Prior approval for preparation of a descriptive plan is required s. 33(1) The Land Surveys Act, 2000.

Similar documents
Sections 8 and 10 of the Act and the Condominium Property Regulation (Alberta Regulations 168/2000), govern the preparation of a condominium plan.

WYANDOT COUNTY BASIC STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF REAL ESTATE DEED TRANSFERS & LAND CONTRACT AGREEMENTS

General Instructions For Surveys and Plans Outside the Provincial Survey System

The parties have agreed to continue the program for this fiscal year of 2012/2013 subject to modifications.

Requirements for All Instruments of Conveyance in Logan County, Ohio

Survey Manual Public Land Surveys

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

CFedS Outline Unit 1. Course 1: History, Records & Administrative Systems

REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INSTRUMENTS OF CONVEYANCE IN HARDIN COUNTY, OHIO

Hello Plat Review, I have a question.

Extension Numbers. What Is an Extension Number?

Greenfield Development Requirements

A lot line or terminology adjustment will be reviewed concurrently with any other development review application(s) that are required.

CHAPTER 4 FINAL PLAT

Guide to Minor Developments

BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION

SMOKY LAKE COUNTY. Alberta Provincial Statutes. To provide a process to close a Government Road Allowance, or cancel a surveyed Road Plan.

PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECK LIST

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

FINAL PLAN CHECKLIST

Instructions for Maps to Accompany Proof of Appropriation and Beneficial Use of Ground Water

CHAPTER FINAL AND PARCEL MAPS

SECTION 10 STANDARD PLATS

Street and Road Closures in Saskatchewan

STANDARDS GOVERNING CONVEYANCES OF REAL PROPERTY IN SENECA COUNTY OHIO

2018 EASEMENT DEDICATION PACKET

Minimum Requirements. In Carroll County, Ohio

RULES OF THE GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS CHAPTER APPLICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

PLANNING PROCEDURES AND FEES BYLAW

(10) The Board has the powers and duties of an arbitrator under sections 29(3) and 43 of the Arbitration Act.

Voluntary Merger. Updated March 13, 2017

ALBERTA LAND SURVEYORS ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION SPRING 2016 STATUTE LAW

Certified Survey Review Instructions

MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CLARE SUBDIVISION BY-LAW

Plat Reviews. Richard Powell, P.L.S.

Plats and subdivisions; mapping requirements. (a) Size Requirements. All land plats presented to the register of deeds for recording in the

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE APPLICATION FOR FAMILY DIVISION. Family Division = $742 (Provide 5 copies of plat)

PROVINCIAL SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. Municipal Government Act

CITY OF STRONGSVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION. PARCEL SPLIT and/or ADJOINMENTS

MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTYSURVEYORS MANUAL OF MINIMUM GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLATS

Ballard City Final Plat Check List

OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER Minimum Standards for Boundary Surveys in the State of Ohio

THE THREE MILE METHOD OF SURVEYING IN THE UTE MERIDIAN. Mesa County, Colorado

Guide to Preliminary Plans

Change In The Name Of Owner (s) Of Land.

Department of Development Services Engineering; Survey Plat Review Group SPRG

CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION GUIDE application for approval under Section 51 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990

To provide for the review of the final engineering plans, the subdivision improvement agreement, public dedications, and other legal agreements.

Standards of Practice for Surveying in the State of Alabama

Well Survey Requirements

Sale and Other Disposition of Land Policy

Gates County Planning and Zoning

PERPETUATION OF SURVEY MONUMENTS FOR ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

PRELMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST

May 2012 Professional (Cadastral) Examination

CITY OF SARALAND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW

Guide to Replats. Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8. Step 9. Step 10

Survey and Recording Requirements

PARCEL MAP CHECKLIST

Subdivision Application Package URBAN MUNICIPALITY

TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS POLICY FOR THE STOPPING UP, CLOSURE AND SALE OF ROADS POLICY STATEMENT

APPLICATION FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL (FINAL PLAT)

Staff Report. Planning Commission. Case: SDF July 17, 2017 Meeting Date: August 1, 2017 REQUEST: Final Plat, Prairie Dunes II

Enforcement of Minimum Survey Standards

Final Subdivision Plat

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE APPLICATION FOR RURAL SUBDIVISION

Residential Minor Subdivision Review Checklist

The Homesteads Act, 1989

Oakland County Michigan Register of Deeds Plat Engineering, GIS, & Remonumentation Dept. Ph: (248) Fax (248)

DAWSON COUNTY MINOR PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST $50.00 FEE PER PLAT REVIEW, $5.00 FEE FOR SCAN & CD FOR RECORDING

A Final Plat will be reviewed concurrently with any other development review application(s) that is required.

APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT

Richmond County Subdivision By-law

A. Appropriate agency responsible for transportation review for the subject property.

STONE COUNTY PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST. Note: Applications need to be in the office by 2 p.m. on the cutoff day.

CITY OF LANCASTER CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FINAL MAP SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FINAL MAP APPLICATION

MnDOT Contract No Exhibit B. Scope of Work. Scope of Work

STANDARDS GOVERNING CONVEYANCES OF REAL PROPERTY

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEES (Fish and Game Code 711.4)

PERMIT AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (PR)

Administrative Application Duplex Subdivisions

R/W PREQUALIFICATION ODOT, 3/14/2018

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The number indicates the number of copies for submittal (if applicable).

CITY OF EL CENTRO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

SUBJECT: CROWN RESERVED ROAD POLICY

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SURVEY SUBCOMMITTEE WHITE PAPER SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MAY 15, 2009

Rule 21 STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING

City of Fort Lupton Amended Plat Process

HERMISTON PLANNING COMMISSION. Regular Meeting May 10, 2017

2017_10_MIKES_SWEETMAN_OE_PC.PDF

Preliminary Subdivision Application (Minor) (Three (3) lots or less)

Residential Major Subdivision Review Checklist

Plan of Survey (Feature Plans)

WESTON COUNTY FINAL PLAT APPLICATION

Electronic Land Title Plan and Plan Application Requirements

Preliminary Subdivision Application (Major) (Four (4) lots or more)

Preliminary Plat/Final Plat Application

MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT

SUBDIVISION BY-LAW MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF INVERNESS

Robert Street Gateway, West St. Paul, Minnesota. A Premier Development Opportunity at the Gateway to West St. Paul and Dakota County

Transcription:

Number Owner Ministry of Justice - Controller of Surveys POLICY AND PROCEDURE Manual Surveys GO-05/002 Page 1 of 8 Last Revision May 24, 2018 Policy Name Using the Boundaries of Existing Plans to Create New Parcels or Features Effective Date February 28, 2005 Revised Date August 27, 2018 Policy Statement: The boundaries of an existing plan of survey may be used to define a new parcel or a feature as long as the resulting boundaries or limits can be defined on the ground with no ambiguities. An existing plan of survey may be active, inactive, abandoned, cancelled, etc. It must be approved for survey information and available through a plan search. It may be used regardless of its age, status or layer (surface, mineral, feature). A descriptive plan that uses the boundaries of an existing plan this way is allowed by the Controller of Surveys under s. 33 of The Land Surveys Act, 2000. Prior approval for preparation of a descriptive plan is required s. 33(1) The Land Surveys Act, 2000. This policy outlines when a type two descriptive plan ( DP2 ) may be accepted when boundaries from existing plans are used to create new parcel boundaries or feature limits. Purpose: This will allow a DP2 rather than a full plan of survey to be used to create a parcel or a feature if the boundaries or limits can be defined by an existing plan of survey and if a field survey is not required. The approval of a DP2 under this policy does not verify the boundaries of the parcel or the limits of a feature. Verifying the boundaries or the limits on the ground requires the services of a Saskatchewan Land Surveyor ( surveyor ). Scope: 1. A DP2 can be prepared by anyone and if no portion of the plan requires survey work. 2. The support documents required for a descriptive plan under this policy are the same as for a plan of survey except that a surveyor s certificate is not required. 3. If survey re-establishment of an existing boundary is needed, a surveyor must submit a plan of survey. A plan that combines both a plan of survey and a DP2 is also acceptable. Procedure: a) Prior approval for a DP2 under this policy will not be given if there is an existing inspection, survey or misclosure problem. The problem must be resolved at least to the extent that will allow the DP2 to proceed. For misclosure issues, see Policy GO-06/002 - Accuracy Standards Angular and Linear Closures to determine the accuracy factor to use.

Page 2 b) If a surveyor or survey firm prepares the DP2, it must be accompanied by a letter in which a surveyor states that the plan meets the appropriate standard for survey accuracy. Where the surveyor cannot run a closure as per Policy GO-06/002, the surveyor is to state in the letter the reason why (for example: lack of available plan information). c) Boundaries surveyed on previous plans of survey, as long as that plan is available through a plan search, regardless of its age or status, may be used to define new parcels or features. d) Natural boundaries may also be used, as long as they have been defined through remote sensing with ground truthing. A natural boundary that is already used as a boundary on an existing plan of survey does not need to be further re-defined or ground truthed. e) A DP2 under this policy may be approved where the new parcel boundary is defined by a quarter section line, section lines where there is no road allowance (blind lines) and un-posted limits of road allowances, roads and railways. f) The plan limit(s) being used to create the new parcel or feature must be labelled on the plan proper for clarity and not in the legend. For example, limit of plan AB123. Other limits from the existing plan may be labelled, but this is not required. See Example J in Schedule A. g) A road plan in an Indian Reserve, if the plan was filed but not titled, will not be accepted for creating road parcel(s) under this policy. In that situation, please refer to Policy GO-05/001 Re-approving Road Plans through Indian Reserves for Title Creation. See Schedule A for examples of type two descriptive plans (DP2s). NOTE: These are provided for illustrative purposes only and all plans must still receive prior approval. Approved By: Controller of Surveys Date: August 27, 2018

Page 3 SCHEDULE A Acceptable Descriptive Type II Plans Example A: Plan 102061426 is adapted to show Parcel A was created using the unmonumented northeasterly limit of abandoned railway plan BE2595. The source parcels are the NE 31 and SE 31. Example B: Limit of plan CX1921 Plan 102152911- Parcel M was created by subdividing the original road allowance and using the monumented and unmonumented limits of the railway plan CX1921.

Page 4 Example C: Limit of plan 63R01967 Plan 102076242 - The new Parcel C was created by subdividing the original road allowance and using the monumented limit of highway plan 63R01967. Example D: Plan 102180675 The plan subdivides a number of streets and lanes, creating Parcel B by using the monumented limit of plan 78Y02730.

Page 5 Example E: Limit of plan 88B08916 Plan 102189461 A railway right of way was subdivided, creating Parcel A for a highway by using the limits of plan 88B08916. Example F: Plan 102221862 Parcel D was created for a roadway by using the western limit of plan 76R22973.

Page 6 Example G: Parcel A is created by the production of the unposted limit of plan AB123 which subdivides the original road allowance. A type two descriptive plan (DP2) can also be used for the following: 1. to subdivide a road at a deflection on the bisector, 2. to subdivide a road or original road allowance at 90 degrees at an existing position, whether it is monumented or not. For examples, see Controller of Surveys Policy GO-05/004 Canceling Feature Plans. Example H: Plan 102274455 Parcel A was created using the limits of a filed or 103 plan. (This refers to a plan that was approved under section 103 of the former Land Titles Act but was not acted upon before that Act was repealed.)

Page 7 Example I: Plan 102160853 Parcel A was created by subdividing map sheet 73P07. One boundary is the bank of the Churchill River, obtained through using imagery. Ground truthing was required for the bank definition, using existing plans 87PA23863 and 69PA07967. Example J: Plan 102244070 - The plan subdivided consolidation plan 101836054 creating Lot 18, Block 1. The showing of copied distances is optional. The labelling of the limit of plan 87B10382 is required and the labelling of the limits of plan 85B18165 is optional. Example K:

Page 8 Plan 101943873 - The limits of right of way plan FR2899 are used to create separate right of ways for two transmission lines. The new individual right of ways each have a width of 9.906 m which are used to create the limit between the new features A and B. The widths of the new right of ways must total the width of the original right of way. Example L: A new feature is defined using the monumented limit of an existing feature plan for a right of way through the streets and lanes. The closure of the streets and lanes and consolidation with the lots back to the quarter section causes the existing feature to have gaps where the streets and lanes previously existed. A DP2 right of way remedies this situation. Showing the dashed streets and lanes would not be allowed on the feature plan and is shown here for illustration purposes only.