City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Similar documents
City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, October 16, 2018

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet March 6, 2012

CITY OF RICHARDSON CITY PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2016 APPROVED

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, February 16, 2016

City of Richardson Zoning Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet August 16, 2017

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet July 19, 2011

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, September 6, 2016

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, November 7, 2017

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet June 7, 2011

CITY OF RICHARDSON CITY PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 2012

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Synergy Park Addition (Companion to item 3)

Also present were Bill Mann, Senior Planner and Senior Secretary Amber Lehman.

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

AGENDA BURLESON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION February 10, 2015 BURLESON CITY HALL 141 W. RENFRO BURLESON, TX 76028

ARTICLE 143. PD 143.

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA PACKET

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 20, :30 P.M. PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT:

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 757 North Galloway Avenue May 29, :00 P.M.

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: April 19, Item No. H-2. Mark Hafner, City Manager. Michele Berry, Planner II

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 26, 2016 Regular Meeting. 3. Adoption of the Agenda. 4. Visitors to Be Heard

Richardson s TOD Experience From ULI Panel Report to Breaking Ground. September 8, 2011

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, :00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL 2401 MARKET STREET, BAYTOWN, TEXAS AGENDA

MINUTES JOINT MEETING LINCOLN COUNTY and SIOUX FALLS PLANNING COMMISSIONS 7:00 pm August 10, 2011

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO. September 17, 2018

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REGULAR AGENDA

ATTACHMENT A REQUEST/BACKGROUND INFORMATION VENTURA/TYRONE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECT OVERVIEW/REQUEST BACKGROUND Ventura Boulevard

Report to the Plan Commission August 20, 2012

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA PACKET

Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION / BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA

ARTICLE 410. PD 410.

A i r l i n e R o a d, A r l i n g t o n, T N

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENID-GARFIELD COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

Development Plan DP13-3 (Arlington Lofts) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: Document Being Considered: Ordinance

Preliminary report for a mixed beverage late hours alcoholic beverage special use permit. Recommendation

AAAA. Planning and Zoning Staff Report Lake Shore Land Holdings, LLC CU-PH Analysis

AGENDA. 2. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: May 1, Item No. H-4. Steve Polasek, Interim City Manager. David Hawkins, Senior Planner

CLEARFIELD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND SUMMARY REPORT July 31, 2018 SPECIAL POLICY SESSION

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 7, 2016

AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 18, :00 PM City Council Chambers 125 East Avenue B, Hutchinson, Kansas

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

Marion Johnson with Design & Development Consultants. Divine Grace Church represented by Patricia Owusu-Sampah

CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS Development Services 1601 S. State Street Decatur, TX (940) voice (940) fax

Betty Jefferson, Vice Chairman Rick Keeler Bonney Ramsey Melissa Ballard Jim Phillips Erik Barnard

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 24, 2018 Special Joint Meeting with Clay County Planning Commission. 3. Adoption of the Agenda

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

MINUTES. May 1, Chairman Smith called the City Plan Commission Meeting to order at 7 p.m.in the City Council Chambers.

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENID-GARFIELD COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes

CITY OF MURFREESBORO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS

Planning Commission Hearing Minutes August 8, 2016

CITY OF ALBERT LEA PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD

EDMOND PLANNING COMMISSION 20 S. Littler, Edmond, Oklahoma Tuesday, May 6, :30 p.m.

AGENDA ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT August 10, :00 pm BURLESON CITY HALL 141 W. RENFRO BURLESON, TX 76028

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: April 9, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Scott Bradburn, Planner I

City of Colleyville City Council Agenda Briefing

HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD BOARD AGENDA

CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 8. 20,000 sf 30,000 sf 100,000 sf (with approval by Special Use Permit according to Sec

ARTICLE 214. PD 214.

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PRE-MEETING CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 757 North Galloway Avenue October 9, :30 P.M. Pre-Meeting Agenda

Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 19, :30 P.M. PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBERS PRESENT Chair Derek Martin COMMISSIONERS:

CITY OF CEDAR HILL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PANEL A PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DALLAS CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2017

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 757 North Galloway Avenue April 26, :30 P.M. AGENDA

MINUTES OF THE LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION June 18, 2018 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Tyler Klatt, Ron Albers, Darrel Sogn,

MINUTES MANHATTAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS City Commission Room, City Hall 1101 Poyntz Avenue Wednesday, July 9, :00 PM

Planning Commission 16 February 4, 2014 EDMOND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Tuesday, February 4, 2014

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. May 29, 2018 Regular Meeting. 3. Adoption of the Agenda. 4. Visitors to Be Heard

Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission

City of Sachse, Texas Page 1

CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012

Town of Waxhaw Board of Commissioners. Waxhaw Police Department Community Meeting Room Tuesday January 12, 2016

Evolution of the Vision for NE 181st Street Study Area

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

July 18, 2017 Planning & Zoning Meeting 6:30 p.m.

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS (ZBOA) MEETING AGENDA

DEWITT CHARTER TOWNSHIP 1401 W. HERBISON ROAD, DeWITT, MI PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, APRIL 7, 2008

PLANNING COMMISSION Thursday, September 5, :00 p.m. Council Chambers, Administration Building 100 Ribaut Road, Beaufort, South Carolina

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF. May 08, Staff members present: Jim Hewitt, Ginny Owens, David Mahoney

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Single-family or Two-Family Residential Properties (No Subdivision or Site Plan Application)

PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT Fax

HARRIS TOWNSHIP Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 19, 2016

Transcription:

City of Richardson City Plan Commission Agenda Packet Tuesday, December 20, 2016 To advance to the background material for each item in the agenda, click on the item title in the agenda or click on Bookmarks in the tool bar on the left side of your screen.

AGENDA CITY OF RICHARDSON - CITY PLAN COMMISSION DECEMBER 20, 2016, 7:00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 411 W. ARAPAHO ROAD BRIEFING SESSION: 6:00 P.M. Prior to the regular business meeting, the City Plan Commission will meet with staff in the East Conference Room located on the first floor to receive a briefing on: A. Discussion of Regular Agenda items B. Staff Report on pending development, zoning permits, and planning matters. REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING: 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES 1. Approval of minutes of the regular business meeting of December 6, 2016. CONSENT ITEMS All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Plan Commission and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless desired, in which case any item(s) may be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate consideration. 2. Site and Landscape Plans Aldi Food Market: A request for approval of revised site and landscape plans for the construction of a 1,700-square foot building addition to the south side of the existing grocery store. The 2.20-acre site is located at 1549 E. Belt Line Road, on the north side of Belt Line Road, east of Plano Road. Applicant: Bryan M. Burger, Burger Engineering, LLC, representing Aldi (Texas), LLC. Staff: Mohamed Bireima. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Replat Floyd Terrace Addition: Consider and take the necessary action on a request for approval of a replat to subdivide Lots 12 and 13, Block 7, of the Floyd Terrace Addition into four (4) single-family lots. The 1.09-acre site is located at 1016 and 1018 N. Lindale Lane at the southeast corner of Lindale Lane and Arapaho Road. Applicant: Tom Chawana, Going Forward Inc., representing Jesse C. Wallace, Jr. Staff: Chris Shacklett. 4. Zoning File 16-28 Main Street: Consider and take the necessary action on a request for approval of a Special Development Plan for a 14.5-acre tract of land to allow for a mixed-use development and a Special Permit for a drive-through bank on 3.05 acres of land within the 14.5-acre tract of land located between Central Expressway and N. Interurban Street, and W. Main Street and Greer Street. The property is currently zoned PD Planned Development Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Central Place Sub-District). Applicant: John Kirk, Embry Partners, Ltd. Staff: Sam Chavez. ADJOURN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD AT CITY HALL ON OR BEFORE 5:30 P.M., FRIDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2016. KATHY WELP, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ACCOMMODATION REQUESTS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SHOULD BE MADE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING BY CONTACTING TAYLOR LOUGH, ADA COORDINATOR, VIA PHONE AT 972 744-4208, VIA EMAIL AT ADACOORDINATOR@COR.GOV, OR BY APPOINTMENT AT 411 W. ARAPAHO ROAD, RICHARDSON, TEXAS 75080. PURSUANT TO SECTION 30.06 PENAL CODE (TRESPASS BY HOLDER WITH A CONCEALED HANDGUN), A PERSON LICENSED UNDER SUBCHAPTER H, CHAPTER 411, GOVERNMENT CODE (HANDGUN LICENSING LAW), MAY NOT ENTER THIS PROPERTY WITH A CONCEALED HANDGUN. PURSUANT TO SECTION 30.07 PENAL CODE (TRESPASS BY HOLDER WITH AN OPENLY CARRIED HANDGUN), A PERSON LICENSED UNDER SUBCHAPTER H, CHAPTER 411, GOVERNMENT CODE (HANDGUN LICENSING LAW), MAY NOT ENTER THIS PROPERTY WITH A HANDGUN THAT IS CARRIED OPENLY. ds/endeavor/cpc/2016/cpc 2016-12-20 Agenda.doc Page 1 of 1

Briefing Session B Development Status Report & Map City of Richardson, Texas City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 Meeting Packet

Development Status Report City of Richardson, Texas ٠ Development Services Department Updated: December 16, 2016 # Name/Location Project Information Status ZONING/SPECIAL PERMIT 1 Jasmine Hill NW of Abrams Rd. & Buckingham Rd. 2 Shamm Mediterranean Cuisine 310 E. Main St. 3 Great Room Escape 100 S. Central Expy. 4 Main Street NE of Central Expy. & Main St. Zoning File 16-25: A request for a change in zoning from R-1250-M Residential to PD Planned Development for the RP-1500-M Patio Home District with modified development standards to accommodate a 35-lot single-family patio home development on approximately 5.43 acres to be located at the northwest corner of Abrams Road and Buckingham Road. The property is currently zoned R-1250-M Residential. Applicant: Abrams Developers, LLC. Staff: Sam Chavez. Zoning File 16-26: A request for approval of a Special Permit for a smoking establishment located at 310 E. Main Street, east of S. Greenville Avenue, on the south side of E. Main Street. The property is currently zoned PD Planned Development for the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Main Street Subdistrict). Applicant: Nedal Naser, Shamm Mediterranean Cuisine. Staff: Amy Mathews. Zoning File 16-27: A request for approval of a Special Permit for an approximate 6,000-square foot indoor commercial amusement center located within the Richardson Heights Village Shopping Center at the southwest intersection of Belt Line Road and Central Expressway. The property is currently zoned PD Planned Development for the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Central Place Sub-district). Applicant: Greg Salyers, Great Room Escape, LLC. Staff: Amy Mathews. Zoning File 16-28: A request for approval of a Special Development Plan for a 14.5-acre tract of land to allow for a mixed-use development and a Special Permit for drive-through service for Chase Bank on 3.05 acres of land within the 14.5-acre tract of land located between Central Expressway and N. Interurban Street and W. Main Street and Greer Street. The property is currently zoned PD Planned Development for the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Central Place Sub-district). Applicant: Embrey Partners, Ltd. and Fobare Commercial, LP. Staff: Sam Chavez. City Plan Commission November 15, 2016 Recommended Approval City Council December 12, 2016 Rescheduled to the January 23, 2017 City Council Meeting City Plan Commission December 6, 2016 Recommended Approval City Council January 23, 2017 Tentative City Plan Commission December 6, 2016 Recommended Approval City Council January 23, 2017 Tentative City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 X:\Publications and Forms\Development Status Report & Map\COR Development Status Report.docx Page 1 of 3

Development Status Report City of Richardson, Texas ٠ Development Services Department # Name/Location Project Information Status ZONING/SPECIAL PERMIT (CONT D) 5 Fadi s Mediterranean Grill 1601 N. Central Expy. 6 Massage Establishment 2050 N. Collins Blvd. VARIANCE Zoning File 16-29: A request for approval of a Special Permit for a smoking establishment located at 1601 N. Central Expressway, on the west side of Central Expressway, north of Collins Boulevard. The property is currently zoned C-M Commercial. Applicant: Chadi Merched representing Fadi s Mediterranean Grill. Staff: Amy Mathews. Zoning File 16-30: A request for approval of a Special Permit for a massage establishment to be located at 2050 N. Collins Boulevard on the south/east side of Collins Boulevard, north of Campbell Road. The property is currently zoned C-M Commercial. Applicant: Li Kao. Staff: Amy Mathews. No recent Variance applications. City Plan Commission January 3, 2017 Tentative City Plan Commission January 3, 2017 Tentative PLAT/CONCEPT PLAN/DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 Routh Creek Addition NE of Routh Creek Pkwy. & Glenville Dr. 8 Aldi Food Market 1549 E. Belt Line Rd. 9 Floyd Terrace Addition SE of Arapaho Rd. & Lindale Ln. Final Plat: A request for approval of a final plat for Lot 2, Block C of the Routh Creek Addition to create a 6.28-acre lot located at 2810 Routh Creek Parkway, on the east side of Routh Creek Parkway, approximately 900 feet north of Glenville Drive. Applicant: Joseph Hornisher, Kimley-Horn, representing JRG LHC, LLC. Staff: Chris Shacklett. Site and Landscape Plans: A request for approval of revised site and landscape plans for the construction of a 1,700-square foot building addition to the south side of the existing grocery store. The 2.20-acre site is located at 1549 E. Belt Line Road, on the north side of Belt Line Road, east of Plano Road. Applicant: Bryan M. Burger, Burger Engineering, LLC, representing Aldi (Texas), LLC. Staff: Mohamed Bireima. Replat: A request for approval of a replat to subdivide Lots 12 and 13, Block 7, of the Floyd Terrace Addition into four (4) single-family lots. The 1.09-acre site is located at 1016 and 1018 N. Lindale Lane at the southeast corner of Lindale Lane and Arapaho Road. Applicant: Tom Chawana, Going Forward Inc., representing Jesse C. Wallace, Jr. Staff: Chris Shacklett. City Plan Commission December 6, 2016 Approved City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 X:\Publications and Forms\Development Status Report & Map\COR Development Status Report.docx Page 2 of 3

Development Status Report City of Richardson, Texas ٠ Development Services Department # Name/Location Project Information Status ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL 10 Telecom Park 2703 Telecom Pkwy. Site Plan and Landscape Plan: Revised the site and landscape plans to reflect the installation of ten (10) parking spaces near the southwest corner of the property. Staff: Mohamed Bireima. Staff December 18, 2016 Approved Approval Memo & Plans X:\Publications and Forms\Development Status Report & Map\COR Development Status Report.docx Page 3 of 3

Coit Dublin Cottonwood Custer Grove Waterview West Shore Floyd Lindale Audelia Whitehall Plano Yale Collins Alma Bowser Jupiter Jupiter Shiloh Murphy PLANO Collin County Dallas County DALLAS Mimosa Frankford Lake Park Jonsson Waterfall Melrose Northlake Campbell Belt Line Dumont Spring Valley Waterview Synergy Park University Newberry TI Weathered President George Bush Turnpike Point North Canyon Creek 9 Sherman Greenside 3 US75 / Central Expressway 4 Abrams Interurban Greenville 1 Richardson Municipal Renner Fall Creek 2 Main Lookout Dorothy Polk Prairie Creek Apollo Spring Valley Richland Park 6 5 Buckingham Alma Woodall DALLAS Palisades Creek Lakeside Frances Galatyn Arapaho Centennial College Park 7 Routh Creek ² Undeveloped Glenville CityLine Owens Lookout Owens Collins Apollo 8 Spring-Valley Buckingham Wyndham Lookout Belt Line North Spring GARLAND Land (Approx. 4.5%) Clear Springs Renner Breckinridge Research 10 Telecom Greenfield Sharp Summerfield Holford GARLAND Beck North Star Moroney Brand Hartford Carrington Coventry Zoning/Special Permit 1. Jasm ine Hil,NW ofabram s Rd.&Buck ingh am Rd.(ZF16-25) 2. S h am m Me d ite rrane an Cuisine,310E.Main S t.(zf16-26) 3. Gre atroom Escape,100S.Ce ntralexpy.(zf16-27) 4. Main S tre e t,neofce ntralexpy.&main S t.(zf16-28) 5. Fad i s Me d ite rrane an Gri l,1601n.ce ntralexpy.(zf16-29) 6. Massage Establish m e nt,2050n.co lins Blvd.(ZF16-30) Variance No re ce ntvariance applications. MURPHY Plat/Concept Plan/Development Plan 7. Routh Cre e k Ad d ition,neofrouth Cre e k Pk w y.&gle nvile Dr. 8. Ald i Food Mark e t,1549e.be ltline Rd. 9. Floyd Te rrace Ad d ition,s EofArapah o Rd.&Lind ale Ln. Administrative Approval 10.Te le com Park,2703Te le com Pk w y. Development Status Map City of Richardson, Texas Updated: December 16, 2016 1 0.5 0 1 2 Mile s

Agenda Item 1 Approval of the Minutes of the December 6, 2016 City Plan Commission Meeting City of Richardson, Texas City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 Meeting Packet

CITY OF RICHARDSON CITY PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2016 The Richardson City Plan Commission met on December 6, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the Council Chambers, 411 W. Arapaho Road, Richardson, Texas. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gerald Bright, Chairman Ron Taylor, Vice Chair DRAFT Janet DePuy, Commissioner Bill Ferrell, Commissioner Tom Maxwell, Commissioner Randy Roland, Commissioner Stephen Springs, Alternate MEMBERS ABSENT: Marilyn Frederick, Commissioner Ken Southard, Alternate CITY STAFF PRESENT: Sam Chavez, Assistant Director Dev. Svcs. Planning Chris Shacklett, Sr. Planner Amy Mathews, Sr. Planner Kathy Welp, Executive Secretary BRIEFING SESSION Prior to the start of the regular business meeting, the City Plan Commission met with staff regarding staff reports, agenda items and rezoning initiatives. No action was taken. REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES 1. Approval of minutes of the regular business meeting of November 15, 2016. Motion: Vice Chair Taylor made a motion to approve the minutes as presented; second by Commissioner Maxwell. Motion approved 7-0. CONSENT ITEM All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Plan Commission and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless desired, in which case any item(s) may be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate consideration. 2. Final Plat Routh Creek Addition: A request for approval of a final plat for Lot 1, Block A of the Routh Creek Addition to create a 6.28-acre lot located at 2810 Routh Creek Parkway, on the east side of Routh Creek Parkway, approximately 900 feet north of Glenville Drive. Ds:CPC/2016/2016-12-06 Minutes.doc

Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes December 6, 2016 Motion: Commissioner Roland made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented; second by Commissioner Ferrell. Motion approved 7-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Zoning File 16-26 Shamm Mediterranean Cuisine: Consider and take the necessary action on a request for approval of a Special Permit for a smoking establishment located at 310 E. Main Street, east of S. Greenville Avenue. The property is currently zoned PD Planned Development for the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Main Street Sub-district). Ms. Mathews stated the applicant was requesting a Special Permit for a smoking establishment to be located on the patio of an existing restaurant. She added the hookahs and tobacco products would be provided by a concierge service and the materials would not be stored on site. Ms. Mathews highlighted the recent remodeling of the building and presented illustrations showing the patio area where smoking would be allowed. She noted that City ordinance states a smoking area must be at least 10 feet from any doors or windows and the proposed smoking area complied with those requirements. With no questions for staff, Chairman Bright opened the public hearing. Mr. Cal Hamida, 210 S. Greenville, Richardson, Texas, said he was an attorney and friend of the applicant and was available for any questions. Commissioner Roland asked how the applicant would control or direct customers using the smoking section to insure they did not go outside the permitted area. He also wanted to confirm the smoking area would be the portion of the patio closest to the outside wall and away from the doors. DRAFT Mr. Hamida replied that Mr. Roland was correct on the location of the smoking area and the wait staff would direct the customers as to where they could smoke. In addition, the concierge service would not be allowed to serve any tobacco products outside the smoking area. Chairman Bright asked how the concierge service would access the patio. Mr. Hamida said the service would be outside the back entrance to the patio and no smoking material would move through the restaurant. Chairman Bright called for any other comments in favor or opposed, and with none, asked the applicant if they had any closing comments. Ds:CPC/2016/2016-12-06 CPCMinutes.doc 2

Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes December 6, 2016 Mr. Hamida noted the applicant was at a competitive disadvantage because many of the surrounding businesses were either a restaurant with a smoking area or hookah bars and after spending almost $2 million dollars to purchase and remodel the business it would benefit him to make sure tobacco and related smoking products and equipment were available for his customers. With no other comments or questions in favor or opposed, Chairman Bright closed the public hearing. Commissioner Springs asked staff to clarify the connectivity of the Special Permit and what would happen if the property changed hands. Mr. Chavez replied that most Special Permits were connected to the property, but the Commission and City Council had the ability to issue permits to an individual, the name of the business, or both. He added the proposed Special Permit was attached to the property. Chairman Bright asked if Special Permit for the restaurant just east of the applicant s business was specific to the site or the owner. Mr. Chavez said he did not recall. Commissioner Roland noted statements were made about the property in question being surrounded by other restaurants and bars that had smoking areas and was wondering if those businesses were legal-nonconforming. Mr. Chavez replied they were legal-nonconforming, but with the exception of the Afrah Restaurant, the others were basically smoking establishments where most of the proceeds were derived from the sale of tobacco and tobacco related products. Commissioner Ferrell asked if customers would be allowed to remain on the patio after the restaurant closed and Ms. Mathews said the patio hours would be the same as the hours for the restaurant. Commissioner Springs asked if staff had information regarding what was approved for the Afrah Restaurant and whether it was tied to the property or the owner. While staff researched the answer for Mr. Springs question, Mr. Chavez explained that smoking was an accessory use for Afrah and the applicant s business, while the hookah bars derived the majority of their income from tobacco and tobacco related materials. In addition, most of those establishments stayed open past midnight. Commissioner DePuy also wanted to know if smoking at Afrah was tied to the hours of operation for the restaurant and Mr. Chavez said the information being researched would also question.draft answer that Ds:CPC/2016/2016-12-06 CPCMinutes.doc 3

Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes December 6, 2016 Ms. Mathews pointed out that both Afrah and the applicant s business had Certificates of Occupancy (CO) listing the businesses as restaurants, however, the hookah bars CO was listed as smoking establishments. Regarding the approval for the Afrah restaurant, Mr. Chavez stated the Special Permit was granted under Ordinance 4092 and limited smoking to outdoor use only on the restaurant patio with established hours of operation from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. He also noted the Special Permit was issued to the property and smoking was limited to the hours the restaurant was operating. Chairman Bright asked if the current proposal was presented in a similar manner to the Afrah restaurant and Mr. Chavez said it was. Ms. Mathews added the Special Permit for the applicant s business was intended for a restaurant business, but it also had to be in conformance with the attached zoning exhibit. Motion: Commissioner DePuy made a motion to recommend approval of Zoning File 16-26 as presented; second by Vice Chair Taylor. Commissioner Maxwell suggested the motion should contain a condition to match the hours of operation of the adjacent restaurant. Mr. Chavez stated that was a question the applicant would have to answer and Mr. Hamida replied the suggestion would be acceptable to the applicant. Chairman Bright asked if the motion on the floor had to be voted on or withdrawn and Mr. Chavez stated the motion could be withdrawn. Commissioner DePuy withdrew her motion as was the second by Vice Chair Taylor. DRAFT Motion: Commissioner DePuy made a motion to recommend approval of Zoning File 16-26 with the conditions listed in the staff report as well as having the hours of operation from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday; and the on-site availability and use of tobacco and tobacco related materials would be limited to the hours of operation of the restaurant; second by Vice Chair Taylor. Motion approved 7-0. 4. Zoning File 16-27 Great Room Escape: Consider and take the necessary action on a request for a Special Permit for an approximate 6,000-square foot indoor commercial amusement center located within the Richardson Heights Village Shopping Center, at the southwest corner of Belt Line Road and Central Expressway. The property is currently zoned PD Planned Development for the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Central Place Sub-district). Ds:CPC/2016/2016-12-06 CPCMinutes.doc 4

Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes December 6, 2016 Ms. Mathews stated the proposed amusement center would have approximately four (4), 1,000-square foot, fictionally themed rooms where the participants would work together to solve a puzzle then escape the room. She added that each room would have safety features to allow participants to exit the room before the puzzle was solved if there was a problem. Ms. Mathews concluded her presentation by noting the hours of operation would be between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday; 12 noon to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday; and 12 noon to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday. With no questions for staff, Chairman Bright opened the public hearing. Mr. Santos Martinez, 900 Jackson Street, Dallas, Texas, representing Great Room Escape, stated the amusement center would have four (4) themed rooms including a zombie room, a Houdini room and a Sherlock room and those designs could change throughout the year. He added that although there was no age limit, the center was recommended for participants from teenage years and older. Mr. Martinez noted that each room in the amusement center would have sprinklers, panic hardware on the doors, and would be monitored by staff to ensure safety and give clues if the participants were having trouble solving the puzzle. In addition, participants would need to be on time for their reservation because once the reservation time began, the doors would be locked and no one would be allowed to enter the room after the start of the game. Mr. Martinez concluded his presentation by stating that if the project was approved, it would be the third Great Room Escape in Texas with the other two located in San Antonio and Austin. Commissioner DePuy asked if corporations might use the center for team building exercises and wanted to know the average time each group would be in a room. DRAFT Mr. Martinez replied the maximum time for each puzzle was 60 minutes and that many companies use the centers for team building for their employees. Chairman Bright asked if there would be staff members in the rooms while the participants were solving the puzzle and if food and beverage service would be available. Mr. Martinez said there could be staff members in rooms as observers and would most likely be a character in one of the themes, but there would also be two way mirrors to allow staff outside the room to observe the participants and make sure the authenticity of the game was being respected. Regarding food and beverage service, Mr. Martinez stated they would not have a kitchen, but there were many restaurants in the adjacent shopping center where participants could eat either before or after their reserved time. Ds:CPC/2016/2016-12-06 CPCMinutes.doc 5

Richardson City Plan Commission Minutes December 6, 2016 No other comments in favor or opposed were received and Chairman Bright closed the public hearing. Mr. Chavez noted that the conditions in the Special Permit were written to allow a commercial amusement center, which could allow any type of commercial amusement center (i.e., arcade, etc.), and asked the Commission if they would prefer to have the Special Permit limited to Great Room Escape, LLC. Chairman Bright thought Mr. Chavez idea was good and asked if there were any other questions or comments. Commissioner Roland said he had researched escape type rooms and found they were prevalent in many of the major cities in the United States. Chairman Bright asked if there were any other escape type rooms in North Texas and Mr. Martinez replied he did not know of any. Motion: Commissioner Springs made a motion to recommend approval of Zoning File 16-27 as presented with the additional constraint of tying the Special Permit to Great Room Escape, LLC; second by Vice Chair Taylor. Motion approved 7-0. ADJOURN With no further business before the Commission, Chairman Bright adjourned the regular business meeting at 7:43 p.m. Gerald Bright, Chairman City Plan Commission DRAFT Ds:CPC/2016/2016-12-06 CPCMinutes.doc 6

Agenda Item 2 Site and Landscape Plans: Aldi Food Market City of Richardson, Texas City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 Meeting Packet

Aldi Food Market 1549 E. Belt Line Road Attachments: 1. Locator 2. Site Plan Staff Report 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan Staff Report 5. Landscape Plan 6. Special Conditions of Variances 07-10, 07-11 & 16-06

S Plano Rd N Plano Rd N St Johns Dr Centenary Dr Subject site 2.20 acres Marquette Dr University Dr E Belt Line Rd E Belt Line Rd Aldi Food Market 4 1549 E. Belt Line Road

CITY PLAN COMMISSION BACKGROUND INFORMATION December 20, 2016 Site Plan PROJECT SUMMARY Project: Location: Staff Comments: Aldi Food Market 1549 E. Belt Line Road North side of Belt Line Road, east of Plano Road. The site plan reflects the construction of a 1,687-square foot expansion along the south side of the existing 16,657-square foot single-story grocery store. The site plan complies with all applicable zoning and development regulations. CPC Action: Final decision BACKGROUND Zoning: Special Conditions: Ordinance 432-A Ordinance 464-A Variances: Variance 07-10 Variance 07-11 Variance 16-06 LR-M(2) Local Retail District under Ordinances 432-A & 646-A. Outside storage or display of merchandise shall not be allowed outside the main building structure. Accessory buildings and outside cabinets and storage racks shall not be allowed. None. Permits 50-foot rear building setback from residential properties to the east; granted by City Council on July 9, 2007 (see attached special conditions). Permits 20-foot side building setback from north property line; granted by City Council on July 9, 2007 (see attached special conditions). Permits 50-foot rear building setback from residential properties to the east; granted by City Council on Page 1 of 2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES U:\Development (new)\development Plan Files\Site Plan Files\Belt Line Rd E\1549 (ALDI - Richardson) - converted\staff Reports & Minutes\2016-12-20 Site & Landscape - CPC\Site Plan Staff Report.doc

November 14, 2016 (see attached special conditions). Although this variance was similar to the previous variance (VAR 07-10) in allowing a 50-foot rear setback; however, it was necessary to allow additional linear footage of the building wall along the open space setback. Tract Size: Building Area/Use: 2.20 acres (95,950 sq. ft.) Existing 16,657 sq. ft. single story building; Retail Proposed 1,687 sq. ft. single-story addition; Retail 18,344 sq. ft. (total) Site Access: The subject property is accessed from Belt Line Road by a two-way access drive, which is not served by a median opening. Mutual access drives through the adjacent properties to the west provide access to the property from an existing median opening on Belt Line Road. Parking Summary: Parking Ratio 30 spaces for first 10,000 square feet + 1 space per 200 square feet of additional building area above 10,000 square feet. Spaces Required 72 Spaces Provided 83 Required Wall/Screen: The subject property is screened from the apartments to the north and from the residential subdivision to the east by the existing 8-foot high masonry screening wall along the north and east property lines. Page 2 of 2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES U:\Development (new)\development Plan Files\Site Plan Files\Belt Line Rd E\1549 (ALDI - Richardson) - converted\staff Reports & Minutes\2016-12-20 Site & Landscape - CPC\Site Plan Staff Report.doc

CITY PLAN COMMISSION BACKGROUND INFORMATION December 20, 2016 Landscape Plan PROJECT SUMMARY Project: Location: Staff Comments: Aldi Food Market 1549 E. Belt Line Road The landscape plan reflects the expansion of the existing single-story grocery store. The landscape design is consistent with City regulations and policies. CPC Action: Final decision BACKGROUND Landscape Area Summary: Area Required Area Provided Landscape Design: Frontage Internal Tree Preservation/Removal: 7% of property (6,717 square feet) 26% of property (24,803 square feet) Canopy and ornamental trees, evergreen shrubs, and ground cover beds are provided within a minimum 10- foot landscape buffer along Belt Line Road in accordance with the City policy for street trees. Canopy and ornamental trees and grasses are provided in all internal parking lot islands. Live Oak trees are provided along the east property line and Leyland Cypress trees are provided along a portion of the north property line, in accordance with the conditions of Variances 07-10 and 07-11 (see attached conditions). All of the existing trees on the property will be preserved. Page 1 of 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES U:\Development (new)\development Plan Files\Site Plan Files\Belt Line Rd E\1549 (ALDI - Richardson) - converted\staff Reports & Minutes\2016-12-20 Site & Landscape - CPC\Landscape Staff Report.doc

Special Conditions of Variances 07-10, 07-11 and 16-06 1. The building shall be oriented generally as depicted on the variance plan submitted by the applicant. The areas north and east of the building shall be landscaped buffers. 2. The east wall of the building shall be located a minimum distance of 50 feet from the nearest residential property line (30 feet from the east property line). Evergreen canopy trees (Live oak or similar) shall be provided on the east side of the building at a maximum distance of 50 feet on center. An eight-foot high masonry screening wall shall be constructed by the non-residential developer on the east property line. 3. The north wall of the building shall be located a minimum distance of 20 feet from the north property line. Evergreen trees (Leyland cypress or similar) shall be provided on the north side of the building at a maximum distance of 15 feet on center to screen the proposed truck dock. 4. No window or door opening on the east or north sides of the building shall be shall be permitted to exceed a maximum height of eight feet above the adjacent ground level.

Agenda Item 3 Replat: Floyd Terrace Addition City of Richardson, Texas City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 Meeting Packet

Floyd Terrace Addition Lots 12A, 13A, 14 and 15, Block 7 Attachments: 1. Locator Map 2. Replat Staff Report 3. Replat 4. Notice of Residential Replat 5. Written Correspondence

Lot 15 20,840 s.f. Lot 14 10,116 s.f. Lot 13A 8,593 s.f. Lot 12A 8,142 s.f. Floyd Terrace Addition 4 Lots 12A, 13A, 14 & 15, Block 7

CITY PLAN COMMISSION BACKGROUND INFORMATION December 20, 2016 Public Hearing on a Residential Replat PROJECT SUMMARY Subdivision: Floyd Terrace Addition, Lots 12A 13A, 14 & 15, Block 7 being a replat of Floyd Terrace Addition, Lots 12 & 13, Block 7 Location: Staff Comments: 1016 & 1018 N. Lindale Lane / southeast corner of Lindale Lane and Arapaho Road. The purpose of the replat is to subdivide two (2) existing singlefamily lots into four (4) single-family lots. On October 10, 2016, the subject properties received approval for a variance from Chapter 21, Subdivision and Development Ordinance, allowing side lot lines that are not perpendicular to tangent street lines or radial to curved street lines. CPC Action: Notice of Public Hearing: Final decision As required by the Texas Local Government Code, written notification of the request has been provided for this residential replat. Attached are letters in opposition from surrounding neighbors stating their opposition to the request. Their opposition is to the subdivision of the existing two (2) lots into four (4) lots. With the approval of the variance approved by City Council on October 10, 2016 referenced above, the proposed replat complies with City zoning and subdivision regulations. Therefore, Local Government Code regulations related to the requirement for a three-fourths vote for approval by the City Plan Commission does not apply. BACKGROUND Tract Size: Zoning: 1.094 acres (47,691 square feet) R-1100-M Residential (Ordinance 129-A) Page 1 of 2 X:\Development (new)\development Plan Files\Subdivision Files\Floyd Terrace Addition\Lots 12A, 13A 14 & 15, Block 7\Minutes & Staff Reports\2016-12-20 CPC\Replat Staff Report.doc

Easements/Setbacks: Existing to Remain 25 drainage easement along the south property line of Lot 12A; 30 building line along Lindale Lane; and a 40 building line along Arapaho Road. Dedicated by this Plat 25 x25 corner clip easement at the northwest corner of Lot 15; and a 5 x25 alley corner clip easement at the northeast corner Lot 15. Abandoned by this Plat Previous lot line between Lots 12 and 13. Page 2 of 2

Notice of Public Hearing City Plan Commission Richardson, Texas DATE NOTICE POSTED AND MAILED: December 2, 2016 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall, 411 W. Arapaho Road, Richardson, Texas PURPOSE OF THE HEARING: The Richardson City Plan Commission will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 20, 2016, in the Council Chambers, Richardson Civic Center/City Hall, 411 W. Arapaho Road, Richardson, Texas, to consider a request by Tom Chawana, Going Forward Inc., for a residential replat for properties located at 1016 & 1018 N. Lindale Lane, currently zoned for R-1100-M Residential District. The purpose of the replat is to subdivide two (2) lots into four (4) lots. The Texas Local Government Code requires notice of the public hearing where a replat is proposed for property that was limited to residential uses of no more than two units per lot during the preceding five years. THIS IS NOT A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST: This is a request for review and approval of a replat to ensure compliance to the Subdivision & Development Ordinance, Chapter 21 of the City of Richardson Code of Ordinances. TO CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS: Property owners that are within the original subdivision and within 200 of the residentially zoned lots to be replatted receive written notification of the request. All interested property owners are encouraged to attend this hearing. Persons wishing their opinion to be part of the record, and who are unable to attend, may send a written reply prior to the date of the hearing to: City Plan Commission, P.O. Box 830309, Richardson, TX 75083. AGENDA: The City Plan Commission agenda for this item will be posted on the City of Richardson website the Friday before the public hearing. For a copy of the agenda, please go to: http://www.cor.net/index.aspx?page=1331. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact a planner, (972) 744-4240, during business hours. Gerald Bright, Chairman, City Plan Commission Attachment: Texas Local Government Code 2016 Edition 212.015. Additional Requirements for Certain Replats Development Services Department City of Richardson, Texas 411 W. Arapaho Road, Room 204, Richardson, Texas 75080 972-744-4240 www.cor.net

N Lindale Ln 2578-A Residential Replat 16-07 LR-M(1) 1007-A O-M Rockingham Ln 367-A O-M 107-A C-M 171-A C-M W Arapaho Rd 2356-A / 2272-A O-M 200' Notification Boundary 129-A R-1500-M Kirby Ln 129-A R-1000-M Hampshire Ln Subject Properties to be Replatted 106-A C-M 171-A C-M Notified Properties Floyd Terrace Addition, Lots 12 & 13, Block 7 1016 & 1018 N. Lindale Lane 4

TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 2016 EDITION 212.015. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN REPLATS (c) If the proposed replat requires a variance and is protested in accordance with this subsection, the proposed replat must receive, in order to be approved, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members present of the municipal planning commission or governing body, or both. For a legal protest, written instruments signed by the owners of at least 20 percent of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed replat and extending 200 feet from that area, but within the original subdivision, must be filed with the municipal planning commission or governing body, or both, prior to the close of the public hearing.

Agenda Item 4 Zoning File 16-28: Main Street City of Richardson, Texas City Plan Commission December 20, 2016 Meeting Packet

ZONING FILE 16-28 Attachments: 1. Staff Report 2. Zoning Map 3. Aerial Map 4. Oblique Aerial 5. Special Development Plan (Exhibit B ) 6. Street Cross Sections A and B (Exhibit C-1 ) 7. Street Cross Sections C and D (Exhibit C-2 ) 8. Street Cross Sections E and F (Exhibit C-3 ) 9. Street Cross Sections G and H (Exhibit C-4 ) 10. Garage Shared Parking Summary (Exhibit D ) 11. Applicant s Statement 12. Notice of Public Hearing 13. Notification List X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Attachment List.docxe

Staff Report TO: FROM: City Plan Commission Sam Chavez, Assistant Director Development Services SC DATE: December 16, 2016 RE: Zoning File 16-28: Special Development Plan and Special Permit for a drivethrough service ATM Bank Main Street NEC Central Expressway and W. Main Street. REQUEST: Approval of a Special Development Plan for 14.5 acres of land for a mixed-use development and a Special Permit for drive-through service for Chase Bank on 3.05 acres of land within the 14.5 acre tract of land located at the northwest corner of Central Expressway and W. Main Street. The subject 14.5 acre site is located between Central Expressway and N. Interurban Street and W. Main Street and Greer Street and zoned PD Planned Development Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code (Ordinance Number 4191). (Please refer to the complete Applicant s Statement.) APPLICANT: John Kirk, Embrey Partners, Ltd. PROPERTY OWNERS: Rick Currey, Fobare Commercial LP / Monty J. Jackson / Nancy H. Allegro EXISTING DEVELOPMENT: The subject site is developed with a 200,000 square foot, multi-story office building and drivethrough bank facility, a 1-story, 11,932 square foot building motor vehicle repair facility, a 5,655 square foot 1-story vacant motor vehicle repair facility and surface parking lots. ADJACENT ROADWAYS: Interurban Street: Two-lane, undivided minor collector street; no traffic counts available. D EVELOPMENT S ERVICES

W. Main Street: Six-lane, divided arterial street, 31,800 vehicles per day on all lanes between Texas Street and McKinney Street (February 2015). US-75: Highway; 338,000 vehicles per day on all lanes, northbound and southbound, south of Campbell Road (December 2015). Greer Street: Two-lane, undivided local street; no traffic counts available. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: South: East: West: Retail/Commercial/Office; PD Planned Development Retail/Commercial; PD Planned Development D.A.R.T./Retail/Commercial; PD Planned Development Retail/Commercial; PD Planned Development FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: Enhancement/Redevelopment The subject property is located in the Central Place Sub-District of the recently approved Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code. This vision for this sub-district is to create a vibrant, mixed use district at the heart of the City which focuses on supporting infill development to create an address in the region via a pedestrian-oriented, more walkable environment. Future Land Uses of Surrounding Area: North: Enhancement/Redevelopment South: Enhancement/Redevelopment East: Enhancement/Redevelopment West: Enhancement/Redevelopment EXISTING ZONING: PD Planned Development Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code, Central Place Sub-District (Ordinance Number 4191). INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS: The proposed request will not have any significant impacts on the existing utilities in the area. STAFF COMMENTS: Background: In November of 2016, the property was rezoned as part of the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code. The subject property is located within the Central Place Sub-District. X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 2

Request: The applicant s request is composed of the following two elements Approval of Special Development Plan for approximately 14.5 acres (17.47 gross acres) of land for a mixed-use development. The Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code requires a Special Development Plan to be approved for modifications to the standards of the Code that are not considered Minor Modifications (which are approved at staff level). The specific modifications to the Code are listed further below, including minor modifications that are critical for the development as proposed, and Approval of a Special Permit for drive-through ATM service lanes for Chase Bank on 3.05 acres of land (Parcel C), the northwest corner of Central Expressway and W. Main Street. The Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code requires approval of a Special Permit for all uses with drive-through services. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (Exhibit B ): Parcel A (Mixed Use) This parcel is a vertical mixed-use development located at the northwest corner of Interurban Street and W. Main Street. The 378,000 square foot development is a five-story wood frame residential development, with the exception of the western portion of the development which supports retail/commercial uses on the first floor. That portion of the development is a four-story building (three-story wood frame over a retail podium). The parcel generally consists of: A 378,000 square foot mixed-use building o 15,000 square feet of retail/commercial o 288,000 square feet of residential 332 dwelling units (density = 64.5 units/acre exceeds minimum required density of 40 units/acre) Three (3) private court yards (total of 35,000 sq. ft.) A 4-1/3 level parking garage (700 parking spaces accessed from Street A and Street B) 51 on-site surface parking spaces (along W. Main Street) 29 on-street parking spaces (on Interurban, Street A and Street B) As proposed, the development complies with the Central Place Sub-District development standards of the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code, with the exception of the following (see Exhibit B Project Data for Parcel A for detailed information): Maximum Block Lengths, Minimum Building Frontage (minimum percentage of building within Build-To-Zone) Street Cross Section (Exhibit C-2 Street Cross Section C) Due to existing right-of-way constraints, the street cross section standards cannot be met. However, the landscape amenity areas when combined and landscaped as proposed meet the general intent of the standards. The balance of the street cross sections comply with the Central Place Sub-District standards. X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 3

In addition, and although not typically considered during this stage of review, the applicant is requesting: Relief from the development standards requiring the minimum finished floor elevation for grade-level units to be located a minimum of 18 inches above the elevation of the adjacent sidewalk. This relief would only apply to those grade-level units along Interurban Street located at the southeast portion of the building and as designated on the Special Development Plan (Exhibit B ). The request provides for a better transition from the leasing office and the units adjacent to the leasing office portion of the building; otherwise ramping and/or steps would need to be incorporated in the leasing office or in the internal common corridor leading into the leasing office. Minor Modification In conjunction with the Special Development Plan request, the applicant is seeking approval of a minor modification with regard to the Build-To-Zone along W. Main Street. A request to increase the Build-To-Zone from 5-15 to 5-80 can be requested to allow for a single drive aisle with parking between the street and principal building. As proposed, the portion of the development along W. Main Streets meets the criteria. Parcel B (Townhome Apartments) This parcel is an 83 apartment townhome development located at the southwest corner of Interurban Street and Greer Street. The units are a combination of two and three story units for a total of 149,000 square feet, with an average of 1,800 square feet per unit. The development s primary access is located on Interurban Street, with a designated resident only secondary access on Street A and a secondary fire access entry located on Street B. The apartment townhome units fronting along Greer Street, Interurban Street, Street B and Street A will contain private yards adjacent to the street, which will be enclosed by 3-1/2 foot tall privacy fences. Privacy fences are allowed for residential uses in the Central Place Sub-District with the condition that the fence is required to be a minimum of 50% open or transparent. The parcel generally consists of: 83 dwelling units (density = 18.6 units/acre does not meet the minimum required density of 40 units/acre for multi-family developments) Two (2) private open space/amenity areas (total of 20,300 square feet) 166 enclosed parking spaces (2 garage parking spaces per unit) 9 on-site surface parking spaces (interior to the property) 47 on-street parking spaces (on Interurban Street, Street B, Street A and Greer Street) As proposed, the development complies with the Central Place Sub-District development standards of the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code, with the exception of the following (see Exhibit B Project Data for Parcel B for detailed information): Minimum Density X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 4

Maximum Block Length Minimum Building Frontage (minimum percentage of building within Build-To-Zone) Minimum Open Space Percentage Parcel C (Existing Office) This parcel is developed with a 200,000 existing multi-story office building located at the northeast corner of Central Expressway and W. Main Street, and which is also the subject site for the Special Permit request for drive-through ATM service lanes for Chase Bank. With the exception of the drive-through service facility, no additional development is proposed for the parcel. The parcel in general consists of: An existing 200,000 square foot, multi-story office building A 535 square foot ATM canopy 66 on-site surface parking spaces (along W. Main Street) 36 on-street parking spaces (Street A and Street B) As proposed, the development complies with the Central Place Sub-District development standards of the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code, with the exception of the following (see Exhibit B Project Data for Parcel C for detailed information): Build-To-Zone Maximum Block Lengths, Minimum Building Frontage (minimum percentage of building within Build-To-Zone) Maximum Ground Floor Building Area (does not apply to existing development) Minimum Open Space Percentage Street Cross Section (Exhibit C-2 Street Cross Section D) Due to existing right-of-way and existing utility easement constraints, the street cross section standards cannot be met. However, the landscape amenity areas when combined and landscaped as proposed meet the general intent of the standards. The balance of the street cross sections comply with the Central Place Sub-District standards. Special Permit Request To accommodate development of Parcel A; the mixed-use development, the existing drivethrough bank will be relocated to Parcel C (existing Office site). As required by the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code approval of a Special Permit for all uses with drivethrough services is required. The proposed drive-through facility will be located on the southern portion of the Parcel C within the existing parking lot, which will be reconstructed to allow for the proposed drive-through service lanes and ATM canopy. The bank drive-through service facility will contain a 585 square foot ATM canopy serviced by three (3) service lanes which are protected from on-site traffic circulation with landscape islands. The service lanes can accommodate at total of nine (9) vehicles (3 vehicles in each service lane). Access to the site is provided along Street B and the site will be screened from in accordance with the Central Place Sub-District. X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 5

Parcel D (Restaurant) This parcel is proposed as a free-standing, 6,500 square foot restaurant development located at the northeast corner of Central Expressway and Street B which includes the triangular shaped property located at the southwest corner of Greer Street and Street A that serves as surface parking only. Access is provided to the parcel from Street A, Street B and an existing driveway along Central Expressway. The Central Expressway driveway does not conform with driveway spacing criteria and may be consolidated with the adjacent driveway located to the north in the future. The parcel generally consists of: A 6,500 square foot restaurant 110 on-site surface parking spaces 17 on-street parking spaces (on Interurban Street, Street B, Street A and Greer Street) As proposed, the development complies with the Central Place Sub-District development standards of the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code, with the exception of the following (see Exhibit B Project Data for Parcel D for detailed information): Build-To-Zone Maximum Block Length, Minimum Building Frontage (minimum percentage of building within Build-To-Zone) Minimum Open Space Percentage Additional Special Development Plan Standards Parking The Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code established parking requirements for each sub-district and provided regulations regarding when parking is to be required on-site and associated ratios. The intent within the Central Place Sub-District is to provide convenient and efficient parking for a vibrant mixed-use environment while providing flexibility in the allowable uses and allowing for reuse of properties, in addition to maximizing on-street parking and reducing the overall amount of pavement. In accordance with the Central Place Sub-District, Parcels A, B and D are required to provide onsite parking spaces. Parcels B and D conform with the parking space requirement. Although Parcel C (existing Office) is not required additional parking (since no additional building square footage is proposed), parking spaces are needed to meet the parking demand for the use. Parcel A requires a total of 548 parking spaces (multi-family-498 spaces and retail/commercial- 50 spaces). No additional parking is required for the existing office Tower on Parcel C. As proposed, a total of 852 parking spaces are provided for both parcels, which includes garage parking spaces, on-site surface parking, off-site parking (Parcel D 36 parking spaces) and onstreet parking spaces adjacent to the subject parcels. An additional 64 on-street parking spaces which could also be utilized by patrons of Parcels A and B, and which are not required to meet Parcel s B and D parking requirement, are located within 600 feet of Parcels A and C, altogether providing a total of 916 parking spaces. X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 6

As part of the applicant s Special Development Plan request, a Garage Shared Parking Analysis (Exhibit D ) that would apply to Parcel A (mixed use development) and Parcel C (existing Office) was submitted by the applicant. The proposed 4-1/3 level parking garage located on Parcel A provides a total of 700 parking spaces, with 112 parking spaces on the first level allocated to residential/office users, and 39 parking spaces allocated to the general public. The remaining balance of the parking spaces within the parking garage are allocated to the residential units (approximately 549 parking spaces). Based on the Shared Parking Analysis, a total weekday parking demand of 709 spaces would be required and a total weekend parking demand of 527 spaces would be required, which includes a 5% parking space buffer in each scenario. Based on the Shared Parking Analysis, there appears to be a sufficient number of parking spaces provided when combined to meet the demand, which does not include the additional adjacent on-street parking spaces in the analysis. Mutual Access Easement Ownership of Parcel C (existing Office) consists of three (3) separate property owners. The two (2) separately owned parcels located on the southern end of Parcel C are functionally incorporated into the larger development via a ground lease which allows and limits development of that shown on Exhibit B. The western most tract of land does not have frontage on public right-of-way; therefore, a mutual access easement will be established at the time of platting in order to allow the lot to be platted. Similar methods have been approved in the past to allow lots to be platted with frontage on public right-of-way. Signage Although the applicant is not at the stage of developing signage for the development, the entire site is to be considered as a single development, and therefore, may utilize the Master Sign Plan provision in the Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code. The Code allows the Master Sign Plan provision for sites larger than 7 acres in size. When combined, the parcels (the entire Special Development Plan) exceed the minimum acreage requirement for a Master Sign Plan. Correspondence: As of this date, no correspondence has been received. Motion: The Commission will be making a recommendation to the City Council regarding this request. The Commission may approve the request, add or amend conditions, or recommend denial of the request. Should the CPC recommend approval of the applicant s request, the motion should include the following special conditions: 1. A Special Permit shall be granted for a drive-through ATM service bank as depicted on the attached Special Development Plan, marked as Exhibit B and made a part thereof. 2. The drive-through ATM service facility shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the attached Special Development Plan, marked as Exhibit B and made a part thereof. X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 7

3. A Special Development Plan as allowed in The Main Street/Central Expressway Form Based Code shall be approved in conformance with Exhibit B and Exhibits C-1 thru C-4 (Street Cross Sections). 4. Parking requirements for Parcels A and C shall be allowed as depicted on Exhibit B. 5. A mutual access easement shall be established on Parcel C at the time of platting for the purposes of platting lots without street frontage as depicted on Exhibit B. 6. Parcels A through D shall be considered a single site for the purpose of requesting a Master Sign Plan. Council Hearing Date: The earliest possible City Council hearing date is January 23, 2017. X:\Zoning\Zoning Cases\2016\ZF 16-28 Main Street & 75\2016-12-20 CPC Packet Info\ZF 16-28 Staff Report-CPC.doc 8

Custer Rd 2309-A R-1100-M ZF 16-28 Ridgedale Dr R-1100-M Westwood Dr Rustic Cir R-1100-M Central Expy Greer St Bishop Ave Jackson St N Interurban St SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL PERMIT 4135 Terrace Dr 4134 La Salle Dr Lockwood Dr 4191 PD W Tyler St Dart Light Rail 56-A A-950-M W Belt Line Rd W Main St W Polk St S Sherman St S Interurban St W Tyler St S Texas St E Main St N Texas St N Greenville Ave E Tyler St R-1250-M E Tyler St ZF 16-28 Zoning Map Updated By: mathewsa, Update Date: December 13, 2016 File: DS\Mapping\Cases\Z\2016\ZF1628\ZF1628zoning.mxd This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 4

Inge Dr Custer Rd ZF 16-28 Ridgedale Dr Westwood Dr Rustic Cir Central Expy Greer St Bishop Ave Jackson St N Interurban St SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT Terrace Dr Lockwood Dr W Tyler St Dart Light Rail W Belt Line Rd W Main St E Main St W Polk St S Sherman St S Interurban St W Tyler St S Texas St N Texas St N Greenville Ave E Tyler St E Tyler St ZF 16-28 Aerial Map Updated By: mathewsa, Update Date: December 13, 2016 File: DS\Mapping\Cases\Z\2016\ZF1626\ZF1626aerial.mxd This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 4