BEFORE THE GALLATIN COUNTY COMMISSION GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA

Similar documents
Planning 101: Annexation and Municipal & County Zoning. Annexation Title 7, Chapter 2, Parts Required Provision of Services

Buildings for Lease or Rent

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRYAN, TEXAS:

Adopted August 22, 2013 by Sanders County Commissioners. Page 1 of 6

B. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.

IV. REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR MINOR SUBDIVISIONS

ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

3. What is the requested zoning for the property (including intensity designator)? RM1-45 Residential (Multi-Dwelling).

ZONING CHANGE/SUP APPLICATION

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF MINING, LAND, AND WATER FINAL FINDING AND DECISION

4/3/2018. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

LOCATION MAP: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, 2015:

ORDINANCE NO

Mike & Sherry Dudley Rezone, RZ

Urban Planning and Land Use

, Assistant County Attorney. when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit: RESOLUTION NO.

TOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE COUNTY OF MIDLAND STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 178 LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE TOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE

REPORT TO THE SHASTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

PUBLIC NOTICE & AGENDA PLAN COMMISSION City Hall Forum State Street, Beloit, WI :00 PM Wednesday, November 07, 2018

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ARCHULETA COUNTY, COLORADO RESOLUTION 2018-

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

ORDINANCE NO.: Adopted: August 2, 2005 Amended: March 27, 2007 Amended: September 23, Fillmore County Rural Addressing Ordinance

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER S SNYDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JULY 2, 2014

MINUTES JOINT MEETING LINCOLN COUNTY and SIOUX FALLS PLANNING COMMISSIONS 7:00 pm July 14, 2010

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report. Executive Summary

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report

Castle Danger Subordinate Service District Phase I Land Use Ordinance #1

CHAPTER 2 APPLICATION AND PERMITTING PROCEDURES

TOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND ORDINANCE NO. 57-1, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

WEBSTER TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE. Summary Table of Amendments

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. 41. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008

BARROW COUNTY, GEORGIA

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS

Wind Energy Conversion System Ordinance No. 467

Amendment to the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; Consider Repeal Cluster Development Standards

Planning Commission Hearing Date: 2/21/2017 Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: 3/8/2017

COUNTY SUBDIVISION. Attachments: (1) Staff Analysis (2) Subdivision Maps (3) Related Documents including the Disclosure Statement

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 2015

AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 18, :00 PM City Council Chambers 125 East Avenue B, Hutchinson, Kansas

-Section Contents- 201 Districts Overlay Districts Incorporation of Maps District Boundaries...

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

Zoning Districts Agriculture Low Density Rural Residential Moderate Density Rural Residential High Density Rural Residential Manufactured Home Park

WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACTS GUIDELINES

1 st Hearing: 2 nd Hearing: Publication Dates: Notices Mailed: Rezone, Special Exception and Variance APPLICANT INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report Executive Summary

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE WHITEFISH AREA ZONING DISTRICT REQUEST FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A ZONING DISTRICT

Urban Planning and Land Use

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Urban Planning and Land Use

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS OF FACT BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE (BDC) UPDATE AMENDMENT PZ

CHAPTER 10 Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION OF THE RAPID CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS

STATE OF MICHIGAN LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE NO.53

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 801 BURLINGTON AVENUE. June 2, :00 p.m. AGENDA

LAFCO APPLICATION NO LINDE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO KEYES COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP DONATION of DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ORDINANCE (DDR, No. 45)

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016

FINAL REPORT OF THE MILES CITY ZONING COMMISSION ON DRAFT UPDATES TO ZONING REGULATIONS AND MAP

To: Flathead County Planning Board

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP

RC ; Reclassification - The Courtyards of Colonial Forge

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

CITY OF NOVI LAND DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 12, 2016

II. What Type of Development Requires Site Plan Review? There are five situations where a site plan review is required:

FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA

Project File #: SF Project Name: Jackson Ranch Filing No. 4 Parcel Nos.: , and

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ZONE CHANGE

City and County of Broomfield, Colorado

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

RESOLUTION NO. R

Board of Adjustments Staff Brief

Ordinance Page 1

CASE # LUP Commission District: # 3

Please include this letter in the record for the April 3, 2017, quasi-judicial hearing on Application #

Primary Districts Established 4

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018

SPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

Transcription:

BEFORE THE GALLATIN COUNTY COMMISSION GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF TOM MURPHY, MANAGING MEMBER OF THE BRIDGER CENTER, LLC, FOR A ZONE MAP AMENDMENT TO THE GALLATIN COUNTY/BOZEMAN AREA OFFICIAL ZONING MAP (FILE Z2016-039) FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER PURSUANT to the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Zoning District (adopted July 27, 1999), after notice given, a public hearing was held before the Gallatin County Commission (County Commission), at the Gallatin County Courthouse, 311 W. Main Street, Bozeman, Montana, on April 26, 2016, beginning at approximately 9:00 a.m., to consider a request for a Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) submitted by Tom Murphy Managing Member of the Bridger Center, LLC, to rezone an approximately 12 acre property from Agricultural Suburban (A-S) to Residential Suburban (R-S). The following is the record upon which the County Commission based its decision on this zone map amendment request: 1. The April 26, 2016, Staff Report of County Planner, Megan K. Gibson with Exhibits A-W; (Staff Report); 2. Written Public Testimony (Exhibit Q); 3. The Applicant s complete submittal received December 11, 2015, by the Gallatin County Planning Department (Application); 4. The recorded and minute proceedings of the April 26, 2016, County Commission hearing, time stamped 10:50:56 AM to 11:55:30 AM which includes verbal comments of the public (Hearing Record). BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 1

The County Commission having allowed the opportunity for testimony and public input considering the same, being fully advised of all matters presented to it regarding this matter, make the following: I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Subject Property. The Subject Property is legally described as Tract NW4SE4 of Certificate of Survey 885 in Section Thirty-One (31), Township One South (T01S), Range Six East (R06E) PMM, Gallatin County, Montana. The Subject Property is generally located southwest of Boylan Road and north of Commercial Drive. 2. Existing and Proposed Zoning Classification. a. Existing Zoning. The Subject Property is currently zoned Agricultural Suburban (A-S) within the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Zoning Regulation. The intent of the A-S District is: to provide for Agricultural Activities and rural residential Uses on larger tracts of land, and to maintain and preserve the rural character and pattern of development of outlying areas in compliance with the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Plan. For the purpose of 76-2-209 MCA, the County Commission has determined that the A-S District is residential in nature. The A-S District has allowed Principal Uses, Accessory Uses and Conditional Uses that all have established setbacks, height limitations and are subject to the General Development Standards and other applicable standards of the Zoning Regulation. The minimum lot area for a singlefamily dwelling in the A-S District is twenty (20) acres or existing parcel prior to the adoption of the Zoning District. b. Proposed Zoning. The Applicant is proposing to zone the Subject Property Residential Suburban (R-S). The intent of the R-S District is: BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 2

to provide for residential single-household country estates in areas that are in compliance with the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Plan. The R-S District has allowed Principal Uses, Accessory Uses and Conditional Uses that all have established setbacks, height limitations and are subject to the General Development Standards and other applicable standards of the Zoning Regulation. The minimum lot area for standard development shall be one (1) acre, with a minimum lot width of 150 feet in the R-S District. 3. Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning. The Subject Property is surrounded by the following: North/Northeast Property: Bridger Creek Subdivision Open Space, 3.62 acre parcel; R-S Zoning Subdivision Open Space, City of Bozeman South Property: Bridger Center Subdivision; M-1 Zoning Industrial, City of Bozeman and the Ziegler Property; A-S Zoning Zoned agricultural suburban, but being used commercially, Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Zoning District East Properties: Bridger Creek Subdivision-Village Greens Townhouses and The Links Condominiums; R-3 Zoning Residential, City of Bozeman West Property: State of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks property, approximately 53 acre tract; PLI Zoning Park, Open Space and Recreation Lands, City of Bozeman. 4. Notice. Notice of the public hearing was posted in five locations within the Zoning District on March 2, 2016, and published in the Bozeman Daily BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 3

Chronicle on March 27 and April 3, 2016. Adjacent property owners were mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, on March 28, 2016. 5. Planning Board Recommendation. The Gallatin County Planning Board considered the zone map amendment application during their public hearing held on April 12, 2016. The Planning Board voted 3:1 to recommend denial of the ZMA as submitted by the Applicant and that it not be adopted by the Gallatin County Commission. 6. Additional Findings. The County Commission made additional Findings of Fact as set forth in the recorded Hearing Record. II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. The County Commission has jurisdiction to hear and decide applications for Zone Map Amendments pursuant to Title 76, Chapter 2, Part 2 Mont. Code Ann., the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Zoning Regulations, and the Zone Map Amendment Application. B. The County Commission sets forth the following portion of the relevant plans and zoning regulations that it used for the decision of this matter. Sections refer to the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Zoning Regulation and Montana Code Annotated referenced, quoted or paraphrased. 1. General Criteria. To help provide an understanding of the requested amendment, the following questions shall be considered. a. How will the public interest be served if this application is approved? b. What reasons prevent you from using this property for any of the uses allowed under the existing zoning? c. Why is there a need for the intended use of the property at this location? BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 4

2. Compliance with Statutory Criteria. In reviewing the application for the change in zoning classification, the Governing Body shall consider the criteria of Section 76-2-203 Montana Codes Annotated. a. Zoning regulations must be made in accordance with the Growth Policy. b. Zoning Regulations must be designed to: i. Secure safety from fire and other dangers; ii. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare; and iii. Facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. c. In the adoption of zoning regulations, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider: i. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air; ii. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems; iii. Compatible urban growth in the vicinity of cities and towns that at a minimum must include areas around municipalities; iv. The character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses; and v. Conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land throughout the jurisdictional area. d. Zoning regulations must be, as nearly as possible, be made compatible with the zoning ordinances of nearby municipalities. 3. Zoning Regulation Criteria. Amendments to the official zoning map must be consistent with each of the following provisions found in the zoning regulation: a. The intent and/or purpose of the zoning Regulation. The Purpose and Intent of the Regulations is stated in Section 2. 2.01 These Regulations have been made in accordance with the Gallatin County Growth Policy (adopted April 15, 2003) and the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Plan (adopted November 1, 2005) for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, and general welfare. BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 5

Additionally, in accordance with 76-2-203(1), MCA, these Regulations are designed to: 1. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. 2. Promote public health, safety, and general welfare; and 3. Facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements. 2.02 These Regulations are intended to implement the objectives, goals and policies of the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Plan and Future Land Use Map. The intent of these Regulations are to regulate and promote orderly development. Any Use not listed herein as a Permitted Principal, Accessory, or Conditional Use is prohibited, except that the County Commission may consider at a public hearing, and on a case by case basis, if a proposed Use is similar in intent, purpose, and impact to other allowable uses in the District, and if the Use may be permitted as a Principal, Accessory, or Conditional Use. b. The intent of the zoning sub-district(s) to be affected by the proposed amendment. c. The public necessity and convenience and general welfare require such amendment. d. Any provision specific to the zoning regulation regarding amendments. Pursuant to Section 30 of the Zoning Regulation the following applies: a. Intent. These Regulations and the boundaries of the Official Zoning Map may be amended or revised whenever the public health, safety and general welfare requires such amendment. Amendments shall follow the procedure prescribed by 76-2- 201 et seq., MCA, and these Regulations. BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 6

b. Procedure. An amendment may be initiated by submittal of one of the following to the Planning Department: 1. An application of one or more landowners in the District. The application shall be filed on the required application and accompanied by the required fee. 2. Resolution of intention of the County Commission. 3. Resolution of intention of the Planning Board. 4. Spot Zoning. In 1981, the Montana Supreme Court adopted a three-part test for spot zoning with Little v. Board of County Commissioners, 193 Mont. 334, 631 P.2d 1282. To demonstrate whether or not the requested zoning designation benefits a small area and only one or a few landowners, the Governing Body must consider the following criteria: a. Whether the requested zoning classification and potential uses are significantly different from the prevailing use in the area; b. Whether the area in which the requested zoning classification benefits a small area and only a few landowners, or does the requested zoning classification benefit the surrounding neighborhood, community and the general public; and, c. Whether the requested zoning classification is compatible with the zoning district s adopted plan, or is it special legislation designed to benefit one or a few landowners at the expense of the surrounding landowners or general public. 5. Public Comment. Exhibit Q of the Staff Report included a master list of names and written public comment. C. The County Commission made additional Conclusions of Law as set forth in the recorded Hearing Record. BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 7

III. ORDER After evaluating the record and the testimony of the public, the Applicant and the Gallatin County Planning Staff, Commissioner White made a motion (11:39:28 AM) to approve the Bridger Center, LLC Zone Map Amendment request and adopt the Staff Report. Commissioner Seifert seconded said motion. Discussion, additional findings, and conclusions to the motion were made between (11:40:02 AM and 11:55:15 AM). The motion failed unanimously (3-0) (11:55:22 AM). THEREFORE IT IS NOW HEREBY ORDERED by the County Commission that the Zone Map Amendment request by Bridger Center, LLC, is denied. Appeal Provisions: Any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by the decision of the Gallatin County Commission, may within thirty (30) days after such decision or order, appeal to Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County (Section 76-2-227, MCA). GALLATIN COUNTY COMMISSION JOE P. SKINNER, MEMBER DATE ATTEST: CHARLOTTE MILLS, CLERK & RECORDER F:\Development Review\Projects\Zoning\Z2016-039 Bridger Center LLC ZMA\Bridger Center ZMA.CC.FOF.doc BRIDGER CENTER, LLC ZMA: FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER 8