RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE ADOPTING AND LEVYING REVISED ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Staff Report

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO THE CITY'S

Agenda Item No. 6B January 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, City Manager

CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 6 From: Susan George, Town Manager July 26, 2011

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TULARE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

CITY COMMISSION REPORT (and Planning Board Report) For Meeting Scheduled for November 7, 2013 Vested Rights Special Permit Resolution

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

TOWN OF WINDSOR TOWN COUNCIL

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO APPROVING THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AND THE NEW VILLAGE SCHOOL.

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

And adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on May 2, 2017 by the following vote:

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

ORDINANCE NO

City of Calistoga Staff Report

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1228

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

Councilmember Heilman, Mayor Pro Tempore Meister, and Mayor Horvath. Councilmember Duran. Councilmember D'Amico. None.

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR 1855 AND 1875 CLAYTON ROAD

RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE SUNSET DATE FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM TO DECEMBER 31, 2016; AND

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

December 13,2011. Resolution No Resolution of the Board of Directors Marina Coast Water District Approving a District Surplus Property Policy

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

RESOLUTION NUMBER 5059

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE RATE ADJUSTMENT

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

Planning Commission Staff Report

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO. RD:TDM:CER 6/1/2017

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

PAMELA ARENDS -KING, FINANCE DIRECTOR /CITY TREASURER ADOPT RESOLUTION NO APPOINTING CERTAIN PARTIES TO

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4678

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Resolution No : 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD, ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

RESOLUTION NO. -15 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE ADOPTING HOUSING IMPACT FEES FOR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

R Meeting September 26, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM

CITY OF SAN LEANDRO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OVERSIGHT BOARD. Cynthia Battenberg, Business Development Manager

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2015

ORDINANCE NO. _ _

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

Planning Commission Staff Report August 4, 2016

Village of Palm Springs

RESOLUTION TO FORM THE REDSTONE PARKWAY BENEFIT DISTRICT

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

VILLAGE OF JUSTICE ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO xx

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. December 11, 2018

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. (,.J Key Words: Southwest Dixon, General Plan, Specific Plan Rezone Meeting Date: May 18, 2016

Ordinance(s): Contract(s):

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

Meeting Date: March 14, 2018

Agenda Item No. 6D June 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. 2009 137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE ADOPTING AND LEVYING REVISED ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES WHEREAS, the City of Elk Grove General Plan includes a general description of the location, capacity, and types of roadway improvements needed to serve new development in the City; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure that adequate roadway facilities are provided for the residents of the City and so that new development pays its fair share for the cost of providing these facilities, levy of roadway development impact fees is necessary; and WHEREAS, Chapter 16.95 of the Elk Grove Municipal Code as amended by Ordinance No. 10-2009, effective June 26, 2009, establishes a program for funding roadway facilities from development impact fees (Roadway Fee Program); and WHEREAS, Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. has prepared for the City an Elk Grove Roadway Fee Program Nexus Study - 2009 Update dated May 13, 2009 (Nexus Study) which details the relationship between the use of and the need for the proposed ~--- -_...""-...,...,..~...,...1"...+ "... \uhi,..h +ho fooc!.:llro irnnnc!qn tt,q rqi~tinnc::hin ICC~ CIIIU lilt; I.YtJv~ VI Uv vlvtjlllvlll VII YYIIiVII I,llv I"''''~ """IV 1I"t''''''''''~' "11_..._..._.,"",... between the amount of the fees and cost of the public facilities, and has been presented to the City Councii and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2009 and February 11, 2009, the City Council held special meetings to introduce the roadway fee updates to the general public and receive public comment regarding the Nexus Study then under preparation; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fee schedule detailed in the attached Table 2, and the planned improvements detailed in the Nexus Study are consistent with the Elk Grove General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 66016, the data required to be made available to the public prior to the adoption of the roadway fee program update by this resolution was made available for public review at least 10 days prior to the date of this meeting; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 66018, notice of a public hearing on the levy of the Roadway Fee was published in the Elk Grove Citizen for at least ten days prior to the date of this meeting; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing before the City Council on the levy of the revised Roadway Fee Program was held on April 22, 2009, at which public testimony was received and duly considered; and

WHEREAS, levy of revised fees for the Roadway Fee Program is not a "project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because it is a funding mechanism having no physical effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Elk Grove hereby approves and adopts: 1) Approval of Findings. After considering the information and determinations contained in the Roadway Fee Program, the Nexus Study and the testimony received at the public hearing, the City Council hereby approves and expressly adopts the findings, determinations, and conclusions contained in the Nexus Study. 2) Approval and Adoption of Revised Fees. The roadway fees applicable to new development in the City set forth in the attached Table 2-Road Fee Program are hereby approved and levied. 3) Exemptions. All determinations regarding the exemptions provided in this section shall be made by the City Finance Director or her designee. The following shall be exempted from payment of the roadway fees: a. Public Agencies. All federal and state agencies, public school districts, fire stations, and the City of Elk Grove wiii be exempt from the roadway fees. Other non-city public agencies shall be subject to payment of the fees; however, the City may choose to waive some or all of the fees in certain cases. b. Replacement/Reconstruction. i. Residential Structure. Any replacement or reconstructions (no change in use) of any residential unit that is damaged or destroyed as a result of fire, flood, explosion, wind, earthquake, riot, or other calamity, or act of God shall be exempt from the roadway fees. However, if the residential unit(s) replaced or reconstructed exceeds the documented +,...,+,..1......,..,,100..,...,..,..,of... i+"'",..,of +1-."" A"""..."',.",.I/,.Il"IIt..ft...,...,,...""',.,I..""'''':,.,,..,...:,..,1 "...11"1.""..."" LVLClI IIUlllUvl VI UIIIL;;) VI L111:J UClIIICl~vU/Ug;;)LI vyvu I v;;)iuviillcli ;;)LI ULAUIv, the excess units are subject to the fees. If a residential structure has been vacant for more than five years, the exemption will not apply. ii. Non-Residential Structure. Any replacement or reconstructions (no change in use) of any non-residential unit that is damaged or destroyed as a result of fire, flood, explosion, wind, earthquake, riot, or other calamity, or act of God shall be exempt from the roadway fees. However, if the building(s) replaced or reconstructed exceeds the documented total floor area of the damaged/destroyed building(s), the excess square footage is subject to the fees. If a structure has been vacant for more than five years, the exemption will not apply.

iii. Change in Land Use. If a residential and/or non-residential structure is replaced with an alternative land use, such as replacing an office building with a retail building, then the applicant will be subject to the incremental difference, if any, between the roadway fees associated with the original land use and the new land use. If this difference is ----...:... "......,....._-I...,... ""..,..._,.Ii+,-a,ill hft i~~1 l.o.ri +n tho. ~nnli,...~nt I n:,~allvv, IIV I vluiiu VI vi vui~ VVIII UV ';;li;;liuvu lv lliv..."v...,ll. c. AdditionsiAiterationsiModifications/Temporary Faciiities i. Additions to single family residential structures provided no change in use occurs and a second full kitchen is not added. ii. iii. Additions to multi-family residential structures that are not part of a mixed use type project provided no change in use occurs and no additional units result. Supporting use square footage in multi-family projects, such as the office and recreation areas required to directly serve the multi-family project. The residential unit fee will provide the full mitigation require in multi-family projects. iv. Non-habitable residential structures such as decks, pools, poii cabanas, sheds, garages, etc. v. Construction of a granny unit that does not have a full kitchen. vi. Mobile or manufactured homes with no permanent foundation. 4) Fee Adjustments. For specialized development projects that would not fall under one of the fee categories in the fee schedule, the Finance Director, in conjunction with the City Engineer, will review the impact applicable to the specialized development and decide on an applicable fee. The Finance Director, in conjunction with the City Engineer, will also review requests for fee adjustments where redevelopment of a parcel resuits in a net increase in developed area or results in a change of land use. If the previously built structure has been vacant for more than five years, the parcel will be treated as if it was undeveloped, and no such adjustment will be applied. 5) Effective Date. Pursuant to Government Code section 66017(a) the revised fees authorized by this Resolution shall become effective 60 days after the date of the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Elk Grove this 8 th day of July 2009. ~ PATRICK HUME, MAYOR of the C!TY OF ELK GROVE ATTEST: ~/'~~~ SUSAN J. SLAC rqnjcity CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~~_. -'SUSANCOCHRAN, CITY ATTORNEY

Table 2 City of Elk Grove Road Fee Program Nexus Study Update Revised Staff Recommended Total Fee Schedule Incl. Administration [1] Staff Recommended Fee Rates EDU Zone 1 Fees Zone 2 Fees Zone 3 Fees Zone 4 Fees Zone 5 Fees Land Use Factor [2] (Elk Grove) (Laguna) (Laguna West) (Lakeside) (Stonelake) Rasldentlal l!idjjj! EJL.IJ!!A EJL.IJ!!A EJL.IJ!!A EJL.IJ!!A Single-Family (1-2 units) 1.00 $7,551 $6,346 $5,539 $3,932 $7,382 Single-Family Age-Restricted 0.39 $2,927 $2,513 $2,324 $1,842 $2,877 Single-Family TOO [3] 0.90 $6,796 $5,711 $4,985 $3,539 $6,644 Multifamily (3+ units - attached) 0.69 $5,247 $4,296 $3,859 $2,750 $5,130 Multifamily - Age-Restricted 0.39 $2,927 $2,513 $2,324 $1,842 $2,877 Multifamily - TOO [3] 0.52 $3,935 $3,222 $2,894 $2,063 $3,848 Nonresidential [4] [5] Commercial P!r lk Sq. R. EerlKSq Et. EerlK Sq.R. E!rlK Sq. R PerlKSqR Shopping Center/Gen. Comm. (SC/GC) [6] Local-Serving 0.81 $5,510 $3,610 $3,420 $860 $5,310 Local-Serving (TOO) [3] 0.77 $5,235 $3,430 $3,249 $817 $5,045 Regional-Serving [3] 2.02 $13,775 $9,025 $8,550 $2,150 $13,275 Restaurant (w/o Drive-Through) 2.78 $18,944 $14,524 $14,114 $8,184 $18,454 Restaurant (wi Drive-Through) 4.41 $30,062 $23,222 $22,592 $13,412 $30,062...,..OI:.I:.Q lt~j;;n~ CarSaies I.'v.pu,""""... ""t $6,326 $3,586 $8,336 ""... Supermarket 1.63 $11,151 $8,391 $8,121 $4,401 $10,851 Pte t:utinq sftclpn PteEutHnq SftClpn Ptefutloq SltI!go Pte EutlagSttClpa PteFueljnqstlligo Gas Station 1.34 $9,132 $7,059 $6,864 $4,084 $8,899 Office P!rlKSqR E!rlKSq Ft E!rlK Sq. R E!rlKSq R E!rlKSq. R. Office 0.95 $6,499 $4,679 $5,119 $2,419 $6,319 Office (TOO) [3] 0.86 $5,849 $4,211 $4,607 $2,177 $5,687 Industrial 0.68 $4,663 $3,733 $3,703 $2,573 $4,543 Instltutlona1 Church [7] 0.67 $4,559 $3,831 $3,344 $2,374 $4,457 DaylChiid Care [7] 2.48 $16,951 $14,246 $12,434 $8,827 $16,572 Private School 7] 0.92 $6,269 $5,269 $4,599 $3,264 $6,129 Miscellaneous E!JLBmn E!JLBmn E!JLBmn E!JLBmn ~ HoteUMotel 0.48 $3,305 $3,160 $2,299 $1,070 $3,202 EerlKSq R Eer1KSq R. Eer tk Sq.R PerlKSq Fl Per lk Sq. Fl. Congregate Care Facility 7] 0.09 $644 $541 $472 $335 $629 Hsalth Club [7] 0.66 $4,501 $3,783 $3,302 $2,344 $4,400 Library [7] 0.46 $3,115 $2,618 $2,285 $1,622 $3,045 Source: City of Elk Grove and EPS. T6e_scrradulfLo;d- [1] Zones 2 through 5 based on the credits shown in the current EGRFP. [2] See Table 4 for calculation of revised DUE allocation factors. [3] For this land use category, EPS estimated the credits and fee applicable for Zones 2 through 5 based on the relationship of the Zone 1 fee to the typical Zone 1 fee for the given category (Le.) "Office (TOO)" Zone 1 fee to "Office" Zone 1 fee. [4] Nonresidential fee is amount per 1,000 building square feet except as noted. [5] All nonresidential rates reflect reduced rates resulting from application of $10 million in other funding sources to offset commercial and office fee obligations. [6] Local-Serving SCIGC includes neighborhood and community retail and is typically <175,000 sq. fl., while regional serving SCIGC includes regional retail and is typically ~175,000 sq. fl. [7] EPS estimated the credits and fee applicable for Zones 2 through 5 based on the relationship of its Zone 1 fee to the Zone 1 single-family fee. Preparedby EPS 412912009

CERTIFICATION ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2009 137 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO) CITY OF ELK GROVE ) ss I, Susan J. Blackston, City Clerk of the City of Elk Grove, Caiifornia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Elk Grove at a regular meeting of said Council held on July 8, 2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Hume, Scherman, Cooper, Davis, Detrick None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ~ ~...u.~ Susan J. Blackson, City Clerk City ofelk Grove, California