Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :37:26 PM 18-CA-9531

Similar documents
1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a

l. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-

2. This action is brought pursuant to Florida Statute $ Plaintiff, ATLANTIC AVE DEVELOPMENT LLC, is a Florida Limited Liability

1". This is an actibn to contest an ad valorem tax assessments for the tax year. limited liability company and SOUTHEASTERN.

1. This is an action to contest ad valorem tax assessments for the tax year. Plaintiff, WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC.

l. This is an action to contest the decision of the Osceola County Value 2. The plaintiff, Katrina Scarborough, is the duly elected Osceola County

Plaintiff, ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

1. As of January L,20L4,legaI title to the Subject Property was vested in The

1. The Plaintiff, IA LODGING ORLANDO DOWNTOWN, LLC (hereinafter. 2. The Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to transact -1-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

1.1 This is an action for injunctive relief and declaratory relief within the

1. The Plaintiff, LAKE V/ALES RETIREMENT CENTER, [NC., (hereinafter

1. The Plaintifl, FGHP FUNDING WEST LP (hereinafter "Plaintiffl'), owns real

1.1 This is an action for injunctive relief and declaratory relief within the

1. The Plaintiff, PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, [NC., 2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

Filing # E-Filed 06/16/ :55:18 PM

1. This action arises out of the denial for the Tax Years 2016 and 2017 by the St. Lucie. Filing # E-Filed 04124/2017 ll:04:01 PM COMPLAINT

Filing # E-Filed 06/16/ :48:54 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

Defendants. I. 1. This is an action for a declaratory judgement and to challenge the removal

. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

Filing # E-Filed 06/17/ :41:16 AM

1. This is an action for statutory relief. This Court has jurisdiction pursuantto Florida

1. This is an action to contest ad valorem tax assessments pursuant to Section

2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

1. In this action, the Property Appraiser appeals a decision of the Miami-Dade

Filing # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM

1. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-Dade

1. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the partial removal

L This is an action brurght pursuant to Sections l94.l7l and (2), Florida Statutes,

Filing # E-Filed 06/16/ :40:09 PM

L This is an action brought pursuant to Sections and (2), Florida Statutes'

Courthouse News Service

UNIFORM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARDS

ALACHUA COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD. Process and Procedures 2007

UNIFORM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARDS

Florida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion

IN THE FLORIDA FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

l. This is an action for declaratory relief, contesting the legality and validity of the

1. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-Dade

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Supreme Court of Florida. Lewis WARD, et al., Petitioners, Gregory BROWN, Property Appraiser of Santa Rosa County, etc., et al., Respondents.

1. Ptaintifl Andrew A. Greenstein, in his capacity as Trustee of the Andrew. 2. Defendant CAREY BAKER is sued in his official capacrty as Lake County

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF. Plaintiff, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Filing # E-Filed 06/17/ :34:36 AM

American Bankruptcy Board of Certification Sample Exam Creditors Rights Multiple Choice Total Time Two Hours

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO

UNDERSTANDING PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS A GUIDE TO REGULAR ASSESSMENT APPEALS UNDER TRUE MARKET VALUE AND COMMON LEVEL RANGE STANDARDS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO FSC CASE NO ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Appellant, vs.

CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.

Case 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9

ARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, )

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

RESOLUTION 14- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

CITY OF HIALEAH, FLORIDA. Annual Report of Financial Information and Operating Data for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION DIVISION:

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Case 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ) ) Defendant.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

Final Report Taxpayer Complaint. Teller County

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 2222

Doug Belden, Tax Collector

COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, RESTITUTION, CIVIL PENALTIES, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF

, J.S.C. J.S.C., at a motion term of Part -7. of this Court, to be held in and for the County of New PRESENT: HON. BORN TO BUILD LLC, Index No.

RECErVED FOR FlUNG AMERICAN MARKETING GROUP, LLC.

ARTICLE IV. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE

Questioning Authority: Presumptions in Property Tax Cases

DAVIS v. GULF POWER CORP. 799 So.2d 298, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D2368 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 2001) District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

CITY OF AUSTIN S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE January 11, 2008 JANET SIMMONS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Case 2:17-cv JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv TWP-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Larry E. Levy and Loren E. Levy of The Levy Law Firm, Tallahassee for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rick Barnett.

ARIZONA TAX COURT TX /19/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

Supreme Court of Florida

Plaintiff, CASE NO. : COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ERVIN HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC

ESCROW AGREEMENT. Dated as of August [ ], 2017

DRAFT- SUBJECT TO REVISIONS BEFORE FILING

Property Tax Oversight Program

HOW TO PREPARE FOR YOUR ASSESSMENT APPEAL HEARING

IC Application of chapter Sec. 1. This chapter applies to each unit having a commission. As added by P.L (ss), SEC.18.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 4-D

Transcription:

Filing # 78610997 E-Filed 09/28/2018 03:37:26 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION SHELL POINT MARINA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, v. Plaintiff, BOB HENRIQUEZ, AS PROPERTY APPRAISER OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA; DOUG BELDON, AS TAX COLLECTOR OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA; and LEON M. BIEGALSKI, AS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendants. Case No.: Division: 18-CA-9531 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, SHELL POINT MARINA, LLC, sues Defendants, BOB HENRIQUEZ, as property appraiser of Hillsborough County, Florida; DOUG BELDON, as tax collector of Hillsborough County, Florida; and LEON M. BIEGALSKI, as the executive director of the Department of Revenue for the State of Florida, and alleges: 1. This is an action filed pursuant to section 197.182(1)(m), Florida Statutes, challenging the denial of a tax refund application filed by Plaintiff requesting a refund for Taxpayer's overpayment of ad valorem taxes for the tax years 2010-2013, regarding certain real property identified by the Property Appraiser as Parcel No. 031923.0000 (the "Property"). 2. Pursuant to section 194.171(1), Florida Statutes, this Court has original jurisdiction of all matters related to property taxation. The venue is proper for this action.

3. Defendant, BOB HENRIQUEZ, is the duly elected Property Appraiser of Hillsborough County, Florida (Property Appraiser"). The Property Appraiser is named as a party in accordance with Section 194.181(2), Florida Statutes. 4. Defendant, DOUG BELDON, is the duly elected Tax Collector for Hillsborough County, Florida ("Tax Collector"). The Tax Collector is named as a party in accordance with Section 194.181(3), Florida Statutes. 5. Defendant, LEON M. BIEGALSKI, is the Executive Director of the Department of Revenue for the State of Florida ("Department of Revenue"). The Department of Revenue is named as a party in accordance with Section 194.181(5), Florida Statutes. 6. Plaintiff, SHELL POINT MARINA, LLC ("Taxpayer") is a Florida limited liability company authorized to conduct business in Hillsborough County, Florida. At all material times, the Property owned by Taxpayer has been an operating marina, also known as a working waterfront property. 7. On January 1, 2010, and for all times thereafter, Taxpayer was the record owner of the Property. 8. The Property Appraiser erroneously assessed the Property at a value of $2,546,239, for tax year 2010; $2,435,979 for tax year 2011; $2,459,504 for tax year 2012; and $2,465,726 for tax year 2013. These assessed values were erroneous because the Property Appraiser, through oversight, mistakenly failed to classify and assess the Property as a marina, a working waterfront property. This error was admittedly not an error of judgment. 9. Taxpayer has paid the ad valorem taxes for tax years 2010-2013, which are the subject of this action, at the erroneously assessed values for those years. Attached as composite Exhibit "A" is a copy of the proof of payment and receipt of the ad valorem taxes paid by Taxpayer for the tax years 2010-2013 at the erroneously assessed valuations. 2

10. Article 7, section 4 of the Florida Constitution was amended effective for the tax year 2010 providing for favorable tax treatment to working waterfront properties, such as the Property. Art. 7, section 4(j)(1), Florida Constitution. Commencing with the year 2010, the Tax Appraiser was required by the Florida Constitution to assess Plaintiff's Property as a working waterfront property (e.g., marina) and assess the value of the Property based on that classification as opposed to any other classification. 11. In September 2014, Plaintiff brought to the attention of the Property Appraiser the Property Appraiser's error in failing to classify Plaintiffs Property in accordance with the Florida Constitution, and initiated communication with the Property Appraiser to set a meeting with the Property Appraiser to discuss the error. 12. In Taxpayer's meeting with the Property Appraiser, the Property Appraiser admitted its error in the classification and assessment of the Property, and represented to Taxpayer that the Property Appraiser would correct the error for 2014 and for the previous tax years 2010-2013, and initiate the processing of a refund to Taxpayer of its overpayment of ad valorem taxes for those prior years. 13. Taxpayer relied on these representations and was misled and lulled into inaction believing that the assessment for years 2010-2013 would be correctly adjusted and a refund would be processed and delivered to Plaintiff 14. Taxpayer's accounting department is located in Minnesota. The operating officer of Taxpayer is Jason Barth, who, at all material times, has lived in Hillsborough County, Florida. Jason Barth does not regularly communicate with the accounting department regarding receipts of refunds for Taxpayer. During much of the time between 2014 and 2018, Jason Barth was fighting a serious illness which incapacitated him from his regular duties. In the spring of 2018, Jason Barth became interested in making capital improvements to the marina and approached 3

Taxpayer's accounting department to inquire about the money from the promised tax refund in order to make these capital expenditures for the marina. At that time, Mr. Barth first became aware that the refund for the prior years 2010-2013, which the Property Appraiser represented would be provided to Taxpayer, was not, in fact, provided and that the Defendants had failed to make the correction of the error in the assessed values for the prior years and provide the promised refund for the overpayments. 15. Upon learning of this, with the assistance of the Property Appraiser, Taxpayer filed an application for the tax refund for the years 2010-2013. A true and accurate copy of the application filed by Taxpayer is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by reference. 16. In the application, the Property Appraiser admitted its error regarding the classification and assessments of the Property and the submission to the Department of Revenue of a correction and refund. 17. The amount of the refund that should have been processed and delivered to Taxpayer and for which Taxpayer's is entitled is $76,105.38, together with interest. 18. The Department of Revenue, however, rejected the application for tax refund stating, as its sole basis, that the application was untimely. On August 7, 2018, the Tax Collector notified Taxpayer of this denial. 19. Taxpayer had been misled and lulled into inaction, and relied to its detriment on the representations made by the Property Appraiser in 2014 that the classification and assessed value would be corrected and that a refund would be provided for the overpayments for the years 2010-2013. 4

20. The Department of Revenue's decision has the effect of failing to correct an overpayment of taxes by Taxpayer for the Property, an error admitted by the Property Appraiser, all to Taxpayer's detriment. 21. All conditions precedent to bringing this action have been performed, have occurred or have been waived. WHEREFORE, Taxpayer respectfully requests this Court to enter final judgment: (a) Overturning the decision of the Department of Revenue in the denial of Plaintiff's application for tax refund and directing the Department of Revenue to approve the Taxpayer's application for tax refund; (b) Determining that Plaintiff is entitled to a refund in the amount of $76,105.38, together with interest, for Taxpayer's overpayment of ad valorem taxes for the Property; (c) Directing the Tax Collector to pay the Taxpayer the amount of the refund set forth above; and (d) Granting such other and further relief as the Court deems proper. Dated: September, 2018. JO. M RA DES, ESQUIRE Flori Bar No. 332615 STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEIS SLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. 401 E. Jackson Street, Suite 2100 (33602) Post Office Box 3299 Tampa, Florida 33601 Email: jmuratides@steamsweaver.com Email: lwade@stearnsweaver.com Telephone: (813) 223-4800 Facsimile: (813) 222-5089 Attorneys for Plaintiff 43286/0001/6835324 vl 9/24/2018