ANNEXATION POLICY, PROGRAM, AND PLAN. Presented to the City Council By the Planning and Development Department

Similar documents
ANNEXATION POLICY, PROGRAM, AND PLAN. Presented to the City Council By the Planning and Development Department

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Resolution adopting City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Actual & Projected Population

WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY

EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX D HOUSING ELEMENT

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PANAMA CITY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN

RESOLUTION NO ( R)

2011 AICP Review Course

Section 4 Master Plan Framework

PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLAN AND REINVESTMENT ZONE FINANCING PLAN FOR PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1, CITY OF OAK RIDGE NORTH

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center

(,, po uox 653. i'atuxent BUmlvE, LE6NARDT.*N, MD aat. St. MenY's CoUNTY GovERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.

CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ELEMENT

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I

Infill Development Incentive Policy

Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document)

CITY OF COLLEGE STATION SERVICE PLAN FOR THE AREA TO BE ANNEXED EFFECTIVE 14 APRIL 2011

City of Boerne, Texas Incentives Policy

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

Street Improvement Plan Residential/Local Reconstruction Funding Options Part 2 Council Presentation July 21, 2015

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

From Policy to Reality

Annexation Issues and SB 6

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Regional Planning Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5D

BASTROP COUNTY TAX ABATEMENT POLICY. (Guidelines and Procedures)

Stearns Lane Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) September 18, 2018

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

CLASS 8-C: LAND USE CONTROLS AND PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT

STAFF REPORT FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING. CASE NAME: Taylor Annexation and Zoning PC DATE: August 7, 2013

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 287

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

Understanding Texas TIRZ Statute Chapter 311 Texas Tax Code

BYLAW 5781 ****************

ORDINANCE N0.18-ll6. WHEREAS, City has prepared a Service Plan for said tract which is attached as Exhibit "A" to this ordinance; &

ANNEXATION PACKET. Annexation Process. Other Considerations

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

IV. REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR MINOR SUBDIVISIONS

Saskatchewan Municipal Financing Tools

Overview of Public Improvement Districts (PIDs)

Pueblo Regional Development Plan, Addendum

City of Azle Application for Incentive

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS Staff Report May 16, 2017

Implementation TOWN OF LEON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9-1

City of Peachtree City. Annexation Review Process

EXCERPTS FROM HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY CHARTER

SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN CITY OF HASLET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN August 3, \ v

Funding Public Capital Projects

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 624 Oak Lawn Avenue

Title 6 - Local Government Provisions Applicable to Special Purpose Districts and Other Political Subdivisions

Application to Amend the Bay County Zoning Map (Please type or print clearly)

MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Transit-Oriented Development Purchase and Sale Agreement and Ground Lease

Senate Eminent Domain Bill SF 2750 As passed by the Senate. House Eminent Domain Bill HF 2846/SF 2750* As passed by the House.

The Texas Constitution sets out five basic rules for property taxes in our state:

SANDOVAL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 10, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING

Town of Onalaska. A scale map depicting the portion of Pineview Drive to be officially laid out as a Town highway is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING REPORT

A. Land Use Relationships

1. Make the following projections by year, including the first and last year in which any construction and/or development takes place:

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

(if more than one, give square footage for each) ANNEXATION LOT LINE Adjustments PRE/FINAL PLAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Annexation Policy Plan of the City of Logan, Utah

GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA. For Granting Tax Abatement in the North Killeen Revitalization Area. Designated by the City of Killeen, Texas

Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: April 5, 2016

City of Titusville "Gateway to Nature and Space"

URBANIZATION ELEMENT. PREPARED BY CITY OF MEDFORD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 200 SOUTH IVY STREET MEDFORD, OREGON

Parcel Tax Reporting- Statistical Data (To Be Completed by Levying Entity)

Silver Line Acceptance

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4F

Bill 7, Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016

Enhancing Project Profitability Utilizing Public Financing Central Texas Commercial Association of Realtors October 25, 2017

City Hall Essentials Planning & Zoning

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR

CITY COUNCIL VOTING RESULTS

Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

WHEREAS, the City of Kenosha, Wisconsin is a Wisconsin municipality with offices at nd Street, Kenosha, Wisconsin 53140; and

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

FINDINGS OF FACT. Page 1 of 8

Planning 101: Annexation and Municipal & County Zoning. Annexation Title 7, Chapter 2, Parts Required Provision of Services

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS StaffReport to the City Council

RIVENDALE POINTE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN. August 9, MuniCap v 1.6

Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

Oregon Statutes Relevant to Quiet Water Home Owners Association

Expiration of Transportation Certificate of Concurrency for Application for Minor or Major Development; Approval

Reappraisal Important Property Tax Information

Special Exception Use Order Application

Interlocal Service Boundary and Joint Planning Agreement. City of Coleman and Sumter County

To achieve growth, property development, redevelopment and an improved tax base in the cities and boroughs in the Lehigh Valley.

COMMUNITY OPTION STUDY

Fiscal Impact Analysis Evergreen Community

Summary. Draft Redevelopment Plan Summary Flowery Branch Tax Allocation District # 1:

Transcription:

ANNEXATION POLICY, PROGRAM, AND PLAN Presented to the City Council By the Planning and Development Department August 2, 2011 1

Purpose Review the following: Annexation policy Annexation program Annexation plan Annexation actions for remainder of 2011 Answer questions and receive comments City Limits Extraterritorial Jurisdiction 2

Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Vision and Values PART I: FOCUSING ON THE FUTURE 1. Population Trends 2. Economic Trends 3. Financial Trends PART II: BUILDING STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS 4. Land Use 5. Housing 6. Parks and Community Services 7. Libraries 8. Human Services 9. Neighborhood Capacity Building PART III: DEVELOPING A SOUND ECONOMY 10. Economic Development 11. Transportation 12. Education 13. Historic Preservation 14. Urban Design 15. Arts and Culture PART IV: PROVIDING A SAFE COMMUNITY 16. Police Services 17. Fire and Emergency Services 18. Environmental Quality 19. Public Health 20. Municipal Facilities PART V: TOOLS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 21. Capital Improvements 22. Development Regulations 23. Financial Incentives 24. Annexation Policy 25. Intergovernmental Cooperation APPENDICES A. Existing Plans and Studies B. Population Projection Methodology C. Sector Land Use Policies D. Funded Capital Improvements E. Unfunded Capital Improvements F. Youth Asset Model G. Annexation Plan, Policy and Program H. Conservation and Reclamation District Policy I. Tax Abatement Policy Statement GLOSSARY 3

History of Annexation 1873 2011 City land area (sq. mi.) 4.2 350 Limited Purpose --- 13 City population 3,000 746,290 ETJ land area (sq. mi.) --- 310 Legend Annexation Years 1873, Original Town 1874-1930 No Annexations 1931-1940 1941-1962 1963-1986 1987-1990 1991-2005 2006-2010 Limited Purpose Annexation (2002-2004, and 2007) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction 4

The Three P s Annexation Policy City Council adopted in September 2004 Provides criteria for annexation Annexation Program Adopted yearly with Comprehensive Plan Identifies areas the City may consider for annexation in the next 5 and 20 year windows Annexation Plan State mandated when area to be annexed has 100 or more residential dwelling units 5

Annexation Policy Provides the City Council with specific, objective, and prescriptive guidance for making annexation decisions Enables the City to be proactive in identifying areas to consider for annexation Promotes meaningful and timely public participation in formulating the annexation program as part of the annual update of the Comprehensive Plan 6

Annexation Policy Contents I. Purpose and intent II. Definitions III. Annexation criteria and procedures IV. Disannexation V. Preparation of fiscal impact analysis VI. Preparation of five-year annexation program VII. Preparation of three-year annexation plan VIII. External communication 7

Annexation Policy: Criteria A. Full-Purpose Annexation Area to meet one or more of the following conditions: 1. Enclave a. Enclave within City s ETJ b. Ability to provide municipal services 2. Urban Development a. Development activity of an urban nature b. Ability to provide municipal services c. Positive fiscal impact analysis 3. Growth Center a. Designated growth center b. Ability to provide municipal services c. Positive fiscal impact analysis 4. Adverse Impact a. Adverse impact on City if not annexed b. Ability to provide municipal services 5. Option to Expand a. Detriment to City s orderly growth if not annexed b. Ability to provide municipal services Enclave City Limit 8

B. Annexation Policy: Criteria (cont.) Limited-Purpose Annexation Area must meet one or more of the five conditions for full-purpose annexation and either of the following conditions: 1. Populated Area 2. Long-Term Development Limited-Purpose Full-Purpose ETJ 9

Why does the City annex enclaves? To promote sustainable development by Facilitating the efficient delivery of municipal services, Ensuring timely police, fire and emergency response, Allowing all residents using City facilities to contribute their fair share to the operation and maintenance costs, Assessing transportation impact fees for developments using City arterials for access, and Applying appropriate land use regulations, development standards, gas drilling standards, property maintenance standards, fire codes, construction codes and environmental regulations. 10

Annexation Policy: Fiscal Impact Analysis General Fund revenues based on existing and proposed land uses and population estimate General Fund expenditures based on transitional costs and anticipated service response calls 10-year analysis timeframe 11

Annexation Program The annexation program is a general guide for making decisions about annexation. Areas are identified within Fort Worth s ETJ that the City might wish to consider for annexation during the next five years. The annexation program is not legally binding: Inclusion of an area in the annexation program does not obligate the City to annex that area. Omission of an area from the annexation program does not prevent the City from annexing that area. 12

Annexation Program Contents Procedure to prepare annexation program Potential City-initiated and owner-initiated annexations, 2011 2015 Potential long-term annexations, 2016 2030 Relationship to capital improvement program 13

Annexation Plan The annexation plan is a State-mandated document for considering annexation of areas with 100 or more residential parcels. Areas may only be annexed three years after the plan is adopted. The annexation plan is legally binding: Inclusion of an area in the annexation plan does obligate the City to annex that area. Removal of an area from the annexation plan may prevent the City from annexing that area for five years. 14

Development Agreements in Lieu of Annexation State law requires cities to offer a development agreement in lieu of annexation to parcels with an agricultural exemption from the appraisal district. If the development agreement is accepted by the property owner, the area cannot be annexed for a specified time period, typically five years. The development agreement requires the property owner to continue the agricultural uses and follow certain City regulations. 15

Potential Annexations: 2011-2015 32 areas totaling 13.5 square miles: 16 enclaves 4 areas in a mixed-use growth center 1 area previously annexed for limited purposes 4 areas of adverse impact 5 areas with anticipated urban development 2 areas of possible ownerinitiated annexation 16 13

Potential Annexations: 2016-2030 39 areas totaling 43.6 square miles, including: 19 enclaves. 4 potential enclaves. 16 areas with anticipated urban development. 1 area with possible adverse impact 14 areas of possible ownerinitiated annexation. 20 17

Proposed Annexation Actions for Remainder of 2011 City-Initiated Owner-Initiated 18

City-Initiated Disannexation Avondale-Haslet Road Right-of-Way 0.6 acres Northern half of roadway Southern half disannexed as part of agreement with Haslet To be considered: August 2 Haslet 19

City-Initiated Annexation Full-Purpose Annexation Dirks Road right-of-way Area 3-1 Area 13 Addition to 3-Year Annexation Plan Area 18 5-Year Development Agreement Portion of Area 73 20

Full-Purpose Annexation: Dirks Road Right-of-Way 15.4 acres City-Initiated Annexation (cont.) City widening roadway with Tarrant County Principal arterial To be considered: August 2 21

City-Initiated Annexation (cont.) Full-Purpose Annexation: Area 3-1 749 acres CFW water service area 18 residential parcels 14 dwelling units 28 non-residential parcels $15 million assessed value To be considered: December 2011 22

City-Initiated Annexation (cont.) Full-Purpose Annexation: Area 13 247 acres CFW water service area 8 residential parcels 7 dwelling units 34 non-residential parcels $7.6 million assessed value To be considered: December 2011 23

Addition to 3-Year Annexation Plan: Area 18 62 acres City-Initiated Annexation (cont.) City of Fort Worth water service area 109 dwelling units 1 non-residential parcel $39.8 million assessed value Add to plan: August 2 24

City-Initiated Annexation (cont.) 5-Year Development Agreement: Portion of Area 73 1,127 acres CFW water service area 4 residential parcels 3 dwelling units 23 non-residential parcels $10.8 million assessed value Development agreement: August 9 25

2484 Avondale-Haslet Road 3.3 acres CFW water service area 1 non-residential parcel $1.1 million assessed value To be considered: August 23 Owner-Initiated Annexation 26

12700 Block of Private Road 4716 38.2 acres Owner-Initiated Annexation (cont.) CFW water service area West of Texas Motor Speedway Proposed GE locomotive engine manufacturing facility $25 million building cost To be considered: August 23 27

Schedule for 2011 Annexation Actions August 2 August 9 August 23 December 6 Disannexation of Avondale-Haslet right-of-way Annexation of Dirks Road right-of-way Addition of Area 18 to 3-year annexation plan Authorization for development agreements in lieu of annexation for portion of Area 73 Annexation of 2484 Avondale-Haslet Road Annexation of proposed GE manufacturing facility Annexation of Area 3-1 Annexation of Area 13 28

Questions? Comments? 29

Full municipal services Elements of Service Plan Timeframe Fire and police protection Immediately Emergency medical services Immediately Solid waste collection Immediately Operation and maintenance of parks, publicly- Immediately owned facilities, and streets Library services Immediately Drainage and storm sewer maintenance Immediately Enforcement of environmental health, zoning and Immediately subdivision ordinances Enforcement of building and construction codes Immediately Inspection services Immediately Access to water and wastewater services unless Within 2½ years of services are provided by another utility petition and commitment (or 4½ years, if justified) 30

How does annexation affect the use of land? Existing land uses may continue after annexation, even if inconsistent with City of Fort Worth zoning applied to the property. The uses become nonconforming, aka grandfathered. Existing water wells and septic systems may be used. New development and redevelopment must comply with all City codes. 31

What capital improvements are needed to support City-initiated annexations in years 2011 to 2015? 32

What capital improvements are needed to support City-initiated annexations in years 2011 to 2015 (cont.)? 33

What elements are included in the annexation plan? Resolution to Amend the 1999 Annexation Plan, first year Coordinate Provision of Services with current service providers, first and second years Informational meetings with property owners, first through third years 34