North West Community Council before they can consider approval of the proposed amending development agreement. Should Community Council decide to proceed with a public hearing on this application, in addition to the published newspaper advertisements, property owners within the notification area shown on Map 2 will be notified of the hearing by regular mail. DISCUSSION Policy Staff reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed amending development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies. Traffic An initial Traffic Impact Study (TIS) raised concerns with the original concept sign and its location on the subject site. However, the applicant modified their proposal both in site location and sign dimensions and submitted a revised TIS. Upon review of the revised submission, engineering staff concluded the redesign conformed to traffic engineering guidelines and that the sign is not expected to pose an impediment to driver sight lines and sight distances. Proposed Amending Development Agreement The prosed amendment is a single clause insertion permitting the sign, subject to maximum dimensions, and will refer to a schedule for site placement parameters. The amendment qualifies as substantive under Section 3.2 of the existing development agreement as signage is not an included item for non-substantive amendments. Please refer to Attachment A for the proposed amendment to the existing development agreement. North West Planning Advisory Committee On December 6, 2017, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved noting no conditions nor concerns. A report from the PAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover. Conclusion Staff reviewed the proposal in terms of all relevant policy criteria and advise that the proposal is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS and is a reasonable accommodation of design and placement improving tenant visibility along a commercial strip. Signage is permitted as-of-right on the property and the applicant`s monument ground sign proposal diverges modestly from the Bedford Land Use By-law, well within the discretion of an amendment to the existing development agreement. Therefore, staff recommend that the North West Community Council approve the proposed amendment to the existing development agreement as set out in Attachment A.

Case 20975: Development Agreement Amendment 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford Community Council Report - 4 - April 9, 2018 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no budget implications. The applicant will be responsible for all costs, expenses, liabilities and obligations imposed under or incurred in order to satisfy the terms of this proposed amending development agreement. The administration of the proposed amending development agreement can be carried out within the approved 2017/18 C310 Planning Applications budget and with existing resources. RISK CONSIDERATION There are no significant risks associated with the recommendations contained within this report. This application may be considered under existing MPS policies. Community Council has the discretion to make decisions that are consistent with the MPS, and such decisions may be appealed to the N.S. Utility and Review Board. Information concerning risks and other implications of adopting the proposed amending development agreement are contained within the Discussion section of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No environmental implications are identified. ALTERNATIVES 1. North West Community Council may choose to approve the proposed amending development agreement subject to modifications. Such modifications may require further negotiation with the applicant and may require a supplementary report or another public hearing. A decision of Council to approve this amending development agreement is appealable to the N.S. Utility & Review Board as per Section 262 of the HRM Charter. 2. North West Community Council may choose to refuse the proposed amending development agreement, and in doing so, must provide reasons why the proposed agreement does not reasonably carry out the intent of the MPS. A decision of Council to refuse the proposed amending development agreement is appealable to the N.S. Utility & Review Board as per Section 262 of the HRM Charter. ATTACHMENTS Map 1: Map 2: Attachment A: Attachment B: Generalized Future Land Use Zoning and Notification Area Proposed Amending Development Agreement & Schedules Review of Relevant MPS and LUB Policies A copy of this report can be obtained online at halifax.ca or by contacting the Office of the Municipal Clerk at 902.490.4210. Report Prepared by: T. Scott Low, Planner II, Current Planning, 902.490.6373

Case 20975: Development Agreement Amendment 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford Community Council Report - 5 - April 9, 2018 Original Signed Report Approved by: Maggie Holm, Principal Planner, Current Planning, 902.293-9496 Original Signed Report Approved by: Steve Higgins, Acting Manager, Current Planning, 902.476.8120

! Stockton Rg Windridge Lane Haystead Rg Thorndale Terr Ravines Dr Kingsbury Way Sedgewick Pl Southgate Dr ±!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Larry Uteck Blvd Bedford Plan Area Halifax Plan Area WSPS Map 1 - Generalized Future Land Use 540 Southgate Drive Bedford Subject Property Bedford Designations Bedford South Secondary Planning Strategy 0 40 80 120 m Bedford Plan Area Halifax Mainland Designations WSPS Wentworth Secondary Planning Strategy This map is an unofficial reproduction of a portion of the Generalized Future Land Use Map for the plan area indicated. The accuracy of any representation on this plan is not guaranteed. 13 October 2017 Case 20975 T:\work\planning\SER_Group\SER_CasesVariances\20975\Maps_Plans\ (AKT)

! 364 372 51 47 43 39 35 33 29 25 19 15 11 7 382 3 45 48 41 390 44 37 52 48 44 42 38 36 392 34 22 16 40 33 12 8 4 398 36 27 136 133 23 409 412 28 130 19 129 24 126 15 415 418 125 20 122 11 121 426 18 419 7 12 19 117 432 3 15 9 423 8 3 113 438 4 109 429 105 435 446 226 16 99 232 10 4 441 240 95 447 460 91 86 87 3 82 7 11 476 78 75 63 15 59 21 55 74 51 25 482 45 41 35 31 477 488 72 68 14 485 18 496 ± 64 60 22 56 26 52 48 44 40 36 34 30 491 500 497 506 505 511 128 517 132 129 Windridge Lane Sedgewick Pl Stockton Rg Southgate Dr Haystead Rg 535 507 26 20 14 10!!!!!!!!!!! 38 34 42 58 62 46 52 30!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 45 51 55 59 63 9 4 3 183 177 461 66 67 45 49 52 41 41 35 29 25 19 15 34 50 28 22 46 42 16 10 103 173 167 163 109 159 153 147 143 117 137 131 123 206 200 220 212 194 188 180 176 170 164 158 152 116 148 142 120 138 132 128 540 Larry Uteck Blvd Thorndale Terr Ravines Dr Bedford Land Use By-Law Area Halifax Mainland Land Use By-Law Area 405 421 420 Kingsbury Way WCDD 565 WCDD 500 Map 2 - Zoning and Notification 540 Southgate Drive Bedford Subject Property Area of Notification Bedford Land Use By-Law Area Bedford Zones Bedford South Comprehensive Development District Halifax Mainland Zones WCDD Wentworth Comprehensive Development District 0 40 80 120 m This map is an unofficial reproduction of a portion of the Zoning Map for the plan area indicated. The accuracy of any representation on this plan is not guaranteed. 13 October 2017 Case 20975 T:\work\planning\SER_Group\SER_CasesVariances\20975\Maps_Plans\ (AKT)

ATTACHMENT A Proposed Amending Development Agreement THIS SECOND AMENDING AGREEMENT made this [INSERT] day of [INSERT], 2018, BETWEEN: BORIS HOLDINGS INCORPORATED a body corporate, in the Province of Nova Scotia (hereinafter called the Developer ) OF THE FIRST PART - and - HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY a municipal body corporate, in the Province of Nova Scotia (hereinafter called the Municipality ) OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Developer is the registered owner of the subject lands known by the civic address of 540 Southgate Drive, Bedford, or PID 41278649 (more particularly described in Schedule A and hereinafter called the Lands ); AND WHEREAS Clayton Developments Limited conveyed interest in the Lands to the Developer on August, 30 2010; AND WHEREAS Clayton Developments Limited and the Municipality previously entered into an agreement to allow for development of the Lands commonly known as Bedford South Ravines, approved by the Chebucto Community and North West Community Council at a meeting held on September 18, 2006 (referenced by Original Municipal Case number 00624), being recorded at the Land Registry Office at Halifax on September 20, 2007 as Document 88868600 (hereinafter known as the Original Agreement ), and which does apply to the Lands; AND WHEREAS the North West Community Council of the Municipality approved on January 22, 2009 an amendment to the Original Agreement to allow for additional dwelling lots (referenced as Municipal Case Number 01223), filed at the Land Registry Office at Halifax on March 19, 2009 as Document Number 92987438 (hereinafter called the First Amending Agreement ), and which does not apply to the Lands; AND WHEREAS the Original Agreement and the First Amending Agreement together comprise the Existing Agreement (hereinafter called the Existing Agreement ); AND WHEREAS the Developer requested an amendment to the Existing Agreement allowing for installation of a commercial ground sign on the Lands pursuant to the provisions of the Halifax Regional Municipality Charter (S. 240), the Bedford Municipal Planning Strategy (Policy C-8, and Policy C-9), and the Bedford Land Use By-law (Part 4); AND WHEREAS the Halifax North West Community Council of the Municipality approved this request at a meeting held on [INSERT-Date], referenced as Municipal Case Number 20975; WITNESSETH THAT, in consideration of the benefits accrued to each party from the covenants

herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Except where specifically varied by this Second Amending Agreement, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Existing Agreement shall remain in effect. 2. The Developer agrees that the Lands shall be developed and used only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Second Amending Agreement and the Existing Agreement. 3. The Existing Agreement shall be amended (and a new Schedule simultaneously attached) by inserting a line in the Original Agreement under PART 2: USE OF LANDS AND DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS, 2.1.1 to read in bold as follows: Schedule C Ground Sign Site Plan (attached) 4. The Existing Agreement shall be amended by inserting a clause under PART 2: USE OF LANDS AND DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS, 2.2.7 Commercial Development to read in bold as follows, after sub-clause (k): (l) The developer shall be permitted to install a maximum 6 feet tall by 6 feet wide ground sign, of metal frame and backlit display, at civic address 540 Southgate Drive (PID 41278649), positioned on the Larry Uteck Boulevard street frontage of the lot, meeting sight line requirements approved by the Development Engineer, and site placement as specified in Schedule C. WITNESS that this Agreement, made in triplicate, was properly executed by the respective Parties on this day of, 20. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of: <INSERT REGISTERED OWNER NAME> Witness Per: Witness Per: ==================================== SEALED, DELIVERED AND ATTESTED to by the proper signing officers of Halifax Regional Municipality, duly authorized in that behalf, in the presence of: ================================== HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY Per: Mayor Per: Municipal Clerk

Schedule C - Ground Sign Site Plan Ground Sign Location

Attachment B: Review of Relevant MPS and LUB Policies Halifax MPS, Bedford South Secondary Planning Strategy Policy Policy MCP-1 The Community Concept Plan, presented as Schedule I, shall form the framework for land use allocation within the master plan area and all policies and actions taken by the Municipality shall conform with the intent of this plan. A comprehensive development district zone shall be applied to all lands within the master plan area and any development of the land shall be subject to approval of a development agreement. Comment The subject site is as within the Community Commercial/Institutional Designation. The signage proposal for 540 Southgate is appropriate to the character of the locality. The design is acceptable based on local context and similar signs at nearby commercial sites. Policy MCP-2 Unless otherwise specified by this secondary planning strategy, the standards for developments applied under the Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law shall be preferred under any development agreement application brought forward for approval. Under the Existing Development Agreement, the LUB standards and requirements for ground signs do not apply to the proposal. Signage request are instead subject to review by staff from Development, Engineering, Traffic Services, Development Officer, Civic Addressing and Fire Protective Services. Community Commercial/Institutional Designation Policy Policy CCI-1 A range of community commercial, institutional, and recreational uses may be permitted within the Community Commercial/Institutional Designation subject to consideration of the following matters: a) the windows, exterior features and materials and signs employed in any building create a sense of interest from public streets; Comment See below. The proposed ground sign, based on information as submitted, is a design response to the business s perceived lack of visibility for commercial tenants.

The revised sign, both lessened in height and width, is deemed acceptable and in character with the building and similar signs from other local businesses. b) the proposal conforms with all applicable provisions and requirements adopted under this Secondary Planning Strategy regarding environmental protection, the community transportation system and municipal services. Staff reviewed all provisions and requirements adopted under the and find the proposal, and signage in general, is not addressed in the environmental protection, community transportation system or municipal services policies. Bedford Land Use Bylaw: Part 14 Mainstreet Commercial (CMC) Zone Special Requirements: Signs - Ground Signs Ground signs shall not: a) exceed a height of eight feet; b) exceed an area of 20 sq. ft. per side; c) be within 2 feet of the street right-of-way; d) be within 10 feet of a side property line or driveway. The proposal exceeds the dimensions specified in the Bedford LUB. A substantive amendment to the existing DA is therefore required.