University District Specific Plan

Similar documents
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Butte County General Plan 2030 General Plan Amendment and Draft Zoning Ordinance

SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CENTRAL PARK VILLAGE BREA ENTITLEMENT DOCUMENTS FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE PROJECT AT W.

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Staff Report July 6, 2017

After taking public testimony, staff recommends the City Council take the following course of action:

Agenda Item No. 6B May 9, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

NOTICE OF PREPARATION of a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the Fresno County General Plan Review and Zoning Ordinance Update

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Butte County Board of Supervisors

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

RESOLUTION NO

Planning Commission Staff Report October 6, 2011

Planning Commission Staff Report July 16, 2015

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ADDENDUM AUGUST 14, Members of the Planning Commission

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

The following is a summary of the proposed policies and maps considered for analysis or amendments to the General Plan:

FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA

EMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION. Report Date: June 18, 2015 Meeting Date: June 25, 2015

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY

REPORT Elections Code 9212 Report on Proposed Initiative

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

October 10, All Interested Parties

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Dan Marks, Director, Planning and Development

Chair Brittingham, Vice-Chair Barron, Commissioner Hurt, Commissioner Keith, Commissioner LaRock

CITY OF ELK GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

PRIMUS TRACT MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA

Planning Commission Staff Report

COUNTY OF EL DORADO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE MAP

Watertown City Council

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 21, 2016

Rosslyn Sector Plan Implementation GLUP, MTP & Zoning Amendments. Park and Recreation Commission June 28, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

EXHIBIT D. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION For. TOWNSEND VILLAGE PUD December 23, 2015 (Revised)

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 5.1

Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development

Jefferson County. Case RZ. Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach. Planning and Zoning Division

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Unlimited. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

Planning Commission Application Summary

AN ORDINANCE OF THE NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NAPA COUNTY AND NAPA REDEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC

REZONING STAFF REPORT Case: Jay Sikes, Mgr. of Planning Services Phone: (910) Fax: (910)

2018 RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY AND VACANT LAND ANALYSIS. Martin County Board of County Commissioners

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OVERVIEW

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Comment: the Plan endeavors to conserve resources that can nurture additional development. What kind of resources, environmental, capital, or etc.?

PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

CHAPTER IV IMPLEMENTATION

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CASE SUMMARY Conditional District Zoning Modification Planning Commission January 9, 2013 CD M1212

Sacramento Railyards P December 11, 2007

City of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Year Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015

Agenda Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: NOVEMBER 20,2006

3.0 Project Description

FORA Board Consistency Determinations Summary

Claudia Stuart, Williamson Act Program Manager and Nick Hernandez, Planning Intern

4.1 Overview. 4.2 Land Use Plan

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT February 19, 2015

Town of Falmouth s Four Step Design Process for Subdivisions in the Resource Conservation Zoning Overlay District

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

Public Hearing. Item # 16. Meeting Date: June 3, 2014

Planning Commission Staff Report August 4, 2016

1999 Town Center West Proposal

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: February 8, 2017 Item: ZN Prepared by: Johanna Murphy

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-02 Cary Oaks Subdivision Town Council Meeting June 12, 2014

LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

Coastal Apartment Homes 2250 E. Pleasant Valley Rd

LAND USE ELEMENT CITY OF HAWTHORNE GENERAL PLAN

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

Central Lathrop Specific Plan

Planning & Zoning Commission

Planning Commission Staff Report October 2, 2014

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

County Council Of Howard County, Maryland

POLK COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CASE OVERVIEW

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 13-REZ-31 Weston PDD Amendment at Centregreen Park Town Council Meeting March 13, 2014

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

Technology Park Planned Unit Development Technology Park PUD-IP

ITEM 7-C. CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. Honorable President and Members of the Planning Board. From: Andrew Thomas City Planner

APPLICATIONS FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE

Transcription:

University District Specific Plan City of Rohnert Park City Council April 8, 2014

Project Vicinity Map

Aerial Photograph

Requested Entitlements Rescission of Tentative Maps and Development Area Plans approved in 2006 EIR Addendum General Plan Amendment Revised Specific Plan Tentative Map (Vast Oak property) Tentative Parcel Map (UDLLC property) Amended and Restated Development Agreement

Planning Commission Action Hearing held March 13, 2014 Commissioners unanimously voted to approve resolutions recommending City Council approval of requested entitlements

Existing Approved Project University District Specific Plan (UDSP) Background: One of five specific plan areas designated in GP 300 acres of land, five property owners Specific Plan approved and EIR adopted in 2006 1,645 residential units plus 126 second units 175,000 sf commercial building area 5 park areas U.D. LLC property: less than 1.0 acre total park land Vast Oak property: approx. 12.90 acres total park land (3 parks and plaza) CRPUSD property: approx. 2.0 acres total park land

Existing Land Use Plan

Proposed Project Specific Plan Revisions: Same total residential unit count (1,645) with revised number of units per land use designation Modified gross acreages and configurations for land uses Reduction of commercial building area Increased total park acreage Larger and more useful parks that will be more efficient to maintain

Site Plan

Rescission of 2006 Resolutions 2006-144: Tentative Map (UDLLC) 2006-145: Tentative Map (Vast Oak) 2006-146: Development Area Plan (UDLLC) 2006-147: Development Area Plan (Vast Oak)

General Plan Amendments GP Table 2.4-1 (2014 project amendments shown in yellow) Land Use Designation 2006 Gross Acreage 2014 Gross Acreage 2006 Housing Units 2014 Housing Units 2006 Building Area (1,000sf) 2014 Building Area (1,000sf) Rural Estate Residential 12-18 10-15 20-26 20-26 -- -- Low Density Residential 45-55 50-75 245-320 200-410 -- -- Medium Density Residential 55-65 55-100 510-560 600-900 -- -- High Density Residential 35-45 5-15 570-630 200-500 -- -- Public/Institutional -- 5-20 -- -- -- -- Mixed Use 20-40 10-30 70-150 0-150 Max. of 175 100 Parks -- 10-20 -- -- -- -- Plaza 1-2 -- -- -- -- -- Linear Park 12-15 -- -- -- -- -- Open Space & Buffers -- 50-70 -- -- Copeland Creek 2-5 -- -- -- -- -- Crane Creek 15-20 -- -- -- -- -- Hinebaugh Creek 15-25 -- -- -- -- -- Petaluma Hill Rd Buffer 20-35 -- -- -- -- -- Totals 300 300 1,415-1,645 1,400-1,645 Max. of 175 100

General Plan Amendments GP Text and Figure Amendments Amendments to UDSP Area on GP Land Diagram (Figure 2.2-1)

General Plan Amendments List of GP Text Amendments: Amend High Density Residential text on page 2-20 to clarify that specific plans may modify the range of housing types permitted within the designation. Amend text on page 2-21 and 2-22 for clarification of Public/Institutional/Medium Density Residential and Commercial-R/High Density land use designations. Amend Table 2.3-1 to reflect revised acreage totals. Amend Policy LU-15 to include amended principles. Amend Table 2.4-1, Land Use Program: University Specific Plan Area, to reflect the Project, as proposed. Amend Policy CD-2 to change linear park to linear parkway and change public plaza to private plaza. Amend Figure 3.1-2 to reflect the proposed land use configuration. Amend Policy CD-31 to delete references to Figure 3.2-7 and Figure 3.2-8.

General Plan Amendments Amend Policy CD-32 to change public plaza to private plaza. Amend Policy CD-33 to change linear park to linear parkway and delete reference to Figure 3.2-9. Delete Figures 3.2-7, 3.2-8, and 3.2-9. Amend Policy CD-35 to revise open space and parks description. Amend Policy CD-36 to add Low Density Residential and Mixed Use. Amend Policy CD-38 to change two way spine road to linear parkway. Amend Figures 4.1-1, 4.1-2, and Figure 4.4-1 to reflect the proposed land use configuration. Delete Policy TR-8, a policy which requires a north-south spine road through the UDSP area. Amend Figures 5.1-1, 5.1-2, 5.2-1, and 5.3-1 to reflect the proposed land use configuration. Amend Policy OS-2 to correct reference to Policy CD-34 and revise the minimum acreage for the UDSP open space buffer.

General Plan Amendments Amend Table 5.2-2, New Parks under the General Plan, to reflect amended park acreage for the University District. Amend Figures 6.2-2, 7.1-1, 7.1-2, 7.2-1, 7.2-2, and 8.2-1 to reflect the proposed land use configuration. Amend Housing Element, Table 9.5-1 to reflect amended total housing units. Amend Housing Element, University District Specific Plan Area (page 9-62) to reflect amended acreages and unit counts. Amend Housing Element, Table 9.7-1 to reflect revised unit counts. Amend Housing Element, Appendix A, Policy HO-2 to reflect information related to the revised Specific Plan. Amend Housing Element, Appendix A, Policy HO-27 to reflect revised unit counts. Amend Housing Element Appendix C: Rohnert Park Housing Sites Figure to reflect revised unit counts.

Revised Specific Plan Residential Land Uses Acreages and Units Rural Estate - Total acreage/units consistent with 2006 Plan 2006: 12-18 acres, 26 units 2014: 11.78 acres, 26 units Low Density Slight increase in acreage/units 2006: 45-55 acres, 320 units 2014: 66.88, 382 units Medium Density Increase in acreage/units 2006: 55-65 acres, 537 units 2014: 75.93 acres, 666 units Public / Institutional / Medium Density New designation (UDLLC property) 2014: 22.34 acres, 203 units High Density Decrease in acreage/units 2006: 35-45 acres, 612 units 2014: 9.12 acres, 218 units Mixed Use/Commercial No change in total units 2006: 150 units 2014: 150 units

Revised Specific Plan Commercial Land Uses Total Acreage consistent with 2006 Plan 2006: 20-40 acres 2014: 24.34 acres Decrease in total commercial building area 2006: 175,000 sf 2014: 100,000 sf Public Plaza 2006: public plaza 2014: private plaza

Revised Specific Plan Open Space/Wetlands/Basin Locations and total acreages same as 2006 Plan Open space/wetland preservation areas Same as included in the 2006 Plan Wetlands and preserve area completed along Petaluma Hill Road

Revised Specific Plan Parks and Open Space Total Acreage 2006: 15.85 acres 2014: 19.78 acres Parks Concept 2006: Linear Park trail concept 2014: Altered Linear Parkway concept based on shift of MU/Commercial Center. Larger active park to serve as focal point of community. Class I Bike Trails Both sides of Hinebaugh Creek Connect to existing City trails Vehicular/pedestrian/bike trail bridge Trails to be owned by City, maintained by VO/UDLLC Homeowner s Association

Twin Creeks Park

Oak Grove Park

Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Plan

Revised Specific Plan Comparison of land use locations LDR HDR P LDR P/I MDR MDR HDR HDR MU P LDR MDR HDR MU P MDR LDR RE LDR OS OS P/I MDR P/I MDR OS MDR P LDR LDR MU RE OS MDR HDR P P/I/MDR OS High Density: Shifted north adjacent to Keiser Avenue, west of park Mixed Use: Shifted to eastern edge of the development area across from the GMU Public/Institutional/Medium Density: New land use designation for area south of RPX Parks: Two larger parks on Vast Oak property with greater total acreage.

Revised Specific Plan Development Phasing Phasing Plan Phase I (VO West)

Design Guidelines Appendix B of Revised Specific Plan Planning and design fundamentals for pedestrian friendly neighborhoods with defined architecture and landscaping Guidelines and standards provided for: Site and architecture for residential and mixed use areas; Residential architectural styles; and Landscaping, park and open space concepts

Tentative Map (Vast Oak) 226.58 acres south of Keiser Avenue and north of Rohnert Park Expressway 1,033 single family residential lots 2 parcels for future neighborhood parks 1 parcel for water quality detention basin 4 parcels for open space 1 parcel for high density residential 1 parcel for mixed use/commercial Phased infrastructure Twin Creeks Park and Oak Grove Park Class I Bike Trails, bridge across Hinebaugh Creek Linear Parkway

Tentative Map (Vast Oak)

Tentative Parcel Map (UDLLC) 34.34 acre UDLLC Property Three-lot tentative parcel map Parcel A (8.91 acres) - open space/buffer Parcel B (10.88 acres) - medium density residential and/or a temporary water quality and detention basin Parcel C (14.55 acres) - medium density residential

Tentative Parcel Map (UDLLC)

Development Agreement Original DA entered into in 2006 2014 Amended and Restated DA for development of Vast Oak and UDLLC properties Roadway Improvements and Regional Traffic Fees Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) Fees Growth Management Program Maintenance of City Services and Facilities Affordable Housing Plan

Development Agreement Detention Basins Temporary UDLLC Basin Regional Detention Basin (Anderson 53 Property) Permanent UDLLC Basin UDSP Plan Area Anderson 53 Property

Environmental Review CEQA Compliance NOP December 2003 Scoping meeting held December 11, 2003 Draft EIR July 2005 Recirculated Draft EIR November 2005 Revised Section 3.11 (Traffic) and Chapter 4 (Cumulative Impacts and Significant and Unavoidable Impacts) Final EIR adopted in 2006

Environmental Review Addendum to Final EIR Analyze revised 2014 Project relative to 2006 UDSP EIR Updated traffic, noise, and air quality technical studies prepared Reviewed in light of 2006 WSA Concluded that Project would not result in new or substantially more severe or significant effects than disclosed in the 2006 EIR Public circulation not required Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program

Project Analysis Parks GP Consistency Specific Plan Development Agreement Affordable Housing

Recommended Actions Recommend Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2014-031 (Rescission) Adopt Resolution No. 2014-032 (EIR) Adopt Resolution No. 2014-033 (General Plan Amendments) Adopt Resolution No. 2014-034 (Specific Plan) Adopt Resolution No. 2014-035 (Tentative Map) Adopt Resolution No. 2014-036 (Tentative Parcel Map) Introduce Ordinance No. 878 (Development Agreement)

DA Comparison Table

DA Comparison table

DA Exhibit C

DA Exhibit C

DA Exhibit C

DA Exhibit C-1