BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA TUESDAY 9:00 A.M FEBRUARY 8, 2005

Similar documents
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA WEDNESDAY 9:00 A.M. FEBRUARY 17, 2010

Washoe County Board Of Equalization

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA WEDNESDAY 9:00 A.M. FEBRUARY 10, 2010

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA THURSDAY 9:00 A.M. FEBRUARY 21, 2008

How to Petition for a Review of Your Property Taxes: County Board of Equalization

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA TUESDAY 8:30 A.M. FEBRUARY 27, Nancy Parent, Chief Deputy County Clerk

BOARD OF REVIEW SCRIPT

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA WEDNESDAY 9:00 A.M. FEBRUARY 4, 2009

SHELBY COUNTY APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CERTIFICATE TO ROLL. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Property Appraiser in

VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Board Conference Room, Fifth Floor Pinellas County Courthouse 315 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida October 4, :30 A.M.

vv BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA FRIDAY 9:00 A.M. FEBRUARY 3, 2012

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA THURSDAY 9:00 A.M. FEBRUARY 5, 2009

Tioga County Board of Assessment Appeals Tioga County Courthouse 118 Main Street Wellsboro, PA 16901

APPEAL PROCESS GUIDE FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER

Board of Review Present: Dennis Uecker, Bob Knueppel, Bruce Nekich, Mary Jensen, Mike Grant, Kim Hopfinger and Ted Engelbart

H.B. 75 As Introduced

Board of Equalization Procedures Manual

Perry County. Appeal Procedures, Rules, and Regulations v.1.1

PASCO COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD 2008 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

CERTIFICATE TO ROLL. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Property Appraiser in and for BROWARD

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Location& Mailing Address: Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, 1910 Carnegie Ave., 3rd Floor, Cleveland, Ohio

MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS

UNIFORM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARDS

Appeals Process Overview

UNDERSTANDING PROPERTY TAXES IN COLORADO

MINERAL COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

UNIFORM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARDS

ARB POLICY MANUAL. Appraisal Review Board of Milam County. ARB Policy Manual - June

- - - (ONE PARCEL PER FORM) PROPERTY INDEX NUMBER (PIN)

November 2017 Legal Calendar

UNDERSTANDING PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS A GUIDE TO REGULAR ASSESSMENT APPEALS UNDER TRUE MARKET VALUE AND COMMON LEVEL RANGE STANDARDS

Staff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement

The Texas Constitution sets out five basic rules for property taxes in our state:

ALACHUA COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD. Process and Procedures 2007

NOTICE OF PETITION. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed petition of Mercedes Casado, Paul Hertgen and

Harris County Appraisal District

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2001

D Minor* or Major Subdivision Final Approval

OFFICIAL MINUTES OF MARION COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD. December 13, 2013

2018 Annual Appraisal Report

2016 MARTIN COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Martin County Commission Chambers 2401 SE Monterey Road, Stuart, FL Friday, April 7, :00 AM

Others present were Chief Appraiser Don Long, Personal Property Appraiser Robby Williams and Board Secretary Betty Browning.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, on Relation of Its Department of Highways, Appellant, v. CECIL G. CAMPBELL and CHARLOTTE CAMPBELL, Husband and Wife, Respondents.

HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION

Town of Round Hill Planning Commission Meeting July 11, :00 p.m.

Central Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board

July 18, 2017 Planning & Zoning Meeting 6:30 p.m.

* * ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO Mr. Gary L. Flory McPherson County Counselor The Home State Bank & Trust Bldg. McPherson, Kansas 67460

MOTLEY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT

INFORMATION ON 2017 PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS AND APPEALS IN ORLEANS PARISH Property Tax Assessment & Appeal Information

AUSTIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY MANUAL

TWO LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULAR BOARD MEETING MARCH 15, :45 A.M.

NOTICE GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EQUALIZATION MEETING. Tuesday, April 15, 2:00 p.m.

HOW TO PREPARE FOR YOUR ASSESSMENT APPEAL HEARING

Request for Proposals For Village Assessment Services

Routt County Board Hearing Petition for Abatement

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

February 2014 Legal Calendar

SB 346, Property Tax Administration Procedures

A G E N D A. Administrative Review Board City Council Chambers 800 Municipal Drive, Farmington, NM February 9, 2017 at 6:00 p.m.

6. The entity proposing to take your property must make a good faith offer to buy the property before it files a lawsuit to condemn the property.

WORK SESSION DOCUMENT

Property Tax and Real Estate Appraisal Services

INSTRUCTIONS AND RULES OF PROCEDURE & COMPLAINT AGAINST VALUATION FORM TAX YEAR 2018 CALENDAR YEAR 2019

ASSEMBLY, No. 326 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT POSTING

LOUISIANA TAX COMMISSION

Request for Proposals For Assessor. Charter Township of Augusta Washtenaw County

Dallas Central Appraisal District Excerpt from Protest Process


Official Minutes of MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. December 20, 2017

Reappraisal Important Property Tax Information

Village of Palm Springs

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

VARIANCE FROM USE APPLICATION PROCEDURES

VILLAGE OF HINSDALE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF THE MEETING October 15, 2014

Matter of Holcomb v Town of RIchford 2012 NY Slip Op 33130(U) December 13, 2012 Sup Ct, Tioga County Docket Number: Judge: Jeffrey A.

Q. How is Agricultural property valued? A. GENERAL INFORMATION Many states have laws regarding the preferential assessment of agricultural land.

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 20 REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT. Article I. In General

Community Services Department Planning and Development ABANDONMENT APPLICATION

PROCEDURE FOR CLOSING STREETS AND ALLEYS UNDER N.C.G.S. 160A-299 CITY OF GASTONIA, LEGAL DEPT., P. O. BOX 1748, GASTONIA, NC ( )

OPERATIONAL PLAN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DOWNTOWN SUN PRAIRIE

April 7, B. Notice of Assessment - Taxpayers receive annual notices of assessment in accordance with , VA Code, Ann.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET. DATE: January 12, 2018 HCR18-002

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1454

Somervell Central Appraisal District

OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Walker CAD Annual Report (As required by IAAO Standard 6.5.1)

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Final Report Taxpayer Complaint. Teller County

Motion by Hovland, seconded by Perry and carried, to approve the Dangerous Dog Ordinance.

William S. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. In this eminent domain action, the JEA appeals a final order awarding

INVENTORY, APPRAISAL AND RECORD OF VALUE

Abstract Of Assessments And Levies

CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES Thursday, April 20, 2017

District Formation Instructions ORS Chapter 198. Instructions for Filing an Application by Individuals

Transcription:

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA TUESDAY 9:00 A.M FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PRESENT: Steven Sparks, Chairman Gary Schmidt, Vice Chairman William Brush, Member Thomas Koziol, Member John Krolick, Member Nancy Parent, Chief Deputy Clerk Peter Simeoni, Deputy District Attorney Ernie McNeill, Senior Appraiser The Board met pursuant to a recess taken on February 7, 2005, in the Commission Chambers of the Washoe County Administration Complex, 1001 East Ninth Street, Reno, Nevada. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sparks, the Clerk called the roll, and the Board conducted the following business: 9:00 A.M. - BLOCK 1 SWEARING IN WITNESSES Chief Deputy Clerk Nancy Parent administered the Oath to Appraiser Mark Stafford. CONSOLIDATION OF HEARINGS On motion by Member Koziol, seconded by Member Brush, which motion duly carried, Chairman Sparks ordered that the typical consolidation procedures of hearing appeals together that assert the same or similar issues where no petitioners are present be adopted for this day's hearings, although it was noted that will probably not be the case in today's hearings. 05-31E HEARING NOS. 16A THROUGH 16U - HARRAH'S CLUB PARCEL NOS. 011-071-26, 011-052-32, -33, -35, -36, -37, -38, -39, 40, -41, -42, -43, -44, -45, -46, -47, -48, 011-071-09, 011-071-25 AND 011-370-50 A petition for Review of Assessed Valuation received from Harrah's Club, protesting the taxable valuation on land and improvements located at 200 North Center Street, Reno, Washoe County, Nevada, was set for consideration at this time. The property is zoned HCD and CB and designated casino, hotel-casino. FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PAGE 38

into evidence: The Petitioner was not present but had submitted the following documents Exhibit A, Financial Statements. Appraiser Stafford submitted the following documents into evidence: Exhibit I, Assessor s Fact Sheet(s) including comparable sales, maps, financial analyses, and subject's appraisal record, pages 1 through 80. Appraiser Stafford advised that the Assessor is recommending a total taxable value of $105,000,000 for the subject property based on an analysis of the financial statements submitted by the petitioner. In response to Chairman Sparks, Appraiser Stafford reviewed the financial statements and his analysis of the same. He also responded to questions from Board members. The Chairman closed the hearing. Based on the FINDINGS that economic obsolescence in the amount of $12,963,182 should be applied to the subject parcels, as evidenced by the Assessor's and Petitioner's Exhibits, on motion by Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Koziol, which motion duly carried, it was ordered that the total taxable value of the land, improvements and personal property for Harrah's Club be set at $105,000,000.00 by applying the obsolescence to the improvement value of Assessor's Parcel No. 011-071- 26. The Board also made the finding that, with this adjustment, the land and improvements are valued correctly and the total taxable value does not exceed full cash value. The values by parcel are as follows: PARCEL LAND IMPROVEMENTS PERS PPTY TOTAL 011-071-26 $ 5,957,250 $23,618,895 $8,554,869 $ 38,131,014 011-052-32 1,074,900 1,056,718 $ 2,131,618 011-052-33 985,800 3,113,629 $ 4,099,429 011-052-35 450,000 536,907 $ 986,907 011-052-36 825,320 16,543,292 $ 17,368,612 011-052-37 275,000 $ 275,000 011-052-38 550,000 $ 550,000 011-052-39 275,000 $ 275,000 011-052-40 275,000 9,950 $ 284,950 011-052-41 412,500 11,015 $ 423,515 011-052-42 412,500 16,882 $ 429,382 011-052-43 1,100,000 556,783 $ 1,656,783 011-052-44 3,478,000 27,019,672 $ 30,497,672 011-052-45 705,000 $ 705,000 PAGE 39 FEBRUARY 8, 2005

011-052-46 256,800 $ 256,800 011-052-47 763,200 $ 763,200 011-052-48 900,000 238,737 $ 1,138,737 011-071-09 538,125 1,993,908 $ 2,532,033 011-071-25 643,500 1,850,408 $ 2,493,908 011-370-50 500 $ 500 TOTALS $19,878,395 $76,566,736 $8,554,869 $105,000,000 05-32E HEARING NO. 55 - ONE SOUTH LAKE STREET, LLC (SIENA) PARCEL NO. 011-122-09 A petition for Review of Assessed Valuation received from One South Lake Street, LLC, protesting the taxable valuation on land, buildings and personal property located at One South Lake Street, Reno, Washoe County, Nevada, was set for consideration at this time. The property is zoned TRD and designated casino/hotel. Mike Bosma of Grant, Thornton, LLP, representing the Petitioner, was sworn and submitted the following documents into evidence: Exhibit A, Summary Report of a Complete Appraisal prepared by William G. Kimmel & Associates. Mr. Bosma testified that William Kimmel did a complete reconciliation of value on the subject property and arrived at a total value range of $12.8- to $14.9-million. He drew the Board's attention to several pages within the summary report detailing the subject's financial history. Mr. Bosma then responded to questions from Board members providing more detailed information on the revenue and expenses. Appraiser Stafford submitted the following documents into evidence: Exhibit I, Assessor s Fact Sheet(s) including comparable sales, maps, financial analyses, and subject's appraisal record, pages 1 through 67. Appraiser Stafford reviewed his analysis of the subject property's financial statements, stating the property is under performing in the gaming area, but their hotel and food/beverage operations are doing well. He further testified that he is in agreement that the correct value for the subject property should be $15,000,000. Appraiser Stafford then answered questions of the Board members. In rebuttal, Mr. Bosma provided additional information concerning the operations of the subject property. FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PAGE 40

The Chairman closed the hearing. Based on the FINDINGS that additional economic obsolescence in the amount of $5,000,334 should be applied to the subject property as evidenced by the Assessor's and Petitioner's Exhibits, on motion by Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Krolick, which motion duly carried, it was ordered that the taxable value of the improvements on Parcel No. 011-122-09 be reduced to $6,738,137, and the taxable value of the land and personal property be upheld, for a total taxable value of $15,000,000. The Board also made the finding that, with this adjustment, the land and improvements are valued correctly and the total taxable value does not exceed full cash value. 05-33E HEARING NO. 50 - PONDEROSA HOTEL, INC. PARCEL NO. 011-226-34 A petition for Review of Assessed Valuation received from the Ponderosa Hotel, protesting the taxable valuation on land and improvements located at 515 South Virginia Street, Reno, Washoe County, Nevada, was set for consideration at this time. The property is zoned CB, 43/COMM and designated hotel. The Petitioner was not present. Appraiser Stafford submitted the following documents into evidence Exhibit I, Assessor s Fact Sheet(s) including comparable sales, maps, income analyses and subject's appraisal record, pages 1 through 32. Appraiser Stafford testified that the subject property is operated as two businesses, one of which is a 165-room hotel with weekly rentals, and the other is a nightclub. He reviewed his analysis of the subject's revenue and expenses. Appraiser Stafford further stated he met with the owner and did consider the repairs that the owner indicated needed to be done. He said the subject is in the 2005 reappraisal area and the Assessor had been carrying some obsolescence on it. Appraiser Stafford said the property is making some good revenue and he believes the Assessor's value is correct. The Chairman closed the hearing. Based on the FINDINGS that the land and improvements are valued correctly and the total taxable value does not exceed full cash value, as evidenced by the Assessor's Exhibits, on motion by Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Krolick, which motion duly carried, it was ordered that the taxable value of the land, improvements and personal property on Parcel No. 011-226-34 be upheld. PAGE 41 FEBRUARY 8, 2005

05-34E HEARING NOS. 51A THROUGH I - PNK, (RENO) LLC PARCEL NOS. 038-120-08, -14, 038-430-02, -03, -04, -22, -24, -28, AND PERSONAL PROPERTY I.D. NO. 2/283-003 A petition for Review of Assessed Valuation received from PNK (Reno) LLC, (Boomtown) protesting the taxable valuation on land, improvements and personal property located at 2100 Interstate 80 West (at Garson Road), Verdi, Washoe County, Nevada, was set for consideration at this time. The property is zoned HC and designated hotel/casino and ancillary operations. The Petitioner was not present. Appraiser Stafford advised there was some confusion on the original petition as to whether the property owner was appealing for 2004 or 2005 and that he would only be addressing 2005. Chairman Sparks noted that on the petition documents the Board received there is an "X" across the column for 2/283-003. He asked to see the original of this document. Chief Deputy Clerk Nancy Parent provided Chairman Sparks the original document, and he noted the "X" was in red, so it could not have been done by the petitioner. The Board agreed to separate this hearing and only hear the 2005 secured roll value at this time. Appraiser Stafford began reviewing his analysis of the subject property's financial statements. Chairman Sparks noted a letter from the petitioner wherein they indicate their willingness to provide additional information to Appraiser Stafford. Mr. Stafford responded that there were e-mails and faxes going back and forth over the previous weekend between himself and the petitioner's representative. Chairman Sparks stated he would like to see those reports and review the information. On motion by Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Brush, which motion duly carried, it was ordered that Hearing Nos. 0051A through 0051I for PNK (Reno) LLC, (Boomtown) be continued to Friday, February 18, 2005 to consider both the secured property for 2005 and the unsecured property for 2004; that the Clerk so notify the petitioner; and that the petitioner and the Assessor be advised that they need to get any and all information to the Board through the County Clerk's Office prior to the hearing. Member Schmidt commented this is a good reflection of the issue he has raised in the past regarding where petitions should be filed. In this case, the petitioner, in all good faith, derived the information from somewhere that he could pass his information for his appeal to the Board of Equalization through the Assessor's office; but the information did not get to the Board. FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PAGE 42

BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Schmidt stated there was a difference of opinion on a parcel considered the previous day and read a portion of NRS 361.227, concerning appraising vacant and improved land, into the record. He stated he would like to request a future agenda item, noting it was his recollection that the Board previously decided that any Board member could place an item on an agenda; and he believes there is some confusion at the Clerk's Office where they are either unwilling to do so or are concerned about the process. He requested the Board discuss this further and said, in the meantime, he would submit his items in writing to Chairman Sparks. Member Schmidt stated one item he would like placed on a future agenda as soon as possible is consideration of the seating arrangement for the Board, as he would like to have Legal Counsel sit off the podium and away from the Board. Chairman Sparks advised that he would have to leave the February 9, 2005 meeting by 5:15 p.m. and he would leave it up to the other Board members whether to have an alternate member sit in if they feel the meeting is going to go late. PUBLIC COMMENTS Gary Schmidt, Washoe County resident, discussed the bill draft by the County to the State Legislature to modify the compensation of the individual Board members. He said the bill could accommodate other statutory changes in the manner in which the Board functions; and he will be lobbying for a change to extend the February 28 th deadline to the end of March in any year when there are more than 400 appeals filed. He urged the Board members and citizens to weigh in with the County Commissioners and State Legislators in regard to these issues as well as other issues regarding the County Board of Equalization. * * * * * * * * * * * PAGE 43 FEBRUARY 8, 2005

10:55 a.m. There being no further hearings or business to come before the Board, the Board recessed until February 9, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. ATTEST: STEVEN SPARKS, Chairman Washoe County Board of Equalization AMY HARVEY, County Clerk and Clerk of the Washoe County Board of Equalization Minutes prepared by Sharon Gotchy, Deputy Clerk FEBRUARY 8, 2005 PAGE 44