Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Similar documents
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

3. What is the requested zoning for the property (including intensity designator)? RM1-45 Residential (Multi-Dwelling).

LOCATION MAP: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, 2015:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

BOSSIER CITY PARISH METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION 620 Benton Rd. Bossier City, LA Phone: Fax: PRELIMINARY PLAT

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

WESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION

City of Tarpon Springs, Florida STAFF REPORT

TO: Glynn County Board of Commissioners. Eric Landon, Planner II. ZM2773 Peppertree Crossing Phase II

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

WESTMINSTER PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION

Report to the Plan Commission February 4, 2013

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

I. Requirements for All Applications. C D W

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Planning Commission Application Summary

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

ORDINANCE NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

HB-S RM8-S RS9 RM18 HB-S RS9 DOCKET #: W2872. PROPOSED ZONING: RM8-S (Child Day Care Center) EXISTING ZONING: RS9 and RM8-S

CITY OF BELLEVIEW PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report. 956 W. Chatham Street. Town Council Meeting January 9, 2014

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance shall not be construed as an admission that the aforesaid claim has merit or is correct; and

STAFF REPORT. Lee County School Board APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER DOCKET/CASE/APPLICATION NUMBER

City Council Agenda Item #13_ Meeting of March 6, 2017

Town of Holly Springs Town Council Meeting Agenda Cover Sheet

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

GENERAL PROVISIONS, DISTRICTS, AND DISTRICT MAPS

MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 9, 2016 REGULAR MEETING

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 13-REZ-13 An Zou Property Town Council Meeting November 21, 2013

Rapid City Planning Commission

WHEREAS, the Petition was filed by PATRICK AND KIMBERLY SHULER for the vacation of plat on property described herein; and

Planning Commission Application Summary

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: September 15, 2016

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/05/2014

CITY OF DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA. Zoning Map Change Report. RR Existing Zoning. Rural Rural Density Residential Site Characteristics

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO

/ Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report Jay Walker- All Terra Consulting - RZ

LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Request Conditional Rezoning (A-12 to Conditional R- 5S) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING

AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE THE ALDEN RIDGE PUD As Recommended to the Lowell Township Board by the Lowell Township Planning Commission January 11, 2016

RM18 RS9 RM12 RS9 !( S DOCKET #: W3120 PROPOSED ZONING: GB-L EXISTING ZONING: HB-S. PETITIONER: Bank of North Carolina for property owned by Same

Planning Commission Staff Report Final Plat Approval Administrative Hearing Date: June 5, 2013 ITEM 5 Dixon Neighborhood ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS

Planning Commission Agenda April 16, 2019

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Request Subdivision Variance (Sections 4.4 (b) & (d) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

42-Acre Parcel Rezoning and Master Plan Amendment. Danny Cagle and Patrick Stanley 6301 Duckweed Rd. Lake Worth, FL 33449

Urban Planning and Land Use

PLANNING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

Request Conditional Rezoning (AG-1 & AG-2 Agricultural to Conditional R-10 Residential) Staff Recommendation Deferral. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

1101 MAIN STREET ANDREWS NC PHONE FAX MAYOR NANCY J. CURTIS MEMORANDUM

August 10, Hotz Dr Fayetteville, AR Dear Ms. Smith

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS Staff Report May 16, 2017

PUD Ordinance - Cascade Lakes Plat #10 of 1995

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

COUNTY OF LINCOLN, NORTH CAROLINA

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 2017

Subject: Ordinance 1657, Annexation of 3.55 acres of land at 3015 and 3001 Parker Road.

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA:

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

Watertown City Council

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

SUBJECT PARCEL(S) Property Owner(s) TMS Number Approximate Acreage Carolina Park Development, LLC

Town of Waxhaw Board of Commissioners. Waxhaw Police Department Community Meeting Room Tuesday January 12, 2016

Add on item to regular section of agenda: FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program

URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES. July 9, 2018

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: December 6, 2018 RE:

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 1, 2018

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-5D Residential Duplex District and I-1 Light Industrial District to Conditional A-36 Apartment District)

Section Preliminary Plat Checklist and Application Forms

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

EDGERTON CITY HALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REGULAR SESSION March 12, 2019

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

Transcription:

City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form Jeremy Pate Submitted By 2016 0489 Legistar File ID 11/1/2016 City Council Meeting Date Agenda Item Only N/A for Non Agenda Item 10/14/2016 Submitted Date Action Recommendation: City Planning / Development Services Department Division / Department RZN 16 5588: Rezone (407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD./STRIKER DEVELOPMENT, 479): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD. The properties are zoned RSF 4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 3.65 acres. The request is to rezone the properties to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. Budget Impact: Account Number Fund Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item? NA Current Budget $ Funds Obligated $ Current Balance $ Does item have a cost? No Item Cost Budget Adjustment Attached? NA Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget $ Must Attach Completed Budget Adjustment! Previous Ordinance or Resolution # V20140710 Original Contract Number: Approval Date: Comments:

MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 2016 TO: THRU: FROM: Mayor, Fayetteville City Council Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Quin Thompson, Current Planner DATE: October 14, 2016 SUBJECT: RZN 16-5588: Rezone (407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD./STRIKER DEVELOPMENT, 479): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 3.65 acres. The request is to rezone the properties to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the recommend approval rezoning the property from RSF-4 to the NC zoning district as proposed according to exhibits A and B. BACKGROUND: The subject property contains portions of phase I and II-a of the large master-planned Mountain Ranch development and contains 3.65 acres. Mountain Ranch Phase I was approved in 2005 and contains 117 single-family lots. Phase II was approved in 2009, and contains 30 single-family lots, 3 multi-family lots, and 2 commercial out-lots. The subject rezone request will affect 5 of the single-family lots. Request The request is to rezone the property from RSF-4 to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. The applicant has indicated the rezoning is needed to allow for development of homes on smaller lots similar to the Park Hill at Mountain Ranch R-PZD adjacent to the north. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding mixture of residential uses. The immediate area contains a range of single-family and multi-family development types with low to moderate densities. The NC zone allows a density of 10 units per acre, which would provide an appropriate transition from the 24 units per acre allowed to the east, 6 units per acre single family to the north, and the 4 units per acre single-family to the west. Land Use Plan Analysis: The proposed zoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation of this site as a Residential Area, which anticipates a mixture of residential densities and units types in this area. DISCUSSION:

On the forwarded the applicant s request for a rezoning to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. A motion by Commissioner Hoffman to forward the proposal to the City Council with a recommendation for approval was made with a vote of 8-0-0. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Application Staff Report 2

!! Shared RZN 16-5588 Close Up View 16-5588 EXHIBIT 'A' STRIKER DEVELOPMENT N!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PERSIMMON ST RPZD MOUNTAIN VIEW DR BOWLING GREEN PL Subject Property PROVIDENCE DR RMF-24 CORAL CANYON LOOP PRIVATE 3341 MOUNTAIN RANCH BLVD PRIVATE 3301 RSF-4 R-A RSF-2 Legend Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Use Paved Trail Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 feet Residential-Agricultural RSF-2 RSF-4 RMF-24 Commercial, Industrial, Residential

16-5588 EXHIBIT 'B' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PARK HILL II @ MOUNTAIN RANCH) All of Lot 98 of Mountain Ranch Subdivision Phase I and all of Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Mountain Ranch Subdivision Phase II as per plat on file in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas and being described as follows: Beginning at the NW Corner of Lot 98, thence N61 15'54"E 79.47 feet, thence along a curve to the right 31.42 feet, said curve having a radius of 20.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of S73 44'06"E 28.28 feet, thence S29 12'25"E 143.70 feet, thence N61 21'48"E 23.37 feet, thence S51 14'06"E 55.32 feet, thence along a curve to the right 34.95 feet, said curve having a radius of 89.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of S39 59'06"E 34.73 feet, thence S28 44'06"E 11.62 feet; thence S28 44'06"E 53.39 feet, thence along a curve to the left 87.46 feet, said curve having a radius of 225.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of S39 52'17"E 86.92 feet, thence along a curve to the right 35.28 feet, said curve having a radius of 25.00 feet and a chord bearing and distance of S10 34'49"E 32.42 feet, thence along a curve to the right 57.47 feet feet, said curve having a radius of 475.00 feet feet and a chord bearing and distance of S33 18'47"W 57.43 feet, thence S36 46'45"W 31.76 feet, thence N53 13'15"W 336.97 feet, thence N61 21'48"E 60.65 feet, thence N28 44'06"W 163.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: Containing 1.35 acres more or less subject to easements and right of way of record.

ffi CITY OF PLANNING COMMISSION MTMO City of Fayetteville THRU: FROM: MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Quin Thompson, Current Planner October 10,2016 RZN 16-5588: Rezone (407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD./STRIKER DEVELOPMENT, 479): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, lnc. for properties at 407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 3.65 acres. The request is to rezone the properties to NC. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends foruvarding RZN 16-5588 to the City Council with a recommendation for approval of NC as proposed. BACKGROUND: The subject property contains portions of phase I and ll-a of the large master-planned Mountain Ranch development and contains 3.65 acres. Mountain Ranch Phase I was approved in 2005 and contained 117 single-family lots. Phase ll was approved in 2009, and contains 30 singlefamily lots, 3 multi-family lots, and 2 commercial out-lots. The subject rezone request will affect 5 of the songle-family lots. Surrounding land use and zoning is depicted on Table 1. Table 1 Land Use and Direction from Site Land Use Zoning North Single and Multi-family Residential R-PZD, Park Hillat Mountain Ranch South Single-family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-Family East Multi-familv Residential RMF-24. Residential Multi-familv West Sinqle-familv Residential RSF-4, Residential Sinqle-Family Requesf; The request is to rezone the property from RSF-4 to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. The applicant has indicated the rezoning is needed to allow for development of homes on smaller lots similar to the Park Hill at Mountain Ranch R-PZD adjacent to the north. Public Comment: Staff has not received public comment. INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: The subject parcel has access to Mountain Ranch Boulevard and Providence Drive, both fully improved with curb/gutter and storm drainage. Any street improvements (including sidewalk construction) would be determined at time of development. Mailing Address: 113 W Mountain Street Favetteville. AR727Ol wwwfayettevi lle-ar.gov Page 1 of 13

Water: Public water is available to the subject parcel. An 8" water main exists in the Mountain Ranch Boulevard right-of-way. Sewer: Public sewer is available to the subject parcel. An 8" sewer main exists in the Mountain Ranch Boulevard right-of-way. Drainage: Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage would be determined at time of development. No portion of this parcel lies within the FEMA designated 100-yr floodplain. No protected streams are present on these parcels. No portions of these parcels lie within the HHOD. Fire: Police: The Fire Department did not express any concerns with the request. The Police Department did not express any concerns with this request. CITY PLAN 2030 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates the properties within the proposed rezone as Residential Neighborhood Area. These areas are primarily residential in nature and support a variety of housing types of appropriate scale and context, including single family, multifamily and rowhouses. Residential Neighborhood encourages highly connected, compact blocks with gridded street patterns and reduced setbacks FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding mixture of residential uses. The immediate area contains a range of single-family and multi-family development types with low to moderate densities. The NG zone allows a density of 10 units per acre, which woufd provide an appropriate transition from the 24 units per acre allowed to the east, 6 units per acre single family to the north, and the 4 units per acre single-family to the west. Land Use PIan Analysis: The proposed zoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map, which anticipates a mixture of residential densities and units types in this area. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The applicant has requested the zoning change in order develop the property with a higher density of single-family residences. The proposed zoning districtwould beneficially increase residentialdensities above those allowed under the current four unit per acre limit. The City as a whole benefits from higher residential densities in areas with existing infrastructure such as the subject property. This allows a greater number of residents to share the same amount of Gity maintained infrastructure, such as water and sewer service and streets and sidewalks. G:\ETC\Development Services ReviewVOlG\Development Review\16-5588 RZN 407 N. Mtn. Ranch Blvd. (Striker Development) 479\03 \10-10-2016\Comments and Redlines Page 2 of 13

J. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: The site has access to Mountain Ranch Boulevard, a fully improved 'Collector' street. The rezone encourages development that would increase traffic on this property slightly, however, development of the area is not expected to have significant negative impact on safety and congestion in the area. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: Rezoning the property from RSF-4 to NG would more than double potential future population density, but should not undesirably affect load on public services. The Police and Fire Departments have expressed no objections to the proposal. 5. lf there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: Finding: N/A a, lt would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding RZN 16-5588 to the City Council with a recommendation for approval of NC as proposed. PLANNING COMMISSION AGTION: Required YES Date: October 10. 2016 D Tabled ff Forwarded f Denied Motion: Second: Vote: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES Date: November 1. 2016 fl Approved tr Denied G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2016\Development Review\16-5588 RZN 407 N. Mtn. Ranch Blvd. (Striker Development) 479\03 \10-10-2016\Comments and Redlines Page 3 of 13

BUDGET'STAFF IMPACT: None Attachments:. Unified Development Code sedions 161.07 & 161.27. Request letter. One Mile Map, Close-Up Map, Current Land Use Map, Future Land Use Map G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2016\Development Review\'16-5588 RZN 407 N. Mtn. Ranch Blvd. (Striker Development) 479\03 \1 0-10-2016\Comments and Redlines Page 4 of 13

161.07 - District RSF4, Residential Single-Family - Four (4) Units Per Acre (A) Purpose. The RSF-4 Residential District is designed to permit and encourage the development of low density detached dwellings in suitable environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types. (B) Uses. (1) Permifted Uses. Single-family dwellings (2) Conditional Uses. : Unit 2 I City-wiOe uses by conditional use permit i ;.i - - -"....". --.-.'-. : Unit 3 I Public.protection and utilityfacilities.l, Unit + Cuttural and recreational facilities I I _ unit 5 unit e I unit 12 unft2a J Unit 36 ] ' "_ "."_, ". _., "".. "...,, * t Government facilities Two-family dwellings Limited business Home occupations -s Wireless communications facilities I I i 1 i Unit 44 i Cottage Housing Development l (C) Density. Single-family Two (2) family (D) Bulk and Area Regulations. Lot minimum width Lot area minimum, Land area per dwelling unit i Single-family dwellings 70 feet 8,000 square i 12,000 square feet I feet Hillside Overlay District Lot minimum width ] i--*"------- **"'Y : Hillside Overlay ] 8,000 square 12,000 square District Lot feet i feet area minimum -'^t-'*"---- Land area per g**rs Ylt 8,000 square i 6,000 square I feet i feet I Page 5 of 13

(F) Building Height Regulations. Height Regulations. Structures in this Districl are limited to a building height of 45 feet. Existing struciures that exceed 45 fuet in height shall be grandfathered in, and not considered nonconforming uses. (G) Building Arca. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot. (Code 1991, $160.031;Ord. No.4100, S2 (Ex. A),6-16-98;Ord. No.4178,8-31-99;Ord. No.4858,4-18-06;Ord. No. 5028, 6-19-07: Ord. No. 5128, 4-1$08; Ord. No. 5224,3-3-09; Ord. No. 5312,4-20-10; Ord. No. 5462,12-6-'11) Page 6 of 13

' :l:o 1 'l 61.27 - Neighborhood Conservation (A) Purpose. The Neighborhood Conservation zone has the least activity and a lower density than the other zones. Although Neighborhood Conservation is the most purely residential zone, it can have some mix of uses, such as civic buildings. Neighborhood Conservation serves to promote and protect neighborhood character. For the purposes of Chapter 96: Noise Control, the Neighborhood Conservation district is a residential zone. (B) Uses. (1) Permifted Uses. Unit 1 Unit 8 Unit 41 (2) ConditionalUses. f"'*--"'-tr Unit 2 I City-wide uses by conditional use permit I -Yj[" -j* Public protection and"u-tility facilities i 1-9ylt'r3lsnd'""'"'19:1r"grf:-j t.-u. l,: -n- I ---Y: @-r ^-'tv" *Ilg:--j Unit to I rnree (3) family dwellings I ljnit 12 i Limited business* ] Home occupations,unit21,. Unit 25 I Offices. studios, and related services Unit 28 I Center for collecting recyclable materials :1 i Unit 36 I Wireless communication facilities Unit 44 j Cottage Housing Development I (c) (D) Density. Ten (10) Units PerAcre. Bulk and Area Regulations. (1) LotWidth Minimum. Single Family 40 feet I Two Family 80 feet Three Family 90 feet (2) Lot Area Minimum.4,000 square feet (E) Setback Regulations. Front Side r;: A build-to zone that is located between the front property line and a line 25 feet from the front propefi line. 5 feet 5 feet Page 7 of 13

Rear, from i center line of I *t- - 12feet an alley : (F) Building Height Regulations. Building Height Maximum j +S teet (Ord. No. 5128,4-15-08;Ord. No.5312,4-20-10;Ord. No.5462,12-6-11;Ord. No.5592,6-18-13;Ord. No.5664,2-18-14; Ord. No. 5800, $ 1(Exh. A), 10-6-15) Page 8 of 13

JORGENSEN +ASSOCIATES i vrl i:lg,nggr'.q ' :j:it\" 'rrfr! 124 W Sunbridge Drive, Suite 5 Fayetteville, AR 72703 Office: 479.442.9127 Fax: 479.582.4807 WrlJ,.lrgei"lSe'er!:i., il:-,:rl August 74,2OLG Cjty of Fayettwille 113 W Mountain Fayettevifle, AR 727Ot Att Planning DePt Re: Rezoning for Cobblestone Homes Attached ptease find information pertaining to a rezoning for four lots in Mounbin Ranch. These four lots face Mountain Ranch Apartments and the owner would like to rezone this from RSF 4 to Neighborhood Conservation- This woutd allow for single family houses to be built similar to those in Parkhill. There is a demand for this product. Water and sewer presently exists for this. Please review and contact me concerning any questions you may have- Thank you. Sincerely; (0 4: David L. Jorgensen, P.E. Page 9 of 13

Page 10 of 13

RZN 16-5588 Close Up View STRIKER DEVELOPMENT ^l' NORTH R I RSF-4 RSF-2 Legend j Ptannins Area l:: l: - j Fayetteville City Limits Shared Use Paved Trail Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 feet I Residential-Agricultural RSF.2 RSF.4 IRur-z+ I Commercial, tndustrial, Residential Page 11 of 13

Page 12 of 13

Page 13 of 13